Skip to main content
Log in

The Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillectomy and Management of Cases of Incomplete Resection: A Single-Center Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic papillectomy is increasingly performed as an alternative to surgery for early ampullary tumors.

Aim

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term results of endoscopic papillectomy, the management of cases with incomplete endoscopic resection, and the long-term recurrence rates.

Methods

All 46 patients who underwent endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary tumors between November 2003 and March 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

The final pathological diagnoses were adenoma (n = 44) and adenocarcinoma (n = 2). Histopathological evaluations after endoscopic papillectomy revealed that complete resection was achieved in 19 patients (19/46, 41.3%). Among the 27 patients with incomplete resection, the margin was histopathologically positive in 14 patients and difficult to evaluate in 13. Additional surgery was performed for 2 of the 14 patients with positive margins. Excluding 2 patients who received additional surgery, 7 of the 25 patients with incomplete resection had recurrence, and 18 had no recurrence during the follow-up period. Ten (77%) of the 13 patients in whom the margin was difficult to evaluate had no recurrence.

Conclusion

Approximately 80% of the patients in whom the histopathological evaluation of the resected margin was difficult had no recurrence even after approximately 5 years of follow-up. Thus, careful observation may be considered for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Han J, Kim MH. (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(2):292–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Irani S, Arai A, Ayub K, Biehl T, Brandabur JJ, Dorer R, Gluck M, Jiranek G, Patterson D, Schembre D, Traverso LW, Kozarek RA. Papillectomy for ampullary neoplasm: results of a single referral center over a 10-year period. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70(5):923–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn DW, Ryu JK, Kim J, Yoon WJ, Lee SH, Kim YT, Yoon YB. Endoscopic papillectomy for benign ampullary neoplasms: how can treatment outcome be predicted? Gut Liver. 2013;7(2):239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. De Palma GD. Endoscopic papillectomy: indications, techniques, and results. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(6):1537–1543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Will U, Müller AK, Fueldner F, Wanzar I, Meyer F. Endoscopic papillectomy: data of a prospective observational study. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(27):4316–4324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Offerhaus GJ, Giardiello FM, Krush AJ, Booker SV, Tersmette AC, Kelley NC, Hamilton SR. The risk of upper gastrointestinal cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastroenterology. 1992;102(6):1980–1982.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ceppa EP, Burbridge RA, Rialon KL, Omotosho PA, Emick D, Jowell PS, Branch MS, Pappas TN. Endoscopic versus surgical ampullectomy: an algorithm to treat disease of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):315–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Napoleon B, Gincul R, Ponchon T, Berthiller J, Escourrou J, Canard JM, Boyer J, Barthet M, Ponsot P, Laugier R, Helbert T, Coumaros D, Scoazec JY, Mion F, Saurin JC. Endoscopic papillectomy for early ampullary tumors: long-term results from a large multicenter prospective study. Endoscopy. 2014;46(2):127–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamao T, Isomoto H, Kohno S, Mizuta Y, Yamakawa M, Nakao K, Irie J. Endoscopic snare papillectomy with biliary and pancreatic stent placement for tumors of the major duodenal papilla. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(1):119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Obana T, Horaguchi J, Koshita S, Kanno Y, Ogawa T, Kato Y, Yamashita Y. Impact of technical modification of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasm on the occurrence of complications. Dig Endosc. 2012;24(1):30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Norton ID, Gostout CJ, Baron TH, Geller A, Petersen BT, Wiersema MJ. Safety and outcome of endoscopic snare excision of the major duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(2):239–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsuji S, Itoi T, Sofuni A, Mukai S, Tonozuka R, Moriyasu F. Tips and tricks in endoscopic papillectomy of ampullary tumors: single-center experience with large case series (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015; 22(6):E22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Anderson MA, Fisher L, Jain R, Evans JA, Appalaneni V, Ben-Menachem T, Cash BD, Decker GA, Early DS, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Fukami N, Hwang JH, Ikenberry SO, Jue TL, Khan KM, Krinsky ML, Malpas PM, Maple JT, Sharaf RN, Shergill AK, Dominitz JA. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(3):467–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37(3):383–393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Suzuki K, Kantou U, Murakami Y. Two cases with ampullary cancer who underwent endoscopic excision. Prog Dig Endosc. 1983;23:236–239.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Binmoeller KF, Boaventura S, Ramsperger K, Soehendra N. Endoscopic snare excision of benign adenomas of the papilla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39(2):127–131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maguchi H, Takahashi K, Katanuma A, Hayashi T, Yoshida A. Indication of endoscopic papillectomy for tumors of the papilla of Vater and its problems. Dig Endosc. 2003;15:S33–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hirooka Y, Itoh A, Goto H. EUS/IDUS and endoscopic papillectomy. Dig Endosc. 2004;16:S176–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Chathadi KV, Khashab MA, Acosta RD, Chandrasekhara V, Eloubeidi MA, Faulx AL, Fonkalsrud L, Lightdale JR, Salztman JR, Shaukat A, Wang A, Cash BD, DeWitt JM. ASGE guideline: The role of endoscopy in ampullary and duodenal adenomas. Gastrointestinal Endosc. 2015;82(5):773–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Horaguchi J, Takasawa O, Obana T. Preoperative evaluation of ampullary neoplasm with EUS and transpapillary intraductal US: a prospective and histopathologically controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66(4):740–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moon JH. Endoscopic diagnosis of ampullary tumors using conventional endoscopic ultrasonography and intraductal ultrasonography in the era of endoscopic papillectomy: advantages and limitations. Clin Endosc. 2014;47(2):127–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ridtitid W, Schmidt SE, Al-Haddad MA, LeBlanc J, DeWitt JM, McHenry L, Fogel EL, Watkins JL, Lehman GA, Sherman S, Coté GA. Performance characteristics of EUS for locoregional evaluation of ampullary lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(2):380–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Itoh A, Goto H, Naitoh Y, Hirooka Y, Furukawa T, Hayakawa T. Intraductal ultrasonography in diagnosing tumor extension of cancer of the papilla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;45(3):251–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Okano N, Igarashi Y, Hara S, Takuma K, Kamata I, Kishimoto Y, Mimura T, Ito K, Sumino Y. Endosonographic preoperative evaluation for tumors of the ampulla of Vater using endoscopic ultrasonography and intraductal ultrasonography. Clin Endosc. 2014;47(2):174–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moon JH, Choi HJ, Lee YH. Current status of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary tumors. Gut Liver. 2014;8(6):598–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Standards of Practice Committee, Adler DG, Qureshi W, Davila R, Gan SI, Lichtenstein D, Rajan E, Shen B, Zuckerman MJ, Fanelli RD, Van Guilder T, Baron TH. ASGE guideline: The role of endoscopy in ampullary and duodenal adenomas. Gastrointestinal Endosc. 2006;64(6):849–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Japan Medical Communication for editing the English text of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M. S. and K. H. designed the study, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript; U. D, T. T., and M. K. collected the data; O. H. gave the final approval of the manuscript; all the other authors revised the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichiro Muro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Statement of Ethics

The subjects of the present study gave their written informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muro, S., Kato, H., Matsumi, A. et al. The Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillectomy and Management of Cases of Incomplete Resection: A Single-Center Study. J Gastrointest Surg 25, 1247–1252 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04532-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04532-7

Keywords

Navigation