Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Surgical treatment of fistula-in-ano is an ongoing challenge and has led to the design of the disposable shape memory nitinol anal fistula clip (AFC) (Fig. 1). We conducted a prospective clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the AFC for cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano treatment compared with the endorectal advancement flap (ERAF).
Methods
Fifty-one patients with cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano were enrolled between January 2019 and January 2020 in the National Colorectal Disease Center of Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. The patients were randomly assigned for management with either AFC or ERAF (Fig. 2). The primary endpoint was fistula healing after proctology clip placement assessed by clinical examination (at weeks 6 and 12 and month 6) and endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) (at week 6). The secondary endpoints included reduced pain score (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) and incontinence (Wexner) score at follow-up. Safety evaluation based on adverse events was also monitored.
Results
Of the 51 patients, 25 were included in the AFC group and 26 in the ERAF group. There were no significant differences in selected features between the two groups at baseline.
The fistula healing rates within the AFC group and ERAF group at week 6 were 48.0% (12/25) and 46.2% (12/26), respectively, with no significant difference between them (p = 1.0). At week 12, the healing rates between the AFC group (88.0%, 22/25) and ERAF group (69.2%, 18/26) did not differ significantly (p = 0.1), while at month 6, there was a significant difference (p = 0.021) between the AFC (92.0%, 23/25) and the ERAF (65.4%, 17/26) groups. Furthermore, at month 6, the trans-sphincteric fistula healing rate differed significantly (p = 0.047) between the AFC (100.0%, 20/20) and the ERAF (80.0%, 15/20) groups (Table 1). There was no significant difference in the VAS and Wexner scores between the two groups. Fewer adverse events were observed in the AFC group (32.0%) than in the ERAF group (53.9%), although the difference was nonsignificant.
Discussion
Although ERAF does not destroy the anal sphincter and has a moderate success rate, postoperative recurrence and incontinence represent challenges.1,2 The AFC exerts constant pressure on the internal opening resulting in permanent and dynamic closure.
In the AFC group, one clip fell off on its own on day 10, while the rest were removed by cutting the lateral hinges of the clip with the special AFC clip cutter at about 3.8 weeks (range, 3–4 weeks) without complaint. Six clips needed to be removed under abnormal circumstances. In the ERAF group, eight patients still complained of persistent secretions around the anus at week 12, and five received a second operation. In this study, six cases in the two groups retained a narrow tract without secretion while the internal opening was closed. The key to success was the capture of sufficient tissue volume. If sufficient external drainage cannot be guaranteed, inflammatory complications are inevitable.
The main limitations of this study were the small sample size and the short follow-up time. Nevertheless, the study provides evidence for the safety and efficacy of AFC in the treatment of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano. AFC is an innovative contribution to minimally invasive sphincter-preserving technology.
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request. After the completion of the trial, all data will be uploaded to China’s clinical trial registration center.
References
Soltani A, Kaiser AM. Endorectal advancement flap for cryptoglandular or Crohn's fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:486-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ce8b01.
Gottgens KW, Smeets RR, Stassen LP, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical interventions for high cryptoglandular perianal fistula. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:583-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-2091-8.
Acknowledgements
We express our sincere appreciation to the patients who participated in this study.
Funding
This work was funded by Key Medical Science and Technology Development Projects of Nanjing Commission of Health, No. ZKX17034. The disposable nitinol memory alloy anal fistula clip was supported by Shaanxi Fulltai Medical Science &Technology Co. Ltd (No. 1001 Building 3 No.3 Dian Zi Si Road, Xi An 710000, Shaanxi Province, China).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YZ designed the study, included patients, carried out the surgical treatment, prepared figures, drafted the manuscript, revised the manuscript, and polished the language of the article; YXW made a follow-up, collected, analyzed, interpreted the data, prepared the figures, drafted the manuscript, and revised it. YLW conducted an AFC animal experiment, revised and polished the language of the article, and monitored the data; YHW included patients, carried out the surgical treatment, and provided some technical assistance and pertinent proposals on the scheme. YHW also polished the language of the article. CZ and BJ polished the language of the article and made some pertinent proposals on the scheme. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All experimental protocols were approved by the ethics committee of Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Nanjing, China). Written informed consent was obtained from all study subjects.
Consent for Publication
Consent for publication was obtained from all study subjects and their guardians by signing an informed consent form during screening. All the authors consent to publish the paper.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Wu, Y., Wang, Y. et al. A Disposable Nitinol Memory Alloy Anal Fistula Clip (AFC) for the Treatment of Cryptoglandular Fistula-In-Ano: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study With Short-Term Follow-Up. J Gastrointest Surg 26, 2224–2226 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05355-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05355-4