Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Early Oral Feeding vs. Traditional Feeding in Patients Undergoing Elective Open Bowel Surgery—a Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Objective

This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the safety, tolerability and outcome of early oral feeding vs. traditional feeding in patients undergoing elective open bowel surgery.

Methods

A total of 120 consecutive patients who underwent elective open bowel surgeries were randomized into either early feeding (n = 60) or traditional feeding group (n = 60). Patients in the early feeding group were started on oral fluids on post-operative day 1, while those in the traditional feeding group were started orals after the resolution of ileus. Patient characteristics, surgical procedures, co-morbidity, first flatus, first defecation, time of starting solid diet, complications and length of hospitalization were assessed between the two groups.

Results

The two groups were similar in demographic and baseline data. The number of days to first flatus (p < 0.0001), first defecation (p < 0.0001), length of post-operative stay (p = 0.011) and time of starting solid diet (p < 0.0001) were significantly earlier in the early feeding group. Anastomotic leak, wound infection, fever, vomiting, abdominal distention and other complications were similar. Multivariate analysis showed that patients in the early oral feeding group were discharged 3.4 days earlier (p = 0.037).

Conclusion

In patients undergoing elective open bowel surgeries, early post-operative feeding is safe, is well tolerated and reduces the length of hospitalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levine AL. A new gastroduodenal catheter. JAMA 1921; 76:1007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer JJ, Gelernt IM, Salky BA, Kreel I. Is routine postoperative nasogastric decompression really necessary? Ann Surg 1985; 201: 233-236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Argov S, Goldstein I, Barzilai A. Is routine use of the nasogastric tube justified in upper abdominal surgery? Am J Surg 1980; 139: 849-850.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nathan BN, Pain JA. Nasogastric suction after elective abdominal surgery: a randomized study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1991;73:291-294.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meltvedt R, Knecht B, Gibbons G, Stahler C, Stojowski A, Johansen K:Is nasogastric suction necessary after elective colon resection? Am J Surg 1985;149:620-622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolff BG, Pemberton JH, Van Heerden JA, Beart RW,. Nivatvongs S, Devine RM, Dozois RR, Ilstrup DM. Elective colon and rectal surgery without nasogastric decompression. Ann Surg 1989;209(6):670-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrelli NJ, Stulc JP, Rodriquez-Bigas M, Blumenson L. Nasogastric decompression following elective colorectal surgery. Am Surg 1993; 59: 632-635.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991;1:144-150.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Ramos R, Rosenthal D. Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 1992; 216:703-707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Corbitt JD Jr. Preliminary experience with laparoscopic guided colectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992; 2:79-81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective assessment and current perspective. Br J Surg 1993; 80:1602-1605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wexner SD, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy: a prospective assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35:651-655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zucker KA, Pitcher DE, Martin DT, Ford RS. Laparoscopic assisted colon resection. Surg Endosc 1994; 8:12-18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoover HC, Ryan JA, Anderson EJ, Fischer JE . Nutritional benefits of immediate postoperative jejunal feeding of an elemental diet. Am J Surg 1980; 139:153-159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ryan JA Jr, Page CP, Babcock L .Early postoperative jejunal feeding of elemental diet in gastrointestinal surgery. Am Surg 1981; 47:393-403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meguid MM, Campos AC, Hammond WG. Nutritional support in surgical practice: part II. Am J Surg 1990; 159:427-443.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moore FA, Feliciano DV, Andrassy RJ, McArdle AH, Booth FV, Morgenstein-Wagner TB, Kellum JM Jr, Welling RE, Moore EE. Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral reduces postoperative septic complications: the results of a meta-analysis. Ann Surg.1992; 216:172-183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rao W, Zhang X, Zhang J, Yan R, Hu Z, Wang Q. The role of nasogastric tube in decompression after elective colon and rectum surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26(4):423-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nelson R, Tse B, Edwards S. Systematic review of prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal operations. Br J Surg 2005; 92(6):673-80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sindell S, Causey MW, Bradley T, Poss M, Moonka R, Thirlby R. Expediting return of bowel function after colorectal surgery. Am J Surg 2012; 203(5):644-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Macarone Palmieri R, Amodio PM, Rizzello M, Goglia A, Piciollo M, Piccioni E, et al. Does the nasogastric tube has a role in elective colorectal surgery? G Chir 2012; 33(3):58-61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Han-Geurts IJM, Hop WCJ, Kok NFM, Lim A, Brouwer KJ, Jeekel J. Randomized clinical trial of the impact of early enteral feeding on postoperative ileus and recovery. Br J Surg. 2007; 94(5):555-61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW. Prospective randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2003;46(7):851-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fukuzawa J, Terashima H, Ohkohchi N. Early postoperative oral feeding accelerates upper gastrointestinal anastomotic healing in the rat model. World J Surg 2007; 31(6):1234-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S. Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ 2001; 323(7316):773-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dag A, Colak T, Turkmenoglu O, Gundogdu R, Aydin S. A randomized controlled trial evaluating early versus traditional oral feeding after colorectal surgery. Clin Sao Paulo Braz. 2011; 66(12):2001-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rohatiner T, Wend J, Rhodes S, Murrell Z, Berel D, Fleshner P. A prospective single-institution evaluation of current practices of early postoperative feeding after elective intestinal surgery. Am Surg 2012; 78(10):1147-50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Burden S, Todd C, Hill J, Lal S. Preoperative nutrition support in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012.

  29. Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang XD, Chen BC, Yu Z. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56(5):667-78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sagar S, Harland P, Shields R. Early postoperative feeding with elemental diet. BMJ 1979 (3);1:293–5.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hartsell PA, Frazee RC, Harrison JB, Smith RW. Early postoperative feeding after elective colorectal surgery. Arch Surg. 1997;132(5):518-20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Han-Geurts IJ, Jeekel J, Tilanus HW, Brouwer KJ. Randomized clinical trial of patient-controlled versus fixed regimen feeding after elective abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88(12):1578-82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lucha PA Jr, Butler R, Plichta J, Francis M. The economic impact of early enteral feeding in gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective survey of 51 consecutive patients. Am. Surg. 2005;71(3):187–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou T, Wu XT, Zhou YJ, Huang X, Fan W, Li YC. Early removing gastrointestinal decompression and early oral feeding improve patients rehabilitation after colorectostomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12: 2459–2463.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Behrns KE, Kircher AP, Galanko JA, Brownstein MR, Koruda MJ. Prospective randomized trial of early initiation and hospital discharge on a liquid diet following elective intestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4(2):217-21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, 605006, India

    M. Pragatheeswarane, R. Muthukumarassamy, D. Kadambari & Vikram Kate

Authors
  1. M. Pragatheeswarane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Muthukumarassamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Kadambari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vikram Kate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikram Kate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pragatheeswarane, M., Muthukumarassamy, R., Kadambari, D. et al. Early Oral Feeding vs. Traditional Feeding in Patients Undergoing Elective Open Bowel Surgery—a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gastrointest Surg 18, 1017–1023 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2489-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2489-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation