Abstract
Bipolar disorders (BDs) represent one of the leading causes of disability and morbidity globally. The use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is being increasingly studied as a tool to improve the diagnosis and treatment of BDs. While morphological biomarkers can be identified through the use of structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), recent studies have demonstrated that varying degrees of both structural and functional impairments indicate differing bipolar subtypes. Within fMRI, resting-state fMRI has specifically drawn increased interest for its capability to detect different neuronal activation patterns compared to task-based fMRI. This study aims to review recently published literature regarding the use of fMRI to investigate structural–functional relationships in BD diagnosis and specifically resting-state fMRI to provide an opinion on fMRI’s modern clinical application. All sources in this literature review were collected through searches on both PubMed and Google Scholar databases for terms such as ‘resting-state fMRI’ and ‘functional neuroimaging biomarkers of bipolar disorder’. While there are promising results supporting the use of fMRI for improving differential accuracy and establishing clinically relevant biomarkers, additional evidence will be required before fMRI is considered a dependable component of the overall BD diagnostic process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rego T, Velakoulis D. Brain imaging in psychiatric disorders: target or screen? BJPsych open. 2019;5(1):e4. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.79.
Miret M, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Sanchez-Moreno J, Vieta E. Depressive disorders and suicide: epidemiology, risk factors, and burden. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(10):2372–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.008.
Cardoso de Almeida JR, Phillips ML. Distinguishing between unipolar depression and bipolar depression: current and future clinical and neuroimaging perspectives. Biol Psychiat. 2013;73(2):111–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.06.010.
Sagar R, Pattanayak R. Potential biomarkers for bipolar disorder: where do we stand? Indian J Med Res. 2017;145(1):7. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1386_16.
Vargas C, López-Jaramillo C, Vieta E. A systematic literature review of resting state network—functional MRI in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2013;150(3):727–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.083.
Gong B, Naveed S, Hafeez DM, et al. Neuroimaging in psychiatric disorders: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most highly cited articles: neuroimaging in psychiatric disorders. J Neuroimaging. 2019;29(1):14–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.12570.
Hohenfeld C, Werner CJ, Reetz K. Resting-state connectivity in neurodegenerative disorders: is there potential for an imaging biomarker? NeuroImage Clin. 2018;18:849–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.013.
Syan SK, Smith M, Frey BN, Remtulla R, Kapczinski F, Hall GBC, Minuzzi L. Resting-state functional connectivity in individuals with bipolar disorder during clinical remission: a systematic review. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2018;43(5):298–316. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.170175.
Tang F, Yang H, Li L, Ji E, Fu Z, Zhang Z. Fusion analysis of grey matter and white matter in bipolar disorder by multimodal CCA-joint ICA. J Affect Disord. 2020;263:80–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.119.
Nugent AC, Milham MP, Bain EE, Mah L, Cannon DM, Marrett S, Zarate CA, Pine DS, Price JL, Drevets WC. Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder investigated with MRI and voxel-based morphometry. NeuroImage. 2006;30(2):485–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.029.
Lan MJ, Rubin-Falcone H, Sublette ME, Oquendo MA, Stewart JW, Hellerstein DJ, McGrath PJ, Zanderigo F, Mann JJ. Deficits of white matter axial diffusivity in bipolar disorder relative to major depressive disorder: no relationship to cerebral perfusion or body mass index. Bipolar Disord. 2020;22(3):296–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12845.
Ott CV, Johnson CB, Macoveanu J, Miskowiak K. Structural changes in the hippocampus as a biomarker for cognitive improvements in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;29(3):319–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.01.105.
Hibar DP, Westlye LT, Doan NT, et al. Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder: an MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group. Mol psychiatry. 2018;23(4):932–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.73.
Koshiyama D, Fukunaga M, Okada N, et al. White matter microstructural alterations across four major psychiatric disorders: mega-analysis study in 2937 individuals. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25(4):883–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0553-7.
Velakoulis D, Wood SJ, Wong MT, McGorry PD, Yung A, Phillips L, et al. Hippocampal and amygdala volumes according to psychosis stage and diagnosis: a magnetic resonance imaging study of chronic schizophrenia, first-episode psychosis, and ultra–high-risk individuals. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(2):139–49. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.139.
Tang Y, Ma Y, Chen X, Fan X, Jiang X, Zhou Y, Wang F, Wei S. Age-specific effects of structural and functional connectivity in prefrontal-amygdala circuitry in women with bipolar disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1732-9.
Rosso IM, Killgore WD, Cintron CM, Gruber SA, Tohen M, Yurgelun-Todd DA. Reduced amygdala volumes in first-episode bipolar disorder and correlation with cerebral white matter. Biol Psychiat. 2007;61(6):743–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.035.
Damme KSF, Alloy LB, Young CB, Kelley NJ, Chein J, Ng TH, Titone MK, Black CL, Nusslock R. Amygdala subnuclei volume in bipolar spectrum disorders: insights from diffusion-based subsegmentation and a high-risk design. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25021.
Maletic V, Raison C. Integrated neurobiology of bipolar disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00098.
Nunez SC, Dapretto M, Katzir T, Starr A, Bramen J, Kan E, et al. fMRI of syntactic processing in typically developing children: structural correlates in the inferior frontal gyrus. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011;1(3):313–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.02.004.
Lu LH, Dapretto M, O’Hare ED, Kan E, McCourt ST, Thompson PM, et al. Relationships between brain activation and brain structure in normally developing children. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(11):2595–604. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp011.
Joshi SH, Vizueta N, Foland-Ross L, Townsend JD, Bookheimer SY, Thompson PM, Narr KL, Altshuler LL. Relationships between altered functional magnetic resonance imaging activation and cortical thickness in patients with euthymic bipolar I disorder. Biol Psychiatry: Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016;1(6):507–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.06.006.
Townsend JD, Bookheimer SY, Foland-Ross LC, Moody TD, Eisenberger NI, Fischer JS, et al. Deficits in inferior frontal cortex activation in euthymic bipolar disorder patients during a response inhibition task: activation deficits in euthymic bipolar disorder patients. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14(4):442–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01020.x.
Altshuler LL, Bookheimer SY, Townsend J, Proenza MA, Eisenberger N, Sabb F, Mintz J, Cohen MS. Blunted activation in orbitofrontal cortex during mania: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiat. 2005;58(10):763–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.012.
Radua J, Borgwardt S, Crescini A, Mataix-Cols D, Meyer-Lindenberg A, McGuire PK, Fusar-Poli P. Multimodal meta-analysis of structural and functional brain changes in first episode psychosis and the effects of antipsychotic medication. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(10):2325–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.07.012.
Calhoun VD, Liu J, Adalı T. A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data. NeuroImage. 2009;45(1):S163–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.057.
Chen C-H, Suckling J, Lennox BR, Ooi C, Bullmore ET. A quantitative meta-analysis of fMRI studies in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2011;13(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00893.x.
Ambrosi E, Arciniegas DB, Madan A, Curtis KN, Patriquin MA, Jorge RE, Spalletta G, Fowler JC, Frueh BC, Salas R. Insula and amygdala resting-state functional connectivity differentiate bipolar from unipolar depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017;136(1):129–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12724.
Yu H, Li M-L, Li Y-F, Li X-J, Meng Y, Liang S, Li Z, Guo W, Wang Q, Deng W, Ma X, Coid J, Li DT. Anterior cingulate cortex, insula and amygdala seed-based whole brain resting-state functional connectivity differentiates bipolar from unipolar depression. J Affect Disord. 2020;274:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.005.
Du Y, Fu Z, Sui J, Gao S, Xing Y, Lin D, Salman M, Rahaman MA, Abrol A, Chen J, Hong E, Kochunov P, Osuch EA, Calhoun VD. NeuroMark: a fully automated ICA method to identify effective fMRI markers of brain disorders [Preprint]. Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1101/19008631.
Brady RO Jr, Tandon N, Masters GA, Margolis A, Cohen BM, Keshavan M, Öngür D. Differential brain network activity across mood states in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2017;207:367–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.041.
Wang Y, Gao Y, Tang S, Lu L, Zhang L, Bu X, Li H, Hu X, Hu X, Jiang P, Jia Z, Gong Q, Sweeney JA, Huang X. Large-scale network dysfunction in the acute state compared to the remitted state of bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity. EBioMedicine. 2020;54:102742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102742.
O’Connor EE, Zeffiro TA. Why is clinical fMRI in a resting state? Front Neurol. 2019;10:420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00420.
Brooks JO, Vizueta N. Diagnostic and clinical implications of functional neuroimaging in bipolar disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2014;57:12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.05.018.
Perry DC, Sturm VE, Peterson MJ, Pieper CF, Bullock T, Boeve BF, Miller BL, Guskiewicz KM, Berger MS, Kramer JH, Welsh-Bohmer KA. Association of traumatic brain injury with subsequent neurological and psychiatric disease: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(2):511–26. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.2.JNS14503.
Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry-the methods. Neuroimage. 2000;11(6 Pt 1):805–21. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0582.
Xu L, Groth KM, Pearlson G, Schretlen DJ, Calhoun VD. Source-based morphometry: the use of independent component analysis to identify gray matter differences with application to schizophrenia. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(3):711–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20540.
Sorella S, Lapomarda G, Messina I, Frederickson JJ, Siugzdaite R, Job R, Grecucci A. Testing the expanded continuum hypothesis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Neural and psychological evidence for shared and distinct mechanisms. NeuroImage Clin. 2019;23:101854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101854.
Kakeda S, Watanabe K, Nguyen H, et al. An independent component analysis reveals brain structural networks related to TNF-α in drug-naïve, first-episode major depressive disorder: a source-based morphometric study. Transl Psychiatry. 2020;10:187. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-00873-8.
Bora E, Fornito A, Yücel M, Pantelis C. Voxelwise meta-analysis of grey matter abnormalities in bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiat. 2010;67(11):1097–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.01.020.
Funding
This review was not funded.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors declare conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Waller, J., Miao, T., Ikedionwu, I. et al. Reviewing applications of structural and functional MRI for bipolar disorder. Jpn J Radiol 39, 414–423 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-01074-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-01074-5