Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Management of Esophageal Perforation and Anastomotic Leak by Transluminal Drainage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

The management of esophageal perforations and leaks remains a challenge. Although there are broad management principles, each situation may require a different surgical approach. The aim of this report was to describe the management of these esophageal crises by transluminal drainage via a transabdominal approach.

Methods

Between 2005 and 2009, patients with anastomotic or gastric staple line leak (n = 4) or esophageal perforation (n = 2) underwent transabdominal surgery and transluminal drainage. This simple technique has, to the best of our knowledge, not been previously reported.

Results

All six patients survived. The median intensive care unit and hospital stays were 12 days (range 0–32) and 63 days (range 32–99), respectively. At a median follow-up time of 25 months (range 15–60), five of the six patients remain alive and well. One patient with node positive esophageal carcinoma has died from relapsed disease.

Conclusions

Transabdominal transluminal drainage should be added to the list of potential techniques that can be employed in management of esophageal leaks and perforations. It is a valuable adjunct to the armamentarium of the esophageal surgeon for dealing with these challenging situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Attar S, Hankins JR, Suter CM, Coughlin TR, Sequeira A, McLaughlin JS. Esophageal perforation: a therapeutic challenge. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50(1):45–9; discussion 50–1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, Marshall MB, Kaiser LR, Kucharczuk JC. Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77(4):1475–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB. Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak--a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol 1992;49(3):163–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Port JL, Kent MS, Korst RJ, Bacchetta M, Altorki NK. Thoracic esophageal perforations: a decade of experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75(4):1071–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan MY, Khan ZM, Rahamim JS. Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27(1):3–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roy-Choudhury SH, Nicholson AA, Wedgwood KR, Mannion RA, Sedman PC, Royston CM, et al. Symptomatic malignant gastroesophageal anastomotic leak: management with covered metallic esophageal stents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176(1):161–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sauvanet A, Baltar J, Le Mee J, Belghiti J. Diagnosis and conservative management of intrathoracic leakage after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 1998;85(10):1446–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bufkin BL, Miller JI, Jr., Mansour KA. Esophageal perforation: emphasis on management. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61(5):1447–51; discussion 1451–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cameron JL, Kieffer RF, Hendrix TR, Mehigan DG, Baker RR. Selective nonoperative management of contained intrathoracic esophageal disruptions. Ann Thorac Surg 1979;27(5):404–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blackmon SH, Santora R, Schwarz P, Barroso A, Dunkin BJ. Utility of removable esophageal covered self-expanding metal stents for leak and fistula management. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89(3):931–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leers JM, Vivaldi C, Schafer H, Bludau M, Brabender J, Lurje G, Herbold T, Holscher AH, Metzger R. Endoscopic therapy for esophageal perforation or anastomotic leak with a self-expandable metallic stent. Surg Endosc 2009;23(10):2258–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman RK, Ascioti AJ, Wozniak TC. Postoperative esophageal leak management with the Polyflex esophageal stent. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133(2):333–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dai YY, Gretschel S, Dudeck O, Rau B, Schlag PM, Hunerbein M. Treatment of oesophageal anastomotic leaks by temporary stenting with self-expanding plastic stents. Br J Surg 2009;96:887–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman RK, Van Woerkom JM, Vyverberg A, Ascioti AJ. Esopheageal stent placement for the treatment of spontaneous esophageal perforations. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:194–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eubanks S, Edwards CA, Fearing NM, Ramaswamy A, de la Torre RA, Thaler KJ, Miedema BW, Scott JS. Use of endoscopic stents to treat anastomotic complications after bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:935–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Udelnow A, Huber-Lang M, Juchems M, Trager K, Henne-Bruns D, Wurl P. How to treat esophageal perforations when determinants and predictors of mortality are considered. World J Surg 2009;33(4):787–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Erdogan A, Gurses G, Keskin H, Demircan A. The sealing effect of a fibrin tissue patch on the esophageal perforation area in primary repair. World J Surg 2007;31(11):2199–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Linden PA, Bueno R, Mentzer SJ, Zellos L, Lebenthal A, Colson YL, et al. Modified T-tube repair of delayed esophageal perforation results in a low mortality rate similar to that seen with acute perforations. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83(3):1129–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Griffin SM, Lamb PJ, Shenfine J, Richardson DL, Karat D, Hayes N. Spontaneous rupture of the oesophagus. Br J Surg 2008;95(9):1115–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Page RD, Shackcloth MJ, Russell GN, Pennefather SH. Surgical treatment of anastomotic leaks after oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27(2):337–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rohatgi A, Papanikitas J, Sutcliffe R, Forshaw M, Mason R. The role of oesophageal diversion and exclusion in the management of oesophageal perforations. Int J Surg 2009;7(2):142–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Salo JA, Isolauri JO, Heikkila LJ, Markkula HT, Heikkinen LO, Kivilaakso EO, et al. Management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis. Esophagectomy or primary repair? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106(6):1088–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Orringer MB, Stirling MC. Esophagectomy for esophageal disruption. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49(1):35–42; discussion 42–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gupta NM, Kaman L. Personal management of 57 consecutive patients with esophageal perforation. Am J Surg 2004;187(1):58–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. National Oesophago-gastric Cancer Audit 2010. The NHS Information Centre, Leeds 2010. http://www.ic.nhs.uk/services/national-clinical-audit-support-programme-ncasp/cancer/oesophago-gastric

  26. Lagarde SM, de Boer JD, ten Kate FJ, Busch OR, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ. Postoperative complications after esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus are related to timing of death due to recurrence. Ann Surg 2008;247:71–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Den Dulk M, Marijen CA, Collette L, Putter H, Pahlmans L, Folkessons J, Bosset JF, Rodel C, Bujkos K, van der Velde CJ. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2009;96:1066–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schuchert MJ, Abbas G, Nason KS, Pennathur A, Awais O, Santana M, Pereira R, Oostdyk A, Luketich JD, Landreneau RJ. Impact of anastomotic leak on outcomes after transhiatal esophagectomy. Surgery 2010;148:831–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Level 6 Balmoral Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK

    Robert N. Williams, Andrew W. Hall, Christopher D. Sutton, Sukhbir S. Ubhi & David J. Bowrey

Authors
  1. Robert N. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew W. Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christopher D. Sutton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sukhbir S. Ubhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David J. Bowrey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Bowrey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, R.N., Hall, A.W., Sutton, C.D. et al. Management of Esophageal Perforation and Anastomotic Leak by Transluminal Drainage. J Gastrointest Surg 15, 777–781 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1472-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1472-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation