Abstract
Previous psychophysical studies have sought to determine whether the processes of movement engagement and termination are dissociable, whether stopping an action is a generic process, and whether there is a point in time in which the generation of a planned action is inevitable (“point of no return”). It is not clear yet, however, whether the action of stopping is merely a manifestation of low level, dynamic constraints, or whether it is also subject to a high level, kinematic plan. In the present study, stopping performance was studied while nine subjects, who generated free scribbling movements looking for the location of an invisible circular target, were requested unexpectedly to impede movement. Temporal analysis of the data shows that in 87% of the movements subsequent to the ‘stop’ cue, the tangential motion velocity profile was not a decelerating function of the time but rather exhibited a complex pattern comprised of one or more velocity peaks, implying an unstoppable motion element. Furthermore, geometrical analysis shows that the figural properties of the path generated after the ‘stop’ cue were part of a repetitive geometrical pattern and that the probability of completing a pattern after the ‘stop’ cue was correlated with the relative advance in the geometrical plan rather than the amount of time that had elapsed from the pattern initiation. Altogether, these findings suggest that the “point of no return” phenomenon in humans may also reflect a high level kinematic plan and could serve as a new operative definition of motion primitives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaron AR, Fletcher PC, Bullmore ET, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW (2003) Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior gyrus in humans. Nature Neurosci 6:115–116
Armstrong IT, Munoz DP (2003) Inhibitory control of eye movements during oculomotor counter demanding in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Exp Brain Res 152:444–452
Bachorowski JA, Newman J (1985) Impulsivity in adult: motor inhibition and time-interval estimation. Pers Indiv Differ 6:133–136
Bachorowski JA, Newman J (1990) Impulsive motor behavior: effects of personality and goal salience. J Pers Soc Psychol 58:512–518
Band GPH, Van Boxtel GJM (1999) Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychologica 101:179–211
Bekker EM, Kenemans JL, Hoeksma MR, Talsma D, Verbaten MN (2005) The pure electrophysiology of stopping. Int J Psychophysiol 55:191–198
Brown SH, Cooke JD (1984) Initial agonist burst duration depends on movement amplitude. Exp Brain Res 55:523–527
Brown SH, Cooke JD (1990) Movement-related phasic muscle activation. I. Relations with temporal profile of movement. J Neurophysiol 63(3):455–464
Chhabildas N, Pennington BF, Willcutt EG (2001) A comparison of the neurological profiles of the DSM-IV subtypes of ADHD. J Abnorm Child Psychol 29:529–540
Cooke JD, Brown SH (1994) Movement-related phasic muscle activation: III. The duration of phasic agonist activity initiating movement. Exp Brain Res 99:473–482
Cooke JD, Brown S, Forget R, Lamarre Y (1985) Initial agonist burst duration changes with movement amplitude in a deafferented patient. Exp Brain Res 55(60):184–187
De Jong R, Coles MGH, Logan GD, Gratton G (1990) In search of the point of no return – the control of response processes. J Exp Psychol – Human Percept Perform 16(1):164–182
De Jong R, Coles MGH, Logan GD (1995) Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. J Exp Psychol – Human Percept Perform 21:498–511
Fisher RA (1925) Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd, London
Hallett M, Marsden CD (1979) Ballistic flexion movements of the human thumb. J Physiol 294:33–50
Ladefoged P, Silverstein R, Papcun G (1973) Interruptibility of speech. J Acoust Soc Am 54:1105–1108
Levitt H (1970) Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 49:467–477
Li CSR, Krystal JH, Mathalon DH (2005) Fore-period effect and stop-signal reaction time. Exp Brain Res 167:305–309
Logan GD (1994) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a users’ guide to the stop signal paradigm. In: Dagenbach D, Carr TH (eds) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. Academic press, San Diego, pp 189–239
Logan GD, Cowan WB (1984) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychol Rev 91:295–327
McGarry T, Franks IM (1997) A horse race between independent processes: evidence for a phantom point of no return in the preparation of a speeded motor response. J Exp Psychol – Human Percept Perform 23(5):1533–1542
McGarry T, Franks IM (2000) Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: comment on Band and van Boxtel (1999). Acta Psychol 105:83–88
McGarry T, Inglis JT, Franks IM (2000) Against a final ballistic process in the control of voluntary action: evidence using the Hoffmann reflex. Motor Control 4(4):469–485
McGarry T, Chua R, Franks IM (2003) Stopping and restarting an action at various times. Quart J Exp Psychol Sect A – Human Exp Psychol 56(4):601–620
Menon V, Adleman NE, White CD, Glover GH, Reiss AL (2001) Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Hum Brain Mapp 12:131–143
Mirabella G, Pani P, Pare M, Ferraina S (2006) Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans. Exp Brain Res 174:240–255
Morein-Zamir S (2003) Individual stopping times and cognitive control: converging evidence for the stop signal task from a continuous tracking paradigm. Quart J Exp Psychol 56a(3):469–489
Morein-Zamir S, Nagelkerke P, Chua R, Franks I, Kingstone A (2004) Inhibiting prepared and ongoing responses: is there more than one kind of stopping? Psychon Bull Rev 11(6):1034–1040
Oosterlaan J, Sergeant JA (1996) Inhibition in ADHD, aggressive and anxious children: a biologically based model of child psychopathology. J Abnorm Child Psychol 24:19–36
Osman A, Sylvan K, Meyer DE (1986) The point of no return in choice reaction time: controlled and ballistic states of response preparation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 12(3):243–258
Osman A, Sylvan K, Meyer DE (1990) Does motor programming necessitate response execution? J Exp Psychol: Human Percept Perform 16(1):183–198
Rieger M, Gauggel S, Burmeister K (2003) Inhibitor of ongoing responses following frontal, nonfrontal, and basal ganglia lesions. Neuropsychology 17:272–282
Rubia K, Oosterlaan J, Sergeant JA, Brandeis D, Von Leeuwen T (1998) Inhibitory dysfunction in hyperactive boys. Behav Brain Res 94:25–32
Rubia K, Smith AB, Brammer MJ, Taylor E (2003) Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection. Neuroimage 20:351–358
Rubia K, Smith AB, Brammer MJ, Toone B, Taylor E (2005) Abnormal brain activation during inhibition and error detection in medication-naïve adolescents with ADHD. Am J Psychiatr 162:1067–1075
Schachar R, Mota VL, Logan GD, Tannock R, Klim P (2000) Confirmation of an inhibitory control deficit in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol 28:227–235
Scheres A, Oosterlaan J, Swanson J, Morein-Zamir S, Meiran N, Schut H, Vlasveld L, Sergeant JA (2003) The effect of methylphenidate on three forms of response inhibition in boys with AD/HD. J Abnorm Child Psychol 31(1):105–120
Scheres A, Oosterlaan J, Geurts H, Morein-Zamir S, Meiran N, Schut H, Vlasveld L, Sergeant JA (2004) Executive functions in boys with ADHD: primarily an inhibition deficit? Arch Clin Neuropsychol 19:569–594
Sosnik R, Hauptmann B, Karni A, Flash T (2004) When practice leads to co-articulation: the evolution of geometrically defined movement primitives. Exp Brain Res 156(4):422–438
Sosnik R, Hauptmann B, Karni A, Flash T (2006) The acquisition and implementation of the smoothness maximization motion strategy is dependent on spatial accuracy. Exp Brain Res 176(2):311–331
Stark E, Drori R, Abeles M (2006) Partial cross-correlation analysis resolves ambiguity in the encoding of multiple movement features. J Neurophysiol 95:1966–1975
Stewart JA, Tannock R (1999) Inhibitory control differences following mild head injury. Brain Cognit 41:411–416
Tannock R, Schachar RJ, Carr RP, Chajczyk D, Logan GD (1989) Effects of methylphenidate on inhibitory control in hyperactive children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 17(5):473–491
Torres E, Andersen R (2006) Space-time separation during obstacle-avoidance learning in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 96:2613–2632
Torres E, Zipser D (2002) Reaching to grasp with a multi-jointed arm. I. Computational model. J Neurophysiol 88:2355–2367
Van Boxtel GJM, Band GPH (2000) Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: reply to McGarry and Franks. Acta Psychol 105(1):79–82
Van Boxtel GJM, Van der Molen MW, Jennings JR, Brunia CHM (2001) A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm. Biol Psychol 58:229–262
Van der Schoot M, Lichat R, Horsley TK, Sergeant JA (2005) Effects of stop signal modality, stop signal intensity and tracking method on inhibitory performance as determined by use of the stop signal paradigm. Scan J Psychol 46:331–341
Viviani P, Flash T (1995) Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21(1):32–53
Walton M, Gandhi NJ (2006) Behavioral evaluation of movement cancellation. J Neurophysiol 96:2011–2024
Williams BR, Ponesse JS, Schachar RJ, Logan GD, Tannock R (1999) Development of inhibitory control across the life span. Dev Psychol 35(1):205–218
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Prof. Tamar Flash and Prof. Claude Ghez for their insightful comments. This work was supported in part by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the framework of German-Israeli Project Cooperation (DIP) and the Rich center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sosnik, R., Shemesh, M. & Abeles, M. The point of no return in planar hand movements: an indication of the existence of high level motion primitives. Cogn Neurodyn 1, 341–358 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-007-9025-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-007-9025-x