Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous monitoring of two fungal genotypes on plant roots by single nucleotide polymorphism quantification with an innovative KASPar quantitative PCR

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mycological Progress Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An innovative quantitative PCR-based method derived from the Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR Assay Reagent (KASPar) system was developed to quantify the genomic DNA from two coexisting genotypes on the same tissues of a host-plant. For this purpose, the classical end-point KASPar method was evolved to a real-time method thanks to the addition of an adapted measurement step after each PCR cycle. It was applied to the quantification of the two genotypes G1 and G2 of the Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici (Ggt) soilborne fungus, pathogenic on wheat roots. Specific primers targeting a single nucleotide polymorphism from the ITS sequence were used allowing simultaneous quantification of both genotypes in the same reaction. The assays were applied to quantify fungal DNA of each genotype, aside or mixed together, after DNA extraction from fungal pure cultures and from single or co-inoculated roots in artificial medium or in soil. The detection and quantification lower limits for the two genotypes were 1.25 pg and 5 pg for DNA from fungal pure cultures, and 1.8 pg and 7 pg for DNA from fungal inoculated roots. The advantages of this cost-effective method are the high levels of specificity, sensitivity and reproducibility. Moreover, the accuracy of the method is independent of the copy numbers of the target sequences. The method is the first one to adapt the non-quantitative genotyping KASPar system to a quantitative application of two known genotypes of a species simultaneously and is suitable for simultaneous genotype-specific quantification of any other organisms (fungi, bacteria, plants).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augustin C, Ulrich K, Ward E, Werner A (1999) RAPD-based inter- and intravarietal classification of fungi of the Gaeumannomyces-Phialophora complex. J Phytopathol 147:109–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman GL, Ward E, Hornby D, Gutteridge RJ (1997) Comparisons of isolates of the take-all fungus, Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici, from different cereal sequences using DNA probes and non-molecular methods. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1225–1232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan GT, Daniel MJ, Osbourn AE (1995) Comparison of fungi within the Gaeumannomyces-Phialophora complex by analysis of ribosomal DNA sequences. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:681–689

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canovas A, Rincon G, Islas-Trejo A, Wickramasinghe S, Medrano JF (2010) SNP discovery in the bovine milk transcriptome using RNA-Seq technology. Mamm Genome 21:592–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daval S, Lebreton L, Gazengel K, Guillerm-Erckelboudt A-Y, Sarniguet A (2010) Genetic evidence for differentiation of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici into two major groups. Plant Pathol 59:165–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daval S, Lebreton L, Gazengel K, Boutin M, Guillerm-Erckelboudt A-Y, Sarniguet A (2011) The biocontrol bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf29Arp strain affects the pathogenesis-related gene expression of the take-all fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici on wheat roots. Molec Plant Pathol 12:839–854

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feau N, Vialle A, Allaire M, Maier W, Hamelin RC (2011) DNA barcoding in the rust genus Chrysomyxa and its implications for the phylogeny of the genus. Mycologia 103:1250–1266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman J, Ward E, Gutteridge RJ, Bateman GL (2005) Methods for studying population structure, including sensitivity to the fungicide silthiofam, of the cereal take-all fungus, Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Plant Pathol 54:686–698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hietala AM, Eikenes M, Kvaalen H, Solheim H, Fossdal CG (2003) Multiplex real-time PCR for monitoring Heterobasidion annosum colonization in Norway Spruce clones that differ in disease resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4413–4420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogendoorn B, Norton N, Kirov G, Williams N, Hamshere ML, Spurlock G, Austin J, Stephens MK, Buckland PR, Owen MJ, O’Donovan MC (2000) Cheap, accurate and rapid allele frequency estimation of single nucleotide polymorphisms by primer extension and DHPLC in DNA pools. Hum Genet 107:488–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hornbak M, Banasik K, Justesen JM, Krarup NT, Sandholt CH, Andersson A, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Pisinger C, Witte DR, Sorensen TIA, Pedersen O, Hansen T (2011) The minor C-allele of rs2014355 in ACADS is associated with reduced insulin release following an oral glucose load. BMC Med Genet 12:4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Köhl J, Groenenboom-de Haas BH, Kastelein P, Rossi V, Waalwijk C (2009) Quantitative detection of pear-pathogenic Stemphylium vesicarium in orchads. Phytopathol 99:1377–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok PY (2001) Methods for genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2:235–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton L, Lucas P, Dugas F, Guillerm A-Y, Schoeny A, Sarniguet A (2004) Changes in population structure of the soilborne fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici during continuous wheat cropping. Environ Microbiol 6:1174–1185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton L, Gosme M, Lucas P, Guillerm-Erckelboudt A-Y, Sarniguet A (2007) Linear relationship between Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici (Ggt) genotypic frequencies and disease severity on wheat roots in the field. Environ Microbiol 9:492–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SB, Milgroom MG, Taylor JW (1988) A rapid high yield mini prep method for isolation of total genomic DNA from fungi. Fungal Genet Newl 35:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez MM, Llop P, Olmos A, Marco-Noales E, Cambra M, Bertolini E (2009) Are molecular tools solving the challenger posed by detection of plant pathogenic bacteria and viruses? Curr Issues Mol Biol 11:13–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin KJ, Rygiewicz PT (2005) Fungal-specific PCR primers developed for analysis of the ITS region of environmental DNA extracts. BMC Microbiol 5:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanasamy P (2011) Microbial plant pathogens—detection and disease diagnosis: fungal pathogens. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Psifidi A, Dovas C, Banos G (2011) Novel quantitative real-time LCR for the sensitive detection of SNP frequencies in pooled DNA: method development, evaluation and application. PLoS One 19:e14560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi M, Yang Y (2002) Quantification of Magnaporthe grisea during infection of rice plants using real-time polymerase chain reaction and northern blot / phosphoimaging analyses. Phytopathol 92:870–876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schena L, Nigro F, Ippolito A, Gallitelli D (2004) Real-time quantitative PCR: a new technology to detect and study phytopathogenic and antagonistic fungi. Eur J Plant Pathol 110:893–908

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, Levesque CA, Chen W, Fungal Barcoding Consortium (2012) Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:6241–6246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward E, Gray RM (1992) Generation of a ribosomal DNA probe by PCR and its use in identification of fungi within the Gaeumannomyces-Phialophora complex. Plant Pathol 41:730–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward E, Foster SJ, Fraaije BA, McCartney HA (2004) Plant pathogen diagnostics: immunological and nucleic acid-based approaches. Ann Appl Biol 145:1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu A, Geng H, Zhou X (2006) Quantify single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) ratio in pooled DNA based on normalized fluorescence real-time PCR. BMC Genomics 7:143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from INRA (“Institut National de la Recherche Agonomique”), Plant Health and Environment division. We thank J. Wilson, a native English speaker and a professional translator, for her English revisions of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphanie Daval.

Additional information

Kévin Gazengel and Lionel Lebreton equal contributors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gazengel, K., Lebreton, L., Guillerm-Erckelboudt, AY. et al. Simultaneous monitoring of two fungal genotypes on plant roots by single nucleotide polymorphism quantification with an innovative KASPar quantitative PCR. Mycol Progress 12, 657–666 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-012-0872-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-012-0872-4

Keywords

Navigation