Skip to main content
Log in

Single-Centre Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hepatectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Expansion of laparoscopic major hepatectomy is still limited mainly due to the well-recognised technical difficulties compared to open surgery, and doubts regarding the oncological efficiency when major resections are required.

Methods

Patients undergoing open right hepatectomy (ORH) were matched with patients undergoing laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) and compared for perioperative outcomes.

Results

Seventy patients were included: 36 patients underwent LRH and 34 ORH. Operative time was significantly longer for LRH (median, 300 min vs. 180 min for ORH; p < 0.0001). Intensive care unit (median, 2 days for LRH vs. 4 days for ORH; p < 0.0001) and postoperative length of stay (5 days for LRH vs. 9 days for ORH; p < 0.0001) were significantly shorter for LRH. Four laparoscopic cases were converted to open surgery. No significant difference in postoperative complications and mortality was observed between LRH and ORH. Among patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases, R0 resection was obtained in 20/21 (95%) cases after LRH, and in 20/25 (80%) after ORH (p = 0.198). Mid-term overall survival did not significantly differ between the laparoscopic and the open group.

Conclusions

LRH can be a safe, effective, and oncologically efficient alternative to open resection in selected cases. Extensive experience in hepatic and laparoscopic surgery is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 2009; 250:831–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gagner M, Rogula T, Selzer D. Laparoscopic liver resection: benefits and controversies. Surg Clin North Am 2004; 84:451–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cherqui D. Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 2003; 90:644–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Descottes B, Glineur D, Lachachi F, Valleix D, Paineau J, Hamy A, Morino M, Bismuth H, Castaing D, Savier E, Honore P, Detry O, Legrand M, Azagra JS, Goergen M, Ceuterick M, Marescaux J, Mutter D, de Hemptinne B, Troisi R, Weerts J, Dallemagne B, Jehaes C, Gelin M, Donckier V, Aerts R, Topal B, Bertrand C, Mansvelt B, Van Krunckelsven L, Herman D, Kint M, Totte E, Schockmel R, Gigot JF. Laparoscopic liver resection of benign liver tumors. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:23–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Koffron A, Geller D, Gamblin TC, Abecassis M. Laparoscopic liver surgery: Shifting the management of liver tumors. Hepatology 2006; 44:1694–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abu Hilal M, McPhail MJ, Zeidan B, Zeidan S, Hallam MJ, Armstrong T, Primrose JN, Pearce NW. Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: A comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34:1285–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, Abecassis M. Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg 2007; 246:385–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buell JF, Thomas MT, Rudich S, Marvin M, Nagubandi R, Ravindra KV, Brock G, McMasters KM. Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures. Ann Surg 2008; 248:475–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abu Hilal M, Pearce NW. Laparoscopic left lateral liver sectionectomy: a safe, efficient, reproducible technique. Dig Surg 2008; 25:305–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dagher I, O'Rourke N, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Belli G, Gamblin TC, Lainas P, Laurent A, Nguyen KT, Marvin MR, Thomas M, Ravindra K, Fielding G, Franco D, Buell JF. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg 2009; 250:856–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen KT, Geller DA. Is laparoscopic liver resection safe and comparable to open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma? Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16:1765–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abu Hilal M, Underwood T, Taylor MG, Hamdan K, Elberm H, Pearce NW. Bleeding and hemostasis in laparoscopic liver surgery. Surg Endosc 2010; 24:572–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dagher I, Di Giuro G, Dubrez J, Lainas P, Smadja C, Franco D. Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy: a comparative study. Am J Surg 2009; 198:173–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O'Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D'Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 2009; 250:825–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Strasberg SM. Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2005; 12:351–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Syed S, Primrose JN, Abu Hilal M (2011) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: a challenging, but feasible, safe and efficient procedure (How I do it). Am J Surg (in press).

  17. Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 2009; 250:772–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abu Hilal M, Underwood T, Zuccaro M, Primrose JN, Pearce N. Totally laparoscopic resection for colorectal liver metastases in fifty consecutive suitable patients: short and medium term results. Br J Surg 2010; 97:927–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lesurtel M, Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, Fagniez PL. Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a case-control study. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196:236–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Belli G, Fantini C, D'Agostino A, Cioffi L, Langella S, Russolillo N, Belli A. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results. Surg Endosc 2007; 21:2004–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Laurent A, Cherqui D, Lesurtel M, Brunetti F, Tayar C, Fagniez PL. Laparoscopic liver resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic liver disease. Arch Surg 2003; 138:763–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Simillis C, Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, Darzi A, Lovegrove R, Jiao L, Antoniou A. Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms--a meta-analysis. Surgery 2007; 141:203–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O'Rourke N, Shaw I, Nathanson L, Martin I, Fielding G. Laparoscopic resection of hepatic colorectal metastases. HPB (Oxford) 2004; 6:230–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Abu Hilal.

Additional information

Dr. Mohammed Abu Hilal and Dr. Francesco Di Fabio equally contributed to the scientific content of this paper.

Oral presentation, Annual Scientific Meeting of the Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, 25–26 November 2010, Nottingham, UK.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abu Hilal, M., Di Fabio, F., Teng, M.J. et al. Single-Centre Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15, 818–823 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1468-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1468-z

Keywords

Navigation