Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Duodeno-Gastric-Esophageal Reflux—What is Pathologic? Comparison of Patients with Barrett’s Esophagus and Age-Matched Volunteers

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of the study was to analyse pH- and bile-monitoring data in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and in age- and gender-matched controls.

Subjects and Methods

Twenty-four consecutive Barrett’s patients (8 females, 16 males, mean age 57 years), 21 patients with esophagitis (10 females, 11 males, mean age 58 years), and 19 healthy controls (8 females, 11 males, mean age 51 years), were included. Only patients underwent endoscopy with biopsy. All groups were investigated with manometry, gastric and esophageal 24-h pH, and simultaneous bile monitoring according to a standardized protocol. A bilirubin absorption >0.25 was determined as noxious bile reflux. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) method was applied to determine the optimal cutoff value of pathologic bilirubin levels.

Results

Of Barrett’s patients, 79% had pathologic acidic gastric reflux (pH<4 >5% of total measuring time). However, 32% of healthy controls also had acid reflux (p < 0.05) without any symptoms. The median of esophageal bile reflux was 7.8% (lower quartile (LQ)–upper quartile (UQ) = 1.6–17.8%) in Barrett’s patients, in patients with esophagitis, 3.5% (LQ–UQ = 0.1–13.5), and in contrast to 0% (LQ–UQ = 0–1.0%) in controls, p = 0.001. ROC analysis showed the optimal dividing value for patients at more than 1% bile reflux over 24 h (75% sensitivity, 84% specificity).

Conclusion

An optimal threshold to differentiate between normal and pathological bile reflux into the esophagus is 1% (24-h bile monitoring with an absorbance >0.25).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bollschweiler E, Wolfgarten E, Gutschow C, Hoelscher AH. Demographic variations in the rising incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in white males. Cancer 2001;92:549–555.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lagergren J, Bergström R, Lindgren A, Nyren O. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999;18:825–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolfgarten E, Rosendahl U, Nowroth T, Leers J, Metzger R, Hoelscher A, Bollschweiler E. Coincidence of nutritional habits and esophageal cancer in Germany. Onkologie 2001;24:546–551.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bollschweiler E, Wolfgarten E, Nowroth T, Rosendahl U, Monig S, Hoelscher A. Vitamin intake and risk of subtypes of esophageal cancer in Germany. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2002;128:575–580.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sato T, Miwa K, Sahara H, Hattori T. The sequential model of Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma induced by duodeno-esophageal reflux without exogenous carcinogens. Anticancer Res 2002;22(1A):39–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaezi MF, Richter JE. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux and methods to monitor nonacidic reflux. Am J Med 2001;3(111 Suppl. 8A):160S–168S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bremner CG, Mason RJ. “Bile” in the esophagus. Br J Surg 1993;80:1374–1376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stein HJ, Feussner H, Kauer W, DeMeester TR, Siewert JR. Alkaline gastroesophageal reflux: assessment by ambulatory esophageal aspiration and pH monitoring. Am J Surg 1994;167(1):163–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Todd JA, Basu KK, De Caestecker JS. Normalization of oesophageal pH does not guarantee control of duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux in Barrett’s oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:969–975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kauer WK, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Ireland AP, Bremner CG, Hagen JA. Mixed reflux of gastric and duodenal juices is more harmful to the esophagus than gastric juice alone. The need for surgical therapy re-emphasized. Ann Surg 1995;222(4):525–531.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Caldwell MT, Lawlor P, Byrne PJ, Walsh TN, Hennessy TP. Ambulatory oesophageal bile reflux monitoring in Barrett’s oesophagus. Br J Surg 1995;82:657–660.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF, Singh S, Alexander R. Duodenogastro-esophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 1994;107(3):747–754.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vaezi MF, Lacamera RG, Richter JE. Validation studies of Bilitec 2000: an ambulatory duodenogastric reflux monitoring system. Am J Physiol 1994;267(6 Pt 1):G1050–G1057.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fein M, Fuchs KH, Bohrer T, Freys SM, Rocca F. Fiberoptic technique for 24-hour bile reflux monitoring. Dig Dis Sci 1996;1:216–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Byrne JP, Romagnoli R, Bechi P, Attwood SE, Fuchs KH, Collard JM. Duodenogastric reflux of bile in health: the normal range. Physiol Meas 1999;20(2):149–158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bowrey DJ, Williams GT, Carey PD, Clark GWB. Inflammation at the cardio-oesophageal junction: relationship to acid and bile exposure. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;15:49–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bollschweiler E, Wolfgarten E, Puetz B, Gutschow C, Hölscher AH. Bile reflux into the stomach and the esophagus for volunteers older than 40 years. Digestion 2005;71(2):65–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Romagnoli R, Collard JM, Bechi P, Salizzoni M. Gastric symptoms and duodenogastric reflux in patients referred for gatsroesophageal reflux symptoms and endoscopic esophagitis. Surgery 1999;5:480–486.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zweig M, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 1993;39:561–577.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma P, Sampliner R. GERD, DGER, or both in Barrett’s esophagus? Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92(5):903–904.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen SL, Mo JZ, Cao ZJ, Chen XY, Xiao AD. Effects of bile reflux on gastric mucosal lesions in patients with dyspepsia or chronic gastritis. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11(18):2834–2837.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marshall RE, Anggiansah A, Owen WA, Manifold DK, Owen WJ. The extent of duodenogastric reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001;13:5–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Achem AC, Achem SR, Stark ME, DeVault KR. Failure of esophageal peristalsis in older patients: association with esophageal acid exposure. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98(1): 35–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tack J, Bisshops R, Koek G, Sifrim D, Lerut T, Janssens J. Dietary restrictions during ambulatory monitoring of dudenogastroesophageal reflux. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:1213–1220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fein M, Fuchs KH, Bohrer T, Freys SM, Thiede A. Fiberoptic technique for 24-hour bile reflux monitoring. Standards and normal values for gastric monitoring. Dig Dis Sci 1996;41(1), 216–225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas H, Wilhelm L, Petermann J, Rosenbaum KD, Lorenz D. Simultaneous long-term measurement of duodenogastric reflux and gastroduodenal motility. Chirurg 1997;68(6):618–623.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hölscher AH, Bollschweiler E, Bumm R. pH-Metrie von Oesophagus und Magen. In Classen M, Siewert JR, Blum AL, eds. Aktuelle Gastroenterologische Diagnostik, 2. Auflage, Hrsg. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Banki F, DeMeester SR, Mason RJ, Campos G, Hagen JA, Peters JH, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR. Barrett’s esophagus in females: a comparative analysis of risk factors in females and males. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:560–567.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pfaffenbach B, Hullerum J, Orth KH, Langer M, Stabenow-Lohbauer U, Lux G. Bile acid reflux in long and short segment Barrett’s esophagus, and in reflux disease. Z Gastroenterol 2000;38:565–570.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank Mrs. Marlis Janson for help with the organization and data measurement of patients and controls.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    Eva Wolfgarten, Benito Pütz & Arnulf H. Hölscher

  2. Klinik und Poliklinik fúr Visceral-und Gefäβchirurgie, der Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Germany

    Elfriede Bollschweiler

Authors
  1. Eva Wolfgarten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benito Pütz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arnulf H. Hölscher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elfriede Bollschweiler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elfriede Bollschweiler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolfgarten, E., Pütz, B., Hölscher, A.H. et al. Duodeno-Gastric-Esophageal Reflux—What is Pathologic? Comparison of Patients with Barrett’s Esophagus and Age-Matched Volunteers. J Gastrointest Surg 11, 479–486 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-006-0017-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-006-0017-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation