Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of ICARUS Guidelines and Recommendations Not Supported by Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

The ICARUS guidelines are a systematic review and Delphi process that provide recommendations in the treatment and management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Many of the recommendations were supported by randomized trials; some were not. This study assesses guidelines with limited evidence and weak endorsement.

Methods

Four ICARUS guidelines were chosen: the role of fundoplication for patients with BMI > 35, regurgitation, chest pain, and extra-esophageal symptoms. A multicenter database of patients undergoing fundoplication surgery for GERD between 2015 and 2020 was used. Outcomes assessed were anatomic failure and symptom recurrence. Multivariable regression was performed.

Results

Five institutions performed a fundoplication on 461 patients for GERD with a median of follow-up of 14.7 months (IQR 14.2). On multivariate analysis, patients with the chosen pre-operative comorbidities achieved comparable post-operative benefits. Patients with a BMI > 35 were not more likely to experience anatomic failure. Patients with pre-operative regurgitation had similar symptom recurrence rates to those without. Patients with non-cardiac chest pain had comparable rates of symptom recurrence to those without. Reporting a pre-operative chronic cough attributable to reflux was not associated with higher rates of post-operative symptom recurrence.

Discussion

Among the ICARUS guidelines and recommendations, a small proportion was lacking evidence at low risk for bias and endorsement. The results of this multicenter study evaluated outcomes of patients with various pre-operative conditions: BMI > 35, chest pain attributable to reflux, extra-esophageal symptoms attributable to reflux, and regurgitation. Our findings endorse patients with these characteristics as candidates for anti-reflux surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Richter J, Rubenstein J (2018) Presentation and Epidemiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J (2014) Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clarrett DM, Hachem C (2018) Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Mo Med. PMCID: PMC6140167.

  4. Frazzoni M, Piccoli M, Conigliaro R, Frazzoni L, Melotti G (2014) Laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14272

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pauwels A, Boecxstaens V, Andrews CN, et al (2019) How to select patients for antireflux surgery? The ICARUS guidelines (international consensus regarding preoperative examinations and clinical characteristics assessment to select adult patients for antireflux surgery). Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318260

  6. Fraser J, Watson DI, O’Boyle CJ, et al (2001) Obesity and its effect on outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Dis Esophagus. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2001.00157.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Winslow ER, Frisella MM, Soper NJ, et al (2003) Obesity does not adversely affect the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS). Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8118-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anvari M, Bamehriz F (2006) Outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with body mass index >or=35. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0031-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chisholm JA, Jamieson GG, Lally CJ, et al (2009) The effect of obesity on the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0837-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Galmiche J-P, Hatlebakk J, Attwood S, et al (2011) Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery vs Esomeprazole Treatment for Chronic GERD. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lundell L, Attwood S, Ell C, et al (2008) Comparing laparoscopic antireflux surgery with esomeprazole in the management of patients with chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a 3-year interim analysis of the LOTUS trial. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.148833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold HE, et al (2009) Comparison of outcomes twelve years after antireflux surgery or omeprazole maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cassandra Mohr.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Cassandra Mohr and Hailie Ciomperlik are co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohr, C., Ciomperlik, H., Dhanani, N. et al. Evaluation of ICARUS Guidelines and Recommendations Not Supported by Randomized Controlled Trials. J Gastrointest Surg 27, 390–397 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05590-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05590-3

Keywords

Navigation