Skip to main content
Log in

A case-control study on high-risk factors for newborn hearing loss in seven cities of Shandong province

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To investigate the high-risk factors for newborn hearing loss and to provide information for preventing the development of hearing loss and delaying its progression, from May 2003 to June 2006, neonates who failed to pass the universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) were referred to Jinan Newborn Hearing Screening and Rehabilitation Center from 7 newborn hearing screening centers in seven cities of Shandong province. One-to-one pair-matched case-control method was employed for statistical analysis of the basic features of definitely identified cases. High-risk factors relating to the bilateral hearing loss were evaluated by univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis. Our results revealed that 721 transferred newborns who didn’t pass the hearing screening received audiological and medical evaluation and 367 were confirmed to have hearing loss. Of them, 177 neonates with hearing loss who met the matching requirements were included in the study as subjects. Univariate analysis showed that high-risk factors related to hearing loss incuded age of father, education backgrounds of parents, parity, birth weight, gestational weeks, craniofacial deformity, history of receiving treatment in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), neonatal disease, family history of otopathy and family history of congenital hearing loss. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that 4 independent risk factors were related to bilateral hearing loss, including parity (OR=16.285, 95% CI 3.379–78.481), neonatal disease (OR=34.968, 95% CI 2.720–449.534), family history of congenital hearing loss (OR=69.488, 95% CI 4.417–1093.300) and birth weight (OR=0.241, 95% CI 0.090–0.648). It is concluded that parity, neonatal disease and family history of hearing loss are the promoting factors of bilateral hearing loss in neonates and appropriate intervention measures should be taken to deal with the risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2000 Position Statement: Principles and Guideline for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs. Pediatrics, 2000,106(4):798–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berg A L, Spitzer J B, Towers H M et al. Newborn hearing screening in the NICU: profile of failed auditory brainstem response/passed otoacoustic emission. Pediatrics, 2005,114(6):933–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Uus K, Bamford J. Effectiveness of population-based newborn hearing screening in England: ages of interventions and profile of cases. Pediatrics, 2006,117:e887–893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vohr B R, Widen J E, Cone-Wesson B et al. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: char-acteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery. Ear Hear, 2000,21(5):373–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rovet J, Walker W, Bliss B et al. Long-team hearing impairment in congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr, 1996,128(6):776–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ari-Even Roth D, Hildesheimer M, Maayan-Metzger A et al. Low prevalence of hearing impairment among very low birthweight infants as detected by universal neonatal hearing screening. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2006,91:F257–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iwasaki S, Yamashita M, Maeda M et al. Audiological outcome of infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a prospective Study. Audiol Neurootol, 2006,12:31–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Qiu X Q, Zeng X Y, Qin D D et al. A case-control study on the risk factor of perinatals’ congenital malformations in seven cities of Guangxi. Chin J Epidemiol (Chinese), 2003,24(6):512–515

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen P, Tang A Z, Su J P et al. Characteristics of hearing loss in 299 high-risk neonates. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg (Chinese), 2005,40(5):335–338

    Google Scholar 

  10. Castilla E E, Orioli I M. Prevalence rates of microtia in South America. Int J Epidemiol, 1986,15(3):364–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Du J M, Guo W H, Han J et al. Case control study on risk factors of congenital microtia. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg (Chinese), 2006,41(2):107–111

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weichbold V, Nekahm-Heis D, Welzl-Mueller K et al. Universal newborn hearing screening and postnatal hearing loss. Pediatrics, 2006,117:e631–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Norris V W, Arnos K S, Hanks W D et al. Does universal newborn hearing screening identify all children with GJB2 (Connexin 26) deafness? Penetrance of GJB2 deafness. Ear Hear, 2006,27(6):732–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravecca F, Berrettini S, Forli F et al. Cx26 gene mutations in idiopathic progressive hearing loss. J Otolaryngol, 2005,34:126–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pagarkar W, Bitner-Glindzicz M, Knight J. Late postnatal onset of hearing loss due to GJB2 mutations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2006,70(9):1119–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

NIE Wenying, female, born in 1968, Associate Professor

This project is supported by a grant from the National Natural Sciences Foundation (No. 30100207) and a grant from the Top Ten Scientific Research Programs of Shandong Province (No. 2004GG3202003).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nie, W., Wu, H., Qi, Y. et al. A case-control study on high-risk factors for newborn hearing loss in seven cities of Shandong province. J. Huazhong Univ. Sc. Technol. 27, 217–220 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-007-0230-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-007-0230-y

Key words

Navigation