1 Introduction

A two–character set in the projective space \(\textrm{PG}(d,q)\) is a set \({\mathcal {T}}\) of n points with the property that intersection number with any hyperplane only takes two values, say \(n-w_1\) and \(n-w_2\). The positive integers \(w_1\) and \(w_2\) are called the constants of \({\mathcal {T}}\). Two–character sets with respect to hyperplanes are strictly connected to strongly regular graphs. Embed \(\textrm{PG}(d,q)\) as a hyperplane \(\Pi \) in \(\textrm{PG}(d+1,q)\). The linear representation graph \(\Gamma _d^*({{\mathcal {T}}})\) is the graph having as vertices the points of \(\textrm{PG}(d+1,q)\setminus \Pi \) and two vertices are adjacent whenever the line defined by them meets \({\mathcal {T}}\). Then \(\Gamma _d^*({{\mathcal {T}}})\) has \(q^{d+1}\) vertices and valence \(k=(q-1)n\). Delsarte [5] showed that this graph is strongly regular due to the fact that \({\mathcal {T}}\) is a two–character set. The other parameters of the graph are \(\lambda =k-1+(k-qw_1+1)(k-qw_2+1)\) and \(\mu =k+(k-qw_1)(k-qw_2)\). Regarding the coordinates of the elements of \({\mathcal {T}}\) as columns of the generator matrix of a code \({\mathcal {L}}\) of length n and dimension \(d+1\), the two–character set property implies that the code \({\mathcal {L}}\) has two weights [1]. Such a code is called a projective two–weight code. In [3, Proposition 2.1] we proved that the secant variety \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\) of a Veronese surface of \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) is a two–character set with respect to hyperplanes. The Veronese surface contains \(q^2+q+1\) plane conics mutually intersecting in one point. The planes of these conics are called conic planes and it can be proved that the points covered by them is exactly \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\). Since any quadric Veronesean contains plane conics that are either disjoint or mutually intersect in one point, it is natural to ask if the pointset covered by them is always a two–character set with respect to hyperplanes. In this paper we show that the answer is affirmative for the quadric Veronesean of \(\textrm{PG}(3,q)\), any q, but this property breaks down for \(\textrm{PG}(4,q)\). Also, in Sect. 3, we observe that the Grassmannian of lines of \(\textrm{PG}(4,q)\) and the secant variety of the Veronese variety of \(\textrm{PG}(3,q)\), any q, lie in the same projective space \(\textrm{PG}(9,q)\), have the same size and the same characters with respect to hyperplanes.

In the last section, we construct another two-character set of \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) having the same characters as \(\mathcal {M}_4^3\) but with a different automorphism group.

2 The quadric Veronesean \({\mathcal {V}}_n\) of \(\textrm{PG}\left( \frac{n(n+3)}{2},q\right) \)

Let q be a fixed prime power. For any integer k, denote by \(\textrm{PG}(k,q)\) the k–dimensional projective space over the Galois field \(\mathbb {F}_q\). Let \(n\ge 1\) be an arbitrary integer. We choose homogeneous projective coordinates in \(\mathbb {P}:=\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) and in \(\Sigma :=\textrm{PG}(n(n+3)/2,q)\). The Veronesean map, say \(\nu \), sends a point of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) with coordinates \((x_0,\dots ,x_n)\) onto the points of \(\Sigma \) with coordinates

$$\begin{aligned} \left( {x_{0}^{2} ,x_{1}^{2} , \ldots ,x_{n}^{2} ,x_{0} x_{1} , \ldots ,x_{0} x_{n} , \ldots ,x_{{n - 1}} x_{n} } \right) . \end{aligned}$$

The quadric Veronesean or the Veronese variety \({\mathcal {V}}_n^{2^n}\), or, for short \({\mathcal {V}}_n\), is the image of the Veronesean map. It turns out that the Veronesean map is a bijection between points of \(\mathbb {P}\) and points of \({\mathcal {V}}_n\). Also, \(\mathcal {V}_n\) is a cap of \(\Sigma \), cf. [6, Theorem 25.1.8].

Consider the quadric Veronesean \({\mathcal {V}}_n\) in \(\Sigma \) and the correspondiing Veronesean map. The image of an arbitrary plane of \(\mathbb {P}\) under the Veronesean map is a quadric Veronesean \({\mathcal {V}}_2\) and the subspace of \(\Sigma \) generated by it has dimension 5. Such a subspace is called a \({\mathcal {V}}_2\)subspace of \(\Sigma \). The image of a line of \(\mathbb {P}\) is a conic and the plane generated by it is called a conic plane.

The automorphism group G of \({\mathcal {V}}_n\) contains \(\textrm{PGL}(n+1,q)\) and acts transitively on conic planes of \({\mathcal {V}}_n\), cf. [6, Theorem 25.1.10].

Let \(q>2\). The quadrics and the lines of \(\mathbb {P}\) are in \(1-1\) correspondence (under \(\nu \)) with the hyperplanes and the conics of the Veronese variety \(\mathcal {V}_n\), respectively (see [6, Theorems 4.3, 4.10 and 4.12]). Let \(\mathcal {M}:=\mathcal {M}_2(\mathcal {V}_n)\) be the secant variety of \(\mathcal {V}_{n}\), i.e. the set of points on the lines joining two points of \(\mathcal {V}_n\). Since through two distinct points of \(\mathcal {V}_n\) there passes a unique conic of \(\mathcal {V}_n\) then the variety \(\mathcal {M}\) turns out to be the union of the conic planes of \(\Sigma \).

In this setting the following preliminary result can be easily proven.

Proposition 2.1

Let \(H=\nu (\mathcal {Q})\) be a hyperplane of \(\Sigma \) corresponding to a quadric \(\mathcal {Q}\) of \(\mathbb {P}\). Let \(\ell \) be a line of \(\mathbb {P}\) and let \(\pi _\ell \subset \mathcal {M}\) be the corresponding conic plane of the nondegenerate conic \(\nu (\ell )\) of \(\mathcal {V}_n\). We have the following cases:

  1. (1)

    If \(\ell \subset \mathcal {Q}\) then \(|\pi _\ell \cap (H{\setminus }\mathcal {V}_n)|=q^2\).

  2. (2)

    If \(|\ell \cap \mathcal {Q}|=2\) then \(|\pi _\ell \cap (H{\setminus }\mathcal {V}_n)|=q-1\).

  3. (3)

    If \(|\ell \cap \mathcal {Q}|=1\) then \(|\pi _\ell \cap (H{\setminus }\mathcal {V}_n)|=q\).

  4. (4)

    If \(|\ell \cap \mathcal {Q}|=0\) then \(|\pi _\ell \cap (H{\setminus }\mathcal {V}_n)|=q+1\).

Proof

The result follows from the fact that:

  1. (1)

    If \(\ell \subset \mathcal {Q}\) then \(\pi _\ell \subset H\) and \(\pi _\ell \cap \mathcal {V}_n=\nu (\ell )\).

  2. (2)

    If \(|\ell \cap \mathcal {Q}|=2\) then \(\pi _\ell \cap H\) is a line with exactly two points on \(\mathcal {V}_n\).

  3. (3)

    If \(|\ell \cap \mathcal {Q}|=1\) then \(\pi _\ell \cap H\) is a line with exactly one point on \(\mathcal {V}_n\).

  4. (4)

    If \(|\ell \cap \mathcal {Q}|=0\) then \(\pi _\ell \cap H\) is a line with no point on \(\mathcal {V}_n\).

\(\square \)

In this geometric setting let \(x_s,x_0,x_1,x_2\) denote the number of lines contained, external, tangent and secant to \(\mathcal {Q}\), respectively. Also, let \(\Theta _m\) be the number of points of a projective space isomorphic to \(\textrm{PG}(m,q)\). We have the following result.

Proposition 2.2

\(|H\cap \mathcal {M}|=|\mathcal {Q}|+x_sq^2+x_0(q+1)+x_1q+x_2(q-1)\).

Proof

We first observe that \(|\nu (\mathcal {Q})|=|H\cap \mathcal {V}_n|=|\mathcal {Q}|\) and the conics contained in \(H\cap \mathcal {V}_n\) correspond (under \(\nu ^{-1}\)) to the lines of \(\mathbb {P}\) contained in \(\mathcal {Q}\). Hence, for any line \(\ell \subset \mathcal {Q}\), the corresponding conic plane \(\pi _\ell \) is contained in \(H\cap \mathcal {M}\) and intersects \(\mathcal {M}\setminus \mathcal {V}_n\) in \(q^2\) points. Any other line, say m, of \(\mathbb {P}\) is not contained in \(\mathcal {Q}\) and the corresponding conic plane \(\pi _m\subset \mathcal {M}\) of \(\Sigma \) intersects H in a line meeting \(\mathcal {V}_n\) in 0, 1 or 2 points according to the fact that m is external, tangent or secant to \(\mathcal {Q}\). Also, since two conic planes are disjoint or they meet in a point of \(\mathcal {V}_n\), the result follows. \(\square \)

Proposition 2.3

Let \(q>2\) and \(n\ge 4\). The secant variety \(\mathcal {M}\) of \(\Sigma \) has at least three intersection characters with respect to the hyperplanes, more precisely: if n is even

$$\begin{aligned} T1&:= \frac{{\left( {q^{n} - 1} \right) \left( {q^{{n + 1}} + q^{{n + 2}} - q^{n} - 1} \right) }}{{\left( {q + 1} \right) \left( {q - 1} \right) ^{2} }};\\ T2&:= \frac{{\left( {q^{4} + q - 1} \right) q^{{2n - 2}} - \left( {q + 1} \right) q^{{n + 1}} + 1}}{{\left( {q - 1} \right) ^{2} \left( {q + 1} \right) }};\\ T3&:= \frac{{\left( {q^{n} - 1} \right) \left( {q^{{n + 2}} - 1} \right) }}{{\left( {q - 1} \right) ^{2} \left( {q + 1} \right) }}; \end{aligned}$$

and if \(n=2m-1\) is odd

$$\begin{aligned} T1,\ T2 \text { and } T4:=\frac{(q^m+1)(q^{m-1}+q^{2m} -q^{2m+1}+q^{3m-1}-q^{3m-3}+q^3-q-1)}{q-1}. \end{aligned}$$

Also \(T_1>T_2>T_3\) and \(T_4>T_1>T_2\).

Proof

Consider the following cases.

Case 1: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is an \((n-1)\)-dimensional projective space of \(\mathbb {P}\). In such a case any line of \(\mathbb {P}\) is either contained in \(\mathcal {Q}\) or intersects \(\mathcal {Q}\) in exactly one point. Straightforward computations show that

$$\begin{aligned} |\mathcal {Q}|= & {} \frac{q^n-1}{q-1};\\ x_s= & {} \frac{(q^n-1)(q^n-q)}{(q^2-1)(q^2-q)};\\ x_1= & {} \frac{(q^n-1)q^{n-1}}{q-1}. \end{aligned}$$

From Proposition 2.2 it follows

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|= \frac{q^n-1}{q-1}+q^2 \frac{(q^n-1)(q^n-q)}{(q^2-1)(q^2-q)} +q\frac{(q^n-1)q^{n-1}}{q-1} \end{aligned}$$

and hence

$$\begin{aligned} T_1=|H\cap \mathcal {M}|= \frac{(q^n-1) (q^{n+1}+q^{n+2}-q^n-1)}{(q-1)^2(q+1)}. \end{aligned}$$
(1)

Case 2: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a quadratic cone of \(\mathbb {P}\) with vertex an \((n-3)\)-dimensional projective space, say V, and base a non-degenerate conic \(\mathcal {C}\). Then

$$\begin{aligned} |\mathcal {Q}|=q^{n-1}+q^{n-2}+\frac{q^{n-2}-1}{q-1}. \end{aligned}$$

Also, the number of lines contained in \(\mathcal {Q}\) is

$$\begin{aligned} x_s=\frac{ q(q^{n-1}-1)(q^{n-1}-q)-q(q^{n-2}-1) (q^{n-2}-q)+(q^{n-1}-1)(q^{n-1}-q)}{(q^2-1)(q^2-q)}. \end{aligned}$$

If P is a point of the vertex V then through P there pass \(q^{n-1}\) tangent lines to \(\mathcal {Q}\), whereas if \(P\notin V\), then through it there are \(q^{n-2}\) tangents to \(\mathcal {Q}\). It follows that

$$\begin{aligned} x_1=\Theta _{n-3}q^{n-1}+(|\mathcal {Q}|-\Theta _{n-3})q^{n-2}=q^{2n-4} +\frac{q^{n-1}(q^{n-1}-1)}{q-1}. \end{aligned}$$

Since through any point of \(\mathcal {Q}\setminus V\) there pass \(q^{n-1}\) secant lines to \(\mathcal {Q}\), then

$$\begin{aligned} x_2=\frac{(|\mathcal {Q}|-\Theta _{n-3})q^{n-1}}{2}=\frac{q^{2n-3}(q+1)}{2}. \end{aligned}$$

Finally, the number of external lines to \(\mathcal {Q}\) is

$$\begin{aligned} x_0=\frac{q^{2n-3}(q-1)}{2}. \end{aligned}$$

From Proposition 2.2, it follows that

$$\begin{aligned} T_2=|H\cap \mathcal {M}|= \frac{(q^4+q-1)q^{2n-2}-(q+1)q^{n+1}+1}{(q-1)^2(q+1)}. \end{aligned}$$
(2)

Case 3: \(n=2m\) is even and \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a parabolic quadric Q(nq) of \(\mathbb {P}\). Then

$$\begin{aligned} |\mathcal {Q}|=\Theta _{n-1}. \end{aligned}$$

From [2, p.451] (see also [6, pp. 23 and 25]) the number of lines contained, external and secant to \(\mathcal {Q}\) is:

$$\begin{aligned} x_s= & {} \frac{(q^m-1)(q^{m-1}-1)(q^m+1)(q^{m-1}+1)}{(q-1)(q^2-1)};\\ x_0= & {} \frac{q^{n-1}(q^n-1)}{2*(q+1)};\\ x_2= & {} \frac{(q^m+1)(q^m-1)q^{n-1}}{2*(q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$

Hence, the number of tangent line to \(\mathcal {Q}\) is

$$\begin{aligned} x_1=\frac{(q^{n+1}-1)(q^{n+1}-q)}{(q^2-1)(q^2-q)}-x_s-x_0-x_2. \end{aligned}$$

From Proposition 2.2, it follows

$$\begin{aligned} T_3=|H\cap \mathcal {M}|= \frac{(q^n-1)(q^{n+2}-1)}{(q-1)^2(q+1)}. \end{aligned}$$
(3)

Case 4: \(n=2m-1\) is odd and \(\mathcal {Q}\) is an elliptic quadric \(Q^-(n,q)\) of \(\mathbb {P}\). Then

$$\begin{aligned} |\mathcal {Q}|=\frac{(q^m+1)(q^{m-1}-1)}{q-1}. \end{aligned}$$

From [2, p.451] the number of lines contained, external and secant to \(\mathcal {Q}\) is:

$$\begin{aligned} x_s= & {} (q^m+1)(q^{m-1}+1)(q^{m-1}-1)(q^{m-2}-1);\\ x_0= & {} \frac{(q^m+1)(q^{m-1}+1)q^{2m-2}}{2(q+1)};\\ x_2= & {} \frac{(q^m+1)(q^{m-1}-1)q^{2m-2}}{2(q-1)}. \end{aligned}$$

Hence, the number of tangent lines to \(\mathcal {Q}\) is

$$\begin{aligned} x_1=\frac{(q^{n+1}-1)(q^{n+1}-q)}{(q^2-1)(q^2-q)}-x_s-x_0-x_2. \end{aligned}$$

From Proposition 2.2, it follows

$$\begin{aligned} T_4=|H\cap \mathcal {M}|= \frac{(q^m+1)(q^{m-1}+q^{2m} -q^{2m+1}+q^{3m-1}-q^{3m-3}+q^3-q-1)}{q-1}. \end{aligned}$$
(4)

Comparing the numbers \(T_1, T_2,T_3\) and \(T_1, T_2,T_4\) it can be seen that they are different. More precisely, direct computations show that:

$$\begin{aligned} T_1-T_2=q^{2n-2}, \quad T_2-T_3=\frac{q^{n-2}(q^n-q^2)}{q^2-1} \end{aligned}$$

and, since \(q>2\),

$$\begin{aligned} T_4>\frac{q^{4m+1}-q^{4m}}{(q-1)^2(q+1)}>\frac{q^{4m}+q^{4m-1}}{(q-1)^2(q+1)} =\frac{q^{2n+2}+q^{2n+1}}{(q-1)^2(q+1)}>T1. \end{aligned}$$

\(\square \)

Remark 2.4

Note that if \(\mathcal {Q}\) is either the union of two hyperplanes of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) or an \((n-2)\)-dimensional projective subspace of \(\mathbb {P}\), direct computations show that the size of \(H\cap \mathcal {M}\) always equals \(T_1\). Also, if \(n=2m+1\) and \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a hyperbolic quadric \(Q^+(n,q)\) of \(\mathbb {P}\) direct computations show that the size of \(H\cap \mathcal {M}\) equals \(T_2\).

2.1 The case \(n=3\)

In this section, using the previous results, we prove our main theorem.

Theorem 2.5

The secant variety \(\mathcal {M}:=\mathcal {M}_2(\mathcal {V}_3)\) of \(\Sigma =\textrm{PG}(9,q)\) is a two-character set with respect to the hyperplanes. The two characters are:

$$\begin{aligned} q^5+2q^4+2q^3+2q^2+q+1 \text { and }q^5+q^4+2q^3+2q^2+q+1 \end{aligned}$$

Proof

We have to consider all the possibilities for a quadric of \(\mathbb {P}:=\textrm{PG}(3,q)\).

Case 1: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is plane of \(\mathbb {P}\). From (1), we get

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|=q^5+2q^4+2q^3+2q^2+q+1. \end{aligned}$$

Case 2: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a pair of planes of \(\mathbb {P}=\textrm{PG}(3,q)\) intersecting in a line. From Remark 2.4 we have again

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|=q^5+2q^4+2q^3+2q^2+q+1. \end{aligned}$$

Case 3: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a quadratic cone of \(\mathbb {P}\) with vertex a point and base a non-degenerate conic. From (2), we get

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|=q^5+q^4+2q^3+2q^2+q+1. \end{aligned}$$

Case 4: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a hyperbolic quadric of \(\mathbb {P}\). From Remark 2.4 we have again

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|=q^5+q^4+2q^3+2q^2+q+1. \end{aligned}$$

Case 5: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is an elliptic quadric of \(\mathbb {P}\). From (4) we get again

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|=q^5+q^4+2q^3+2q^2+q+1. \end{aligned}$$

Case 6: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a line of \(\mathbb {P}\). From Remark 2.4 we have

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|=q^5+2q^4+2q^3+2q^2+q+1. \end{aligned}$$

\(\square \)

2.2 The Case \(n=4\)

In this section we completely determine the characters of the secant variety \(\mathcal {M}_2(\mathcal {V}_4)\).

Theorem 2.6

The secant variety \(\mathcal {M}=\mathcal {M}_2(\mathcal {V}_4)\) of \(\Sigma =\textrm{PG}(14,q)\) is a three-character set with respect to the hyperplanes. The three characters are:

$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} q^7+2q^6+2q^5+3q^4+2q^3+2q^2+q+1,\\{} & {} q^7 + q^6 + 2 q^5 + 3 q^4 + 2 q^3 + 2 q^2 + q + 1,\\{} & {} q^7 + 2 q^6 + 2 q^5 + 3 q^4 + 2 q^3 + 2 q^2 + q + 1. \end{aligned}$$

Proof

We have to consider all the possibilities for a quadric of \(\mathbb {P}=\textrm{PG}(4,q)\).

Case 1: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a 3-dimensional projective space of \(\mathbb {P}\). From (1), we get

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|=q^7+2q^6+2q^5+3q^4+2q^3+2q^2+q+1. \end{aligned}$$

Case 2: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is pair of hyperplanes of \(\mathbb {P}\) intersecting in a plane. From Remark 2.4 we have again

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|=q^7+2q^6+2q^5+3q^4+2q^3+2q^2+q+1. \end{aligned}$$

Case 3: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is a quadratic cone of \(\mathbb {P}\) with vertex a line and base a non-degenerate conic. From (2), we get

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|=q^7 + q^6 + 2 q^5 + 3 q^4 + 2 q^3 + 2 q^2 + q + 1. \end{aligned}$$

Case 4: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is plane of \(\mathbb {P}\). From Remark 2.4 we have

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|=q^7 + 2 q^6 + 2 q^5 + 3 q^4 + 2 q^3 + 2 q^2 + q + 1. \end{aligned}$$

Case 5: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is parabolic quadric Q(4, q) of \(\mathbb {P}\). From (3) we have

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|=q^7 + q^6 + 2 q^5 + 2 q^4 + 2 q^3 + 2 q^2 + q + 1. \end{aligned}$$

Case 6: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is quadratic cone with vertex a point P and base a hyperbolic quadric \(Q^+(3,q)\) of \(\mathbb {P}\). In such a case \(|\mathcal {Q}|=q(q+1)^2+1\) and \(x_s=2q^3+3q^2+2q+1\). Through any point of \(\mathcal {Q}\) different from P there pass \(q^3\) secant lines to \(\mathcal {Q}\). Hence \(x_2=(|\mathcal {Q}|-1)/2=q^4(q+1)^2/2\). Also, the number of tangents through P is \(q^3-q\) and through any other point of \(\mathcal {Q}\) is \(q^2-q\). Then \(x_1=q^5+q^4-q^2-q\). Finally, \(x_0=q^4(q^2-1)/2\). From Proposition 2.2, direct computations show that

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|=q^7+q^6+2q^5+3q^4+2q^3+2q^2+q+1. \end{aligned}$$

Case 7: \(\mathcal {Q}\) is quadratic cone with vertex a point P and base an elliptic quadric \(Q^-(3,q)\) of \(\mathbb {P}\). In such a case \(|\mathcal {Q}|=q(q^2+1)+1\) and \(x_s=q^2+1\). Through any point of \(\mathcal {Q}\) different from P there pass \(q^3\) secant lines to \(\mathcal {Q}\). Hence \(x_2=(|\mathcal {Q}|-1)/2=q^4(q^2+1)/2\). Also, the number of tangents through P is \(q^3+q\) and through any other point of \(\mathcal {Q}\) is \(q^2+q\). Then \(x_1=q^5+q^4+2q^3+q^2+q\). Finally, \(x_0=q^4(q^2+1)/2\). From Proposition 2.2, direct computations show that

$$\begin{aligned} |H\cap \mathcal {M}|=q^7 + q^6 + 2 q^5 + 3 q^4 + 2 q^3 + 2 q^2 + q + 1. \end{aligned}$$

\(\square \)

3 Grassmannians

Let \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\) denote the set of two–dimensional subspaces of the vector space \(\mathbb {F}_q^{n+1}\). A two–dimensional subspace of \(\mathbb {F}_q^{n+1}\) corresponds to a line of the associated projective space \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) so that \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\) can be viewed as the set of such lines. Denote by \((\dots ,X_{ij},\dots )\), with \(0\le i <j\le n\), the homogeneous coordinates of \(\textrm{PG}(N,q)=PG(\Lambda ^2(\mathbb {F}_q^{n+1}))\), where \(N=n(n+1)/2-1\). They are called the Plücker coordinates on \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\). If \(\ell \) is a line of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) defined by two points, say \(P_1=P(X_1)\) and \(P_2=P(X_2)\), we can associate with \(\ell \) the point \(\rho (\ell )=P(X_1\wedge X_2)\in \textrm{PG}(N,q)\). The map of sets given by

$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} \rho : {\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\rightarrow PG(N,q),\\{} & {} \ell \mapsto \rho (\ell ) \end{aligned}$$

is a well–defined map called the Plücker embedding of \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\). The subset \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\) is an algebraic variety called the Grassmannian of lines of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\). It is known that \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\) contains two systems of maximal subspaces. The first system consists of the \((n-1)\)–spaces \(\Pi _{n-1}\) with \(\rho ^{-1}(\Pi _{n-1})\) the set of all lines through a common point; this system is called Latin system and its elements are called Latins spaces. The second system consists of planes \(\Pi _2\) with \(\rho ^{-1}(\Pi _2)\) the set of lines contained in a common plane; this system is called the Greek system and its elements are called Greek planes.

A linear complex \({\mathcal {L}}\) of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) is a set of lines whose Plu\(\ddot{\textrm{c}}\)ker coordinates satisfy a linear equation \(\sum _{i<j}a_{ij}X_{ij}=0\). There exists a one-to-one correspondence between linear complexes of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\) and hyperplane sections of \({\mathcal {G}}(1,n,q)\). Let \(H:\sum _{i<j}a_{ij}X_{ij}=0\) be a hyperplane of \(\textrm{PG}(N,q)\). We associate with H the \((n+1)\times (n+1)\) skew-symmetric matrix

$$\begin{aligned} A_H= \left( \begin{array}{cccc} 0 &{} a_{01} &{} \dots &{} a_{0n} \\ -a_{01} &{} 0 &{} \dots &{} a_{1n} \\ \vdots &{} \vdots &{} \vdots &{} \vdots \\ -a_{0n} &{} -a_{1n} &{} \dots &{} 0 \\ \end{array}\right) . \end{aligned}$$

up to a non–zero scalar in \(\mathbb {F}_q\setminus \{0\}\). The linear complex \({\mathcal {L}}\) is said to be of type r if the corresponding matrix \(A_H\) has rank r. A linear complex of type \(n+1\) is said to be non-singular. It is known that the rank of a skew–symmetric matrix is an even number. Hence, in \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\), n even, all linear complexes are singular.

Lemma 3.1

Let \(\ell =\langle P_0,P_1\rangle \) be a line of \(\textrm{PG}(n,q)\), with \(P_0=P(X)\) and \(P_1=P(Y)\) two distinct points of \(\textrm{PG}(n,K)\). The point \(\rho (\ell )\) lies on the hyperplane H if and only if \(XA_HY^t=0\).

Proof

Let \(H:\sum _{i<j}a_{ij}X_{ij}=0\), \(X=(X_i)_{0\le i\le n}\), \(Y=(Y_i)_{0\le i\le n}\) and \(\rho (\ell )=(p_{ij})_{0\le i<j\le n}\), where \(p_{ij}=X_iY_j-X_jY_i\). Since

$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{i<j}a_{ij}p_{ij}=\sum _{i<j}a_{ij}x_iy_j -\sum _{i<j}a_{ij}x_jy_i=0, \end{aligned}$$

we see that \(XA_HY^t=0\) if and only if \(\rho (\ell )\in H\). \(\square \)

From now on we assume that \(n=4\) and hence \(N=9\).

Lemma 3.2

[6, Theorem 24.2.15] The automorphism group G of \({\mathcal {G}}(1,4,q)\) in \(\textrm{PGL}(10,q)\) is isomorphic to \(\textrm{PGL}(5,q)\).

There are two possibilities for a hyperplane section of \({\mathcal {G}}(1,4,q)\) since a skew-symmetric matrix of order 5 has type 2 or 4. The corresponding singular linear complexes correspond to:

  • (type 2) lines of \(\textrm{PG}(4,q)\) incident to or contained in a plane. In this case \({\mathcal {L}}\) consists of \((q^2+q+1)(q^3+q^2+1)\) lines;

  • (type 4) lines of \(\textrm{PG}(4,q)\) incident to or contained in a parabolic quadric Q(4, q). In this case \({\mathcal {L}}\) consists of \((q+1)^2(q+1)\) lines.

Theorem 3.3

The Grassmannian of lines of \(\textrm{PG}(4,q)\) is a two–character set of \(\textrm{PG}(9,q)\) with respect to hyperplanes. It has size \((q^2+1)(q^4+q^3+q^2+q+1)\) and the characters are \((q^2+q+1)(q^3+q^2+1)\) and \((q+1)^2(q+1)\).

Remark 3.4

The secant variety \(\mathcal {M}(\mathcal {V}_n)\) and the Grassmannian of lines of \(\textrm{PG}(n+1,q)\) lie in the same projective ambient \(\textrm{PG}\left( \frac{n(n+3)}{2},q\right) \) and, for any n, they have the same number of points, i.e. \((q^n-1)(q^{n+1}-1)q^2/(q-1)(q^2-1)\). Also, as we have shown for \(n=2\) and \(n=3\), they have the same characters (with respect to hyperplanes). Is this just numerology or there is a combinatorial connection between the two algebraic varieties?

4 A derivation technique

In this section we construct another two-character set of \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) with respect to hyperplanes having the same characters as \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3:=\mathcal {M}(\mathcal {V}_2)\) but not isomorphic to \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\).

Let \(X_{11},X_{12},X_{13},X_{22},X_{23},X_{33}\) be projective homogeneous coordinates in \(\textrm{PG}(5,q).\) The Veronese surface \({\mathcal {V}}_2\) in \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) has parametric equations

$$\begin{aligned} (a^2,ab,ac,b^2,bc,c^2), \end{aligned}$$

where \(a,b,c\in \mathbb {F}_q\) and \((a,b,c)\ne (0,0,0)\) and the secant variety \(\mathcal {M}_3^4\) has equation

$$\begin{aligned} X_{11}X_{22}X_{33}+2X_{12}X_{23}X_{13}-X_{12}^2X_{33} -X_{13}^2X_{22}-X_{23}^2X_{11}=0. \end{aligned}$$

Consider the 3-dimensional projective space \(T:X_{13}=X_{33}=0\). It is easy to see that \(T\cap \mathcal {M}_{3}^4\) consists of two planes, i.e., \(\pi _t:X_{11}=X_{13}=X_{33}=0\) and \(\pi _c:X_{23}=X_{13}=X_{33}=0\), which are a tangent plane and a conic plane of \(\mathcal {V}_2\), respectively.

Also, let \(\ell =\pi _t\cap \pi _c\). In T there are, apart from \(\pi _t\) and \(\pi _c\), another \(q-1\) planes through \(\ell \).

Lemma 4.1

If \(\Pi \) is a hyperplane intersecting \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in exactly one point P, then \(\Pi \) contains the tangent plane to \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in P.

Proof

Let \(P=\nu (p)\), with \(p\in \textrm{PG}(2,q)\). Embed \(\textrm{PG}(2,q)\) in \(\textrm{PG}(2,q^2)\). Let G be the stabilizer of \(\textrm{PG}(2,q)\) in \(\textrm{PGL}(3,q^2)\). Then G acts transitively on the points of \(\textrm{PG}(2,q)\) and the stabilizer of p in G acts transitively on the imaginary lines through p. Hence, without loss of generality, we can always choose a hyperplane of \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) intersecting \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in a point.

Assume q is odd and let \(\Pi : X_{22}=\alpha X_{33}\), with \(\alpha \) a nonzero square in \(\mathbb {F}_q\). Then \(\Pi \) intersects \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in the point \(P:=(1,0,0,0,0,0)\) and contains the tangent plane to \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in P with equation \(X_{22}=X_{23}=X_{33}=0\).

Suppose q even and let \(\Pi :\ X_{22}+X_{23}+\alpha X_{33}\), with \(\textrm{Tr}_{q/2}(\alpha )=1\), where \(\textrm{Tr}_{q/2}\) denotes the absolute trace from \(\mathbb {F}_q\) over \(\mathbb {F}_2\). Then \(\Pi \) intersects \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in the point \(P:=(1,0,0,0,0,0)\) and contains the tangent plane to \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in P with equation \(X_{22}=X_{23}=X_{33}=0\). \(\square \)

Lemma 4.2

If a hyperplane \(\Pi \) contains a tangent plane to \(\mathcal {V}_2\) then \(\Pi \) cannot intersect \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in a quartic normal rational curve.

Proof

By way of contradiction suppose that the intersection \(\Pi \cap \mathcal {V}_2\) is a quartic normal rational curve. Then the projective subspace tangent to the curve is a line. \(\square \)

Let \(\pi \) be a plane through \(\ell \) distinct from \(\pi _t\) and \(\pi _c\). The following result generalizes [4, Theorem 2].

Theorem 4.3

The sets \(({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\setminus \pi _c)\cup \pi \) and \(({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\setminus \pi _c)\cup \pi \) are two-character sets with respect to hyperplanes. The two characters are:

$$\begin{aligned} q^3+q^2+q+1 \text { and } q^3+2q^2+q+1. \end{aligned}$$

Proof

From [3] a hyperplane \(\Pi \) of \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) meets \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\) in either \(q^3+2q^2+q+1\) points or \(q^3+q^2+q+1\) points. The first case occurs when the intersection between \(\Pi \) and \(\mathcal {V}_2\) is either a point or a conic or a pair of conics. The latter case occurs when the intersection between \(\Pi \) and \(\mathcal {V}_2\) is a quartic normal rational curve.

We first suppose that \({\mathcal {M}}'=({\mathcal {M}}_4^3{\setminus } \pi _c)\cup \pi \).

Let \(\Pi \) be a hyperplane of \(\textrm{PG}(5,q)\) and let \(P=\ell \cap \mathcal {V}_2\). If \(\Pi \) contains T there is nothing to prove. Otherwise, \(\Pi \) meets T in a plane \(\sigma \).

Four possibilities occur.

\(\boxed {\text {Case 1}.}\) If \(\sigma \) coincides with \(\pi \) then \(\Pi \) cannot contain a conic \(\mathcal {C}\) of \(\mathcal {V}_2\). In such a case \(\Pi \) would contain the tangent line to such a conic \(\mathcal {C}\) through P. Such a line is different from \(\ell \) (otherwise \(\pi _c\subset \Pi \) and so \(T\subset \Pi \)) and hence \(\pi _t\subset \Pi \), i.e. \(T\subset \Pi \), a contradiction. By Lemma 4.1, if \(\Pi \cap \mathcal {V}_2=\{P\}\) then \(\pi _t\subset \Pi \), again a contradiction. Then \(\Pi \) intersects \(\mathcal {V}_2\) in a quartic normal rational curve and hence \(|\Pi \cap \mathcal {M}_3^4|=q^3+q^2+q+1\) and hence \(|\Pi \cap \mathcal {M}'|=q^3+2q^2+q+1\).

\(\boxed {\text {Case 2}.}\) If \(\sigma \) coincides with \(\pi _c\) then, by Lemma 4.2, \(\Pi \) meets \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\) in \(q^3+2q^2+q+1\) points and hence \({\mathcal {M}}'\) in \(q^3+q^2+q+1\) points.

\(\boxed {\text {Case 3}.}\) If \(\sigma \) coincides with \(\pi _t\) then \(\Pi \) meets both \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\) and \({\mathcal {M}}'\) in \(q^3+2q^2+q+1\) points.

\(\boxed {\text {Case 4}.}\) The last possibility is when \(\sigma \) meets both planes \(\pi _c\) and \(\pi \) in two distinct lines. In this case the line \(\sigma \cap \pi _P\) is replaced by \(\sigma \cap \pi \) and hence \(\Pi \) meets \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\) and \({\mathcal {M}}'\) in the same number of points that is either \(q^3+2q^2+q+1\) or \(q^3+q^2+q+1\).

If \({\mathcal {M}}':=({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\setminus \pi _t)\cup \pi \) the cases 2 and 3 interchange. \(\square \)

Proposition 4.4

\({\mathcal {M}}'\) admits an automorphism group of order \(q^3(q-1)\).

Proof

The group of \({\mathcal {M}}_4^3\) in \(\textrm{PSL}_6(q)\) is isomorphic to \(H:=\textrm{PSL}_3(q)\) and it acts transitively on the \((q+1)(q^2+q+1)\) tangent lines to \({\mathcal {V}}_2\). Then the stabilizer of \(\ell \) in H has order \(q^3(q-1)^2\) and permutes the \(q-1\) planes through \(\ell \) in T distinct from \(\pi _t\) and \(\pi _c\). Choosing one among these \(q-1\) planes we get the result. \(\square \)