Abstract
Background
The objective was to clarify the prognostic impact of the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC) of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).
Methods
A total of 103 ICC patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2002 and 2016 were enrolled. The survival impact of AJCC/UICC 8th edition was examined.
Results
The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 75.9% in T1a (n = 23), 88.9% in T1b (n = 10), 14.9% in T2 (n = 24), 52.5% in T3 (n = 11), and 15.2% in T4 (n = 35). The DSS was comparable among T2, T3, and T4 (T2 vs. T3; p = 0.345, T3 vs. T4; 0.295). A multivariate analysis identified multiple tumors (hazard ratio [HR] 2.821), periductal infiltrating (HR 2.439), perforation of the visceral peritoneum (HR 1.850), and vascular invasion (HR 1.872) as independent prognostic factors that were associated with the DSS. The optimum tumor size with the greatest difference in the DSS was 2 cm (p = 0.014). The new T classification was developed as follows: T1, size ≤ 2 cm without other factors; T2, size > 2 cm without other factors; T3, vascular invasion or perforation of the visceral peritoneum; and T4, multiple tumors or periductal infiltrating. The 5-year DSS was 100% in T1 (n = 7), 76.6% in T2 (n = 28), 45.1% in T3 (n = 28), and 3.4% in T4 (n = 40). There were differences in the DSS between T2 and T3 (p = 0.035) and between T3 and T4 (p = 0.003).
Conclusions
T2, T3, and T4 of AJCC/UICC overlapped with regard to the DSS. The new staging can classify ICC patients with sufficient prognostic differences.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ICC:
-
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
- TNM:
-
Tumor-node-metastasis
- AJCC:
-
American Joint Committee on Cancer
- UICC:
-
International Union Against Cancer
- HR:
-
Hazard ratio
- LCSGJ:
-
Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan
References
Shirabe K, Mano Y, Taketomi A, Soejima Y, Uchiyama H, Aishima S et al. Clinicopathological prognostic factors after hepatectomy for patients with mass-forming type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: relevance of the lymphatic invasion index. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(7):1816–22.
Gurlevik E, Fleischmann-Mundt B, Armbrecht N, Longerich T, Woller N, Kloos A et al. Adjuvant gemcitabine therapy improves survival in a locally induced, R0-resectable model of metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 2013;58(3):1031–41.
Shen WF, Zhong W, Liu Q, Sui CJ, Huang YQ, Yang JM. Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative surgery: retrospective control study. World J Surg. 2011;35(9):2083–91.
Cho SY, Park SJ, Kim SH, Han SS, Kim YK, Lee KW et al. Survival analysis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(7):1823–30.
Ariizumi S, Kotera Y, Takahashi Y, Katagiri S, Chen IP, Ota T et al. Mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with marked enhancement on arterial-phase computed tomography reflects favorable surgical outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104(2):130–9.
Yamamoto Y, Turkoglu MA, Aramaki T, Sugiura T, Okamura Y, Ito T et al. Vascularity of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma on Computed Tomography is Predictive of Lymph Node Metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(Suppl 4):485–93.
Yamamoto Y, Sugiura T, Todaka A, Okamura Y, Ito T, Ashida R et al. Surgical Indication for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma According to the Optimal Preoperative Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Cutoff Value. World J Surg. 2018. 42(10):3331–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4605-y.
Yamamoto Y, Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Esaki M, Nara S, Ban D et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma presenting intrahepatic bile duct growth. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(3):161–5.
Turkoglu MA, Yamamoto Y, Sugiura T, Okamura Y, Ito T, Ashida R et al. The favorable prognosis after operative resection of hypervascular intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study. Surgery. 2016;160(3):683–90.
Amin MB ES, Greene F. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York. Springer International Publishing. 2017.
Nathan H, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Zhu AX, Schulick RD et al. A proposed staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(1):14–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0180-z.
Sobin LH. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours seventh edition. 2009.
Farges O, Fuks D, Le Treut YP, Azoulay D, Laurent A, Bachellier P et al. AJCC 7th edition of TNM staging accurately discriminates outcomes of patients with resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: By the AFC-IHCC-2009 study group. Cancer. 2011;117(10):2170–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25712.
Sakamoto Y, Kokudo N, Matsuyama Y, Sakamoto M, Izumi N, Kadoya M et al. Proposal of a new staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Analysis of surgical patients from a nationwide survey of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Cancer. 2016;122(1):61–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29686.
Igami T, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Sugawara G, Takahashi Y, Nagino M. Staging of peripheral-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: appraisal of the new TNM classification and its modifications. World J Surg. 2011;35(11):2501–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1242-0.
Uenishi T, Ariizumi S, Aoki T, Ebata T, Ohtsuka M, Tanaka E et al. Proposal of a new staging system for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter analysis by the Study Group for Hepatic Surgery of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21(7):499–508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.92.
Brierley JD. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours eight edition. 2017.
Ebata T, Kosuge T, Hirano S, Unno M, Yamamoto M, Miyazaki M et al. Proposal to modify the International Union Against Cancer staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinomas. Br J Surg. 2014;101(2):79–88.
Uenishi T, Kubo S, Yamazaki O, Yamada T, Sasaki Y, Nagano H et al. Indications for surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with lymph node metastases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15(4):417–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-007-1315-5.
Nakagohri T, Kinoshita T, Konishi M, Takahashi S, Gotohda N. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2008;32(12):2675–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9778-3.
Endo I, Gonen M, Yopp AC, Dalal KM, Zhou Q, Klimstra D et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: rising frequency, improved survival, and determinants of outcome after resection. Ann Surg. 2008;248(1):84–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176c4d3.
Spolverato G, Bagante F, Weiss M, Alexandrescu S, Marques HP, Aldrighetti L et al. Comparative performances of the 7th and the 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115(6):696–703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24569.
Sasaki K, Margonis GA, Andreatos N, Bagante F, Weiss M, Barbon C et al. Preoperative Risk Score and Prediction of Long-Term Outcomes after Hepatectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226(4):393–403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.011
Ohtsuka M, Ito H, Kimura F, Shimizu H, Togawa A, Yoshidome H et al. Results of surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and clinicopathological factors influencing survival. Br J Surg. 2002;89(12):1525–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02268.x.
Yamasaki S. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: macroscopic type and stage classification. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003;10(4):288–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-002-0732-8.
Uenishi T, Yamazaki O, Yamamoto T, Hirohashi K, Tanaka H, Tanaka S et al. Serosal invasion in TNM staging of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12(6):479–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-005-1026-8.
Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA, Llovet JM, Park JW, Patel T et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014;60(6):1268–89.
Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y, Esaki M, Kosuge T, Ojima H. Surgical outcomes of the mass-forming plus periductal infiltrating types of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a comparative study with the typical mass-forming type of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2007;31(10):2016–22.
Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Yoshikawa T, Ueno K, Nakano M. Does gross appearance indicate prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? J Surg Oncol. 1998;69(3):162–7.
Uenishi T, Yamazaki O, Horii K, Yamamoto T, Kubo S. A long-term survivor of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with paraaortic lymph node metastasis. J Gastroenterol 2006;41(4):391–2.
Miura JT, Johnston FM, Tsai S, George B, Thomas J, Eastwood D, et al. Chemotherapy for Surgically Resected Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(11):3716–23.
Reames BN, Bagante F, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Ruzzenente A, Weiss M, et al. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2017;19(10):901–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Design of work: Y Yamamoto, T Sugiura, and K Uesaka
Acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data: Y Yamamoto, T Sugiura, Y Okamura, T Ito, R Ashida, K Ohgi, and Y Nakanuma
Drafting and revising: Y Yamamoto, T Sugiura, Y Okamura, T Ito, R Ashida, K Ohgi, and K Uesaka
Final approval: Y Yamamoto, T Sugiura, Y Okamura, T Ito, R Ashida, K Ohgi, and K Uesaka
Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work: Y Yamamoto, T Sugiura, Y Okamura, T Ito, R Ashida, K Ohgi, Y Nakanuma, and K Uesaka
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The Institutional Review Board approved this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This paper is not based on a previous communication to a society or meeting.
Summary
T2, T3, and T4 of AJCC/UICC of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma overlapped with regard to the survival. The new classification was developed: T1, size ≤ 2cm; T2, size > 2cm; T3, vascular invasion or perforation of the visceral peritoneum; and T4, multiple tumors or periductal infiltrating. This staging can classify with sufficient prognostic differences.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamamoto, Y., Sugiura, T., Okamura, Y. et al. The Evaluation of the Eighth Edition of the AJCC/UICC Staging System for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: a Proposal of a Modified New Staging System. J Gastrointest Surg 24, 786–795 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04185-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04185-1