Skip to main content
Log in

Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Where Does the Benefit Lie? A Nomogram for Risk Stratification and Patient Selection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

The impact of adjuvant sequential chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear and warrants further investigation.

Methods

NCDB patients with R0/R1 resected PDAC who received adjuvant chemotherapy without CRT or followed by CRT per RTOG-0848 protocol were included. Cox regression for 5-year overall survival (OS) was performed and used to construct a pathologic nomogram in patients who did not receive CRT. A risk score was calculated and patients were divided into low-risk and high-risk groups. Patients from each risk stratum were matched for the receipt of CRT to assess the added benefit of CRT on survival. The Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to compare OS.

Results

A total of 7146 patients were selected, 1308 (18.3%) received CRT per RTOG-0848. Cox regression concluded grade, T stage, N stage, node yield < 12, R1, and LVI as significant predictors of 5-year OS which were used to construct the risk score. Matched analysis in low-risk patients (score 0–79) showed no difference in OS between CRT vs. no CRT (47.6 ± 5.7 vs. 45.1 ± 3.9 months; p = 0.847). OS benefit was 3% at 1 year, − 4% at 2 years, and 4% at 5 years. In high-risk patients (score 80–100), median OS was higher in CRT vs. no CRT (24.8 ± 0.7 vs. 21.7 ± 0.8 months; p = 0.043). Absolute OS benefit was 13% at 1 year, 5% at 2 years, and − 1% at 5 years.

Conclusion

CRT has a short-lived impact on OS in resected PDAC that is only evident in high-risk patients. In this subset, survival benefit peaks at 1 year and subsides at 3 to 5 years following PDAC resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1473-81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;297(3):267-77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304(10):1073-81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Uesaka K, Boku N, Fukutomi A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01). Lancet. 2016;388(10041):248-57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, et al. FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(25):2395-406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (version 2.2021) 2021. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/pancreatic.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2021.

  8. Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer. Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg. 1985;120(8):899-903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Klinkenbijl JH, Jeekel J, Sahmoud T, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region: phase III trial of the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer cooperative group. Ann Surg. 1999;230(6):776-82; discussion 82-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358(9293):1576-85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(12):1200-10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Tudur Smith C, et al. Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid vs observation for pancreatic cancer: composite data from the ESPAC-1 and -3(v1) trials. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(2):246-50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Abrams RA, Winter KA, Safran H, et al. Results of the NRG Oncology/RTOG 0848 Adjuvant Chemotherapy Question-Erlotinib+Gemcitabine for Resected Cancer of the Pancreatic Head: A Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Clin Oncol. 2020;43(3):173-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abrams RA, Winter KA, Regine WF, et al. Failure to adhere to protocol specified radiation therapy guidelines was associated with decreased survival in RTOG 9704--a phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for patients with resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(2):809-16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Strom T, Hoffe SE, Fulp W, et al. Radiosensitivity index predicts for survival with adjuvant radiation in resectable pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117(1):159-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodman KA, Regine WF, Dawson LA, et al. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus panel guidelines for the delineation of the clinical target volume in the postoperative treatment of pancreatic head cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(3):901-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hsu CC, Herman JM, Corsini MM, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the Johns Hopkins Hospital-Mayo Clinic collaborative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(4):981-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shinde A, Verma V, Li R, et al. The role of sequential radiation following adjuvant chemotherapy in resected pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019;10(3):462-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moaven O, Clark CJ, Russell GB, et al. Optimal adjuvant treatment approach after upfront resection of pancreatic cancer: revisiting the role of radiation based on pathologic features. Ann Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003770.

  21. Palta M, Godfrey D, Goodman KA, et al. Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019;9(5):322-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmad SA, Duong M, Sohal DPS, et al. Surgical Outcome Results From SWOG S1505: A Randomized Clinical Trial of mFOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel for Perioperative Treatment of Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2020;272(3):481-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Motoi F, Kosuge T, Ueno H, et al. Randomized phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer (Prep-02/JSAP05). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019;49(2):190-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ASTRO Guideline on Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Available from: https://www.astro.org/Patient-Care-and-Research/Clinical-Practice-Statements/Pancreatic-Cancer-GL. Accessed 1 July 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: SN, AS, JF, SH.

Acquisition of data: SN, AS

Analysis and interpretation of data: SN, AS, JF, SH

Drafting of the manuscript: SN, AS, JF, SH

Critical revision: SN, AS, DWK, EC, JF, PH, JD, MM, JF, SH

All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

This manuscript is not under consideration elsewhere. Data acquisition in this work was completed via an approved access to the NCDB Participant User File (PUF). The authors are not authorized to release data to third parties per their agreement with the American College of Surgeons.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samer A. Naffouje.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Synopsis

The role of adjuvant radiation in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. In this work, we use the NCDB to emulate the settings of arm IV in the RTOG 0848 to study the influence of the added adjuvant radiation in patients who received surgical resection of PDAC and completed adjuvant chemotherapy. Our analysis concludes a “high-risk pathologic profile” for patients who demonstrate a survival benefit for the first 2 years after resection, suggesting an improved local control. However, this benefit subsides by 5 years likely due to the more common systemic recurrence.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naffouje, S.A., Sabesan, A., Kim, DW. et al. Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Where Does the Benefit Lie? A Nomogram for Risk Stratification and Patient Selection. J Gastrointest Surg 26, 376–386 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05130-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05130-x

Keywords

Navigation