Earthquake Science

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 321–329 | Cite as

A cloud-based synthetic seismogram generator implemented using Windows Azure

Research Paper

Abstract

Synthetic seismograms generated by solving the seismic wave equation using numerical methods are being widely used in seismology. For fully three-dimensional seismic structure models, the generation of these synthetic seismograms may require large amount of computing resources. Conventional high-performance computer clusters may not provide a cost-effective solution to this type of applications. The newly emerging cloud-computing platform provides an alternative solution. In this paper, we describe our implementation of a synthetic seismogram generator based on the reciprocity principle using the Windows Azure cloud application framework. Our preliminary experiment shows that our cloud-based synthetic seismogram generator provides a cost-effective and numerically efficient approach for computing synthetic seismograms based on the reciprocity principle.

Keywords

Reciprocity Synthetic seismogram Cloud computing Windows Azure 

References

  1. Akcelik V, Bielak J, Biros G, Epanomeritakis I, Fernandez A, Ghattas O, Kim EJ, Lopez J, O'Hallaron D, Tu T, Urbanic J (2003) High resolution forward and inverse earthquake modeling on terascale computers. Proceedings of the 2003 ACM/IEEE conference on supercomputing, pp 52–73Google Scholar
  2. Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative seismology, 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen P (2011) Full-wave seismic data assimilation: theoretical background and recent advances. Pure Appl Geophys 168(10):1527–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Graves R (1996) Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:1091–1106Google Scholar
  5. Komatitsch D, Liu Q, Tromp J, Süss P, Stidham C, Shaw JH (2004) Simulations of ground motion in the Los Angeles basin based upon spectral element method. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:187–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee E-J, Chen P, Jordan TH, Wang L (2011) Rapid full-wave centroid moment tensor (CMT) inversion in a three-dimensional earth structure model for earthquakes in Southern California. Geophys J Int. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05031.xGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu Q, Gu YJ (2012) Seismic imaging: from classical to adjoint tomography. Tectonophysics 566–567:31–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Magistrale H, Day S, Clayton RW, Graves R (2000) The SCEC Southern California reference three-dimensional seismic velocity model Version 2. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:S65–S76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mell P, Grance T (2011) The NIST definition of cloud computing: recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. US Department of Commerce, Special Publication 800-145. Computer Security Division, Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, pp 20899-8930Google Scholar
  10. Olsen KB (1994) Simulation of three-dimensional wave propagation in the Salt Lake Basin. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake, pp 157Google Scholar
  11. Olsen KB, Day SM, Bradley CR (2003) Estimation of Q for long-period (>2 s) waves in the Los Angeles Basin. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:627–638Google Scholar
  12. Zhao L, Chen P, Jordan TH (2006) Strain Green’s tensors, reciprocity and their applications to seismic source and structure studies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(5):1753–1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Seismological Society of China, Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geology and GeophysicsUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations