We thank Wallace and Matthias for their response to our call for diagnostic excellence in primary care.1 In their letter, they point to limitations of likelihood ratios of symptoms and signs, giving the example of “cough, fever and auscultation” as being “insensitive and nonspecific for the diagnosis of pneumonia”. However, we believe this view downplays the relationship between inadequate data acquisition via history/exam and diagnostic error. Recent studies continue to support long-standing beliefs about the value of history and exam in diagnosis.2 While we recognize the shortcomings of history or exam features, especially in isolation, several studies have found that inadequate histories and exams, as well as problems ordering subsequent tests based on gathered data, are frequently responsible for diagnostic errors.3, 4 In fact, clear red-flag symptoms/signs are often missed by clinicians, sometimes even when they exist in constellation.5, 6
Nevertheless, we agree with Wallace and Matthias that in our current practice environment, technologies such as point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can play an important role in the diagnostic process. Rather than replace the history and physical, POCUS should be used to augment the information gathered at the bedside and serve as a patient-centered tool that enhances the gathering and interpretation of useful diagnostic data.7 Technology can be an adjunct to diagnosis, but it is unlikely to be useful unless physicians are equipped with the history and exam skills necessary to point them in the right direction.
While future research will guide how best to integrate POCUS and similar technologies at the bedside, we must continue to emphasize the value of the history and exam, not only for diagnosis, but also to build relationships with patients and making informed shared decisions about their care. In sum, the pursuit of diagnostic excellence requires renewed emphasis on clinical reasoning and bedside skills—a mission that rightfully includes the use of additional technologies, such as POCUS, that help us gather and interpret useful diagnostic data.
References
Kwan JL, Singh H. General Internists in Pursuit of Diagnostic Excellence in Primary Care: a #ProudtobeGIM Thread That Unites Us All. J Gen Intern Med 2018;33(4):395–396.
Paley L, Zornitzki T, Cohen J, Friedman J, Kozak N, Schattner A. Utility of clinical examination in the diagnosis of emergency department patients admitted to the department of medicine of an academic hospital. Arch Intern Med 2011;171(15):1393–1400.
Schiff GD, Hasan O, Kim S, et al. Diagnostic error in medicine: Analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(20):1881–1887.
Singh H, Giardina TD, Meyer AN, Forjuoh SN, Reis MD, Thomas EJ. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173(6):418–425.
Singh H, Daci K, Petersen LA, et al. Missed opportunities to initiate endoscopic evaluation for colorectal cancer diagnosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104(10):2543–2554.
Bhise V, Meyer AND, Singh H, et al. Errors in Diagnosis of Spinal Epidural Abscesses in the Era of Electronic Health Records. Am J Med 2017;130(8):975–981.
Mathews BK, Miller PE, Olson APJ. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Improves Shared Diagnostic Understanding Between Patients and Providers. South Med J 2018;111(7):395–400.
Funding
Dr. Singh is funded by the Houston VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (CIN 13-413).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kwan, J.L., Singh, H. General Internists in Pursuit of Diagnostic Excellence. J GEN INTERN MED 33, 2026 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4667-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4667-4