Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of Esophageal Stricture after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Esophageal Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) treatment of early esophageal cancer is effective and safe. It is currently the first-line treatment for early esophageal cancer. However, a common side effect is the development of esophageal strictures after ESD. This study was designed to identify the risk factors for esophageal stricture development and to predict its occurrence after ESD.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 150 consecutive patients with early esophageal cancer treated with ESD at Daping Hospital, Chongqing, were enrolled between January 2016 and December 2020. Data on patient demographics, esophageal tumor characteristics, procedure-related factors, and postoperative situations were collected. We identified independent risk factors of esophageal stricture formation using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. The predictive probability was obtained after multivariate logistic analysis. In addition, patients were divided into six groups based on these risk factors and the rate of esophageal stricture in each group was analyzed.

Results

The postoperative esophageal stricture rate was 14% (21/150). Tumor location (OR = 5.655, 95% CI: 1.245–25.691, P = 0.025) and circumferential resection range (OR = 16.113, 95% CI: 4.294–60.466, P < 0.001) are independent risk factors for the development of esophageal strictures. According to predictive probability analysis and the rates of stricture in six groups, we developed a possible flow chart to predict stricture formation.

Conclusions

Tumor location and circumferential resection range are reliable risk factors to predict the occurrence of esophageal strictures. Our prediction flow chart suggests that tumors with a circumferential resection range of 1/2–3/4 and located above the upper thoracic segment or a circumferential resection range of > 3/4 have a high risk of postoperative stricture. Thus, timely and effective preventive measures should be taken in these patients following ESD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J (2016) Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 66:115-132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang Y, Zhang r5t3e2ws42B, Wang Y, Zhang J, Wu Y, Xiao T, Liao Y, Bao Y, Qiu H, Sun S, Guo J (2020) Advances in the Prevention and Treatment of Esophageal Stricture after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Esophageal Cancer. J Transl Int Med 8:135-145

  3. Miyamoto Y, Nonaka S, Oda I, Abe S, Suzuki H, Yoshinaga S, Mano H, Saito Y (2021) Safety and usefulness of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancers in elderly patients aged 80 years or older. Esophagus 18:81-89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakagawa K, Koike T, Iijima K, Shinkai H, Hatta W, Endo H, Ara N, Uno K, Asano N, Imatani A, Shimosegawa T (2014) Comparison of the long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol 109:348-356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pech O, May A, Manner H, Behrens A, Pohl J, Weferling M, Hartmann U, Manner N, Huijsmans J, Gossner L, Rabenstein T, Vieth M, Stolte M, Ell C (2014) Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for patients with mucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Gastroenterology 146:652-660 e651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, Goto O, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Omata M (2009) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 70:860-866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang D, Othman M, Draganov PV (2019) Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection For Barrett's Esophagus and Colorectal Neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:1019-1028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Repici A, Hassan C, Carlino A, Pagano N, Zullo A, Rando G, Strangio G, Romeo F, Nicita R, Rosati R, Malesci A (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a prospective Western series. Gastrointest Endosc 71:715-721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo HM, Zhang XQ, Chen M, Huang SL, Zou XP (2014) Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20:5540-5547

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Berger A, Rahmi G, Perrod G, Pioche M, Canard JM, Cesbron-Metivier E, Boursier J, Samaha E, Vienne A, Lepilliez V, Cellier C (2019) Long-term follow-up after endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter Western study. Endoscopy 51:298-306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ariyoshi R, Toyonaga T, Tanaka S, Abe H, Ohara Y, Kawara F, Ishida T, Morita Y, Umegaki E, Azuma T (2017) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms extending to the cervical esophagus. Endoscopy 50:613-617

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, Kodashima S, Muraki Y, Ono S, Yamamichi N, Tateishi A, Shimizu Y, Oka M, Ogura K, Kawabe T, Ichinose M, Omata M (2006) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:688-694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Qi ZP, Chen T, Li B, Ren Z, Yao LQ, Shi Q, Cai SL, Zhong YS, Zhou PH (2018) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer in elderly patients with relative indications for endoscopic treatment. Endoscopy 50:839-845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Y, Ding H, Chen T, Zhang X, Chen WF, Li Q, Yao L, Korrapati P, Jin XJ, Zhang YX, Xu MD, Zhou PH (2019) Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection vs Esophagectomy for T1 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Real-World Cohort. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:73-81 e73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang YQ, Chen T, Zhang C, Li QL, Chen WF, Yao LQ, Zhou PH, Xu MD (2017) Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Proximal Esophageal Neoplasia is Highly Successful. Ann Surg 266:995-999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu X, Liu Y, Xue L, He S, Zhang Y, Dou L, Liu X, Lu N, Wang G (2021) Risk factors for complications after endoscopic treatment in Chinese patients with early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions. Surg Endosc 35:2144-2153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi Q, Ju H, Yao LQ, Zhou PH, Xu MD, Chen T, Zhou JM, Chen TY, Zhong YS (2014) Risk factors for postoperative stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal carcinoma. Endoscopy 46:640-644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, Goto O, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Omata M (2009) Predictors of postoperative stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial squamous cell neoplasms. Endoscopy 41:661-665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamaguchi N, Isomoto H, Nakayama T, Hayashi T, Nishiyama H, Ohnita K, Takeshima F, Shikuwa S, Kohno S, Nakao K (2011) Usefulness of oral prednisolone in the treatment of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 73:1115-1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hashimoto S, Kobayashi M, Takeuchi M, Sato Y, Narisawa R, Aoyagi Y (2011) The efficacy of endoscopic triamcinolone injection for the prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 74:1389-1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sato H, Inoue H, Kobayashi Y, Maselli R, Santi EG, Hayee B, Igarashi K, Yoshida A, Ikeda H, Onimaru M, Aoyagi Y, Kudo SE (2013) Control of severe strictures after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal carcinoma: oral steroid therapy with balloon dilation or balloon dilation alone. Gastrointest Endosc 78:250-257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sakaguchi Y, Tsuji Y, Shinozaki T, Ohki D, Mizutani H, Minatsuki C, Niimi K, Yamamichi N, Koike K (2020) Steroid injection and polyglycolic acid shielding to prevent stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective comparative analysis (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 92:1176-1186 e1171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wen J, Lu Z, Yang Y, Liu Q, Yang J, Wang S, Wang X, Du H, Meng J, Wang H, Linghu E (2014) Preventing stricture formation by covered esophageal stent placement after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer. Dig Dis Sci 59:658-663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang BZ, Zhang Y, Wang YD, Liao Y, Zhang JJ, Wu YF, Xiao TY, Sun SY, Guo JT (2021) Stent placement to prevent strictures after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 34(9):doab015

  25. Liu Y, Li Z, Dou L, Zhang Y, He S, Zhu J, Ke Y, Liu X, Liu Y, Ng H, Wang G (2021) Autologous esophageal mucosa with polyglycolic acid transplantation and temporary stent implantation can prevent stenosis after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection. Ann Transl Med 9:546

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Liao Z, Liao G, Yang X, Peng X, Zhang X, Xie X, Zhao X, Yang S, Fan C, Bai J (2018) Transplantation of autologous esophageal mucosa to prevent stricture after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophageal cancer (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 88:543-546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hochberger J, Koehler P, Wedi E, Gluer S, Rothstein RI, Niemann H, Hilfiker A, Gonzalez S, Kruse E (2014) Transplantation of mucosa from stomach to esophagus to prevent stricture after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection of early squamous cell. Gastroenterology 146:906-909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kanai N, Yamato M, Ohki T, Yamamoto M, Okano T (2012) Fabricated autologous epidermal cell sheets for the prevention of esophageal stricture after circumferential ESD in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 76:873-881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mizushima T, Ohnishi S, Hosono H, Yamahara K, Tsuda M, Shimizu Y, Kato M, Asaka M, Sakamoto N (2017) Oral administration of conditioned medium obtained from mesenchymal stem cell culture prevents subsequent stricture formation after esophageal submucosal dissection in pigs. Gastrointest Endosc 86:542-552.e541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ohki T, Yamato M, Ota M, Takagi R, Murakami D, Kondo M, Sasaki R, Namiki H, Okano T, Yamamoto M (2012) Prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection using tissue-engineered cell sheets. Gastroenterology 143:582-588.e582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ingrams D R, Ashton P, Dhingra J, Shah R, Shapshay S M (2000) Slow-release 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone reduces subglottic stenosis in a rabbit model. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology 109(4): 422–424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ribeiro F, Guaraldo L, Borges J, Zacchi F F, Eckley C A (2004) Clinical and histological healing of surgical wounds treated with mitomycin C. The Laryngoscope 114(1):148–152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Uno K, Iijima K, Koike T, Abe Y, Asano N, Ara N, Shimosegawa T (2012) A pilot study of scheduled endoscopic balloon dilation with oral agent tranilast to improve the efficacy of stricture dilation after endoscopic submucosal dissection of the esophagus. Journal of clinical gastroenterology 46(9): e76–e82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ishihara R. (2019) Prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection. Digestive endoscopy 31(2): 134–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all patients who participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The first three authors contributed equally to this work. C-H.L.: study conceptualization, study design, data interpretation, manuscript editing, and funding acquisition; X-C.S.: study design, acquisition of data, statistical analysis, and manuscript preparation; B.Z.: study design, acquisition of data, statistical analysis, and manuscript preparation; Z.Z. and X-W.W.: acquisition of data, follow-up of patients; L.F. and J-R.Z.: follow-up of patients and acquisition of data; P-Y.Z.: oversight of the statistical analyses; and D-F.C.: study supervision and coordination. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiao-Chun Shen or Chun-Hui Lan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, B., Zhao, Z., Wang, XW. et al. Prediction of Esophageal Stricture after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Esophageal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 26, 2434–2443 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05467-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05467-x

Keywords

Navigation