Skip to main content
Log in

Factors of incomplete colonoscopy for stenosing colorectal cancer: CT colonography features

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between computed tomography colonoscopy (CTC) features of colorectal cancer (CRC) and incomplete colonoscopy.

Materials and methods

The subjects of this retrospective study consisted of 108 patients with advanced CRC (57 men, 51 women; age range, 32–87 years; median, 65 years) who underwent CTC. We compared local CTC features between the groups of complete (n = 74) and incomplete colonoscopy (n = 34). We performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to assess a diagnostic performance of CTC features to predict incomplete colonoscopy.

Results

The cross-sectional area of tumor and stenosis of complete colonoscopy group were significantly smaller and larger than those of incomplete colonoscopy group (p = 0.001 and < 0.001). Circumferential tumor extent rate (CER) showed significantly higher in the incomplete colonoscopy group than complete colonoscopy group (p < 0.001). In the ROC analysis, the cross-sectional area of stenosis showed AUC of 0.916, which was the best to predict incomplete colonoscopy.

Conclusion

CTC features including larger cross-sectional area of tumor, smaller cross-sectional area of stenosis and 100% CER were significantly associated with incomplete colonoscopy for the patients with CRC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(4):873–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(7):2297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Neerincx M, Terhaarsive Droste JS, Mulder CJ, Rakers M, Bartelsman JF, Loffeld RJ, et al. Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up. Endoscopy. 2010;42(9):730–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Koido S, Ohkusa T, Nakae K, Yokoyama T, Shibuya T, Sakamoto N, et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy at a Japanese academic hospital. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(22):6961–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Witte TN, Enns R. The difficult colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2007;21(8):487–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Oh SY, Sohn CI, Sung IK, Park DI, Kang MS, Yoo TW, et al. Factors affecting the technical difficulty of colonoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54(77):1403–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Waye JD. Difficult colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2013;9(10):676–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huisman JF, Leicher LW, de Boer E, van Westreenen HL, de Groot JW, Holman FA, et al. Consequences of CT colonography in stenosing colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32(3):367–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Billingsley KG, Morris AM, Dominitz JA, Matthews B, Dobie S, Barlow W, et al. Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship. Arch Surg. 2007;142(1):23–31 (discussion 2).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deans GT, Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST. Malignant obstruction of the left colon. Br J Surg. 1994;81(9):1270–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Serpell JW, McDermott FT, Katrivessis H, Hughes ES. Obstructing carcinomas of the colon. Br J Surg. 1989;76(9):965–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ascanelli S, Navarra G, Tonini G, Feo C, Zerbinati A, Pozza E, et al. Early and late outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer: elective versus emergency surgery. Tumori. 2003;89(1):36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lam AK, Chan SS, Leung M. Synchronous colorectal cancer: clinical, pathological and molecular implications. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(22):6815–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mulder SA, Kranse R, Damhuis RA, de Wilt JH, Ouwendijk RJ, Kuipers EJ, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of synchronous colorectal cancer: a Dutch population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35(5):442–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Horvat N, Raj A, Ward JM, Smith JJ, Markowitz AJ, Gollub MJ. Clinical value of CT colonography versus preoperative colonoscopy in the surgical management of occlusive colorectal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(2):333–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Flor N, Ceretti AP, Luigiano C, Brambillasca P, Savoldi AP, Verrusio C, et al. Performance of CT colonography in diagnosis of synchronous colonic lesions in patients with occlusive colorectal cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(2):348–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eickhoff A, Pickhardt PJ, Hartmann D, Riemann JF. Colon anatomy based on CT colonography and fluoroscopy: impact on looping, straightening and ancillary manoeuvres in colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42(4):291–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR. Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(4):774–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee ES, Kim BC, Hur BY, Kim MJ, Park HJ, Park SB, et al. Risk factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy based on the analysis of computed tomographic colonography findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018;42(5):675–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Silva AC, Wellnitz CV, Hara AK. Three-dimensional virtual dissection at CT colonography: unraveling the colon to search for lesions. Radiographics. 2006;26(6):1669–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Park JY, Kim SH, Lee SM, Lee JS, Han JK. CT volumetric measurement of colorectal cancer helps predict tumor staging and prognosis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0178522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang Z, Wang L, Kang L, Xiang J, Peng J, Cui J, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(7):1213–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not accept any grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisuke Tsurumaru.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board of our institution.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsurumaru, D., Nishimuta, Y., Kai, S. et al. Factors of incomplete colonoscopy for stenosing colorectal cancer: CT colonography features. Jpn J Radiol 38, 973–978 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00999-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00999-1

Keywords

Navigation