Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Inward FDI and Family Firm Heterogeneity on Foreign Location Choice: Evidence from India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Management International Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the internal and external factors that influence the location choice decision of family firms. Drawing on two streams of literature—family firm and international business—we investigate the role that inward FDI (IFDI) and firm’s heterogeneity (ownership structure and management type) play in the location choice of family firms. Our analysis of a large sample of family firms (N = 278) from India suggests that IFDI is positively associated with a greater likelihood of advanced economy location choice compared to the choice of emerging economies. Our results also reveal that the relationship between IFDI and advanced economy location choice is stronger for family-controlled firms than for family-influenced firms. In addition, results demonstrate that within family-controlled firms, the above positive relationship is stronger for firms that are professionally-managed than for firms that are family-managed. The study concludes by explaining the theoretical and managerial implications of the findings and highlighting avenues of future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In addition to competition, IFDI can create knowledge spillover and learning opportunities. Examining spillover, learning, and competition on account of IFDI is practically impossible in one study. Following the strategic response literature in the context of EMFs (Ayyagari et al., 2015; Cui et al., 2014; Luo & Tung, 2018; Mondal et al., 2021) we focus only on competition in this paper.

  2. We elaborate on two types of heterogeneity in Sect. 3.2 and 3.3.

  3. The dilemma that family firm actors deal with when simultaneously evaluating various gains / losses of current SEW vis-à-vis prospective financial wealth is known as mixed gamble. Detailed discussion, however, is outside the scope of this study.

  4. We thank an anonymous reviewer for encouraging us to conduct these additional tests. Results will be made available to the readers upon request.

  5. We thank an anonymous reviewer for bringing this important issue to our attention.

References

  • Aguilera, R. V., Marano, V., & Haxhi, I. (2019). International corporate governance: A review and opportunities for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 457–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alessandri, T. M., Cerrato, D., & Eddleston, K. A. (2018). The mixed gamble of internationalization in family and nonfamily firms: The moderating role of organizational slack. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 46–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle, J. L., Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., & Hitt, M. A. (2012). Internationalization of family–controlled firms: A study of the effects of external involvement in governance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1115–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle, J. L., Duran, P., Hitt, M. A., & Van Essen, M. (2017). Why is family firms’ internationalization unique? A meta–analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5), 801–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., & Mari, I. (2019). A missing link in family firms’ internationalization research: Family structures. Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 809–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle, J. L., Chirico, F., Kano, L., Kundu, S. K., Majocchi, A., & Schulze, W. S. (2021). Family firm internationalization: Past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(6), 1159–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayyagari, M., Dau, L. A., & Spencer, J. (2015). Strategic responses to FDI in emerging markets: Are core members more responsive than peripheral members of business groups? Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1869–1894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahl, M., Lahiri, S., & Mukherjee, D. (2021). Managing internationalization and innovation tradeoffs in entrepreneurial firms: Evidence from transition economies. Journal of World Business, 56(1), 101150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banalieva, E. R., Eddleston, K. A., Jiang, J. R., & Santoro, M. D. (2022). Raising or folding the bet? Institutional dynamics, family involvement, and the mixed gamble of internationalization. Thunderbird International Business Review, 64(4), 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baronchelli, G., Bettinelli, C., Del Bosco, B., & Loane, S. (2016). The impact of family involvement on the investments of Italian small-medium enterprises in psychically distant countries. International Business Review, 25(4), 960–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaumik, S. K., & Driffield, N. (2011). Direction of outward FDI of EMNEs: Evidence from the Indian pharmaceutical sector. Thunderbird International Business Review, 53(5), 615–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boers, B. (2016). Go East! How family businesses choose markets and entry modes when internationalising. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 8(4), 333–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bu, J., Tang, Y., Luo, Y., & Li, C. (2022). Learning from inbound foreign acquisitions for outbound expansion by emerging market MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 1–35.

  • Buckley, P. J., Driffield, N., & Kim, J. Y. (2022). The role of outward FDI in creating Korean global factories. Management International Review, 62(1), 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesinger, B., Hughes, M., Mensching, H., Bouncken, R., Fredrich, V., & Kraus, S. (2016). A socioemotional wealth perspective on how collaboration intensity, trust, and international market knowledge affect family firms’ multinationality. Journal of World Business, 51(4), 586–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J., & Shim, J. (2015). When does transitioning from family to professional management improve firm performance? Strategic Management Journal, 36(9), 1297–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Chittoor, R., & Vissa, B. (2021). Does nepotism run in the family? CEO pay and pay-performance sensitivity in Indian family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 42(7), 1326–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Giroud, A., Rygh, A., & Han, X. (2023). Chinese SMEs’ location choice and political risk: The moderating role of legitimacy. International Business Review, 102199.

  • Chittoor, R., Sarkar, M. B., Ray, S., & Aulakh, P. S. (2009). Third-world copycats to emerging multinationals: Institutional changes and organizational transformation in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Organization Science, 20(1), 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittoor, R., Aulakh, P. S., & Ray, S. (2015). Accumulative and assimilative learning, institutional infrastructure, and innovation orientation of developing economy firms. Global Strategy Journal, 5(2), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittoor, R., Aulakh, P. S., & Ray, S. (2019). Microfoundations of firm internationalization: The owner CEO effect. Global Strategy Journal, 9(1), 42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J. (2019). Stewardship theory: Realism, relevance, and family firm governance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(6), 1051–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, H. M. (2013). The role of family management and family ownership in diversification: The case of family business groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30, 871–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CMIE (Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy) (2013). CapEx [Database], https://capex.cmie.com/ (accessed March 2013).

  • Cui, L., Meyer, K. E., & Hu, H. W. (2014). What drives firms’ intent to seek strategic assets by foreign direct investment? A study of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(4), 488–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Angelo, A., Majocchi, A., & Buck, T. (2016). External managers, family ownership and the scope of SME internationalization. Journal of World Business, 51(4), 534–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daspit, J. J., Chrisman, J. J., Ashton, T., & Evangelopoulos, N. (2021). Family firm heterogeneity: A definition, common themes, scholarly progress, and directions forward. Family Business Review, 34(3), 296–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dau, L. A. (2012). Promarket reforms and developing country multinational corporations. Global Strategy Journal, 2(3), 262–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dau, L. A. (2013). Learning across geographic space: Pro-market reforms, multinationalization strategy, and profitability. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(3), 235–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Majocchi, A., & Piscitello, L. (2018). Family firms in the global economy: Toward a deeper understanding of internationalization determinants, processes, and outcomes. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-García, J. B., Blanco-Mazagatos, V., Romero-Merino, M. E., & Díaz-Portugal, C. (2022). Family CEO affect and R&D investments of family firms: The moderation effect of family ownership structure. Long Range Planning, 102230.

  • Deng, P., Delios, A., & Peng, M. W. (2020). A geographic relational perspective on the internationalization of emerging market firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 50–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, J., & Zhao, E. Y. (2023). International expansion and home-country resource acquisition: A signaling perspective of emerging-market firms’ internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 1–19.

  • Elango, B., & Pattnaik, C. (2011). Learning before making the big leap: Acquisition strategies of emerging market firms. Management International Review, 51, 461–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuad, M., Thakur, V., & Sinha, A. K. (2021). Entry timing as a mixed gamble in cross-border acquisition waves: A study of family firms. Family Business Review, 34(3), 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, R. (2023). Inward FDI spillovers and emerging multinationals’ outward FDI in two directions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 40, 265–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, A. S., Ma, X., & Ding, Z. (2018). Home country supportiveness/unfavorableness and outward foreign direct investment from China. Journal of International Business Studies, 49, 324–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Makri, M., & Kintana, M. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Patel, P. C., & Zellweger, T. M. (2018). In the horns of the dilemma: Socioemotional wealth, financial wealth, and acquisitions in family firms. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1369–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, C., & González-Galindo, A. (2022). The institutional context as a source of heterogeneity in family firm internationalization strategies: A comparison between US and emerging market family firms. International Business Review, 31(4), 101972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, C., & Shan, Y. G. (2014). An empirical analysis of the effect of internationalization on the performance of unlisted family and nonfamily firms in Australia. Family Business Review, 27(2), 142–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Q., & Lu, J. W. (2011). Effects of inward investment on outward investment: The venture capital industry worldwide 1985–2007. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(2), 263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 153–161.

  • Hennart, J. F. (2009). Down with MNE-centric theories! Market entry and expansion as the bundling of MNE and local assets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1432–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J. F., Majocchi, A., & Forlani, E. (2019). The myth of the stay-at-home family firm: How family-managed SMEs can overcome their internationalization limitations. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(5), 758–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, V., Nieto, M. J., & Boellis, A. (2018). The asymmetric effect of institutional distance on international location: Family versus nonfamily firms. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 22–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., & Peng, M. W. (2013). Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: The influence of institutions and factor markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1295–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussinger, K., & Issah, A. B. (2019). Firm acquisitions by family firms: A mixed gamble approach. Family Business Review, 32(4), 354–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutzschenreuter, T., & Gröne, F. (2009). Product and geographic scope changes of multinational enterprises in response to international competition. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1149–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, N. K., Kothari, T., & Kumar, V. (2016). Location choice research: Proposing new agenda. Management International Review, 56(3), 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, B. E., Sawant, R. J., & Bendickson, J. S. (2020). Emerging market multinationals’ firm-specific advantages, institutional distance, and foreign acquisition location choice. International Business Review, 29(5), 101702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jormanainen, I., & Koveshnikov, A. (2012). International activities of emerging market firms: A critical assessment of research in top international management journals. Management International Review, 52, 691–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J. A., & Henderson, D. A. (1992). Location preferences of family firms: Strategic decision making or home sweet home? Family Business Review, 5(3), 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, L., & Verbeke, A. (2018). Family firm internationalization: Heritage assets and the impact of bifurcation bias. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 158–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, L., Ciravegna, L., & Rattalino, F. (2021). The family as a platform for FSA development: Enriching new internalization theory with insights from family firm research. Journal of International Business Studies, 52, 148–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, M. S., & Kuo, A. (2017). The effect of uncertainty on FDI entry mode decisions: The influence of family ownership and involvement in the board of directors. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(4), 224–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerai, A., Kumar, V., & Singla, C. (2023). Impact of TMT structural power asymmetry on family firm internationalization. International Business Review, 32(4), 102134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. U., & Aguilera, R. V. (2016). Foreign location choice: Review and extensions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 133–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinger-Hans, L., Chittoor, R., Vissa, B., & Chen, G. (2024). Family-controlled business groups: An in-depth review and a microfoundations-based research agenda. Journal of Management, 50(1), 307–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Gaur, A., Zhan, W., & Luo, Y. (2019). Co-evolution of MNCs and local competitors in emerging markets. International Business Review, 28(5), 101527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Singh, D., Purkayastha, A., Popli, M., & Gaur, A. (2020). Springboard internationalization by emerging market firms: Speed of first cross-border acquisition. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(2), 172–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari, S., Shirodkar, V., & McGuire, S. (2023). Pre-liberalization foundations and the FDI-based internationalization of SMEs from emerging markets. Management International Review, 63(4), 641–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, S. (2011). India-focused publications in leading international business journals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28, 427–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, S., Mukherjee, D., & Peng, M. W. (2020). Behind the internationalization of family SMEs: A strategy tripod synthesis. Global Strategy Journal, 10(4), 813–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapeira, M., Samara, G., Kundu, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2024). To export or to FDI? A configurational approach to family firm internationalization. Journal of World Business, 59(2), 101506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Lin, B. W., Wong, Y. Y., & Calantone, R. J. (2011). Understanding and managing international product launch: A comparison between developed and emerging markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(s1), 104–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Fleury, M. T. L. (2020). Overcoming the liability of outsidership for emerging market MNEs: A capability-building perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Yi, X., & Cui, G. (2017). Emerging market firms’ internationalization: How do firms’ inward activities affect their outward activities? Strategic Management Journal, 38(13), 2704–2725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Quan, R., Stoian, M. C., & Azar, G. (2018). Do MNEs from developed and emerging economies differ in their location choice of FDI? A 36-year review. International Business Review, 27(5), 1089–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, X., Wang, L., & Cui, Z. (2014). Chinese private firms and internationalization: Effects of family involvement in management and family ownership. Family Business Review, 27(2), 126–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, Y. C., & Filatotchev, I. (2015). Ownership characteristics as determinants of FDI location decisions in emerging economies. Journal of World Business, 50(4), 637–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Vrontis, D. (2017). Emerging-market firms venturing into advanced economies: The role of context. Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(3), 255–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J. W., Liang, X., Shan, M., & Liang, X. (2015). Internationalization and performance of Chinese family firms: The moderating role of corporate governance. Management and Organization Review, 11(4), 645–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Bu, J. (2018). When are emerging market multinationals more risk taking? Global Strategy Journal, 8(4), 635–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2018). A general theory of springboard MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 49, 129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Wang, S. L. (2012). Foreign direct investment strategies by developing country multinationals: A diagnostic model for home country effects. Global Strategy Journal, 2(3), 244–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Zhang, H. (2016). Emerging market MNEs: Qualitative review and theoretical directions. Journal of International Management, 22(4), 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Zhang, H., & Bu, J. (2019). Developed country MNEs investing in developing economies: Progress and prospect. Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 633–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, S., Marzano, R., & Piscitello, L. (2021). The role of family firms’ generational heterogeneity in the entry mode choice in foreign markets. Journal of Business Research, 132, 800–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., & Nguyen, H. V. (2005). Foreign investment strategies and sub-national institutions in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 63–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Li, C., & Schotter, A. P. (2020). Managing the MNE subsidiary: Advancing a multi-level and dynamic research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 538–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miroshnychenko, I., Eddleston, K. A., & De Massis, A. (2023). Fight or flight? Understanding family firm internationalization when the rules of the game change. Journal of World Business, 58(5), 101462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, A., & Khatua, A. (2023). Ownership effects on direction of multinationality: Evidence from Indian EMNEs. Thunderbird International Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, A., Lahiri, S., & Ray, S. (2021). Strategic response to inward foreign direct investment: A study of Indian family firms. Management International Review, 61(2), 207–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, A., Ray, S., & Lahiri, S. (2022). Family ownership, family management, and multinationality: Evidence from India. Journal of Business Research, 138, 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, B. B., Asmussen, C. G., & Weatherall, C. D. (2017). The location choice of foreign direct investments: Empirical evidence and methodological challenges. Journal of World Business, 52(1), 62–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, E. C., Wang, H., & Ai, C. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. The Stata Journal, 4(2), 154–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pongelli, C., Caroli, M. G., & Cucculelli, M. (2016). Family business going abroad: The effect of family ownership on foreign market entry mode decisions. Small Business Economics, 47, 787–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pongelli, C., Calabrò, A., Quarato, F., Minichilli, A., & Corbetta, G. (2021). Out of the comfort zone! Family leaders’ subsidiary ownership choices and the role of vulnerabilities. Family Business Review, 34(4), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulis, K., Yamin, M., & Poulis, E. (2012). Domestic firms competing with multinational enterprises: The relevance of resource-accessing alliance formations. International Business Review, 21(4), 588–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Procher, V. D., Urbig, D., & Volkmann, C. (2013). Time to BRIC it? Internationalization of European family firms in Europe, North America and the BRIC countries. Applied Economics Letters, 20(16), 1466–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, S., Mondal, A., & Ramachandran, K. (2018). How does family involvement affect a firm’s internationalization? An investigation of Indian family firms. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 73–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Peña, R., Upadhyay, A., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2023). Foreign competitive pressure and inversions by US multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 54, 829–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sciascia, S., & Mazzola, P. (2008). Family involvement in ownership and management: Exploring nonlinear effects on performance. Family Business Review, 21(4), 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sestu, M. C., & Majocchi, A. (2020). Family firms and the choice between wholly owned subsidiaries and joint ventures: A transaction costs perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(2), 211–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirodkar, V., Nayyar, R., & Varma, S. (2023). Institutional fragility and internationalization of Indian firms: Moderating effects of inward FDI and linkages. Journal of World Business, 101502.

  • Singla, C., Veliyath, R., & George, R. (2014). Family firms and internationalization-governance relationships: Evidence of secondary agency issues. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 606–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., & Webb, J. W. (2008). The role of family influence in firms’ strategic responses to threat of imitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 979–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, R., Filatotchev, I., Lien, Y. C., & Piesse, J. (2009). Insider control and the FDI location decision: Evidence from firms investing in an emerging market. Management International Review, 49, 433–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, Z., Li, J., Wei, S., & Wu, Z. (2024). Effect of inward foreign direct investment on entrepreneurship productivity in emerging markets. Journal of International Management, 30(1), 101116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, D., Anderson, J., & Hertenstein, P. (2018). Is the strategic asset seeking investment proclivity of Chinese MNEs different to that of developed market MNEs? A comparative analysis of location choice and orientation. Management International Review, 58, 911–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, R. W., & Buckley, P. J. (2022). Outward foreign direct investment by emerging market multinationals: The directionality of institutional distance. Journal of Business Research, 149, 314–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E. W. (2020). Family firms and internationalization: An organizational learning perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(1), 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. L., Luo, Y., Lu, X., Sun, J., & Maksimov, V. (2014). Autonomy delegation to foreign subsidiaries: An enabling mechanism for emerging-market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(2), 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Q., Luo, J. H., & Huang, X. (2020). Influence of social identity on family firms’ FDI decisions: The moderating role of internal capital markets. Management International Review, 60(5), 651–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S., Fan, D., & Chen, L. (2022). Revisiting the internationalization-performance relationship: A twenty-year meta-analysis of emerging market multinationals. Management International Review, 62(2), 203–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Zahoor, N., Khan, Z., & Meyer, M. (2023). The effects of inward FDI communities on the research and development intensity of emerging market locally domiciled firms: Partial foreign ownership as a contingency. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, S., & Tian, X. (2023). Performance feedback and location choice of foreign direct investment. International Business Review, 32(4), 102104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, K., Hitt, M. A., & Miller, S. R. (2020). The ownership structure contingency in the sequential international entry mode decision process: Family owners and institutional investors in family-dominant versus family-influenced firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. (2018). Subnational institutions and location choice of emerging market firms. Journal of International Management, 24(4), 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W., & Meyer, K. E. (2015). Competitive dynamics in an emerging economy: Competitive pressures, resources, and the speed of action. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1176–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., Li, J., Stanley, L. J., Kellermanns, F. W., & Li, X. (2020). How family firm characteristics affect internationalization of Chinese family SMEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37, 417–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Sardana, D., & Tang, R. (2022). Heterogeneity in OFDI by EMNEs: Drivers and trends of Chinese and Indian firms. International Business Review, 31(6), 102013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, H., Cantwell, J., Jia, F., & Wang, C. (2023). Location choice of Chinese outward FDI–An ethnicity-based population ecology perspective. Journal of International Management, 29(1), 100983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Somnath Lahiri.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mondal, A., Lahiri, S. The Role of Inward FDI and Family Firm Heterogeneity on Foreign Location Choice: Evidence from India. Manag Int Rev 64, 245–278 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-024-00535-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-024-00535-7

Keywords

Navigation