Skip to main content
Log in

Zur Wirkung von Neukunden-Promotions auf Bestandskunden

Eine empirische Analyse in der Mobilfunkbranche

The impact of promotions on existing customers

An empirical analysis in the mobile telecommunications industry

  • Forschung
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

„Few things stir up a consumer revolt quicker than the notion that someone else is getting a better deal.“

Feinberg et al. (2002)

Zusammenfassung

Neukundenverträge werden häufig mit wesentlich attraktiveren Konditionen ausgestaltet als Vertragsangebote für Bestandskunden. Dabei scheinen Neukunden-Promotions zwar grundsätzlich geeignet, die Kaufbereitschaft potenzieller Kunden zu steigern, eventuelle Reaktionen der davon ausgeschlossenen Bestandskunden hierauf finden in der Praxis wie in der wissenschaftlichen Forschung jedoch kaum Beachtung. Vor diesem Hintergrund untersucht die vorliegende Studie anhand von zwei Laborexperimenten die Auswirkungen von Neukunden-Promotions auf potenzielle Kunden und Bestandskunden. Die Ergebnisse des ersten Experiments zeigen, dass Promotions bei potenziellen Kunden zu den gewünschten positiven Veränderungen der Kaufbereitschaft führen. Bei Bestandskunden dagegen sind negative Effekte zu beobachten, die insbesondere dann stark ausgeprägt sind, wenn Kunden erst seit kurzem in einer Kundenbeziehung mit ihrem Anbieter bzw. kurz vor Auslaufen ihres aktuellen Vertrags stehen. Das zweite Experiment belegt, dass die negativen Wirkungen auf die Bestandskunden vermieden werden können, wenn diesen die Möglichkeit geboten wird, durch eine Weiterempfehlungsprämie an der Neukunden-Promotion zu partizipieren. Dabei bleibt die positive Wirkung der Promotion auf die potenziellen Kunden weiterhin bestehen.

Abstract

Service providers frequently offer better deals to prospective customers than they offer to customers who prolong their contracts. The present paper examines the effectiveness of incentives on new customers and, perhaps even more significantly, assesses negative effects on existing customers. To test the hypothesized effects, a series of two experiments was conducted. Results indicate that promotions that are offered exclusively to prospective customers have a negative effect on existing customers, and that this negative effect is stronger for customers with a short relationship age and for those at the end of their contract life-cycle. The unfairness and inequity perceived by existing customers can be substantially reduced if these customers are offered the opportunity to receive a part of the promotion value, while the promotion’s effectiveness to attract new customers remains unaffected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  • Adams JS (1963) Toward an understanding of inequity. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 67(5):422–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams JS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 2:267–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal MK, Rao VR (1996) An empirical comparison of consumer-based measures of brand equity. Mark Lett 7(3):237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1982) Equity in attitude formation and change. In: Greenberg J, Cohen RL (Hrsg) Equity and justice in social behavior. Academic Press, New York, S 161–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergkvist L, Rossiter JR (2007) The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. J Mark Res 44(2):175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biyalogorsky E, Gerstner E, Libai B (2001) Customer referral management: optimal reward programs. Mark Sci 20(1):82–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton GE, Katok E, Zwick R (1998) Dictator game giving: rules of fairness versus acts of kindness. Int J Game Theory 27:269–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton RN (1998) A dynamic model of the duration of the customer’s relationship with a continuous service provider: the role of satisfaction. Mark Sci 17(1):45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm JW (1966) A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm JW (1989) Psychological reactance: theory and applications. Adv Consum Res 16:72–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm JW, Brehm SS (1981) Psychological reactance: a theory of freedom and control. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell MC (1999) Perceptions of price unfairness: antecedents and consequences. J Mark Res 36(2):187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2. Aufl. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3. Aufl. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • DGAP (2008) Premiere AG: premiere expects EBITDA loss in 2008 and releases Q3-subscriber figures. Dow Jones Newswires News, Oct. 2, 2008

  • Donnell AJ, Thomas A, Buboltz WC Jr (2001) Psychological reactance: factor structure and internal consistency of the questionnaire for the management of psychological reactance. The J Soc Psychol 141(5):679–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling G, Uncles M (1997) Do customer loyalty programs really work? Sloan Manage Rev 38(4):71–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy B, Smith K, Terhanian G, Bremer J (2005) Comparing data from online and face-to-face surveys. Int J Mark Res 47(6):615–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Fader PS, Hardie BGS (2010) Customer-base valuation in a contractual setting: the perils of ignoring heterogeneity. Mark Sci 29(1):85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg FM, Krishna A, Zhang ZJ (2002) Do we care what others get? A behaviorist approach to targeted promotions. J Mark Res 39(3):277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Güth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Organ 3(4):367–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunst RF (1983) Regression analysis with multicollinear prediction variables: definition, detection and effects. Commun Stat Theory Methods 12(19):2217–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwinner KP, Gremler DD, Bitner MJ (1998) Relational benefits in services industries: the customer’s perspective. J Acad Mark Sci 26(2):101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans GC (1961) Social behavior: its elementary forms. Harcourt, Brace & World Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg C, Hoyer WD, Koschate N (2005) Customers’ reactions to price increases: Do customer satisfaction and perceived motive fairness matter? J Acad Mark Sci 33(1):36–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1986) Fairness and the assumptions of economics. J Bus 59(4):285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschate N (2008) Experimentelle Marktforschung. In: Herrmann A, Homburg C, Klarmann M (Hrsg) Handbuch Marktforschung, 3. Aufl. Gabler, Wiesbaden, S 107–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Lee J, Feick L (2001) The impact of switching costs on the customer satisfaction-loyalty link: mobile phone service in France. J Serv Mark 15(1):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis M (2005) Incorporating strategic consumer behavior into customer valuation. J Mark 69(3):230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL, Shor M (2003) Digital redemption of coupons: satisfying and dissatisfying effects of promotion codes. J Prod Brand Manag 12(2):121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimondo MA, Miceli G, Costabile M (2008) How relationship age moderates loyalty formation: the increasing effect of relational equity on customer loyalty. J Serv Res 11(2):142–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld FF (1993) Loyalty-based management. Harv Bus Rev 71(2):64–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz W, Thomas JS, Kumar V (2005) Balancing acquisition and retention resources to maximize customer profitability. J Mark 69(1):63–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter JR (2002) The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. Int J Res Mark 19(4):305–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust RT, Lemon KN, Zeithaml VA (2004) Return on marketing: using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. J Mark 68(1):109–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu G, Feick L (2007) A penny for your thoughts: referral reward programs and referral likelihood. J Mark 71(1):84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweidel DA, Fader PS, Bradlow ET (2008) Understanding service retention within and across cohorts using limited information. J Mark 72(1):82–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seth A, Momaya K, Gupta HM (2005) An exploratory investigation of customer loyalty and retention in cellular mobile communication. J Ser Res Special Issue (December):173–185

  • Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor M, Oliver RL (2006) Price discrimination through online couponing: impact on likelihood of purchase and profitability. J Econ Psychol 27(3):423–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens N, Gwinner KP (1998) Why don’t some people complain? A cognitive-emotive process model of consumer complaint behavior. J Acad Mark Sci 26(3):172–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney JC, Hausknecht D, Soutar GN (2000) Cognitive dissonance after purchase: a multidimensional scale preview. Psychol Mark 17(5):369–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tax SS, Brown SW, Chandrashekaran M (1998) Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: implications for relationship marketing. J Mark 62(2):60–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef PC, Franses PH, Hoekstra JC (2002) The effect of relational constructs on customer referrals and number of services purchased from a multiservice provider: does age of relationship matter? J Acad Mark Sci 30(3):202–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa JE, Verhoef PC (2007) Understanding customer switching behavior in a liberalizing service market: an exploratory study. J Ser Res 10(2):174–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia L, Monroe KB, Cox JL (2004) The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. J Mark 68(4):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeelenberg M, Pieters R (1999) Comparing service delivery to what might have been: behavioral responses to regret and disappointment. J Ser Res 2(1):86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Die Verfasser bedanken sich bei Dr. Benjamin Ballensiefen, Vodafone D2 GmbH und Dr. Maren Wunderlich, Deutsche Telekom AG sowie zwei anonymen Gutachtern der ZfB für die Vielzahl an wertvollen Hinweisen. Ein besonderer Dank gebührt dem Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung für die Unterstützung im Rahmen des Projektes INTER|CYCLE, Förderkennzeichen 01 FL10036.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David Woisetschläger, Heiner Evanschitzky or Christof Backhaus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woisetschläger, D., Evanschitzky, H. & Backhaus, C. Zur Wirkung von Neukunden-Promotions auf Bestandskunden. Z Betriebswirtsch 81, 183–204 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-010-0427-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-010-0427-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

JEL-Classification

Navigation