Skip to main content
Log in

A method to estimate the maximum stress time in a fault zone before an earthquake

  • Research Article - Solid Earth Sciences
  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On the basis of Coulomb criterion and Anderson theory of faulting, a method for estimating the time of maximum shear stress of a failure after an earthquake is proposed in this paper. After the earthquake and in the strain recovery time interval, the second derivative of shear stress versus time is positive and approaches to a turning point. After the turning point by employing the curve fitting and extrapolation by an optimal polynomial, the maximum shear stress and its corresponding time can be estimated. In the proposed method, the real-time variation of stress, distributed at any point along the fault, can be measured by a distributed optical fiber stress sensor. The method is verified in the theoretical framework and experimental data prior to 2011 Tohoku (Japan) and 2014 Alaska earthquakes. The proposed method is statistically investigated according to the data of successive earthquakes of M ≥ 5 in Parkfield, Kuhbanan, and Golbaf–Sirch faults. The predicted time is in good agreement with the experimental results. Consequently on the basis of real-time measurements, a time-predictable model is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson EM (1905) The dynamics of faulting. Trans. Edinburgh Geol Soc 8:387–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apostol TM )1974( 2nd Edition, Mathematical Analysis, Pearson, 512.

  • Bahrampour AR, Maasoumi F (2010) Resolution enhancement in long pulse OTDR for application in structural health monitoring. Opt Fiber Technol 16:240–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrampour AR, Bathaee M, Tofighi S, Bahrampour A, Farman F, Vali M (2012) Polarization maintaining optical fiber multi-intruder sensor. Opt and Laser Tech 44:2026–2031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizzarri A (2012) What can physical source models tell us about the recurrence time of earthquakes? Earth Science Reviews 115:304–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson AB, Crilly PB, Rutledge JC )2002( 4th edition, Communication Systems, McGraw-Hill, 850.

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. BSSA 58:1583–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Debnath L, Ahmad Shah F (2015) 2th edition, Wavelet Transforms and Their Applications, Birkhäuser Basel, 553.

  • Fossen H, Cavalcante GCG (2017) Shear zones–A review. Earth Sci Rev 171:434–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ear-scirev.2017.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Y, Liu Z, Freymueller JT (2015) Spatiotemporal variations of the slow slip event between 2008 and 2013 in the southcentral Alaska subduction zone. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 16:2450–2461. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GC005904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huwaldt J (2005) Plot Digitizer, Available : http://plotdigitizer.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 2011 Jun 28.

  • Jaeger JC, Cook NGW, Zimmerman RW )2007( 4nd Edition. Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, Stockholm: Blackwell Publishing.

  • Jalal Kamali H, Bidokhti AA, Amiri H (2009) Relation between integral effect of sub-surface temperature variation (I) and seismic effects. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1815–1821. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1815-2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly RJH, Sanderson DJ (1997) A Mohr circle reconstruction for the opening of a pre-existing fracture. J Struct Geol 19:887–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan BAF, Shan D, Nathaniel JL, Inder M, Chris T, Michelle R, Veronica RT, Craig U, Barry F, Thomas D, Xiaoye L (2018) Distributed Acoustic Sensing Using Dark Fiber for Near-Surface Characterization and Broadband Seismic Event Detection. Nat Commun 9:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36675-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2002) TableCurve 2D.v5.01 for Windows. CA 95110 USA. SYSTAT Software Inc.; 2002. 1735 . Technology Drive. Suite 430.

  • Kimura T, Kobayashi Y, Naruse R, Xue Z (2018) Earthquake Event Monitoring in a Well Using Optical Fiber and DAS TechnologyJapan Geoscience Union Meeting.

  • King GC, Cocco M (2001) Fualt internasional by elastic stress changes: new clues from Earthquake sequences. Adv Geophys 44:1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiremidjian AS, Anagnos T (1984) Stochastic slip predictable model for earthquake occurrences. BSSA 74:739–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Krezsek C, Lapadat A, Matenco L, Arnberger K, Barbu V, Olaru R (2013) Strain partitioning at orogenic contacts during rotation, strike – slip and oblique convergence: Paleogene – Early Miocene evolution of the contact between the South Carpathians and Moesia. Global Planet Change 103:63–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lay T, Wallace TC (1995) Modern global seismology. Academic Press, San Diego, California, p 521

    Google Scholar 

  • Markou N, Papanastasiou P (2018) Petroleum geomechanics modelling in the Eastern Mediterranean basin: analysis and application of fault stress mechanics. Oil Gas Sci Technol 73:1–19. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2018034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeagney CJ, Boulter CA, Jolly RJH, Foster RP (2004) 3-D Mohr circle analysis of vein opening, Indaramalode – gold deposit, Zimbabwe: implications for exploration. J Struct Geol 26:1275–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei A, Bahrampour AR, Taraz M, Bahrampour A, Bahrampour MJ, Ahmadi Foroushani SM (2013) Transient response of buried oil pipelines fiber optic leak detector based on the distributed temperature measurement. Int J Heat Mass Transf 65:110–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogi K (1985) Earthquake Prediction. Academic Press, Tokyo, p 355

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakstad H, Kringlebotn JT (2008) Realisation of a full – scale fibre optic ocean bottom seismic system, 19th InternationalConference on Optical Fibre Sensors, edited by David Sampson, Stephen Collins, Kyunghwan Oh, Ryozo Yamauchi, Proc. of SPIE., 7004: 7004361 – 7004361, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.791158.

  • Papazachos BC (1989) A time predictable model for earthquake generation in Greece. Bull Seismo Soc Am 79:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Papazachos BC, Papadimitriou EE, Karakaisis GF (1994) Time dependent seismicity in the zones of the continental fracturesystem, Pro. XXIV General Assembly of European Seismological Commission, Athens, Greece, 1099–1107.

  • Papoulis A (1991) 3rd edition. Probability Random Variables and Stochastic Processes, McGraw-Hill, the University of California, 666.

  • Parry RHG (2004) Mohr Circles. Second Edition, Spon Press, London and New York, Stress Paths and Geotechnics, p 280

    Google Scholar 

  • Paudyal H, Singh HN, Shankar D, Singh VP (2008) Validity of Time – Predictable Seismicity Model for Nepal and its AdjoiningRegions. Journal of Nepal Geological Society 38:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid HF (1910) The mechanism of the Earthquake, in: the California Earthquake of April 18, 1906: report of the state Earthquake Investigation Commission, Washington D.C. Carnegie Institution. 2: 1–92.

  • Rudin W (1976) 3rd edition. Principles of Mathematical Analysis, McGraw-Hill, 342.

  • Rutter E, Hackston A (2017) On the effective stress law for rock-on-rock frictional sliding, and fault slip triggered by means of fluid injection. Philosophical Transactions Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sciences 375:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadri H (2009) Mathematical Methods For Students of Physics and Related Fields, springer, 856.

  • Sajjadi SA (2006) main language. Ferdowsi University of Mashahad, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, p 558

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakaguchi K, Yokoyama T, Lin W, Watanabe N (2017) Stress buildup and drop in inland shallow crust caused by the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake events. Sci Rep 7:10242. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10897-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanji MD, Noghani FE, Bahrampour A, Bahrampour AR (2019) A proposal for distributed humidity sensor based on the induced LPFG in a periodic polymer coated fiber structure. Optic Laser Technol 117:126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz WL, Conteb JP, Udda E (2001) long gage fiber optic bragg grating strain sensors to monitor civil structures. Proceedings of the SPIE 4330:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.434156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanker D, Singh VP (1996) Regional Time- and Magnitude predictable Seismicity model for north-east India and vicinity, Acta Geod. Geoph Hung 31:181–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanker D, Singh HN (2007) Application of the time – predictable model in Peninsular India for future seismic hazard assessment assessment. Acta Geophys 55:302–312. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-007-0017-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimazaki K, Nakata T (1980) Time-predictable recurrence model of large earthquakes, Geophysical Res. Letter 7:279–282. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL007i004p00279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibson RH (1985) A note on fault reactivation. J Struct Geol 7:751–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streit JE, Hillis RR (2002) Estimating fluid pressures that can induce reservoir failure during hydrocarbon depletion, Int. Rock Mechanics Conference, Texas, Irving, Paper SPE 78226.

  • Taghipour M, Ghafoori M, Lashkaripour GR, Hafezi Moghaddas N, Molaghab A (2019) Estimation of the current stress field and fault reactivation analysis in the Asmari reservoir. SW Iran, Petroleum Science 16:513–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-019-0331-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terakawa T, Zoporowski A, Galvan B, Miller SA (2010) High-pressure fluid at hypocentral depths in the L’Aquila region inferred from earthquake focal mechanisms. Geology 38:995–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzanis A, Vallianatos F (2003) Distributed power-law seismicity changes and crustal deformation in the SW Hellenic Arc. Nat Hazard 3:179–195. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-3-179-2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzanis A, Vallianatos F, Makropoulos K (2000) Seismic and electric precursors to the 17–1 – 1983, M 7 Kefallinia earthquake, Greece: signatures of a SOC system. Phys Chem Earth (a) 25:281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1895(00)00045-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1989) Predicting earthquakes by analyzing accelerating precursory seismic activity. Pure Appl Geophys 130:661–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen W, Kalkan E (2017) System identification based on deconvolution and cross correlation: An application to a 20 - story instrumented building in Anchorage, Alaska. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107:718–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu SS, Nieto Samaniego AF, Alaniz Alvarez AS (2010) 3D Mohr diagram to explain reactivation of pre-existing planes due to changes in applied stresses, Rock Stress and Earthquakes, Conference Paper,

  • Yamashita T (1976) On the dynamical process of fault motion in the presence of friction and inhomogeneous initial stress, Part I. Rupture Propagation J Phys Earth 24:417–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin ZM, Ranalli G (1992) Critical stress difference, faultorientation and slip direction in anisotropic rocks undernon – Andersonian stress systems. J Struct Geol 14:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokota Y, Koketsu K (2015) A very long-term transient event preceding the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. Nat Commun 6:5934. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoback MD (2007) Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Amiri Khamkani.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Sumiyoshi Abe (ASSOCIATE EDITOR), Ramon Zuñiga (CO-EDITOR-IN-CHIEF).

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 1

Reference Appendix

Bakun WH, Lindh AG (1985) The Parkfield, California, earthquake prediction experiment, Science, 229: 619–624, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.229.4714.619.

Berberian M (1981) Active faulting and tectonics of iran, in: Zagros–Hindukush–Himalaya Geodynamic evolution, Gupta, H. K.and Delany, F. M., (eds), Am. Geophys. Union and Geol. Soc. Am., Geodyn. Ser., 3: 33–69, https://doi.org/10.1029/GD003p0033.

Berberian M, Jackson JA, Fielding E, Parsons BE, Priestley K, Qorashi M, Talebian M, Walker R, Wright TJ, Baker C (2001) The 1998 March 14 Fandoqa earthquake (Mw 6.6) in Kerman province, southeast Iran: re-rupture of the 1981 Sirch earthquake fault, triggering of slip on adjacent thrusts and the active tectonics of the Gowk fault zone, Geophys. J. Int, 146: 371–398,https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2001.01459.x.

Berberian M, Jackson JA, Ghorashi M, Kadjar MH (1984) Field and teleseismic observations of the 1981 Golbaf–Sirch earthquakes In SE Iran, Geophysical Journal International, 77: 809 – 838, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb02223.x.

Berberian M, Navai I (1978) Naghan (Chahar Mahal Bakhtiari-High Zagros, Iran) earthquake of 6 april 1977. A preliminary field report and a seismotectonic discussion, Annals of geophysics, 31: 5-27, https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-4741.

Harry OW (1955) The 1857 earthquake in California, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 45: 47-67.

Ruth AH, Arrowsmith JR (2006) Introduction to the Special Issue on the 2004 Parkfield earthquake and the Parkfield earthquake Prediction Experiment, Bull. Seismo. Soc. Am., 96: S1–S10, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050831.

Talebian M, Biggs J, Bolourchi M, Copley A, Ghassemi A, Ghorashi M, Hollingsworth J, Jackson J, Nissen E, Oveisi B, Parsons B, Priestley K, Saiidi A (2006) The Dahuiyeh (Zarand) earthquake of 2005 February 22 in central Iran: reactivation of an intramountain reverse fault, Geophysical Journal International, 164: 137 - 148 , https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02839x.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amiri Khamkani, H., Tavakoli Chatroodi, M.R. & Bahrampour, A. A method to estimate the maximum stress time in a fault zone before an earthquake. Acta Geophys. 69, 2145–2159 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00651-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00651-0

Keywords

Navigation