Abstract
In this research, we extend Luenberger’s (J Econ Dyn Contr 26(10), 1613–1628, 2002) results on zero-level pricing method to the market with transaction cost. We show that the zero-level price exists in this market. Both the zero-level pricing method and the no-arbitrage pricing method produce price intervals, but the zero-level price interval is smaller than the no-arbitrage price interval. Although the zero-level price interval in general depends on the utility function and initial wealth, we show the zero-level price interval is identical for all individuals with different levels of initial wealth and the HARA utility functions in which one parameter is fixed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiyagari R., Gertler M.: Asset returns with transaction costs and uninsured individual risk. J. Monetar. Econ. 27(3), 311–331 (1991)
Amihud Y., Mendelson H.: Liquidity, asset prices and financial policy. Financial Anal. J. 47(6), 55–66 (1991)
Berge C.: Topological spaces. Macmillan, New York (1979)
Bernardo A., Ledoit O.: Gain, loss and asset pricing. J. Polit. Econ. 108(1), 144–172 (2000)
Cochrane J., Saá Requejo J.: Beyond arbitrage: good-deal asset price bounds in incomplete markets. J. Polit. Econ. 108(1), 79–119 (2000)
Constantinides G.M.: Capital market equilibrium with transaction costs. J. Polit. Econ. 94(4), 842–862 (1986)
Dalakouras G., Kwon R., Pardalos P.M.: Semidefinite programming approaches for bounding Asian option prices. In: Konthoghiorges, E.J., Rustem, B., Winker, P. (eds) Computational Methods in Financial Engineering, pp. 103–116. Springer, New York (2008)
Dermody J.C., Prisman E.Z.: No arbitrage and valuation in markets with realistic transaction costs. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 28(1), 65–80 (1993)
Duffie D., Sun T.: Transaction costs and portfolio choice in a discrete-continuous time setting. J. Econ. Dynam. Contr. 14(1), 35–51 (1990)
Dumas B., Luciano E.: An exact solution to the portfolio choice problem under transaction costs. J. Finance 46(2), 577–595 (1991)
Garman M.B., Ohlson J.A.: Valuation of risky assets in arbitrage free economies with transaction costs. J. Financial Econ. 9(3), 271–280 (1981)
Guu S.-M., Wang J.-N.: Zero-level pricing and the HARA utility functions. J. Optim. Theor. Appl. 139(2), 393–402 (2008)
Holtan, H.M.: Asset valuation and optimal portfolio choice in incomplete markets, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University (1997)
Hugonnier J., Kramkov D., Schachermayer W.: On utility-based pricing of contingent claims in incomplete markets. Math. Finance 15(2), 203–212 (2005)
Karatzas L., Lehoczky J.P., Shreve S.E., Xu G.L.: Martingale and duality methods for utility maximization in incomplete markets. SIAM J. Contr. Optim. 29(3), 702–730 (1991)
Li P., Xia J., Yan J.: Martingale measure method for expected utility maximization in discrete-time incomplete markets. Ann. Econ. Finance 2, 445–465 (2001)
Luenberger D.G.: Investment science. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)
Luenberger D.G.: Arbitrage and universal pricing. J. Econ. Dyn. Contr. 26(10), 1613–1628 (2002)
Luenberger D.G.: Pricing a nontradeable asset and its derivatives. J. Optim. Theor. Appl. 121(3), 465–487 (2004)
Pardalos P.M., Tsitsiringos V.: Financial engineering, supply chain and e-commerce. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)
Pliska S.R.: Introduction to Mathematical Finance: Discrete Time Models. Basil Blackwell Press, Malden (1997)
Prisman E.Z.: Valuation of risky assets in arbitrage-free economies with frictions. J. Finance 41(3), 545–557 (1986)
Ross S.A.: The arbitrage pricing theory. J. Econ. Theor. 13(3), 341–360 (1976)
Ross S.A.: A simple approach to the valuation of risky streams. J. Bus. 51(3), 453–475 (1978)
Smith J.E., Nau R.F.: Valuing risky projects: options pricing theory and decision analysis. Manag. Sci. 41(5), 795–816 (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guu, SM., Wang, JN. & Wu, SC. Zero-level pricing method with transaction cost. Optim Lett 6, 375–392 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-011-0400-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-011-0400-5