Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Likely Sites of Nodal Metastasis Differs According to the Tumor Extent in Distal Bile Duct Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

In the revised Japanese and Worldwide TNM classification of distal bile duct cancer, the lymph node status is defined as N0 or N1 without reference to the tumor location or extent, according to the presence/absence of metastasis to the regional lymph nodes.

Methods

Data of 94 patients with distal bile duct cancer who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy were reviewed retrospectively. In formalin-fixed specimens, we measured the longitudinal lengths from the papilla to the lower and upper margins of the tumor, in order to investigate the correlation of the tumor extent with the likely sites of nodal metastasis.

Results

The frequencies of metastasis to the posterior pancreaticoduodenal nodes (7.1 %) and superior mesenteric artery nodes (0.0 %) were significantly lower in the cases in which the length from the papilla to the lower margin of the tumor was ≥30 mm. The frequencies of nodal metastasis to the common hepatic artery nodes (0.0 %) and hepatoduodenal ligament nodes (6.7 %) were significantly lower in the cases in which the length from the papilla to the upper margin was <40 mm.

Conclusion

The likely sites of nodal metastasis differ according to the extent of the tumor in cases of bile duct cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS). General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Studies on Cancer of the Biliary Tract (2013). 6 ed.

  2. International Union Against Cancer (UICC). TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (2009). 7 ed, Wiley-Liss, New York.

  3. Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K, Ohta T, Takeda T, Miyazaki I Lymphatic flow in carcinoma of the distal bile duct based on a clinicopathologic study. Cancer. 1993; 72: 2112–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kurosaki I, Tsukada K, Hatakeyama K, Muto T The mode of lymphatic spread in carcinoma of the bile duct. American Journal of Surgery. 1996; 172: 239–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakao A, Harada A, Nonami T, Kaneko T, Murakami H, Inoue S, et al. Lymph node metastases in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas region. The British Journal of Surgery. 1995; 82: 399–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoshida T, Matsumoto T, Sasaki A, Morii Y, Aramaki M, Kitano S Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for distal bile duct cancer. Arch Surg. 2002; 137: 69–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoshida T, Matsumoto T, Sasaki A, Morii Y, Shibata K, Ishio T, et al. Lymphatic spread differs according to tumor location in extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Hepato-gastroenterology. 2003; 50: 17–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, eds. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System, Fourth Edition. Lyon: IARC Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sobin LH, Wittekind C, eds. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 6th edition. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shaw MJ, Dorsher PJ, Vennes JA Cystic duct anatomy: an endoscopic perspective. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 1993; 88: 2102–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsunoda M, Sasai N, Mitsumori A, Akaki A, Togami I, Jyoya I, et al. Evaluation of the Cystic Duct and Cysticohepatic Junction with MR Cholangiography: Comparison of various techniques and clinical evaluation with respiratory-trrigaered three-dimensional multislab technique. Nippon Acta Radiologica. 1998; 58: 420–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagakawa T, Konishi I, Ueno K, Ohta T, Kayahara M A clinical study on lymphatic flow in carcinoma of the pancreatic head area—peripancreatic regional lymph node grouping. Hepato-gastroenterology. 1993; 40: 457–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee HG, Lee SH, Yoo DD, Paik KY, Heo JS, Choi SH, et al. Carcinoma of the middle bile duct: is bile duct segmental resection appropriate? World Journal of Gastroenterology : WJG. 2009; 15: 5966–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sakamoto Y, Shimada K, Nara S, Esaki M, Ojima H, Sano T, et al. Surgical management of infrahilar/suprapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma: an analysis of the surgical procedures, surgical margins, and survivals of 77 patients. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. 2010; 14: 335–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Osada H, Okada T, Itoyama S, Komagome M, et al. Preoperative evaluation of the longitudinal spread of extrahepatic bile duct cancer using multidetector computed tomography. Journal of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery. 2009; 16: 216–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park HS, Lee JM, Choi JY, Lee MW, Kim HJ, Han JK, et al. Preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer: MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT with direct cholangiography. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology. 2008; 190: 396–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Unno M, Okumoto T, Katayose Y, Rikiyama T, Sato A, Motoi F, et al. Preoperative assessment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma by multidetector row computed tomography. Journal of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery. 2007; 14: 434–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No special comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuichiro Kato.

Ethics declarations

Source of Financial Support

None

Conflict of Interest

Nothing to declare

Additional information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kato, Y., Takahashi, S., Gotohda, N. et al. The Likely Sites of Nodal Metastasis Differs According to the Tumor Extent in Distal Bile Duct Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 20, 1618–1627 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3179-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3179-y

Keywords

Navigation