Abstract
-
Analyzing the nature of competitive interaction among multinational firms in the tire industry, we find that the histories of the interactions between particular rivals matter.
-
The decision to enter a new foreign market in the era of global consolidation is related to the identities of rivals in the market, characteristics of the firm and the market, and the extent of past competitive interactions with the international pioneering firm.
-
Results suggest that, in an oligopolistic environment, aspects of multimarket competition are important to foreign direct investment decisions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
While each country has its own first-mover, we use the term “pioneer” to represent the first company to establish an overall global presence in an industry. In the case of the tire industry, this was Goodyear.
Baum and Korn (1999) analyzed the dyadic interactions of California commuter airlines, and found an inverted U-shaped relationship between firms’ entry into and exit from each other’s markets and the level of multimarket contact.
Note that the i and m subscripts are dropped for ease of exposition.
We used the reported dollar values if firms disclosed them. When dollar values were not reported, we computed them based on the average exchange rates reported by the International Monetary Fund (1993), for the years concerned.
A conceptually logical addition to the control variables could involve information on automobile plants. However, FDI undertaken by tire companies does not appear to have a direct relationship with the locations in which home country automobile companies establish plants. This is probably due to the nature of the sourcing process in the original equipment market during the time we are considering. It was essentially an auction process, in which tire manufacturers were asked to submit bids for particular vehicle models. Since the car manufacturers would then pressure all firms to match the lowest bid, this system led to extremely low prices. The supply contracts typically lasted for about three years, with annual price re-negotiation (Cool/Chahid-Mouraï 1994, p. 7). The short-term nature of OEM contracts meant that there was little economic justification for tire companies to follow specific auto manufacturers to new production locations.
References
Ball, C. A./Tschoegl, A. E., The Decision to Establish a Foreign Bank Branch or Subsidiary: An Application of Binary Classification Procedures, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 17, 3, 1982, pp. 411–424.
Barron, J. M./Valev, N. T., International Lending by U.S. Banks, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 32, 3, 2000, pp. 357–381.
Baum, J. A. C./Korn, H. J., Dynamics of Dyadic Competitive Interaction, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 3, 1999, pp. 251–278.
Bernheim, B. D./Whinston M. D., Multimarket Contact and Collusive Behavior, Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 1, 1990, pp. 1–26.
Bhardwaj, A./Dietz, J./Beamish, P. W., Host Country Cultural Influences on Foreign Direct Investment, Management International Review, 47, 1, 2007, pp. 29–50.
Borenstein, S./Netz, J., Why Do All the Flights Leave at 8 am?: Competition and Departure-Time Differentiation in Airline Industries, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17, 5, 1999, pp. 611–640.
Bresnahan, T. F./Reiss, P. C., Entry in Monopoly Markets, Review of Economic Studies, 57, 192, 1990, pp. 531–553.
Buckley, P. J./Casson, M., The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan 1976.
Caves, R. E., Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, 2nd ed., Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press 1996.
Coase, R. J., The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 4, 16, 1937, pp. 386–405.
Cool, K./Chahid-Mouraï, B., The World Tire Industry in 1993, Continental Gummi Werke, Fountainebleau, France: INSEAD-CEDEP 394-118-1 1994.
Dunning, J. H., Explaining Changing Patterns of International Production: In Defense of the Eclectic Theory, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41, 4, 1979, pp. 269–96.
Dunning, J. H., Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A Neglected Factor?, Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 1, 1998, pp. 45–66.
Edwards, C. D., Conglomerate Bigness as a Source of Power, in Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research (ed.), Business Concentration and Price Policy, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1955.
Graham, E. M., Market Structure and the Multinational Enterprise: A Game-theoretic Approach, Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 1, 1998, pp. 67–83.
Horst, T., Firm and Industry Determinants of the Decision to Invest Abroad: An Empirical Study, Review of Economics and Statistics, 54, 3, 1972, pp. 258–266.
Hymer, S. H., The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press 1960 (1976).
Institutional Investors, September 1980, 1985, 1990.
International Air Transport Association and International Aeradio, Air Distances Manual, Geneva: International Air Transport Association 1994.
International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics Yearbook, Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund 1993.
Ito, K./Rose, E. L., Foreign Direct Investment Location Strategies in the Tire Industry, Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 3, 2002, pp. 593–602.
Johanson, J./Vahlne, J.-E., The Internationalization Process of the Firm: A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments, Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 1, 1977, pp. 23–32.
Karnani, A./Wernerfelt, B., Multiple Point Competition, Strategic Management Journal, 6, 1, 1985, pp. 87–96.
Kennedy, R. E., Strategy Fads and Competitive Convergence: An Empirical Test for Herd Behavior in Prime-Time Television Programming, Journal of Industrial Economics, 50, 1, 2002, pp. 57–84.
Klemperer, P., Equilibrium Product Lines: Competing Head-to-Head May Be Less Competitive, American Economic Review, 82, 4, 1992, pp. 740–755.
Knickerbocker, F. T., Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise, Boston: Division of Research Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University 1973.
Lieberman, M. B./Montgomery, D. B., First-Mover Advantages, Strategic Management Journal, 9, Special Issue, 1988, pp. 41–58.
Lieberman, M. B./Montgomery, D. B., First-Mover (Dis)Advantages, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 12, 1998, pp. 1111–1125.
Moody’s Investors Service, Moody’s International Manual, New York: The Service (various years).
Netz, J./Taylor, B. A., Maximum or Minimum Differentiation? An Empirical Investigation into the Location of Firms, Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 1, 2002, pp. 162–175.
Pascal, D. B./Barbour, P. A./Griffin, J. (eds.), International Directory of Company Histories, Volume V, Detroit and London: St James Press 1992.
Pitelis, C., Stephen Herbert Hymer and/on the (Theory of the) MNE and International Business, International Business Review, 15, 2, 2006, pp. 103–110.
Price Waterhouse, Corporate Taxes: A Worldwide Summary, New York: Price Waterhouse Center for Transnational Taxation (various years).
Rugman, A. M., The Regional Multinationals: MNEs and “Global” Strategic Management, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press 2005.
Scott, J. T., Multimarket Contact and Economic Performance, Review of Economics and Statistics, 64, 3, 1982, pp. 368–375.
Scott, J. T., Purposive Diversification as a Motive for Merger, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7, 1, 1989, pp. 35–47.
Scott, J. T., Multimarket Contact among Diversified Oligopolists, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9, 2, 1991, pp. 225–238.
Scherer, F. M., International High-Technology Competition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1992.
Scherer, F. M./Ross, D., Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1990.
United Nations Statistical Office, Statistical Yearbook, New York: United Nations (various years).
Vernon, R., International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 2, 1966, pp. 190–207.
Yu, C. M./Ito, K., Oligopolistic Reaction and Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of the U.S. Tire and Textile Industry, Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 3, 1988, pp. 449–460.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge research support from the CIBER at the University of Hawai’i at Manoa, and are extremely grateful for the suggestions of the editors and two anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rose, E., Ito, K. Past Interactions and New Foreign Direct Investment Location Decisions. Manag Int Rev 49, 641–669 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-009-0010-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-009-0010-y