Abstract
We show that, for any q, the pointset covered by the conic planes of a quadric Veronesean of \(\textrm{PG}(3,q)\) is a two character set with respect to hyperplanes of \(\textrm{PG}(9,q)\).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
A two–character set in the projective space \(\textrm{PG}(d,q)\) is a set \({\mathcal {T}}\) of n points with the property that intersection number with any hyperplane only takes two values, say \(n-w_1\) and \(n-w_2\). The positive integers \(w_1\) and \(w_2\) are called the constants of \({\mathcal {T}}\). Two–character sets with respect to hyperplanes are strictly connected to strongly regular graphs. Embed \(\textrm{PG}(d,q)\) as a hyperplane \(\Pi \) in \(\textrm{PG}(d+1,q)\). The linear representation graph \(\Gamma _d^*({{\mathcal {T}}})\) is the graph having as vertices the points of \(\textrm{PG}(d+1,q)\setminus \Pi \) and two vertices are adjacent whenever the line defined by them meets \({\mathcal {T}}\). Then \(\Gamma _d^*({{\mathcal {T}}})\) has \(q^{d+1}\) vertices and valence \(k=(q-1)n\). Delsarte [5] showed that this graph is strongly regular due to the fact that \({\mathcal {T}}\) is a two–character set. The other parameters of the graph are \(\lambda =k-1+(k-qw_1+1)(k-qw_2+1)\) and \(\mu =k+(k-qw_1)(k-qw_2)\). Regarding the coordinates of the elements of \({\mathcal {T}}\) as columns of the generator matrix of a code \({\mathcal {L}}\) of length n and dimension \(d+1\), the two–character set property implies that the code \({\mathcal {L}}\) has two weights [1]. Such a code is called a projective two–weight code. In [3, Proposition 2.1] we proved that the secant variety \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\) of a Veronese surface of \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) is a two–character set with respect to hyperplanes. The Veronese surface contains \(q^2+q+1\) plane conics mutually intersecting in one point. The planes of these conics are called conic planes and it can be proved that the points covered by them is exactly \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\). Since any quadric Veronesean contains plane conics that are either disjoint or mutually intersect in one point, it is natural to ask if the pointset covered by them is always a two–character set with respect to hyperplanes. In this paper we show that the answer is affirmative for the quadric Veronesean of \(\textrm{PG}(3,q)\), any q, but this property breaks down for \(\textrm{PG}(4,q)\). Also, in Sect. 3, we observe that the Grassmannian of lines of \(\textrm{PG}(4,q)\) and the secant variety of the Veronese variety of \(\textrm{PG}(3,q)\), any q, lie in the same projective space \(\textrm{PG}(9,q)\), have the same size and the same characters with respect to hyperplanes.
In the last section, we construct another two-character set of \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) having the same characters as \(\mathcal {M}_4^3\) but with a different automorphism group.
2 The quadric Veronesean \({\mathcal {V}}_n\) of \(\textrm{PG}\left( \frac{n(n+3)}{2},q\right) \)
Let q be a fixed prime power. For any integer k, denote by \(\textrm{PG}(k,q)\) the k–dimensional projective space over the Galois field \(\mathbb {F}_q\). Let \(n\ge 1\) be an arbitrary integer. We choose homogeneous projective coordinates in \(\mathbb {P}:=\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) and in \(\Sigma :=\textrm{PG}(n(n+3)/2,q)\). The Veronesean map, say \(\nu \), sends a point of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) with coordinates \((x_0,\dots ,x_n)\) onto the points of \(\Sigma \) with coordinates
The quadric Veronesean or the Veronese variety \({\mathcal {V}}_n^{2^n}\), or, for short \({\mathcal {V}}_n\), is the image of the Veronesean map. It turns out that the Veronesean map is a bijection between points of \(\mathbb {P}\) and points of \({\mathcal {V}}_n\). Also, \(\mathcal {V}_n\) is a cap of \(\Sigma \), cf. [6, Theorem 25.1.8].
Consider the quadric Veronesean \({\mathcal {V}}_n\) in \(\Sigma \) and the correspondiing Veronesean map. The image of an arbitrary plane of \(\mathbb {P}\) under the Veronesean map is a quadric Veronesean \({\mathcal {V}}_2\) and the subspace of \(\Sigma \) generated by it has dimension 5. Such a subspace is called a \({\mathcal {V}}_2\)–subspace of \(\Sigma \). The image of a line of \(\mathbb {P}\) is a conic and the plane generated by it is called a conic plane.
The automorphism group G of \({\mathcal {V}}_n\) contains \(\textrm{PGL}(n+1,q)\) and acts transitively on conic planes of \({\mathcal {V}}_n\), cf. [6, Theorem 25.1.10].
Let \(q>2\). The quadrics and the lines of \(\mathbb {P}\) are in \(1-1\) correspondence (under \(\nu \)) with the hyperplanes and the conics of the Veronese variety \(\mathcal {V}_n\), respectively (see [6, Theorems 4.3, 4.10 and 4.12]). Let \(\mathcal {M}:=\mathcal {M}_2(\mathcal {V}_n)\) be the secant variety of \(\mathcal {V}_{n}\), i.e. the set of points on the lines joining two points of \(\mathcal {V}_n\). Since through two distinct points of \(\mathcal {V}_n\) there passes a unique conic of \(\mathcal {V}_n\) then the variety \(\mathcal {M}\) turns out to be the union of the conic planes of \(\Sigma \).
In this setting the following preliminary result can be easily proven.
Proposition 2.1
Let \(H=\nu (\mathcal {Q})\) be a hyperplane of \(\Sigma \) corresponding to a quadric \(\mathcal {Q}\) of \(\mathbb {P}\). Let \(\ell \) be a line of \(\mathbb {P}\) and let \(\pi _\ell \subset \mathcal {M}\) be the corresponding conic plane of the nondegenerate conic \(\nu (\ell )\) of \(\mathcal {V}_n\). We have the following cases:
-
(1)
If \(\ell \subset \mathcal {Q}\) then \(|\pi _\ell \cap (H{\setminus }\mathcal {V}_n)|=q^2\).
-
(2)
If \(|\ell \cap \mathcal {Q}|=2\) then \(|\pi _\ell \cap (H{\setminus }\mathcal {V}_n)|=q-1\).
-
(3)
If \(|\ell \cap \mathcal {Q}|=1\) then \(|\pi _\ell \cap (H{\setminus }\mathcal {V}_n)|=q\).
-
(4)
If \(|\ell \cap \mathcal {Q}|=0\) then \(|\pi _\ell \cap (H{\setminus }\mathcal {V}_n)|=q+1\).
Proof
The result follows from the fact that:
-
(1)
If \(\ell \subset \mathcal {Q}\) then \(\pi _\ell \subset H\) and \(\pi _\ell \cap \mathcal {V}_n=\nu (\ell )\).
-
(2)
If \(|\ell \cap \mathcal {Q}|=2\) then \(\pi _\ell \cap H\) is a line with exactly two points on \(\mathcal {V}_n\).
-
(3)
If \(|\ell \cap \mathcal {Q}|=1\) then \(\pi _\ell \cap H\) is a line with exactly one point on \(\mathcal {V}_n\).
-
(4)
If \(|\ell \cap \mathcal {Q}|=0\) then \(\pi _\ell \cap H\) is a line with no point on \(\mathcal {V}_n\).
\(\square \)
In this geometric setting let \(x_s,x_0,x_1,x_2\) denote the number of lines contained, external, tangent and secant to \(\mathcal {Q}\), respectively. Also, let \(\Theta _m\) be the number of points of a projective space isomorphic to \(\textrm{PG}(m,q)\). We have the following result.
Proposition 2.2
\(|H\cap \mathcal {M}|=|\mathcal {Q}|+x_sq^2+x_0(q+1)+x_1q+x_2(q-1)\).
Proof
We first observe that \(|\nu (\mathcal {Q})|=|H\cap \mathcal {V}_n|=|\mathcal {Q}|\) and the conics contained in \(H\cap \mathcal {V}_n\) correspond (under \(\nu ^{-1}\)) to the lines of \(\mathbb {P}\) contained in \(\mathcal {Q}\). Hence, for any line \(\ell \subset \mathcal {Q}\), the corresponding conic plane \(\pi _\ell \) is contained in \(H\cap \mathcal {M}\) and intersects \(\mathcal {M}\setminus \mathcal {V}_n\) in \(q^2\) points. Any other line, say m, of \(\mathbb {P}\) is not contained in \(\mathcal {Q}\) and the corresponding conic plane \(\pi _m\subset \mathcal {M}\) of \(\Sigma \) intersects H in a line meeting \(\mathcal {V}_n\) in 0, 1 or 2 points according to the fact that m is external, tangent or secant to \(\mathcal {Q}\). Also, since two conic planes are disjoint or they meet in a point of \(\mathcal {V}_n\), the result follows. \(\square \)
Proposition 2.3
Let \(q>2\) and \(n\ge 4\). The secant variety \(\mathcal {M}\) of \(\Sigma \) has at least three intersection characters with respect to the hyperplanes, more precisely: if n is even
and if \(n=2m-1\) is odd
Also \(T_1>T_2>T_3\) and \(T_4>T_1>T_2\).
Proof
Consider the following cases.
Case 1: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is an \((n-1)\)-dimensional projective space of \(\mathbb {P}\). In such a case any line of \(\mathbb {P}\) is either contained in \(\mathcal {Q}\) or intersects \(\mathcal {Q}\) in exactly one point. Straightforward computations show that
From Proposition 2.2 it follows
and hence
Case 2: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a quadratic cone of \(\mathbb {P}\) with vertex an \((n-3)\)-dimensional projective space, say V, and base a non-degenerate conic \(\mathcal {C}\). Then
Also, the number of lines contained in \(\mathcal {Q}\) is
If P is a point of the vertex V then through P there pass \(q^{n-1}\) tangent lines to \(\mathcal {Q}\), whereas if \(P\notin V\), then through it there are \(q^{n-2}\) tangents to \(\mathcal {Q}\). It follows that
Since through any point of \(\mathcal {Q}\setminus V\) there pass \(q^{n-1}\) secant lines to \(\mathcal {Q}\), then
Finally, the number of external lines to \(\mathcal {Q}\) is
From Proposition 2.2, it follows that
Case 3: \(n=2m\) is even and \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a parabolic quadric Q(n, q) of \(\mathbb {P}\). Then
From [2, p.451] (see also [6, pp. 23 and 25]) the number of lines contained, external and secant to \(\mathcal {Q}\) is:
Hence, the number of tangent line to \(\mathcal {Q}\) is
From Proposition 2.2, it follows
Case 4: \(n=2m-1\) is odd and \(\mathcal {Q}\) is an elliptic quadric \(Q^-(n,q)\) of \(\mathbb {P}\). Then
From [2, p.451] the number of lines contained, external and secant to \(\mathcal {Q}\) is:
Hence, the number of tangent lines to \(\mathcal {Q}\) is
From Proposition 2.2, it follows
Comparing the numbers \(T_1, T_2,T_3\) and \(T_1, T_2,T_4\) it can be seen that they are different. More precisely, direct computations show that:
and, since \(q>2\),
\(\square \)
Remark 2.4
Note that if \(\mathcal {Q}\) is either the union of two hyperplanes of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) or an \((n-2)\)-dimensional projective subspace of \(\mathbb {P}\), direct computations show that the size of \(H\cap \mathcal {M}\) always equals \(T_1\). Also, if \(n=2m+1\) and \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a hyperbolic quadric \(Q^+(n,q)\) of \(\mathbb {P}\) direct computations show that the size of \(H\cap \mathcal {M}\) equals \(T_2\).
2.1 The case \(n=3\)
In this section, using the previous results, we prove our main theorem.
Theorem 2.5
The secant variety \(\mathcal {M}:=\mathcal {M}_2(\mathcal {V}_3)\) of \(\Sigma =\textrm{PG}(9,q)\) is a two-character set with respect to the hyperplanes. The two characters are:
Proof
We have to consider all the possibilities for a quadric of \(\mathbb {P}:=\textrm{PG}(3,q)\).
Case 1: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is plane of \(\mathbb {P}\). From (1), we get
Case 2: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a pair of planes of \(\mathbb {P}=\textrm{PG}(3,q)\) intersecting in a line. From Remark 2.4 we have again
Case 3: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a quadratic cone of \(\mathbb {P}\) with vertex a point and base a non-degenerate conic. From (2), we get
Case 4: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a hyperbolic quadric of \(\mathbb {P}\). From Remark 2.4 we have again
Case 5: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is an elliptic quadric of \(\mathbb {P}\). From (4) we get again
Case 6: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a line of \(\mathbb {P}\). From Remark 2.4 we have
\(\square \)
2.2 The Case \(n=4\)
In this section we completely determine the characters of the secant variety \(\mathcal {M}_2(\mathcal {V}_4)\).
Theorem 2.6
The secant variety \(\mathcal {M}=\mathcal {M}_2(\mathcal {V}_4)\) of \(\Sigma =\textrm{PG}(14,q)\) is a three-character set with respect to the hyperplanes. The three characters are:
Proof
We have to consider all the possibilities for a quadric of \(\mathbb {P}=\textrm{PG}(4,q)\).
Case 1: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a 3-dimensional projective space of \(\mathbb {P}\). From (1), we get
Case 2: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is pair of hyperplanes of \(\mathbb {P}\) intersecting in a plane. From Remark 2.4 we have again
Case 3: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a quadratic cone of \(\mathbb {P}\) with vertex a line and base a non-degenerate conic. From (2), we get
Case 4: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is plane of \(\mathbb {P}\). From Remark 2.4 we have
Case 5: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is parabolic quadric Q(4, q) of \(\mathbb {P}\). From (3) we have
Case 6: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is quadratic cone with vertex a point P and base a hyperbolic quadric \(Q^+(3,q)\) of \(\mathbb {P}\). In such a case \(|\mathcal {Q}|=q(q+1)^2+1\) and \(x_s=2q^3+3q^2+2q+1\). Through any point of \(\mathcal {Q}\) different from P there pass \(q^3\) secant lines to \(\mathcal {Q}\). Hence \(x_2=(|\mathcal {Q}|-1)/2=q^4(q+1)^2/2\). Also, the number of tangents through P is \(q^3-q\) and through any other point of \(\mathcal {Q}\) is \(q^2-q\). Then \(x_1=q^5+q^4-q^2-q\). Finally, \(x_0=q^4(q^2-1)/2\). From Proposition 2.2, direct computations show that
Case 7: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is quadratic cone with vertex a point P and base an elliptic quadric \(Q^-(3,q)\) of \(\mathbb {P}\). In such a case \(|\mathcal {Q}|=q(q^2+1)+1\) and \(x_s=q^2+1\). Through any point of \(\mathcal {Q}\) different from P there pass \(q^3\) secant lines to \(\mathcal {Q}\). Hence \(x_2=(|\mathcal {Q}|-1)/2=q^4(q^2+1)/2\). Also, the number of tangents through P is \(q^3+q\) and through any other point of \(\mathcal {Q}\) is \(q^2+q\). Then \(x_1=q^5+q^4+2q^3+q^2+q\). Finally, \(x_0=q^4(q^2+1)/2\). From Proposition 2.2, direct computations show that
\(\square \)
3 Grassmannians
Let \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\) denote the set of two–dimensional subspaces of the vector space \(\mathbb {F}_q^{n+1}\). A two–dimensional subspace of \(\mathbb {F}_q^{n+1}\) corresponds to a line of the associated projective space \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) so that \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\) can be viewed as the set of such lines. Denote by \((\dots ,X_{ij},\dots )\), with \(0\le i <j\le n\), the homogeneous coordinates of \(\textrm{PG}(N,q)=PG(\Lambda ^2(\mathbb {F}_q^{n+1}))\), where \(N=n(n+1)/2-1\). They are called the Plücker coordinates on \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\). If \(\ell \) is a line of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) defined by two points, say \(P_1=P(X_1)\) and \(P_2=P(X_2)\), we can associate with \(\ell \) the point \(\rho (\ell )=P(X_1\wedge X_2)\in \textrm{PG}(N,q)\). The map of sets given by
is a well–defined map called the Plücker embedding of \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\). The subset \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\) is an algebraic variety called the Grassmannian of lines of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\). It is known that \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\) contains two systems of maximal subspaces. The first system consists of the \((n-1)\)–spaces \(\Pi _{n-1}\) with \(\rho ^{-1}(\Pi _{n-1})\) the set of all lines through a common point; this system is called Latin system and its elements are called Latins spaces. The second system consists of planes \(\Pi _2\) with \(\rho ^{-1}(\Pi _2)\) the set of lines contained in a common plane; this system is called the Greek system and its elements are called Greek planes.
A linear complex \({\mathcal {L}}\) of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) is a set of lines whose Plu\(\ddot{\textrm{c}}\)ker coordinates satisfy a linear equation \(\sum _{i<j}a_{ij}X_{ij}=0\). There exists a one-to-one correspondence between linear complexes of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) and hyperplane sections of \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\). Let \(H:\sum _{i<j}a_{ij}X_{ij}=0\) be a hyperplane of \(\textrm{PG}(N,q)\). We associate with H the \((n+1)\times (n+1)\) skew-symmetric matrix
up to a non–zero scalar in \(\mathbb {F}_q\setminus \{0\}\). The linear complex \({\mathcal {L}}\) is said to be of type r if the corresponding matrix \(A_H\) has rank r. A linear complex of type \(n+1\) is said to be non-singular. It is known that the rank of a skew–symmetric matrix is an even number. Hence, in \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\), n even, all linear complexes are singular.
Lemma 3.1
Let \(\ell =\langle P_0,P_1\rangle \) be a line of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\), with \(P_0=P(X)\) and \(P_1=P(Y)\) two distinct points of \(\textrm{PG}(n,K)\). The point \(\rho (\ell )\) lies on the hyperplane H if and only if \(XA_HY^t=0\).
Proof
Let \(H:\sum _{i<j}a_{ij}X_{ij}=0\), \(X=(X_i)_{0\le i\le n}\), \(Y=(Y_i)_{0\le i\le n}\) and \(\rho (\ell )=(p_{ij})_{0\le i<j\le n}\), where \(p_{ij}=X_iY_j-X_jY_i\). Since
we see that \(XA_HY^t=0\) if and only if \(\rho (\ell )\in H\). \(\square \)
From now on we assume that \(n=4\) and hence \(N=9\).
Lemma 3.2
[6, Theorem 24.2.15] The automorphism group G of \({\mathcal {G}}(1,4,q)\) in \(\textrm{PGL}(10,q)\) is isomorphic to \(\textrm{PGL}(5,q)\).
There are two possibilities for a hyperplane section of \({\mathcal {G}}(1,4,q)\) since a skew-symmetric matrix of order 5 has type 2 or 4. The corresponding singular linear complexes correspond to:
-
(type 2) lines of \(\textrm{PG}(4,q)\) incident to or contained in a plane. In this case \({\mathcal {L}}\) consists of \((q^2+q+1)(q^3+q^2+1)\) lines;
-
(type 4) lines of \(\textrm{PG}(4,q)\) incident to or contained in a parabolic quadric Q(4, q). In this case \({\mathcal {L}}\) consists of \((q+1)^2(q+1)\) lines.
Theorem 3.3
The Grassmannian of lines of \(\textrm{PG}(4,q)\) is a two–character set of \(\textrm{PG}(9,q)\) with respect to hyperplanes. It has size \((q^2+1)(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)\) and the characters are \((q^2+q+1)(q^3+q^2+1)\) and \((q+1)^2(q+1)\).
Remark 3.4
The secant variety \(\mathcal {M}(\mathcal {V}_n)\) and the Grassmannian of lines of \(\textrm{PG}(n+1,q)\) lie in the same projective ambient \(\textrm{PG}\left( \frac{n(n+3)}{2},q\right) \) and, for any n, they have the same number of points, i.e. \((q^n-1)(q^{n+1}-1)q^2/(q-1)(q^2-1)\). Also, as we have shown for \(n=2\) and \(n=3\), they have the same characters (with respect to hyperplanes). Is this just numerology or there is a combinatorial connection between the two algebraic varieties?
4 A derivation technique
In this section we construct another two-character set of \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) with respect to hyperplanes having the same characters as \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3:=\mathcal {M}(\mathcal {V}_2)\) but not isomorphic to \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\).
Let \(X_{11},X_{12},X_{13},X_{22},X_{23},X_{33}\) be projective homogeneous coordinates in \(\textrm{PG}(5,q).\) The Veronese surface \({\mathcal {V}}_2\) in \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) has parametric equations
where \(a,b,c\in \mathbb {F}_q\) and \((a,b,c)\ne (0,0,0)\) and the secant variety \(\mathcal {M}_3^4\) has equation
Consider the 3-dimensional projective space \(T:X_{13}=X_{33}=0\). It is easy to see that \(T\cap \mathcal {M}_{3}^4\) consists of two planes, i.e., \(\pi _t:X_{11}=X_{13}=X_{33}=0\) and \(\pi _c:X_{23}=X_{13}=X_{33}=0\), which are a tangent plane and a conic plane of \(\mathcal {V}_2\), respectively.
Also, let \(\ell =\pi _t\cap \pi _c\). In T there are, apart from \(\pi _t\) and \(\pi _c\), another \(q-1\) planes through \(\ell \).
Lemma 4.1
If \(\Pi \) is a hyperplane intersecting \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in exactly one point P, then \(\Pi \) contains the tangent plane to \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in P.
Proof
Let \(P=\nu (p)\), with \(p\in \textrm{PG}(2,q)\). Embed \(\textrm{PG}(2,q)\) in \(\textrm{PG}(2,q^2)\). Let G be the stabilizer of \(\textrm{PG}(2,q)\) in \(\textrm{PGL}(3,q^2)\). Then G acts transitively on the points of \(\textrm{PG}(2,q)\) and the stabilizer of p in G acts transitively on the imaginary lines through p. Hence, without loss of generality, we can always choose a hyperplane of \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) intersecting \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in a point.
Assume q is odd and let \(\Pi : X_{22}=\alpha X_{33}\), with \(\alpha \) a nonzero square in \(\mathbb {F}_q\). Then \(\Pi \) intersects \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in the point \(P:=(1,0,0,0,0,0)\) and contains the tangent plane to \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in P with equation \(X_{22}=X_{23}=X_{33}=0\).
Suppose q even and let \(\Pi :\ X_{22}+X_{23}+\alpha X_{33}\), with \(\textrm{Tr}_{q/2}(\alpha )=1\), where \(\textrm{Tr}_{q/2}\) denotes the absolute trace from \(\mathbb {F}_q\) over \(\mathbb {F}_2\). Then \(\Pi \) intersects \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in the point \(P:=(1,0,0,0,0,0)\) and contains the tangent plane to \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in P with equation \(X_{22}=X_{23}=X_{33}=0\). \(\square \)
Lemma 4.2
If a hyperplane \(\Pi \) contains a tangent plane to \(\mathcal {V}_2\) then \(\Pi \) cannot intersect \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in a quartic normal rational curve.
Proof
By way of contradiction suppose that the intersection \(\Pi \cap \mathcal {V}_2\) is a quartic normal rational curve. Then the projective subspace tangent to the curve is a line. \(\square \)
Let \(\pi \) be a plane through \(\ell \) distinct from \(\pi _t\) and \(\pi _c\). The following result generalizes [4, Theorem 2].
Theorem 4.3
The sets \(({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\setminus \pi _c)\cup \pi \) and \(({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\setminus \pi _c)\cup \pi \) are two-character sets with respect to hyperplanes. The two characters are:
Proof
From [3] a hyperplane \(\Pi \) of \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) meets \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\) in either \(q^3+2q^2+q+1\) points or \(q^3+q^2+q+1\) points. The first case occurs when the intersection between \(\Pi \) and \(\mathcal {V}_2\) is either a point or a conic or a pair of conics. The latter case occurs when the intersection between \(\Pi \) and \(\mathcal {V}_2\) is a quartic normal rational curve.
We first suppose that \({\mathcal {M}}'=({\mathcal {M}}_4^3{\setminus } \pi _c)\cup \pi \).
Let \(\Pi \) be a hyperplane of \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) and let \(P=\ell \cap \mathcal {V}_2\). If \(\Pi \) contains T there is nothing to prove. Otherwise, \(\Pi \) meets T in a plane \(\sigma \).
Four possibilities occur.
\(\boxed {\text {Case 1}.}\) If \(\sigma \) coincides with \(\pi \) then \(\Pi \) cannot contain a conic \(\mathcal {C}\) of \(\mathcal {V}_2\). In such a case \(\Pi \) would contain the tangent line to such a conic \(\mathcal {C}\) through P. Such a line is different from \(\ell \) (otherwise \(\pi _c\subset \Pi \) and so \(T\subset \Pi \)) and hence \(\pi _t\subset \Pi \), i.e. \(T\subset \Pi \), a contradiction. By Lemma 4.1, if \(\Pi \cap \mathcal {V}_2=\{P\}\) then \(\pi _t\subset \Pi \), again a contradiction. Then \(\Pi \) intersects \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in a quartic normal rational curve and hence \(|\Pi \cap \mathcal {M}_3^4|=q^3+q^2+q+1\) and hence \(|\Pi \cap \mathcal {M}'|=q^3+2q^2+q+1\).
\(\boxed {\text {Case 2}.}\) If \(\sigma \) coincides with \(\pi _c\) then, by Lemma 4.2, \(\Pi \) meets \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\) in \(q^3+2q^2+q+1\) points and hence \({\mathcal {M}}'\) in \(q^3+q^2+q+1\) points.
\(\boxed {\text {Case 3}.}\) If \(\sigma \) coincides with \(\pi _t\) then \(\Pi \) meets both \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\) and \({\mathcal {M}}'\) in \(q^3+2q^2+q+1\) points.
\(\boxed {\text {Case 4}.}\) The last possibility is when \(\sigma \) meets both planes \(\pi _c\) and \(\pi \) in two distinct lines. In this case the line \(\sigma \cap \pi _P\) is replaced by \(\sigma \cap \pi \) and hence \(\Pi \) meets \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\) and \({\mathcal {M}}'\) in the same number of points that is either \(q^3+2q^2+q+1\) or \(q^3+q^2+q+1\).
If \({\mathcal {M}}':=({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\setminus \pi _t)\cup \pi \) the cases 2 and 3 interchange. \(\square \)
Proposition 4.4
\({\mathcal {M}}'\) admits an automorphism group of order \(q^3(q-1)\).
Proof
The group of \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\) in \(\textrm{PSL}_6(q)\) is isomorphic to \(H:=\textrm{PSL}_3(q)\) and it acts transitively on the \((q+1)(q^2+q+1)\) tangent lines to \({\mathcal {V}}_2\). Then the stabilizer of \(\ell \) in H has order \(q^3(q-1)^2\) and permutes the \(q-1\) planes through \(\ell \) in T distinct from \(\pi _t\) and \(\pi _c\). Choosing one among these \(q-1\) planes we get the result. \(\square \)
References
Calderbank, R., Kantor, W.M.: The geometry of two-weight codes. Bull. London Math. Soc. 18, 97–122 (1986)
Cossidente, A., King, O.: Maximal orthogonal subgroups of finite unitary groups. J. Group Theory 7(4), 447–462 (2004)
Cossidente, A., Marino, G.: Veronese embedding and two-character sets. Des. Codes Cryptogr. 42, 103–107 (2007)
De Clerck, F., Delanote, M.: Two-weight codes, partial geometries and Steiner system. Des. Codes Cryptogr. 21(1–3), 87–98 (2000)
Delsarte, P.: Weights of linear codes and strongly regular normed spaces. Discrete Math. 3, 47–64 (1972)
Hirschfeld, J.W.P., Thas, J.A.: General Galois Geometries. Oxford University Press, New York (1991)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Italian National Group for Algebraic and Geometric Structures and their Applications (GNSAGA–INdAM).
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cossidente, A., Marino, G. Two-character sets, Veronese varieties and Grassmannian of lines. Ricerche mat (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11587-024-00858-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11587-024-00858-5