Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interlaminar Bonding Performance of UHPC/SMA Based on Diagonal Shear Test

  • Cementitious Materials
  • Published:
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed. Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate various interlaminar bonding reinforcement techniques used for steel bridge decks, the UHPC surface was roughened with shot blasting (SB), transverse grooving (TG) and surface embedded stone (S), epoxy resin (E), epoxy asphalt (EA) and high viscosity high elasticity asphalt (HV) as interlayer bonding materials. In addition, a diagonal shear test was conducted using a self-designed diagonal shear jig. The effects of adhesive layer materials type, surface texture type, and different loading rates on the interlaminar bonding performance of UHPC/SMA combination specimens were investigated. The experimental study showed that the peak shear strength and shear modulus of the combined specimen decreased gradually with the decrease of thermosetting of the adhesive layer materials. The peak shear fracture energy of E was greater than that of HV and EA. The synergistic effect of the contact force generated by the roughing of the UHPC surface, the friction force, and the bonding force provided by the adhesive layer material can significantly improve the interlaminar shear performance of the assemblies. The power-law function of shear strength and shear modulus was proposed. The power-law model of peak shear strength and loading rate was verified. The shear strength and predicted shear strength satisfy the positive proportional functions with scale factors of 0.985, 1.015, 0.961, and 1.028, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hu S G. Research and Application of New Steel Bridge Deck Pavement Technology[C]. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the National Urban Highway Association, 2005

  2. Ding Q J. The Invention Relates to a Bridge Deck Paving Method[P]. CN104562888A, 2015–04-29, 2015

  3. Jia X Y, Hu W, Zhu D. Investigation of Interlayer Shear Failure of Concrete Bridge Deck Asphalt Overlay Utilizing Shear Strength Envelopes[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2021, 123: 105 278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Diakhaté M, Millien A, Petit C, et al. Experimental Investigation of Tack Coat Fatigue Performance: Towards an Improved Lifetime Assessment of Pavement Structure Interfaces[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25(2): 1 123–1 133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walubita L F, Fuentes L, Lee S I, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Five HMA Rutting-related Laboratory Test Methods Relative to Field Performance Data: DM, FN, RLPD, SPST, and HWTT[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 215: 737–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang W B, Hu K, Feng S, et al. Shear Behavior of Hydraulic Asphalt Concrete at Different Temperatures and Strain Rates[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 230: 117 022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng Q. Study on Improving Skid Resistance of Old Asphalt Pavement by Shot Blasting Technology[D]. Dalian: Daliann Maritime University, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ministry of Transport of China. Technical Guidelines for the Construction of Highway Cement Concrete Pavements[S]. JTG/T F30–2014, 2014

  9. Sudarsanan N, Karpurapu R, Amrithalingam. An Investigation on the Interface Bond Strength of Geosynthetic-reinforced Asphalt Concrete Using the Leutner Shear Test[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 186: 423–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen J S, Huang C C. Effect of Surface Characteristics on Bonding Properties of Bituminous Tack Coat[J]. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010, 2180(1): 142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang L, Wu Z Y, Huang W B. Research on Interfacial Shear Characteristics of Crumb Rubber Modified Asphalt Concrete Bridge Deck Pavement Structure[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 96: 1 341–1 349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang K, Li R, Yu Y, et al. Evaluation of Interlayer Stability in Asphalt Pavements Based on Shear Fatigue Property[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 258: 119 628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li J, Xia Y, Wang W P, et al. Bond Performances Between Asphalt Surface and UHPC of Ultra-high Performance Lightweight Composite Decks[J]. Journal of Hunan University, 2019, 46(5): 11–20

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shao X D, Qiu M H, Yan B F, et al. A Review on the Research and Application of Ultra-high Performance Concrete in Bridge Engineering Around the World[J]. Materials Review, 2017, 31(23): 33–43

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang M. Prediction Study for Steel Bridge Asphalt Pavement Structural Damage[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huang Q B, Qian Z D, Chen L L, et al. Evaluation of Epoxy Asphalt Rubber with Silane Coupling Agent Used as a Tack Coat for Seasonally Frozen Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 241: 117 957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Walubita L F, Nyamuhokya T P, Komba J J, et al. Comparative Assessment of the Interlayer Shear-bond Strength of Geogrid Reinforcements in Hot-mix asphalt[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 191: 726–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Canestrari F, Ferrotti G, Partl M N, et al. Advanced Testing and Characterization of Interlayer Shear Resistance[J]. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2005, 1929(1): 69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tozzo C, D’Andrea A, Cozzani D, et al. Fatigue Investigation of the Interface Shear Performance in Asphalt Pavement[J]. Modern Applied Science, 2014, 8(2): 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fan X Y, Luo R. Experimental Study on the Crack Resistance of Typical Steel-bridge-deck Paving Materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 277: 122 315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu P J, Zhu X T, Cong P L, et al. Modification of Alkyl Group Terminated Hyperbranched Polyester on Paving Epoxy Asphalt[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 165: 295–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dong V D, Quynh-Anh T B, Dam D N, et al. Prediction of Interlayer Shear Strength of Double-layer Asphalt Using Novel Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Models of ANFIS and Metaheuristic Optimizations[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 323: 126 595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang J Y, Xiao F P, Chen, Z, et al. Application of Tack Coat in Pavement Engineering[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 152: 856–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ministry of Transport of China. Specifications for Design and Construction of Pavement on Highway Steel Deck Bridge[S]. JTG/T 3364–02-2019, 2019

  25. Walubita L F, Faruk Abu NM, Fuentes L, et al. Using the Simple Punching Shear Test (SPST) for Evaluating the HMA Shear Properties and Predicting Field Rutting Performance[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 224: 920–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Li J, Chen S Y, Huang C, et al. Correlation Between Static Properties and Fatigue Life of UHPC-SMA Layers[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 49(03): 14–22

    Google Scholar 

  27. AMELIAN S, KIM Y R. Performance Assessment of Interlayer: with Different Tack Coats by Considering Loading Types and Failure Modes[J]. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018, 2672(28): 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shen J A. Road Performance of Asphalt and Asphalt Mixtures[M]. Beijing: The People’s Communications Publishing House, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  29. Canestrari F, Roche C D L, Benedetto H D, et al. Advances in Interlaboratory Testing and Evaluation of Bituminous Materials[M]. Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2013

  30. Abuaddous M, Canestrari F, Graziani A, et al. Influence of Specimen Dimension and Test Speed on the Shear Strength of Bituminous Interfaces[M]. Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2016

Download references

Funding

Funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos. U21A20149 and 51878003)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, China

    Qingjun Ding  (丁庆军), Yuxiang Lei & Kaizheng Guo

  2. Advanced Building Materials Key Laboratory of Anhui Province, School of Material Science and Chemical Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, 230601, China

    Qingjun Ding  (丁庆军) & Gaozhan Zhang  (张高展)

  3. Wuhan Municipal Construction Group Co., Ltd, Wuhan, 430023, China

    Huaqiang Cheng

  4. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang, 110000, China

    Mingyu Zhao

Authors
  1. Qingjun Ding  (丁庆军)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuxiang Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gaozhan Zhang  (张高展)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huaqiang Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mingyu Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kaizheng Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaozhan Zhang  (张高展).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, Q., Lei, Y., Zhang, G. et al. Interlaminar Bonding Performance of UHPC/SMA Based on Diagonal Shear Test. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mat. Sci. Edit. 38, 97–108 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-023-2672-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-023-2672-1

Key words

Search

Navigation