Abstract
This study undertakes an in-depth examination of how football matches and related sporting performance influence the intraday financial performance of corresponding blockchain-based fan tokens. Utilizing an event study encompassing eight distinct fan tokens and 325 football matches, we find a statistically significant average decline of 0.8% in fan token returns during the course of a football match, which subsequently decreases by an additional 0.7% in the post-match phase. Notably, a “loss effect” is identified, where the market reaction to losses is larger compared to wins. Furthermore, our study reveals large abnormal trading volumes before games, most prominently before UEFA Champions League matches, indicating anticipatory market behaviors. Further analysis establishes that abnormal fan token returns are impacted by various match-specific characteristics, such as the game outcome and form, predominantly before and during the match but not after. This distinct correlation between football games, sporting performance, and fan token returns has implications for a wide array of stakeholders and may suggest a challenge for investor (consumer) protection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data is publicly available from transfermarkt.de and binance.com.
Code availability
Materials and code can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Notes
One exception is the study by Ehrmann and Jansen (2016), who analyze football games of Italy and France at the 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa that took place when stock markets were open. The authors focus on the last games of Group F (Slovakia vs. Italy and Paraguay vs. New Zealand) and Group A (France vs. South Africa and Mexico vs. Uruguay) using high-frequency data of the company STMicroelectronics, which was listed on both the Milan and the Paris stock exchange.
By December 2021, Bitcoin traded below $20,000, before rising over $60,000 March 2021, again dropping to $30,000 in July 2021 and rising to $60,000 in late 2021. Accordingly, it is conceivable that volatile phases of Bitcoin also had an effect on the fan token market and motivates the application of an alternative model for the purpose of robustness.
All variables included in this study underwent extensive pre-analysis screening. In order to assess their suitability for inclusion in the models, a correlation analysis was conducted and variance inflation factors (VIFs) were calculated. It should be noted that the purpose of this procedure was to ensure the avoidance of multicollinearity and the establishment of substantial associations for the subsequent analyses. Detailed results of this preliminary analysis can be made available upon request.
For purposes of robustness, the regression models were further tested using CAARs computed based on the constant mean return model. The results obtained were largely consistent with our initial findings, indicating the reliability of the models applied. However, slight variations in the magnitude of the coefficients were observed, indicating minor – and logical – differences in effect size. These differences do not alter the overall conclusions but provide further nuances in our understanding of the models. Further details can be assessed in Table A.1 in the appendix.
Given the background of the COVID-19 pandemic at the time of data collection, approximately 25% of matches in our sample were played without spectators and consequently have a value of 0. Given this background, attendance cannot potentially be fully interpreted as a proxy for reputation, unlike in existing studies (Gimet and Montchaud 2016).
References
Ajinkya BB, Jain PC (1989) The behavior of daily stock market trading volume. J Account Econ 11:331–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(89)90018-9
Ante L, Schellinger B, Wazinski F-P (2023) Enhancing trust, efficiency, and empowerment in sports – developing a blockchain-based fan token framework. Eur Conf Inform Syst. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4421055
Armitage S (1995) Event study methods and evidence on their performance. J Econ Surv 9:25–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.1995.tb00109.x
Barberis N, Thaler R (2003) Chapter 18 A survey of behavioral finance. pp 1053–1128
Beck R, Czepluch JS, Lollike N, Malone S (2016) Blockchain – the gateway to trust-free cryptographic transactions. Twenty-Fourth Eur Conf Inform Syst 6:4013–4027
Bell AR, Brooks C, Matthews D, Sutcliffe C (2012) Over the moon or sick as a parrot? the effects of football results on a club’s share price. Appl Econ 44:3435–3452. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.577017
Bernile G, Lyandres E (2011) Understanding investor sentiment: the case of soccer. Financ Manage 40:357–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2011.01145.x
Bernstein J (2018) Smart contract integration in professional sports management: the imminence of athlete representation. Depaul J Sports Law Contemp Probl 14:88
Boehmer E, Musumeci J, Poulsen AB (1991) Event-study methodology under conditions of event-induced variance. J Financ Economet 30:253–272
Bowman RG (1983) Understanding and conducting event studies. J Bus Fin Account. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1983.tb00453.x
Brown GW, Hartzell JC (2001) Market reaction to public information: the atypical case of the boston celtics. J Financ Econ 60:333–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00047-2
Brown SJ, Warner JB (1985) Using daily stock returns. The case of event studies. J Financ Econ 14:3–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90042-X
Burnie A (2018) Exploring the interconnectedness of cryptocurrencies using correlation networks. Cryptocurr Res Conf 2018:1–29
Cao C, Petrasek L (2014) Liquidity risk in stock returns: an event-study perspective. J Bank Financ 45:72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.09.020
Cao P, Zhu G, Zhang Q et al (2021) Blockchain-enabled HMM model for sports performance prediction. IEEE Access 9:40255–40262. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3064261
Carlsson-Wall M, Newland B (2020) Blockchain, sport, and navigating the sportstech dilemma. In: Schmidt SL (ed) 21st Century sports: how technologies will change sports in the digital age. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 205–218
CoinGecko (2023) coingecko.com
CryptoSlam (2022) Fan Token Rankings by Market Cap. https://cryptoslam.io/fan-tokens. Accessed 11 Aug 2022
Demir E, Danis H (2011) The effect of performance of soccer clubs on their stock prices: evidence from turkey. Emerg Mark Fin Trade 47:58–70. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X4705S404
Demir E, Rigoni U (2017) You lose, i feel better: rivalry between soccer teams and the impact of schadenfreude on stock market. J Sports Econom 18:58–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002514551801
Demir E, Ersan O, Popesko B (2022) Are fan tokens fan tokens? Fin Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102736
Edmans A, Garcia D, Norli Ø (2007) Sports sentiment and stock returns. J Fin 62:1967–1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01262.x
Ehrmann M, Jansen D-J (2016) It hurts (Stock Prices) when your team is about to lose a soccer match *. Rev Fin 20:1215–1233. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfv031
Ersan O, Demir E, Assaf A (2022) Connectedness among fan tokens and stocks of football clubs. Res Int Bus Fin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101780
Evans S (2021) Messi joins crypto craze as gets part of PSG fee in fan tokens. In: Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/exclusive-messis-paris-st-germain-package-includes-crypto-fan-tokens-2021-08-12
Fama EF (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J Finance 25:383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat 7:117–140
Florysiak D, Schandlbauer A (2022) Experts or charlatans? ICO analysts and white paper informativeness. J Bank & Finance 139:106476
Funk DC, James JD (2006) Consumer loyalty: the meaning of attachment in the development of sport team allegiance. J Sport Manag 20:189–217. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.20.2.189
Gimet C, Montchaud S (2016) What drives european football clubs’ stock returns and volatility? Int J Econ Bus 23:351–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2016.1204686
Gkillas K, Bekiros S, Siriopoulos C (2018) Xtreme correlation in cryptocurrency markets
Hornuf L, Kück T, Schwienbacher A (2021) Initial coin offerings, information disclosure, and fraud. Small Bus Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00471-y
Howell ST, Niessner M, Yermack D (2020) Initial coin offerings: financing growth with cryptocurrency token sales. Rev Financ Stud 33:3925–3974. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz131
Hu A, Parlour CA, Rajan U (2019) Cryptocurrencies: stylized facts on a new investible instrument. Fin Manage 48:1049–1068. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12300
Kelso P (2022) Socios boss defends fan tokens business model. In: Sky. https://news.sky.com/story/socios-boss-defends-fan-tokens-business-model-12526788. Accessed 11 Aug 2022
Khaund S (2020) Blockchain: from fintech to the future of sport. In: Schmidt SL (ed) 21st Century Sports: How Technologies Will Change Sports in the Digital Age. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 191–204
Loipersberger F (2018) The effect of supranational banking supervision on the financial sector: event study evidence from Europe. J Bank Financ 91:34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.04.003
Lopez-Gonzalez H, Griffiths MD (2023) Gambling-like features in fan tokens. J Gambl Stud. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-023-10215-0
MacKinlay AC (1997) Event studies in economics and finance. J Econ Lit 35:13–39
Mazur M, Vega M (2022) Football and cryptocurrencies. SSRN J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4035558
Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system
Naraine M (2019) The blockchain phenomenon: conceptualizing decentralized networks and the value proposition to the sport industry. Int J Sport Commun 12:313–335
Newall PWS, Xiao LY (2021) Gambling marketing bans in professional sports neglect the risks posed by financial trading apps and cryptocurrencies. Gaming Law Rev 25:376–378. https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2021.0027
Palomino F, Renneboog L, Zhang C (2009) Information salience, investor sentiment, and stock returns: the case of British soccer betting. J Corpor Fin 15:368–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.12.001
Parham A, Breitinger C (2022) Non-fungible Tokens: Promise or Peril?
Rocketfan (2023) Fan Engagement Asset Market Cap. https://rocketfan.com/market. Accessed 5 May 2023
Scharnowski M, Scharnowski S, Zimmermann L (2022) Fan Tokens: Sports and Speculation on the Blockchain
Schellinger B, Ante L, Bauers SB (2022) Blockchain Use Cases and Concepts in Sports: A Systematic Review. In: 2022 European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2022)
Shleifer A (2000) Inefficient Markets. Oxford University PressOxford
Socios (2022a) Lionel Messi Joins Socios.com As Global Brand Ambassador. https://www.socios.com/lionel-messi-joins-socios-com-as-global-brand-ambassador. Accessed 11 Aug 2022
Socios (2022b) UEFA club competitions “add on” fan tokens launch on socios.com. https://www.socios.com/uefa-club-competitions-add-on-fan-tokens-launch-on-socios-com/. Accessed 11 Aug 2022
Vidal-Tomás D (2023) Blockchain, sport and fan tokens. J Econ Stud. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-02-2023-0094
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by LA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by all authors and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ante, L., Schellinger, B. & Demir, E. The impact of football games and sporting performance on intra-day fan token returns. J Bus Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-023-01187-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-023-01187-z
Keywords
- Asset pricing
- Blockchain
- Event study
- Fan tokens
- Informational efficiency
- Market efficiency
- Price discovery