Skip to main content
Log in

Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Adenomas

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aims

Endoscopic papillectomy is a safe and effective treatment for ampullary adenomas and has mostly replaced surgical local resection. Recent data have discussed the role of endoscopic removal of laterally spreading adenomas associated with ampullary adenomas. We evaluated our long-term results of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary adenomas.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent endoscopic papillectomy of biopsy-proven adenomas at our tertiary center between 1994 and 2017. Clinical success was defined as complete excision of an adenoma with no evidence of recurrence during follow-up, no evidence of cancer, and without the need for surgery.

Results

A total of 161 patients (73M/88F) with a mean age of 61 (range 19–93) were included. Mean adenoma size was 20 mm (range 5–70). In total, 114/161 patients continued endoscopic surveillance for a minimum of 6 months with a median follow-up of 30 months (range 6–283). Recurrent adenomas were diagnosed in 8 patients (7%) after a median of 36 months (range 12–138). Clinical success was 83%; 35 laterally spreading adenomas were treated, which were larger than adenomas confined to the papilla (mean size 38 mm vs 15 mm, P < 0.05) and required more piecemeal resections (77% vs 15%, P < 0.05). However, no difference was found in recurrence rates between the two groups (8% vs 4%, P = 0.26); 24/161 (15%) of patients had adverse events including bleeding (6%) and pancreatitis (7%).

Conclusions

Endoscopic papillectomy is a safe and effective treatment for ampullary adenomas, including laterally spreading ones. Long-term surveillance demonstrates low recurrence rates at expert centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin JA, Haber GB. Ampullary adenoma: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2003;13:649–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Perzin KH, Bridge MF. Adenomas of the small intestine: a clinicopathologic review of 51 cases and a study of their relationship to carcinoma. Cancer. 1981;48:799–819.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Suzuki K, Kantou U, Murakami Y. Two cases with ampullary cancer who underwent endoscopic excision. Prog Dig Endosc. 1983;23:236–239.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Han J, Kim MH. Endoscopic papillectomy for adenomas of the major duodenal papilla (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:292–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Espinel J, Pinedo E, Ojeda V, et al. Endoscopic ampullectomy: a technical review. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2016;108:271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Onkendi EO, Naik ND, Rosedahl JK, et al. Adenomas of the ampulla of Vater: a comparison of outcomes of operative and endoscopic resections. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1588–1596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alvarez-Sanchez MV, Oria I, Luna OB, et al. Can endoscopic papillectomy be curative for early ampullary adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater? Surg Endosc. 2017;31:1564–1572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rustagi T, Irani S, Reddy DN, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for intraductal extension of ampullary neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng CL, Sherman S, Fogel EL, et al. Endoscopic snare papillectomy for tumors of the duodenal papillae. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:757–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel R, Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Endoscopic ampullectomy: techniques and outcomes. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:8–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ridtitid W, Tan D, Schmidt SE, et al. Endoscopic papillectomy: risk factors for incomplete resection and recurrence during long-term follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Napoleon B, Gincul R, Ponchon T, et al. Endoscopic papillectomy for early ampullary tumors: long-term results from a large multicenter prospective study. Endoscopy. 2014;46:127–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Catalano MF, Linder JD, Chak A, et al. Endoscopic management of adenoma of the major duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Irani S, Arai A, Ayub K, et al. Papillectomy for ampullary neoplasm: results of a single referral center over a 10-year period. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:923–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hopper AD, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, et al. Giant laterally spreading tumors of the papilla: endoscopic features, resection technique, and outcome (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:967–975.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chathadi KV, Khashab MA, Acosta RD, et al. The role of endoscopy in ampullary and duodenal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:773–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moon JH, Choi HJ, Lee YN. Current status of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary tumors. Gut Liver. 2014;8:598–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hornick JR, Johnston FM, Simon PO, et al. A single-institution review of 157 patients presenting with benign and malignant tumors of the ampulla of Vater: management and outcomes. Surgery. 2011;150:169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elek G, Gyori S, Toth B, et al. Histological evaluation of preoperative biopsies from ampulla vateri. Pathol Oncol Res. 2003;9:32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamaguchi K, Enjoji M, Kitamura K. Endoscopic biopsy has limited accuracy in diagnosis of ampullary tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;36:588–592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Klein A, Qi Z, Bahin FF, et al. Outcomes after endoscopic resection of large laterally spreading lesions of the papilla and conventional ampullary adenomas are equivalent. Endoscopy. 2018;50:972–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadav Sahar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Irani and Dr. Ross both serve as consultants to Boston Scientific. Dr. Kozarek received research support from Boston Scientific regarding biliary and pancreatic self-expanding metal stents. The remaining authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Ethical approval

For this type of retrospective study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahar, N., Krishnamoorthi, R., Kozarek, R.A. et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Adenomas. Dig Dis Sci 65, 260–268 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05812-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05812-2

Keywords

Navigation