Skip to main content
Log in

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Obstructive Colorectal Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and short-term and long-term outcomes of colorectal cancer patients with obstruction compared to those of non-obstructive colorectal cancer patients.

Methods

Between January 1998 and December 2005, 1,672 colorectal cancer patients undergoing operation were enrolled in this study. Patients were classified into two groups according to the presentation: patients with complete obstructive colorectal cancer (COC, n = 215) receiving emergency procedures and patients with non-obstructive colorectal cancer (NOC, n = 1,457) receiving elective procedures. The data on the clinicopathologic characteristics and short-term and long-term outcomes of patients were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Among 1,672 colorectal cancer patients, 215 cases presented with complete obstruction. The distribution of tumor location and size, macroscopic type, depth of invasion, liver metastasis, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and TNM stage were found to be different between the COC and NOC groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that tumor location, depth of invasion, and peritoneal carcinomatosis were independent factors associated with obstruction. Patients with obstruction had an increased risk of death by a factor of 2.251 compared to patients without obstruction. Peritoneal carcinomatosis and TNM stage were independent factors for the survival of the COC group. Obstruction, peritoneal carcinomatosis, tumor macroscopic type, and TNM stage were independent indicators for postoperative recurrence. Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in the COC group than the NOC group. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates in the COC group were 47.8% and 42.8%, respectively, compared to 67.2% and 59.8% in the NOC group, respectively (p < 0.05). The postoperative recurrence rates were 43.1% in the COC group and 32.8% in the NOC group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Obstruction is an independent indicator for the survival and postoperative recurrence for patients with colorectal cancer. Patients in the COC group have worse overall survival with high postoperative recurrence rate compared to those in the NOC group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jiang JK, Lan YT, Lin TC, Chen WS, Yang SH, Wang HS, Chang SC, Lin JK. Primary vs. delayed resection for obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer: impact of surgery on patient outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008; 51(3):306–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen HS, Sheen-Chen SM. Obstruction and perforation in colorectal adenocarcinoma: an analysis of prognosis and current trends. Surgery. 2000; 127(4):370–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee YM, Law WL, Chu KW, Poon RT. Emergency surgery for obstructing colorectal cancers: a comparison between right-sided and left-sided lesions. J Am Coll Surg. 2001; 192 (6):719–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang TJ, Wang JY, Lee LW, Chen FM, Chuan CH, Chan HM, Hou MF, Huang CJ, Huang YS, Hsieh JS. Emergency one-stage surgery for obstructing left-sided colorectal carcinomas. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2002; 18(7):323–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Salvo GL, Gava C, Pucciarelli S, Lise M. Curative surgery for obstruction from primary left colorectal carcinoma: primary or staged resection? Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 ;(2):CD002101.

  6. Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Fry JS, Fielding LP. Malignant large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 1985; 72(4):296–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohman U. Prognosis in patients with obstructing colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1982; 143(6):742–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McArdle CS, Hole DJ. Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor 5-year survival. Br J Surg. 2004; 91(5):605–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mcardle CS, Mcmillan DC, Hole DJ. The impact of blood loss, obstruction and perforation on survival in patients undergoing curative resection for colon cancer. Br J Surg 2006; 93:483–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong SK, Kneebone A, Morgan M, Henderson CJ, Morgan A, Jalaludin B. Surgical management of colorectal cancer in south-western Sydney 1997–2001: a prospective series of 1293 unselected cases from six public hospitals. ANZ J Surg. 2005; 75(9):776–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM, Senapati A, Poloniecki JD, Stamatakis JD, Windsor AC. Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM). Br J Surg. 2004 Sep; 91(9):1174–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Metcalfe MS, Norwood MG, Miller AS, Hemingway D. Unreasonable expectations in emergency colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2005; 7(3):275–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Scott NA, Jeacock J, Kingston RD. Risk factors in patients presenting as an emergency with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1995; 82(3):321–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carraro PG, Segala M, Cesana BM, Tiberio G. Obstructing colonic cancer: failure and survival patterns over a ten-year follow-up after one-stage curative surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Feb; 44(2):243–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Diggs JC, Xu F, Diaz M, Cooper GS, Koroukian SM. Failure to screen: predictors and burden of emergency colorectal cancer resection. Am J Manag Care. 2007; 13(3):157–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Li C. Risk factors for obstruction, perforation, or emergency admission at presentation in patients with colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101(5):1098–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ho YH, Siu SK, Buttner P, Stevenson A, Lumley J, Stitz R. The effect of obstruction and perforation on colorectal cancer disease-free survival. World J Surg. 2010; 34(5):1091–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong SK, Jalaludin BB, Morgan MJ, Berthelsen AS, Morgan A, Gatenby AH, Fulham SB. Tumor pathology and long-term survival in emergency colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008; 51(2):223–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Runkel NS, Hinz U, Lehnert T, Buhr HJ, Herfarth Ch. Improved outcome after emergency surgery for cancer of the large intestine. Br J Surg. 1998; 85(9):1260–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Biondo S, Martí-Ragué J, Kreisler E, Parés D, Martín A, Navarro M, Pareja L, Jaurrieta E. A prospective study of outcomes of emergency and elective surgeries for complicated colonic cancer. Am J Surg. 2005; 189(4):377–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bass G, Fleming C, Conneely J, Martin Z, Mealy K. Emergency first presentation of colorectal cancer predicts significantly poorer outcomes: a review of 356 consecutive Irish patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52(4):678–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alvarez JA, Baldonedo RF, Bear IG, Truán N, Pire G, Alvarez P. Presentation, treatment, and multivariate analysis of risk factors for obstructive and perforative colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2005; 190(3):376–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Biondo S, Kreisler E, Millan M, Fraccalvieri D, Golda T, Martí Ragué J, Salazar R. Differences in patient postoperative and long-term outcomes between obstructive and perforated colonic cancer. Am J Surg. 2008; 195(4): 427–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tentes AA, Mirelis CG, Kakoliris S, Korakianitis OS, Bougioukas IG, Tsalkidou EG, Xanthoulis AI, Bekiaridou KA, Dimoulas AI. Results of surgery for colorectal carcinoma with obstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009; 394(1):49–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mulcahy HE, Skelly MM, Husain A, O’Donoghue DP. Long-term outcome following curative surgery for malignant large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 1996; 83(1):46–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim JS, Hur H, Min BS, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim NK. Oncologic outcomes of self-expanding metallic stent insertion as a bridge to surgery in the management of left-sided colon cancer obstruction: comparison with nonobstructing elective surgery. World J Surg. 2009; 33(6): 1281–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dastur JK, Forshaw MJ, Modarai B, Solkar MM, Raymond T, Parker MC. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes following either insertion of self-expanding metallic stents or emergency surgery in malignant large bowel obstruction. Tech Coloproctol. 2008; 12(10: 51–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Park IJ, Choi GS, Kang BM, Lim KH, Lee IT, Jeon SW, Jun SH. Comparison of one-stage managements of obstructing left-sided colon and rectal cancer: stent-laparoscopic approach vs. intraoperative colonic lavage. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13(5): 960–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported partially by a grant (no. 30872488) from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and a grant (no. 8451008901000502) from the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianping Wang.

Additional information

Zuli Yang and Lei Wang contributed equally to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Wang, L., Kang, L. et al. Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Obstructive Colorectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15, 1213–1222 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1563-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1563-1

Keywords

Navigation