Abstract
In this note, we study K-stability of smooth Fano threefolds that can be obtained by blowing up the three-dimensional projective space along a smooth elliptic curve of degree five.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Let \(C_5\) be a smooth quintic elliptic curve in \(\mathbb {P}^3\), and let \(\pi :X\rightarrow \mathbb {P}^3\) be the blow up of this curve. Then X is a smooth Fano threefold in the family No 2.17, and every smooth Fano 3-fold in this family can be obtained by blowing up \(\mathbb {P}^3\) along a suitable smooth quintic elliptic curve.
It is well known that there exists the following Sarkisov link:
![figure a](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11565-024-00532-6/MediaObjects/11565_2024_532_Figa_HTML.png)
where Q is a smooth quadric threefold in \(\mathbb {P}^4\), and q is the blow up of a smooth quintic elliptic curve \(C_5^\prime \). Let \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\) and \(E_Q\) be the exceptional divisors of \(\pi \) and q, respectively. If \(\ell \) is a general fiber of the natural projection \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\rightarrow C_5\), then \(q(\ell )\) is a secant of the curve \(C_5^\prime \) contained in Q. Similarly, if \(\ell ^\prime \) is a general fiber of the projection \(E_Q\rightarrow C_5^\prime \), then \(\pi (\ell ^\prime )\) is a trisecant of the curve \(C_5\).
Let \(\mathcal {E}\) be the harmonic elliptic curve, and let \(\theta \) be an element in \(\textrm{Aut}(\mathcal {E})\) of order 4 that fixes a point \(P\in C_5\). Then it follows from [9] that
and there exists an \(\textrm{Aut}(\mathcal {E},[5P])\)-equivariant embedding \(\phi :\mathcal {E}\hookrightarrow \mathbb {P}^4\) such that \(\phi (\mathcal {E})\) is a smooth quintic elliptic curve. Let G be a subgroup in \(\textrm{Aut}(\mathcal {E},[5P])\) such that \(G\cong \varvec{\mu }_5\rtimes \varvec{\mu }_4\). Then G fixes a unique point in \(\mathbb {P}^4\) that is not contained in the hypersurface spanned by the secants of the quintic curve \(\phi (\mathcal {E})\). Let \(\psi :\mathbb {P}^4\dasharrow \mathbb {P}^3\) be the projection from this point. Then \(\psi \circ \phi (\mathcal {E})\) is a smooth quintic elliptic curve. Let \(C_5=\psi \circ \phi (\mathcal {E})\). Then \(\textrm{Aut}(X)\cong \varvec{\mu }_5\rtimes \varvec{\mu }_4\), and X is K-stable [2, Section 5.7]
Since being K-stable is an open condition, a general member of the family No 2.17 is K-stable. In fact, all smooth Fano threefolds in the deformation family No 2.17 are expected to be K-stable [2]. To show this it is enough to prove that \(\beta (\textbf{F})=A_X(\textbf{F})-S_X(\textbf{F})>0\) for every prime divisor \(\textbf{F}\) over the Fano threefold X [7, 10], where \(A_X(\textbf{F})\) is the log discrepancy of the divisor \(\textbf{F}\), and
Unfortunately, we are unable to prove this. Instead, we prove the following weaker result:
Let \(\textbf{F}\) be a prime divisor over X such that \(\beta (\textbf{F})\leqslant 0\), let Z be its center on X. Then Z is a point in \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\cap E_Q\).
By [13, Corollary 4.14], the Main Theorem implies the following corollary.
Suppose that \(\textrm{Aut}(\mathbb {P}^3,C_5)\) does not fix a point in \(C_5\). Then X is K-stable.
Observe that \(\textrm{Aut}(X)\cong \textrm{Aut}(\mathbb {P}^3,C_5)\), and all possibilities for the group \(\textrm{Aut}(\mathbb {P}^3,C_5)\) can be easily derived from [9]. Namely, if \(C_5\) is general, then \(\textrm{Aut}(\mathbb {P}^3,C_5)\) is trivial, so Corollary 2 is not applicable. If \(\textrm{Aut}(\mathbb {P}^3,C_5)\) is not trivial, then it must be isomorphic to one of the following finite groups:
Furthermore, if \(\textrm{Aut}(\mathbb {P}^3,C_5)\) contains a subgroup isomorphic to \(\varvec{\mu }_5\), it acts on \(C_5\) by translations. This implies that \(\textrm{Aut}(\mathbb {P}^3,C_5)\) does not fix a point in \(C_5\) \(\iff \) \(\textrm{Aut}(\mathbb {P}^3,C_5)\) contains a subgroup isomorphic to \(\varvec{\mu }_5\). Therefore, Corollary 2 gives the following generalization of Example 1.
Suppose that \(\textrm{Aut}(X)\) contains a subgroup isomorphic to \(\varvec{\mu }_5\). Then X is K-stable.
FormalPara Example 4([9]) Fix \(a\in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(a\ne 0\) and \(a^{10}+11a^5-1\ne 0\). Let \(C_5^\prime \) be the quintic elliptic curve in \(\mathbb {P}^4\) given by the following system of equations:
where \([x_0:x_1:x_2:x_3:x_4]\) are coordinates on \(\mathbb {P}^4\). Let \(\sigma \), \(\tau \), \(\iota \) be the automorphisms of \(\mathbb {P}^4\) given by
where \(\omega _5\) is a primitive fifth root of unity. Set \(G=\langle \sigma ,\tau ,\iota \rangle \). Then \(G\cong \varvec{\mu }_5^2\rtimes \varvec{\mu }_2\), and \(C_5^\prime \) is G-invariant. Consider the following quadric hypersurface:
Observe that Q is smooth, and Q is \(\langle \tau ,\iota \rangle \)-invariant. Let \(q:X\rightarrow Q\) be the blow up of the curve \(C_5^\prime \). Then we have \(\langle \tau ,\iota \rangle \)-equivariant Sarkisov link (\(\bigstar \)) for an appropriate non-singular quintic elliptic curve \(C_5\subset \mathbb {P}^3\). Since \(\langle \tau ,\iota \rangle \cong \varvec{\mu }_5\rtimes \varvec{\mu }_2\), X is K-stable by Corollary 3.
Let \(\Bbbk \) be a subfield in \(\mathbb {C}\) such that \(C_5\) is defined over \(\Bbbk \). Then the Sarkisov link (\(\bigstar \)) is also defined over the field \(\Bbbk \). Moreover, the Main Theorem and [13, Corollary 4.14] imply the following result.
If the intersection \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\cap E_Q\) does not have \(\Bbbk \)-points, then X is K-stable.
FormalPara Corollary 6If \(C_5(\Bbbk )=\varnothing \) or \(C_5^\prime (\Bbbk )=\varnothing \), then X is K-stable.
In fact, one can show that \(C_5(\Bbbk )=\varnothing \) if and only if \(C_5^\prime (\Bbbk )=\varnothing \).
Corollary 6 has many applications. For instance, if \(\Bbbk \) is a number field, there are infinitely many smooth quintic genus one curves in \(\mathbb {P}^3\) defined over \(\Bbbk \) that do not have \(\Bbbk \)-rational points [3, 4, 11]. Thus, using Corollary 6 and Pfaffian representations of quintic elliptic curves [5], one can construct infinitely many explicit examples of K-stable smooth Fano threefolds in the family No 2.17.
(T. Fisher) Fix a prime \(p\geqslant 2\). Let \(C_5^\prime \) be the quintic elliptic curve in \(\mathbb {P}^4\) given by
let Q be the quadric \(\{x_0^2+px_1x_4-px_2x_3=0\}\), and let \(q:X\rightarrow Q\) be the blow up along the curve \(C_5^\prime \), where \([x_0:x_1:x_2:x_3:x_4]\) are the coordinates on \(\mathbb {P}^4\). Then (\(\bigstar \)) exists for an appropriate quintic elliptic curve \(C_5\subset \mathbb {P}^3\). We can set \(\Bbbk =\mathbb {Q}\). Then \(C_5^\prime (\Bbbk )=\varnothing \), so X is K-stable by Corollary 6.
Let us prove the Main Theorem. Let \(\textbf{F}\) be a prime divisor over X, and let Z be its center on X. Suppose that Z is not a point in \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\cap E_Q\). Let us show that \(\beta (\textbf{F})>0\).
If Z is a surface, then it follows from [6] that \(\beta (\textbf{F})>0\). Thus, we may assume that
-
either Z is a point,
-
or Z is an irreducible curve.
Let P be any point in Z. Choose an irreducible smooth surface \(S\subset X\) such that \(P\in S\). Set
For \(u\in [0,\tau ]\), let P(u) be the positive part of the Zariski decomposition of the divisor \(-K_X-uS\), and let N(u) be its negative part. Then \(\beta (S)=1-S_X(S)\), where
Let us show how to compute P(u) and N(u). Set \(H_{\mathbb {P}^3}=\pi ^*(\mathcal {O}_{\mathbb {P}^3}(1))\) and \(H_{Q}=q^*(\mathcal {O}_{Q}(1))\). Then
Let us compute P(u) and N(u) in the following cases: \(S\in |H_{\mathbb {P}^3}|\), \(S\in |H_{Q}|\), and \(S=E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\).
Suppose that \(S\in |H_{\mathbb {P}^3}|\). Then \(\tau =\frac{3}{2}\), since \(-K_{X}-uS\sim _{\mathbb {R}}\frac{3-2u}{2}S+\frac{1}{2}E_{Q}\). Based on that, the positive part of the Zariski decomposition has the following form
and the negative part
which gives
Suppose that \(S\in |H_{Q}|\). Then \(-K_{X}-uS\sim _{\mathbb {R}} \frac{4-3u}{3}S+\frac{1}{3}E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\). Then \(\tau =\frac{4}{3}\),
and
which gives
Suppose that \(S=E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\). Then \(-K_{X}-uS\sim _{\mathbb {R}} \frac{3-5u}{5}E_{\mathbb {P}^{3}}+\frac{4}{5}E_{Q}\). Then \(\tau =\frac{3}{5}\),
and
which gives
Now, we choose an irreducible curve \(C\subset S\) that contains the point P. For instance, if Z is a curve, and S contains Z, then we can choose \(C=Z\). Since \(S\not \subset \textrm{Supp}(N(u))\), we can write
where \(N^\prime (u)\) is an effective \(\mathbb {R}\)-divisor on S such that \(C\not \subset \textrm{Supp}(N^\prime (u))\), and \(d(u)=\textrm{ord}_C(N(u)\vert _S)\). Now, for every \(u\in [0,\tau ]\), we set
For \(v\in [0, t(u)]\), we let P(u, v) be the positive part of the Zariski decomposition of \(P(u)|_S-vC\), and we let N(u, v) be its negative part. Following [1, 2], we let
which we can rewrite as
If Z is a curve, \(Z\subset S\) and \(C=Z\), then it follows from [1, 2] that
Hence, if Z is a curve, \(Z\subset S\), \(C=Z\) and \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };C)<1\), then \(\beta (\textbf{F})>0\), since \(S_X(S)<1\) by [6].
Suppose that Z is a curve, \(Z\subset E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\), and \(\pi (Z)\) is not a point. Then \(\beta (\textbf{F})>0\).
FormalPara ProofLet e be the invariant of the ruled surface \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\) defined in Proposition 2.8 in [8, Chapter V]. Then \(e\geqslant -1\) by [12]. Moreover, there is a section \(C_{0}\) of the projection \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\rightarrow C_5\) such that \(C_0^2=-e\). Let \(\ell \) be a fiber of this projection. Then \(H_{\mathbb {P}^{3}}\vert _{E_{\mathbb {P}^3}}\equiv 5\ell \) and \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\vert _{E_{\mathbb {P}^3}}\equiv -C_{0} + \lambda \ell \) for some \(\lambda \in \mathbb {Z}\). Since
we get \(\lambda =\frac{20-e}{2}\). Then e is even, so \(e\geqslant 0\). Moreover, since \(3H_{\mathbb {P}^3}-E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\sim H_{Q}\) is nef, the divisor
is also nef. Then \(0\leqslant \big ( C_{0}+(15-\lambda )\ell \big )\cdot C_{0} = 15 - e - \lambda = 15 - e - \frac{20-e}{2}\), which implies \(e\leqslant 10\) and hence we have \(e\in \{0,2,4,6,8,10\}\).
Now, we set \(S=E_{\mathbb {P}^{3}}\) and \(C=Z\). Using (1), we see that to prove that \(\beta (\textbf{F})>0\), it is enough to show that \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };C)<1\). Let us estimate \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };C)\). It follows from Example 10 that \(\tau =\frac{3}{5}\) and
Moreover, if \(0\leqslant u \leqslant \frac{1}{3}\), then \(N(u)=0\). Furthermore, if \(\frac{1}{3} \leqslant u\leqslant \frac{3}{5}\), then
and \(E_Q\big \vert _{S}\equiv 2C_0+(5+e)\ell \). But it follows from Proposition 2.20 in [8, Chapter V] that
for some integers a and b such that \(a\geqslant 0\) and \(b\geqslant ae\). Since \(\pi (Z)\) is not a point, we also have \(a\geqslant 1\). This gives \(\textrm{ord}_{C}(E_Q\vert _{S})\leqslant 2\). Hence, if \(\frac{1}{3} \leqslant u\leqslant \frac{3}{5}\), then \(d(u)\leqslant 2(3u-1)\). This gives
On the other hand, since \(a\geqslant 1\), we have
Therefore, to show that \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };C)<1\), we may assume that \(Z=C_0\). Then
Moreover, if \(0 \leqslant u \leqslant \frac{1}{3}\) and \(v\in [0,t(u)]\), then
and the negative part N(u, v) is trivial. Similarly, if \(\frac{1}{3}\leqslant u \leqslant \frac{3}{5}\) and \(v\in [0,t(u)]\), then
and the negative part N(u, v) is trivial. Using the collected data, we compute
As explained above, this gives
Since \(e \in \{0,2,4,6,8,10\}\), we conclude that \(S(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{S}};{C})<1\). Then \(\beta (\textbf{F})>0\) by (1). \(\square \)
Let \(f:\widetilde{S}\rightarrow S\) be the blow up of the point P, and let F be the f-exceptional curve. Write
where \(\widetilde{N}^\prime (u)\) is the strict transform of the divisor \(N(u)\vert _{S}\) on the surface \(\widetilde{S}\), and \(\widetilde{d}(u)=\textrm{mult}_P(N(u)\vert _S)\). For every \(u\in [0,\tau ]\), we set
For \(v\in [0,\widetilde{t}(u)]\), we let \(\widetilde{P}(u,v)\) be the positive part of the Zariski decomposition of \(f^*(P(u)|_S)-vF\), and we let \(\widetilde{N}(u,v)\) be its negative part. As above, we let
which we can rewrite as
For every point \(O\in F\), we let
and
Then it follows from [1, 2] that
In the next two lemmas, we show how to apply this inequality to prove that \(\beta (\textbf{F})>0\) under certain generality conditions on the position of the point P.
Let S be a general surface in \(|H_{\mathbb {P}^3}|\) such that \(P\in S\). Suppose \(P\not \in E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\), \(-K_S\) is ample, and P is not contained in a \((-1)\)-curve in S. Then \(\beta (\textbf{F})>0\).
FormalPara ProofObserve that \(\pi (S)\) is a general plane in \(\mathbb {P}^3\) that contains \(\pi (P)\), and \(\pi \) induces a birational morphism \(\varpi :S\rightarrow \pi (S)\) that blows up the points \(\pi (S)\cap C_5\). Let \(\textbf{e}_1\), \(\textbf{e}_2\), \(\textbf{e}_3\), \(\textbf{e}_4\), \(\textbf{e}_5\) be the \(\varpi \)-exceptional curves. Then \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\big \vert _{S}=\textbf{e}_1+\textbf{e}_2+\textbf{e}_3+\textbf{e}_4+\textbf{e}_5\).
Let \(L=H_{\mathbb {P}^3}\vert _{S}\). For \(i\in \{1,2,3,4,5\}\), the pencils \(|L-\textbf{e}_i|\) and \(|2L+\textbf{e}_i-\textbf{e}_1-\textbf{e}_2-\textbf{e}_3-\textbf{e}_4-\textbf{e}_5|\) contain an irreducible curve that passes through the point P. Denote these curves by \(\mathscr {Z}_i\) and \(\mathscr {Z}_i^\prime \), respectively. Then \(\varpi (\mathscr {Z}_i)\) is the line in \(\pi (S)\) that passes through \(\pi (P)\) and \(\varpi (\textbf{e}_i)\), and \(\varpi (\mathscr {Z}_i^\prime )\) is the conic that passes through \(\pi (P)\) and all points among \(\varpi (\textbf{e}_1)\), \(\varpi (\textbf{e}_2)\), \(\varpi (\textbf{e}_3)\), \(\varpi (\textbf{e}_4)\), \(\varpi (\textbf{e}_5)\) except for \(\varpi (\textbf{e}_i)\). Set
Let \(\widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}\) and \(\widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}^\prime \) be the proper transforms on \(\widetilde{S}\) of the curves \(\mathscr {Z}\) and \(\mathscr {Z}^\prime \), respectively. On the surface \(\widetilde{S}\), we have \(\widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}\cdot \widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}^\prime =F\cdot \widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}=F\cdot \widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}^\prime =5\) and \(\widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}^{2}=(\widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}^\prime )^{2}=-5\). Using Example 8, we get \(\tau =\frac{3}{2}\) and
This gives
Furthermore, if \(0\leqslant u\leqslant 1\), then
and
which gives
and
If \(1\leqslant u\leqslant \frac{3}{2}\), then \(\widetilde{P}(u,v)=\frac{3-2u}{5}(\widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}+\widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}^\prime )+(6-4u-v)F\) and \(\widehat{N}(u,v)=0\) for \(v\in [0,6-4u]\), so
and \(\widetilde{P}(u,v)\cdot F=v\) for every \(v\in [0,6-4u]\).
Set \(R=E_Q\vert _{S}\). Then R is smooth curve, since S is a general surface in \(|H_{\mathbb {P}^3}|\) that passes through P. Let \(\widetilde{R}\) be the proper transform of the curve R on the surface \(\widetilde{S}\). Then it follows from Example 8 that
If \(0\leqslant u\leqslant 1\), we have \(\widetilde{d}(u)=0\). Similarly, if \(1\leqslant u\leqslant \frac{3}{2}\) and R does not contain P, then \(\widetilde{d}(u)=0\). Finally, if \(1\leqslant u\leqslant \frac{3}{2}\) and \(P\in R\), then \(\widetilde{d}(u)=(u-1)\).
Using the data collected above, we can compute \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };F)\). Namely, if \(P\in E_{Q}\), then
Similarly, if \(P\not \in E_{Q}\), then \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };F)=\frac{655}{384}+\frac{1}{12}=\frac{229}{128}<2\).
Now, let O be any point in F. Then
Moreover, if \(O\in \widetilde{R}\cap \widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}\), then we compute \(F_O(W_{\bullet ,\bullet ,\bullet }^{\widetilde{S},F})\) as follows:
because the curve \(\widetilde{R}\) intersects F transversally, and every irreducible component of the curve \(\widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}\) also intersects F transversally. Hence, if \(O\in \widetilde{R}\cap \widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}\), then \(S(W_{\bullet , \bullet ,\bullet }^{\widetilde{S},F};O)=\frac{337}{384}<1\). Similar computations imply that \(S(W_{\bullet , \bullet ,\bullet }^{\widetilde{S},F};O)<\frac{337}{384}<1\) if \(O\not \in \widetilde{R}\) or \(O\not \in \widetilde{\mathscr {Z}}\). Thus, using (2), we see that \(\beta (\textbf{F})>0\). \(\square \)
FormalPara Lemma 13Let S be a general surface in \(|H_{\mathbb {P}^3}|\) such that \(P\in S\). Suppose \(P\not \in E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\), \(-K_S\) is ample, and P is contained in a \((-1)\)-curve \(B\subset S\) such that \(\pi (B)\) is a conic. Then \(\beta (\textbf{F})>0\).
FormalPara ProofLet us use notations introduced in the proof of Lemma 12, and let \(\widetilde{B}\) be the proper transform on the surface \(\widetilde{S}\) of the curve B. Observe that \(\widetilde{B}\) and \(\widetilde{Z}\) are disjoint, and \(\widetilde{B}^2=-2\) on the surface \(\widetilde{S}\). Moreover, it follows from Example 8 that \(\tau =\frac{3}{2}\) and
This gives
Furthermore, if \(0\leqslant u\leqslant 1\), then
and
which gives
and
Similarly, if \(1\leqslant u\leqslant \frac{3}{2}\), then
and
which gives
and
Thus, as in the proof of Lemma 12, we compute
so that \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };F)<2\). Similarly, if O is a point in F, then
Therefore, using (2), we see that \(\beta (\textbf{F})>0\). \(\square \)
On the other hand, we have the following purely geometric result.
Suppose that \(P\not \in E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\). Let S be a general surface in \(|H_{\mathbb {P}^3}|\) such that S passes through P. Then \(-K_{S}\) is ample. Further, if P is contained in a \((-1)\)-curve \(B\subset S\), then \(\pi (B)\) is a smooth conic.
FormalPara ProofThe surface \(\pi (S)\) is a general plane in \(\mathbb {P}^3\) that contains the point \(\pi (P)\). Write
where \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(P_3\), \(P_4\), \(P_5\) are distinct points. Then \(\pi \) induces a birational morphism \(\varpi :S\rightarrow \pi (S)\), which is a blow up of the intersection points \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(P_3\), \(P_4\), \(P_5\). Thus, to prove that \(-K_S\) is ample, we must show that at most two points among these five are contained in a line.
If three points among \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(P_3\), \(P_4\), \(P_5\) are contained in a line \(\ell \), it is a trisecant of the curve \(C_5\), the line \(\ell \) is contained in \(\pi (E_Q)\), and its proper transform on X is a fiber of the projection \(E_Q\rightarrow C_5^\prime \). However, the planes containing \(\pi (P)\) and a trisecant of the curve \(C_5\) form a one-dimensional family. Hence, a general plane in \(\mathbb {P}^3\) that passes through \(\pi (P)\) does not contain trisecants of the curve \(C_5\), so that at most two points among \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(P_3\), \(P_4\), \(P_5\) are contained in a line. Thus, \(-K_S\) is ample.
Now, we suppose that P is contained in a \((-1)\)-curve \(B\subset S\). If \(\pi (B)\) is not a conic, it must be a secant of the curve \(C_5\) that contains \(\pi (P)\). Let \(\phi :\mathbb {P}^3\dasharrow \mathbb {P}^2\) be the linear projection from \(\pi (P)\). Since \(\pi (P)\not \in C_5\), \(\phi \) induces a birational morphism \(C_5\rightarrow \phi (C_5)\), and \(\phi (C_5)\) is a singular irreducible curve of degree 5. Moreover, if \(\ell \) is a secant of the curve \(C_5\) that contains \(\pi (P)\), then \(\phi (\ell )\) is a singular point of the curve \(\phi (C_5)\). Since this curve has finitely many singular points, we conclude that there are finitely many secants of the curve \(C_5\) that passes through \(\pi (P)\). This shows that \(\pi (S)\) does not contain secants of the curve \(C_5\) that pass through \(\pi (P)\), because \(\pi (S)\) is a general plane in \(\mathbb {P}^3\) that contains the point \(\pi (P)\). So, we conclude that \(\pi (B)\) must be a conic. \(\square \)
FormalPara Corollary 15If \(\beta (\textbf{F})\leqslant 0\), then Z is a fiber of the projection \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\rightarrow C_5\).
FormalPara Remark 16By [13, Corollary 4.14], Corollary 15 implies both Corollaries 2 and Corollaries 5.
To complete the proof of the Main Theorem, we may assume Z is a fiber of the projection \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\rightarrow C_5\).
Note that \(Z\not \subset E_Q\), since \(E_Q\) is irrational. Thus, we can choose \(P\in Z\) such that \(P\not \in E_Q\) either. Now, let S be a general surface in \(|H_{Q}|\) such that \(P\in S\). Then the surface q(S) is a general hyperplane section of the quadric Q that contains q(P), so \(q(S)\cong \mathbb {P}^1\times \mathbb {P}^1\) and \(q(S)\cap C_5^\prime =P_1\cup P_2\cup P_3\cup P_4\cup P_5\), where \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(P_3\), \(P_4\), \(P_5\) are distinct points in \(C_5^\prime \). Then the morphism \(q:X\rightarrow Q\) induces a birational morphism \(S\rightarrow q(S)\) that blows up the points \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(P_3\), \(P_4\), \(P_5\).
The divisor \(-K_{S}\) is ample.
FormalPara ProofObserve that q(S) is a general hyperplane section of the quadric Q that passes through q(P), and it follows from the adjunction formula that \(-K_S\sim H_{\mathbb {P}^3}\big \vert _{S}\). Thus, if \(-K_S\) is not ample, S contains a fiber \(\ell \) of the projection \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\rightarrow C_5\) such that \(q(\ell )\) is a secant line of the curve \(C_5^\prime \). On the other hand, hyperplane sections of Q that contain q(P) and a secant line of the curve \(C_5^\prime \) form a two-dimensional family. So, we may assume that q(S) is not one of them, which implies that \(-K_S\) is ample. \(\square \)
Since \(-K_{S}\) is ample, the morphism \(\pi \) induces an isomorphism \(S\cong \pi (S)\), and \(\pi (S)\) is a smooth cubic surface in \(\mathbb {P}^3\) that contains the curve \(C_5\). Let us identify S with the smooth cubic surface \(\pi (S)\). Using this identification, we see that \(C_5=E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\cap S\). Then \(P\in C_5\), since \(P\in E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\).
Let \(L_1\) and \(L_2\) be the proper transforms on S of two rulings of the surface \(q(S)\cong \mathbb {P}^1\times \mathbb {P}^1\) that pass through the point q(P). Then \(L_1\) and \(L_2\) are conics in S, because \(q(L_1)\) and \(q(L_2)\) do not contain any of the points \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(P_3\), \(P_4\), \(P_5\), since we assume that q(S) is a general hyperplane section of the quadric Q that contains the point q(P). Moreover, it follows from Example 9 that
and
Let \(T_P\) be the unique curve in the linear system \(|-K_S|\) that is singular at P. Then \(T_P\) is cut out by the hyperplane in \(\mathbb {P}^3\) that is tangent to S at the point P. In particular, the curve \(T_P\) is reduced.
We have the following three possible cases:
-
\(T_P\) is an irreducible cubic curve,
-
\(T_P=\ell +C_2\), where \(\ell \) is a line, \(C_2\) is a smooth conic such that \(C_2\ne L_1\) and \(C_2\ne L_2\),
-
\(T_P=\ell _1+\ell _2+\ell _3\), where \(\ell _1\), \(\ell _2\), \(\ell _3\) are lines such that \(P=\ell _1\cap \ell _2\) and \(P\not \in \ell _3\).
A priori, since \(T_P\) is a reduced cubic curve, we may have the following cases:
-
(1)
\(T_P\) is an irreducible curve,
-
(2)
\(T_P=\ell +L_1\), where \(\ell \) is a line,
-
(3)
\(T_P=\ell +L_2\), where \(\ell \) is a line,
-
(4)
\(T_P=\ell +C_2\), where \(\ell \) is a line, \(C_2\) is a smooth conic such that \(C_2\ne L_1\) and \(C_2\ne L_2\),
-
(5)
\(T_P=\ell _1+\ell _2+\ell _3\), where \(\ell _1\), \(\ell _2\), \(\ell _3\) are lines such that \(P=\ell _1\cap \ell _2\) and \(P\not \in \ell _3\),
-
(6)
\(T_P=\ell _1+\ell _2+\ell _3\), where \(\ell _1\), \(\ell _2\), \(\ell _3\) are lines such that \(P=\ell _1\cap \ell _2\cap \ell _3\).
If \(T_P=\ell _1+\ell _2+\ell _3\) for three lines \(\ell _1\), \(\ell _2\), \(\ell _3\) such that \(P=\ell _1\cap \ell _2\cap \ell _3\), then
which is absurd. Thus, we see that the last case is impossible. To complete the proof, we must show that the second and the third cases are also impossible.
Suppose that \(T_P=\ell +L_1\) for some line \(\ell \). Then \(q(\ell )\) is a twisted cubic curve in Q that contains all intersection points \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(P_3\), \(P_4\), \(P_5\). In particular, we see that \(E_Q\cap \ell \geqslant 5\). On the other hand, the curve \(q(\ell )\) is not contained in the surface \(q(E_{\mathbb {P}^3})\), because the only rational curves in the ruled irrational surface \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\) are fibers of the natural projection \(E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\rightarrow C_5\), which are mapped to lines by q. Therefore, since \(P\in E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\) by assumption, we have
which is absurd. This shows that the conic \(L_1\) cannot be an irreducible component of the curve \(T_P\). Similarly, we see \(L_2\) is also not an irreducible component of the curve \(T_P\). \(\square \)
From Example 9, we know that \(S_X(S)<1\). So, it follows from (2) that \(\beta (\textbf{F})>0\) if \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };F)<2\), and \(S(W_{\bullet , \bullet ,\bullet }^{\widetilde{S},F};O)<1\) for every point \(O\in F\). Let us check these conditions.
Let \(\widetilde{L}_1\), \(\widetilde{L}_2\), \(\widetilde{T}_P\) be proper transforms on \(\widetilde{S}\) of the curves \(L_1\), \(L_2\), \(T_P\). Then
Hence, if \(0\leqslant u\leqslant 1\), then \(\widetilde{t}(u)=4-2u\). Similarly, if \(1\leqslant u\leqslant \frac{4}{3}\), then \(\widetilde{t}(u)=8-6u\). Moreover, since the curve \(C_5=E_{\mathbb {P}^3}\cap S\) is smooth, we have \(\widetilde{d}(u)=0\) for \(0\leqslant u\leqslant 1\), and \(\widetilde{d}(u)=u-1\) for \(1\leqslant u\leqslant \frac{4}{3}\). Finally, let \(\widetilde{C}_5\) be the proper transform on \(\widetilde{S}\) of the curve \(C_5\). Then
Now, we can compute \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };F)\) and \(S(W_{\bullet , \bullet ,\bullet }^{\widetilde{S},F};O)\) for every point \(O\in F\).
If \(T_P\) is irreducible, then \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };F)<2\) and \(S(W_{\bullet , \bullet ,\bullet }^{\widetilde{S},F};O)<1\) for every point \(O\in F\).
FormalPara ProofSuppose that the curve \(T_P\) is irreducible. Then \(\widetilde{S}\) is a smooth del Pezzo surface of degree 2. Note that \(\widetilde{L}_1\), \(\widetilde{L}_1\), \(\widetilde{T}_P\) are disjoint \((-1)\)-curves on \(\widetilde{S}\). If \(0\leqslant u\leqslant \frac{1}{2}\), it follows from (3) that
and
which gives
and
Likewise, if \(\frac{1}{2}\leqslant u\leqslant 1\), then it follows from (3) that
and
which gives
and
Similarly, if \(1\leqslant u\leqslant \frac{4}{3}\), then
and
which gives
and
As in the proof of Lemma 12, we get \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };F)=\frac{1103}{576}\). Likewise, if O is a point in F, then
The lemma is proved. \(\square \)
FormalPara Lemma 20Suppose \(T_P=\ell +C_2\), where \(\ell \) is a line, \(C_2\) is a smooth conic such that \(L_1\ne C_2\ne L_2\). Then \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };F)<2\) and \(S(W_{\bullet , \bullet ,\bullet }^{\widetilde{S},F};O)<1\) for every point \(O\in F\).
FormalPara ProofLet \(\widetilde{\ell }\) and \(\widetilde{C}_2\) be the proper transforms on the surface \(\widetilde{S}\) of the curves \(\ell \) and \(C_2\), respectively. Then \(\widetilde{\ell }\) is a \((-2)\)-curve, \(\widetilde{C}_2\) is a \((-1)\)-curve, and the intersection \(\widetilde{\ell }\cap \widetilde{C}_2\) consists of a single point. Note also that \(\widetilde{\ell }\cap \widetilde{C}_2\in F\) \(\iff \) \(\ell \) and \(C_2\) are tangent at P. If \(0\leqslant u\leqslant \frac{2}{3}\), it follows from (3) that
and
which gives
and
Likewise, if \(\frac{2}{3}\leqslant u\leqslant 1\), then it follows from (3) that
and
which gives
and
Similarly, if \(1\leqslant u\leqslant \frac{4}{3}\), then
and
which gives
and
Now, we can compute
Let O be a point in F. If \(O\in \widetilde{\ell }\cap \widetilde{C}_2\cap \widetilde{C}_5\), then \(O\not \in \widetilde{L}_1\cup \widetilde{L}_2\), so that
so that
Similarly, if \(O\in \widetilde{\ell }\cup \widetilde{C}_2\), then \(S(W_{\bullet , \bullet ,\bullet }^{\widetilde{S},F};O)\leqslant \frac{1685}{1728}\). If \(O\in \widetilde{L}_1\cup \widetilde{L}_2\), then \(O\not \in \widetilde{\ell }\cup \widetilde{C}_2\), and O is contained in exactly one of the curves \(\widetilde{L}_1\) or \(\widetilde{L}_2\). In this case, we have
The lemma is proved. \(\square \)
FormalPara Lemma 21Suppose \(T_P=\ell _1+\ell _2+\ell _3\), where \(\ell _1\), \(\ell _2\), \(\ell _3\) are lines such that \(P=\ell _1\cap \ell _2\) and \(P\not \in \ell _3\). Then \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };F)<2\) and \(S(W_{\bullet , \bullet ,\bullet }^{\widetilde{S},F};O)<1\) for every point \(O\in F\).
FormalPara ProofLet \(\widetilde{\ell }_1\), \(\widetilde{\ell }_2\), \(\widetilde{\ell }_3\) be the proper transforms on \(\widetilde{S}\) of the lines \(\ell _1\), \(\ell _2\), \(\ell _3\), respectively. If \(0\leqslant u\leqslant 1\), then it follows from (3) that
and
which gives
and
Similarly, if \(1\leqslant u\leqslant \frac{3}{2}\), then
and
which gives
and
Since \(P\in C_5\) and \(C_5\) is smooth, we compute \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };F)=\frac{31}{16}\). Similarly, if O is a point in F, then
The lemma is proved. \(\square \)
Thus, we see that \(S(W^S_{\bullet ,\bullet };F)<2\) and \(S(W_{\bullet , \bullet ,\bullet }^{\widetilde{S},F};O)<1\) for every point \(O\in F\). Hence, using (2), we conclude that \(\beta (\textbf{F})>0\). The Main Theorem is proved.
References
Abban, H., Zhuang, Z.: K-stability of Fano varieties via admissible flags. In: Forum of Mathematics, Pi vol. 10, p. e15 (2022)
Araujo, C., Castravet, A.-M., Cheltsov, I., Fujita, K., Kaloghiros, A.-S., Martinez-Garcia, J., Shramov, C., Süß, H., Viswanathan, N.: The Calabi problem for Fano threefolds. In: LMS Lecture Notes in Mathematics vol. 485, Cambridge University Press (2023)
Clark, P., Lacy, A.: There are genus one curves of every index over every infinite finitely generated field. J. Reine Angew. Math. 749, 65–86 (2019)
Fisher, T.: Some examples of \(5\) and \(7\) descent for elliptic curves over \(\mathbb{Q} \). J. Eur. Math. Soc. 3, 169–201 (2001)
Fisher, T.: Pfaffian presentations of elliptic normal curves. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 362, 2525–2540 (2010)
Fujita, K.: On K-stability and the volume functions of \(\mathbb{Q} \)-Fano varieties. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 113, 541–582 (2016)
Fujita, K.: A valuative criterion for uniform K-stability of \(\mathbb{Q} \)-Fano varieties. J. Reine Angew. Math. 751, 309–338 (2019)
Hartshorne, R.: Algebraic geometry. In: Graduate Texts in Mathematics vol. 52, Springer–Verlag (1983)
Hulek, K.: Projective geometry of elliptic curves. Asterisque 137, 143 (1986)
Li, C.: K-semistability is equivariant volume minimization. Duke Math. J. 166, 3147–3218 (2017)
Lin, H.-Y., Shinder, E.: Motivic invariants of birational maps. Ann. Math. 199(1), 445–478 (2024)
Nagata, M.: On self-intersection number of a section on a ruled surface. Nagoya Math. J. 37, 191–196 (1970)
Zhuang, Z.: Optimal destabilizing centers and equivariant K-stability. Invent. Math. 226, 195–223 (2021)
Acknowledgements
We started this project during the first author’s visit to Krakow in 2022, and we completed it during the first author’s second visits to Krakow in 2023. We would like to cordially thank Pedagogical University of Krakow for the hospitality and excellent working conditions.
Funding
Cheltsov has been supported by EPSRC Grant No. EP/V054597/1 and by the Leverhulme Trust Grant RPG-2021-229. Pokora has been supported by The Excellent Small Working Groups Programme DNWZ.711/IDUB/ESWG/2023/01/00002 at the Pedagogical University of Krakow.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declares that there are no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Throughout this paper, all varieties are assumed to be projective and defined over \(\mathbb {C}\).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cheltsov, I., Pokora, P. On K-stability of \(\mathbb {P}^3\) blown up along a quintic elliptic curve. Ann Univ Ferrara 70, 1165–1192 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11565-024-00532-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11565-024-00532-6