Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Meniscus Arrow® as a fixation device for the treatment of mallet fractures: results of 50 cases

  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

Background

The treatment of mallet fractures is a controversial and challenging problem. Generally, mallet fractures are treated conservatively except those involving more than one third of the base of the distal phalanx. Many different surgical fixation techniques have been published. This paper describes a new fixation procedure using ultimate bioresorbable meniscal fixation nails (Meniscus Arrows®).

Methods

Mallet fractures in 50 digits of 49 patients were fixed with this nail in an outpatient surgical procedure, mostly under local (Oberst-block) anaesthesia. The average operation time was 21 min.

Results

According to the Crawford criteria, patient outcome was graded as excellent in 48 %, good in 22 %, and fair in 28 %. In one patient, the outcome was graded as poor, but the fracture was in a pre-existent arthritic joint. All fractures were consolidated without recurrent dislocation. Complications included one wound infection, which was successfully treated with antibiotics and without further consequences. No nail deformities occurred. Two times, the nail spontaneously and gradually dislocated during intensive use of the hand after, respectively, 3 and 6 months and could easily be removed under local anaesthesia without any functional sequelae.

Conclusion

The bioresorbable meniscal nail fixation technique provides a fast and successful surgical treatment for mallet fractures with a minimum of adverse events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auchingloss JM. Mallet-finger injuries: a prospective controlled trial of internal and external splintage. Hand. 1982;14:168–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aulicio PL. Extensor tendons injuries. In: Light TR, editor. Orthopaedic knowledge update: hand surgery, 2nd, Chicago; 1999. p. 139–48.

  3. Crawford GP. The molded polythene splint for mallet finger deformities. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1984;9:231–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Damron TA, Engber WD, Lange RH, et al. Biomechanical analysis of mallet finger fracture fixation techniques. J Hand Surg. 1993;18A:600–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Damron TA, Engber WD. Surgical treatment of mallet finger fractures by tension band technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;300:133–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Doyle J. Extensor tendons—acute injuries. In: Green DP, editor. Operative hand surgery. 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1999. p. 1950–70.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fritz D, Lutz M, Arora R, Gabl M, et al. Delayed single Kirschner wire compression technique for mallet fracture. J Hand Surg (Br). 2005;30:180–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Green DP, Rowland SA. Fractures and dislocations in the hand. In: Rochkwoord CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW, editors. Fractures in adults. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1991. p. 441–561.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hamas RS, Horrel ED, Pierret GP. Treatment of mallet finger due to intra-articular fracture of the distal phalanx. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1978;3:361–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hofmeister EP, Mazurek MT, Shin AY, et al. Extension block pinning for large mallet fractures. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2003;28:453–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Inoue G. Closed reduction of mallet fractures using extension-block Kirschner wire. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6:413–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishiguro T, Ito K, Nakanishi K, et al. A new method of closed reduction for mallet fractures. J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 1988;5:444–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. King HJ, Shin SJ, Kang ES. Complications of operative treatment for mallet fractures of the distal phalanx. J Hand Surg. 2001;26B:28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kinnimonth AWG, Holburn F. A comparative controlled trial of a new perforated splint and a traditional splint in the treatment of mallet finger. J Hand Surg. 1986;11B:261–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kronlage SC, Faust D. Open reduction and screw fixation of mallet fractures. J Hand Surg. 2004;29B:135–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lubahn JD. Mallet finger fractures: a comparison of open and closed technique. J Hand Surg. 1989;14A:394–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelis R, Wouters DB. Is the use of biodegradable devices in the operative treatment of avulsion fractures of the fingers, the so-called mallet finger advantageous? A feasibility study with Meniscus Arrows. Open Orthop J. 2008;2:151–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Okafor B, Mbubaigbu C, Munshi I, et al. Mallet deformity of the finger: five-year follow-up of conservative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg. 1997;79B:544–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pegoli L, Toh S, Arai K, et al. The Ishiguro extension block technique for the treatment of mallet finger fracture: indications and clinical results. J Hand Surg (Br). 2003;28:15–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stack HG. A modified splint for mallet finger. J Hand Surg. 1986;11B:263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stern PJ, Kastrup JJ. Complications and prognosis of treatment of mallet finger. J Hand Surg. 1988;13A:329–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Takami H, Takahashi S, Ando M. Operative treatment of mallet finger due to intra-articular fracture of the distal phalanx. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:9–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tetik C, Gudemez E. Modification of the extension block Kirschner wire technique for mallet fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:284–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Teoh LC, Lee JY. Mallet fractures: a novel approach to internal fixation using a hook Plate. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007;32:24–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Theivendran K, Mahon A, Rajaratnam V. A novel hook plate fixation technique for the treatment of mallet fractures. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58:112–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wehbe MA, Schneider LH. Mallet fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:658–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Fenne L. M. Aarts declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Rosalie Derks declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Diederick B. Wouters declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 [5]. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diederick B. Wouters.

About this article

Cite this article

Aarts, F.L.M., Derks, R. & Wouters, D.B. The Meniscus Arrow® as a fixation device for the treatment of mallet fractures: results of 50 cases. HAND 9, 499–503 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9619-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9619-9

Keywords

Navigation