Abstract
In mantle convection models, the mantle viscosity is generally assumed constant or dependent on depth. In this paper, a laterally variable viscosity is introduced into mantle convection model in which the mantle viscosity consists of a constant background and latitude-dependent viscosity with small fluctuations. The features of toroidal field dependent on depth and Rayleigh number are discussed under two boundary conditions, i.e., the top rigid and bottom stress-free boundaries (R-F boundary for short) and both rigid ones (R-R boundary for short), respectively. The results show that the energy of toroidal field mainly concentrates in the middle and upper parts of a spherical shell, and the ratio of toroidal to total velocities amounts to only a few percents and hardly depends on Rayleigh number, while the convection patterns of toroidal field have been strongly affected by Rayleigh number. It is found that the convection patterns and velocities of toroidal field have obvious differences in latitudinal direction, which clearly reflects the effects of lateral mantle viscosity variations on the convection patterns. These preliminary results give us a possible hint to study some global tectonic phenomena, e.g. the asymmetry of the southern and northern hemispheres and the Earth’s differential rotation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buckus G. 1958. A class of self-sustaining dissipative spherical dynamos[J]. Ann Phys, 4: 381–384.
Cadek O, Richard Y, Martinec Z et al. 1993. Comparison between Newtonian and non-Newtonian flow driven by internal loads [J]. Geophys J Int, 112: 103–114.
Christensen U and Harder H. 1991. 3-D convection with variable viscosity [J]. Geophys J Int, 104: 213–226.
Christensen U, 1984. Convection with pressure- and temperature-dependent non-Newtonian rheology [J]. Geophys J R Astr Soc, 77: 343–384.
Clayton R W, Comer R P. 1983. A tomographic analysis of mantle heterogeneities from body wave travel time [J]. EOS, Trans Aer Geophys Un, 62: 776.
Forte A M and Peltier W R. 1987. Plate tectonics and aspherical earth structure: The importance of poloidal-toroidal coupling [J]. J Geophys Res, 92: 3 645–3 679.
FU R S. 1989. Plate motions, Earth’s geoid anomalies and mantle convection [A]. In: Cohen S C and Vanicek P eds. Slow Deformation and Transmission of Stress in the Earth [C]. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, IUGG, 47–54.
FU Rong-shan. 1990. The earth’s geoid anomalies and the physic-mathematical model of mantle convection [J]. Chinese J Geophy, 33(Supp. II): 457–468 (in Chinese).
Gable C W, O’Connell R J, Travis B J. 1991. Convection in three dimensions with surface plates: Generation of toroidal flow [J]. J Geophys Res, 96: 8 391–8 405.
Hager B H and O’Connell R J. 1979. Kinemetic models of large-scale mantle flow [J]. J Geophys Res, 84: 1 031–1 048.
Hager B H and O’Connell R J. 1978. Subduction zone dips and flow driven by the plates [J]. Tectonophysics, 50: 111–134.
Kirby S H, Kronenberg A K. 1987. Rheology of the lithosphere: selected topics [J]. Rev Geophys and Space Phys, 25: 1 219–1 244.
MA Zong-jin, SONG Xiao-dong, DU Pin-ren, et al. 2001. Asymmetry between the southern and northern hemispheres of the earth [J]. Chinese J Geophy, 45(1): 26–33 (in Chinese).
Minister J B, Jordan T H. 1978. Present-day plate motion [J]. J Geophys Res, 83: 5 331–5 354.
O’Connell R J, Gable C W, Hager B H. 1991. Toroidal-poloidal partitioning of lithospheric plate motion [A]. In: Sabadini R et al eds. Glacial Isostasy, Sea Level and Mantle Rheology [C]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 535–551.
Olson P and Bercovici D. 1991. On the equipartitioning of kinetic energy in plate tectonics [J]. Geophys Res Lett, 18: 1 751–1 754.
Ribe N M. 1992. The dynamics of thin shells with variable viscosity and the origin of toroidal flow in the mantle [J]. Geophys J Int, 110: 537–552.
Richard Y and Vigny C. 1989. Mantle dynamics with induced plate tectonics [J]. J Geophys Res, 94: 17 543–17 560.
Su W J, Woodward R L, Dziwonski A M. 1984. Degree 12 model of shear velocity heterogeity in the mantle [J]. J Geophs Res, 99: 6 945–6 980.
WU Z H. 1997. Geodynamics of the Rotating Earth [M]. Beijing: Geological Press, 8–10 (in Chinese).
YANG Xue-xiang. 1998. Geodynamics of the Earth’s Differential Rotation and Revolution [M]. Jiling: Jilin University Press, 53–79 (in Chinese).
YE Zheng-ren, TENG Chun-kai, ZHANG Xin-wu. 1995. Coupling between mantle circulation and lithospheric plates—(I) thermal free convection in a spherical shell [J]. Chinese J Geophy, 38 (2): 174–180 (in Chinese).
YE Zheng-ren and WANG Jian. 2003. A numerical research on the small-scale convection with variable viscosity in the upper mantle [J]. Chinese J Geophy, 46(3): 335–339 (in Chinese).
YE Zheng-ren and ZHU Ri-xiang. 1996. Coupling between mantle circulation and lithospheric plates—(II) mix convection and its applications [J]. Chinese J Geophy, 39 (1): 47–56 (in Chinese).
Zebib A F, Schubert G, Straus J M. 1980. Infinite Prandtl number thermal convection in a spherical shell [J]. J Fluid Mech, 97(part 2): 257–277.
Zhang S X and Christensen U. 1993. Some effects of lateral viscosity variations on geoid and surface velocities induced by density anomalies in the mantle [J]. Geophys J Int, 114: 531–547.
ZHU T and FENG R. 2005. The patterns of high-degree thermal free convection and its features in a spherical shell [J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 18(1): 12–26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Foundation item: National Natural Science Foundation of China (49834020).
Contribution No. 05FE3006, Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration.
About this article
Cite this article
Tao, Z., Rui, F. Nonlinear free thermal convection in a spherical shell: A variable viscosity model. Acta Seimol. Sin. 18, 206–217 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-005-0068-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-005-0068-y