Skip to main content

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Workup and Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Benign Esophageal Disease

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most frequent gastrointestinal disorder with an increasing incidence likely due to the rising obesity epidemic. GERD patients may present with typical (esophageal) or atypical (extraesophageal) symptoms.

Prior to surgical treatment, patients with GERD symptoms should undergo a thorough objective evaluation including esophagogastroduodenoscopy, barium swallow, high-resolution manometry, and ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring.

Among available diagnostic tests, the ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis. It is the only study that can determine objectively the esophageal acid exposure and the correlation with symptoms.

A thorough evaluation confirming the presence of abnormal reflux, and a cause/effect relationship between symptoms and reflux, is key component of a successful operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2014;63(6):871–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R. The Montreal definition and classification of Gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2006;101(8):1900–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(3):308–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Patti MG, Diener U, Tamburini A, Molena D, Way LW. Role of esophageal function tests in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2001;46(3):597–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bello B, Zoccali M, Gullo R, Allaix ME, Herbella FA, Gasparaitis A, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and antireflux surgery-what is the proper preoperative work-up? J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(1):14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hunt R, Armstrong D, Katelaris P, Afihene M, Bane A, Bhatia S, et al. World gastroenterology organisation global guidelines. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51(6):467–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vakil NB, Traxler B, Levine D. Dysphagia in patients with erosive esophagitis: prevalence, severity, and response to proton pump inhibitor treatment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(8):665–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shaheen NJ, Weinberg DS, Denberg TD, Chou R, Qaseem A, Shekelle P. Upper endoscopy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: best practice advice from the clinical guidelines committee of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(11):808–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ates F, Vaezi MF. New approaches to management of PPI-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2014;12(1):18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999;45(2):172–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nasseri-Moghaddam S, Razjouyan H, Nouraei M, Alimohammadi M, Mamarabadi M, Vahedi H, et al. Inter- and intra-observer variability of the Los Angeles classification: a reassessment. Arch Iran Med. 2007;10(1):48–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jobe BA, Richter JE, Hoppo T, Peters JH, Bell R, Dengler WC, et al. Preoperative diagnostic workup before antireflux surgery: an evidence and experience-based consensus of the esophageal diagnostic advisory panel. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(4):586–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saleh CMG, Smout AJPM, Bredenoord AJ. The diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease cannot be made with barium esophagograms. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):195–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. SAGES Guidelines Committee. Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). www.sages.org. 2001 [cited 2019 Apr 4]. pp. 1–44.

  15. Fuchs KH, DeMeester TR, Albertucci M. Specificity and sensitivity of objective diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgery. 1987;102(4):575–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lacy BE, Dukowicz AC, Robertson DJ, Weiss JE, Teixeira P, Kelley ML. Clinical utility of the wireless pH capsule. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45(5):429–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson LFDT. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol. 1974;62(4):325–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Savarino E, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Pandolfino JE, Roman S, Gyawali CP. Expert consensus document: advances in the physiological assessment and diagnosis of GERD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(11):665–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vela MF. Non-acid reflux: detection by multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH, clinical significance and management. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(2):277–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel A, Sayuk GS, Kushnir VM, Chan WW, Gyawali CP. GERD phenotypes from pH-impedance monitoring predict symptomatic outcomes on prospective evaluation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(4):513–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Molena D, Patti MG, Diener U, Way LW. Esophageal manometry is a prerequisite for pH monitoring. Gastroenterology. 2000;118(4):A1228.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frazzoni M, de Bortoli N, Frazzoni L, Tolone S, Savarino V, Savarino E. Impedance-pH monitoring for diagnosis of reflux disease: new perspectives. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62(8):1881–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Francis DO, Goutte M, Slaughter JC, Garrett CG, Hagaman D, Holzman MD, et al. Traditional reflux parameters and not impedance monitoring predict outcome after fundoplication in extraesophageal reflux. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(9):1902–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco G. Patti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Di Corpo, M., Nurczyk, K., Patti, M.G. (2021). Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Workup and Evaluation. In: Zundel, N., Melvin, W.S., Patti, M.G., Camacho, D. (eds) Benign Esophageal Disease. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51489-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51489-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51488-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51489-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics