Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of bronchial function of NHBD lung following one-h warm ischemia by organ bath model

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study investigated the feasibility and effects of organ bath to be used for detection of bronchial function of non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) lung after 1-h warm ischemia. Sixteen Swedish pigs were divided into two groups randomly: heart-beating donor (HBD) group and NHBD with 1-h warm ischemia (NHBD-1 h) group. The bronchial rings whose lengths and inner diameters were both 1.5 mm were obtained from isolated left lungs of all the pigs. Acetylcholine, arachidonic acid natrium and papaverine were used to test and compare the contractile and relaxant function of bronchial smooth muscles and epithelium-dependent relaxation (EpiDR) response between HBD and NHBD-1 h groups. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the values of bronchial precontraction between HBD and NHBD-1 h groups (5.18±0.07 vs 5.10±0.11 mN, P>0.05). No significant difference in the values of EpiDR responses between HBD and NHBD-1 h groups (1.26±0.05 vs 1.23±0.07 mN, P>0.05) was observed either. During the process of EpiDR induction, the rings had no spontaneous relaxation in two groups. In addition, papaverine solution completely relaxed the bronchial smooth muscles of all bronchial rings. It was concluded that after warm ischemia for 1 h, the contractile and relaxant abilities of bronchial smooth muscles, and the epithelium-dependent adjustment both kept intact. Organ bath model could be a liable and scientific way to evaluate the bronchial function of NHBD lung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meyers BF, Lynch J, Trulock EP, et al. Lung transplantation: a decade of experience. Ann Surg, 1999,230:362–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bando T, Date H, Minami M, et al. First registry report: lung transplantation in Japan: The Japanese Society of Lung and Heart-Lung Transplantation. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008,56:17–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Steen S, Sjoberg T, Pierre L, et al. Transplantation of lungs from a non-heart-beating donor. Lancet, 2001,357: 825–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dark JH. Lung transplantation from the non-heart-beating donor. Transplantation, 2008,86:200–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garrity ER, Moore J, Mulligan MS, et al. Heart and lung transplantation in the United States, 1996–2005. Am J Transplant, 2007,7:1390–1403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sung RS, Galloway J, Tuttle-Newhall JE, et al. Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 1997–2006. Am J Transplant, 2008,8:922–934

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Orens JB, Boehler A, de Perrot M, et al. A review of lung transplant donor acceptablity criteria. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2003,22:1183–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pierre AF, Sekine Y, Hutcheon MA, et al. Marginal donor lungs: a reassessment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2002,123:421–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oto T, Levvey BJ, Whitford H, et al. Feasibility and utility of a lung donor score: correlation with early post-transplant outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007,83:257–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bowdish ME, Barr ML, Starnes VA. Living lobar transplantation. Chest Surg Clin N Am, 2003,13:505–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Date H, Kusano KF, Matsubara H, et al. Living-donor lobar lung transplantation for pulmonary arterial hypertension after failure of epoprostenol therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007,50:523–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pierre AF, Keshavjee S. Lung transplantation: donor and recipient critical care aspects. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2005, 11:339–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Starzl TE, Marchioro TL, Von Kaulla KN, et al. Homo-transplantation of the liver in humans. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1963,117:659–676

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hardy JD, Webb WR, Dalton ML Jr, et al. Lung homo-transplantation in man. JAMA, 1963,186:1065–1074

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oto T. Lung transplantation from donation after cardiac death (non-heart-beating) donors. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008,56:533–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oto T, Levvey B, McEgan R, et al. A practical approach to clinical lung transplantation from a Maastricht Category III donor with cardiac death. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2007,26:196–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tazzeo T, Zuo J, Ellis R, et al. Silk suture used in standard organ bath studies contracts upon exposure to Krebs buffer. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods, 2002,48:179–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Perrault LP, Nickner C, Desjardins N, et al. Improved preservation of coronary endothelial function with Celsior compared with blood and crystalloid solutions in heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplantat, 2001,20:549–558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. de Antonio DG, Marcos R, Laporta R, et al. Results of clinical lung transplant from uncontrolled non-heart-beating donors. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2007,26:529–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Egan TM, Lambert CJ Jr, Reddick R, et al. A strategy to increase the donor pool: use of cadaver lungs for transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg, 1991,52:1113–1121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Raemdonck DE, Rega FR, Neyrinck AP, et al. Non-heart-beating donors. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004,16:309–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Snell GI, Oto T, Levvey B, et al. Evaluation of techniques for lung transplantation following donation after cardiac death. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006,81:2014–2019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Raemdonck DE, Jannis NC, De Leyn PR, et al. Warm ischemic tolerance in collapsed pulmonary grafts is limited to 1 hour. Ann Surg, 1998,228:788–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Steen S, Ingemansson R, Budrikis A, et al. Successful transplantation of lungs topically cooled in the non-heart-beating donor for 6 hours. Ann Thorac Surg, 1997,63:345–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Egan TM. Non-heart-beating donors in thoracic transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2004,23:3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rega FR, Neyrinck AP, Verleden GM, et al. How long can we preserve the pulmonary graft inside the non-heart-beating donor? Ann Thorac Surg, 2004,77:438–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oto T, Rowland M, Griffiths AP, et al. Third-time lung transplant using extended criteria lungs. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007,84:642–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Snell GI, Levvey BJ, Oto T, et al. Early lung transplantation success utilizing controlled donation after cardiac death donors. Am J Transplant, 2008,8:1282–1289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Zhao, S., Liao, Q. et al. Detection of bronchial function of NHBD lung following one-h warm ischemia by organ bath model. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 29, 340–343 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-009-0315-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-009-0315-x

Key words

Navigation