Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hepatic hemangiomas: the various imaging avatars and its mimickers

  • ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hemangiomas are the most common benign tumors of the liver. These lesions are typically asymptomatic, solitary and almost always discovered incidentally, and in recent years with advances in imaging technology these lesions are being detected more frequently. Although, in majority of the cases, the imaging diagnosis of a liver hemangioma is clearly and confidently established, not all hemangiomas present with their characteristic or typical appearance on imaging. Occasionally, these lesions do present with an atypical pattern, and can be confused with other malignant lesions such as hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and angiosarcoma. In this article, we review with illustrations the diverse imaging appearances of hemangiomas on the commonly used imaging modalities, as well as provide a gamut of common and uncommonly encountered hemangioma mimickers. Knowledge of the various atypical avatars of this benign lesion is important and can help one circumvent diagnostic errors, thereby potentially avoiding unnecessary surgeries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Figure has been reproduced with permission from Lunn et al. [22]

Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ojili V, Tirumani SH, Gunabushanam G, Nagar A, Surabhi VR, Chintapalli KN, Ryan J (2013) Abdominal hemangiomas: a pictorial review of unusual, atypical, and rare types. Can Assoc Radiol J 64(1):18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2011.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Madrazo BL (2010) Using imaging studies to differentiate among benign liver tumors. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 6(7):423–427

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vilgrain V, Boulos L, Vullierme MP, Denys A, Terris B, Menu Y (2000) Imaging of atypical hemangiomas of the liver with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 20(2):379–397. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.2.g00mc01379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin S, Zhang L, Li M, Cheng Q, Zhang L, Zheng S (2017) Atypical hemangioma mimicking mixed hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: case report. Medicine 96(50):e9192. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009192

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mamone G, Miraglia R (2019) The, “light bulb sign” in liver hemangioma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 44(6):2327–2328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01964-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Francisco FA, de Araújo AL, Oliveira Neto JA, Parente DB (2014) Hepatobiliary contrast agents: differential diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions, pitfalls and other indications. Radiol Bras 47(5):301–309. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2013.1867

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Thian YL, Riddell AM, Koh DM (2013) Liver-specific agents for contrast-enhanced MRI: role in oncological imaging. Cancer Imaging 13(4):567–579. https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0050

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Klotz T, Montoriol PF, Da Ines D, Petitcolin V, Joubert-Zakeyh J, Garcier JM (2013) Hepatic haemangioma: common and uncommon imaging features. Diagn Interv Imaging 94(9):849–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2013.04.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oto A, Kulkarni K, Nishikawa R, Baron RL (2010) Contrast enhancement of hepatic hemangiomas on multiphase MDCT: can we diagnose hepatic hemangiomas by comparing enhancement with blood pool? AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(2):381–386. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alturkistany S, Jang HJ, Yu H, Lee KH, Kim TK (2012) Fading hepatic hemangiomas on multiphasic CT. Abdom Imaging 37(5):775–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9826-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Doyle DJ, Khalili K, Guindi M, Atri M (2007) Imaging features of sclerosed hemangioma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(1):67–72. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zerpa R, Abdelghani EH, Iliescu G, Escalante C (2019) Enormous hemangioma of the liver. BMJ Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2018-226983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdel Wahab M, El Nakeeb A, Ali MA, Mahdy Y, Shehta A, Abdulrazek M, El Desoky M, Abdel Wahab R (2018) Surgical management of giant hepatic hemangioma: single center’s experience with 144 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 22(5):849–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3696-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Al Farai A, Mescam L, De Luca V et al (2018) Giant pedunculated hepatic hemangioma: a case report and literature review. Case Rep Oncol 11(2):476–484. https://doi.org/10.1159/000490696

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Patnana M, Menias CO, Pickhardt PJ, Elshikh M, Javadi S, Gaballah A, Shaaban AM, Korivi BR, Garg N, Elsayes KM (2018) Liver calcifications and calcified liver masses: pattern recognition approach on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211(1):76–86. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.19704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu MC, Little EC (2018) Isolated hepatic hemangiomatosis in 2 septuagenarians. Radiol Case Rep 13(6):1097–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2018.08.018

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Thampy R, Elsayes KM, Menias CO, Pickhardt PJ, Kang HC, Deshmukh SP, Ahmed K, Korivi BR (2017) Imaging features of rare mesenychmal liver tumours: beyond haemangiomas. Br J Radiol 90(1079):20170373. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170373

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsushita M, Takehara Y, Nasu H, Hirai Y, Yamashita S, Souda K, Kobayashi Y, Miura K (2006) Atypically enhanced cavernous hemangiomas of the liver: centrifugal enhancement does not preclude the diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma. J Gastroenterol 41(12):1227–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-006-1906-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bartolotta TV, Taibbi A, Galia M, Lo Re G, La Grutta L, Grassi R, Midiri M (2007) Centrifugal (insideout) enhancement of liver hemangiomas: a possible atypical appearance on contrast enhanced US. Eur J Radiol 64(3):447–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.02.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee J, Lim HK, Jeon YH (2007) Multiple hepatic hemangiomas with fluid-fluid levels. Australas Radiol 51(Suppl):B310–B312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01801.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin J, Bigge J, Ulbright TM, Montgomery E (2013) Anastomosing hemangioma of the liver and gastrointestinal tract: an unusual variant histologically mimicking angiosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol 37(11):1761–1765. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182967e6c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lunn B, Yasir S, Lam-Himlin D, Menias CO, Torbenson MS, Venkatesh SK (2019) Anastomosing hemangioma of the liver: a case series. Abdom Radiol (N Y) 44(8):2781–2787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02043-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim KW, Kim TK, Han JK, Kim AY, Lee HJ, Choi BI (2001) Hepatic hemangiomas with arterioportal shunt: findings at two-phase CT. Radiology 219(3):707–711. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01ma05707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim KW, Kim AY, Kim TK, Kim SY, Kim MJ, Park MS, Park SH, Lee KH, Kim JK, Kim PN, Ha HK, Lee MG (2006) Hepatic hemangiomas with arterioportal shunt: sonographic appearances with CT and MRI correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(4):W406–W414. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jang HJ, Kim TK, Lim HK, Park SJ, Sim JS, Kim HY, Lee JH (2003) Hepatic hemangioma: atypical appearances on CT, MR imaging, and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(1):135–141. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.1.1800135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Blachar A, Grazioli L (2001) Hemangioma in the cirrhotic liver: diagnosis and natural history. Radiology 219(1):69–74. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.1.r01ap3269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dodd GD III, Baron RL, Oliver JH III, Federle MP (1999) Spectrum of imaging findings of the liver in end stage cirrhosis. II. Focal abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1185–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheng HC, Tsai SH, Chiang JH, Chang CY (1995) Hyalinized liver hemangioma mimicking malignant tumor at MR imaging (letter). AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:1016–1017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Panick CEP, Ward RD, Coppa C, Liu PS (2019) Hepatic capsular retraction: an updated MR imaging review. Eur J Radiol 113:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Blachar A, Federle MP, Sosna J (2009) Liver lesions with hepatic capsular retraction. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 30(5):426–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vilgrain V, Uzan F, Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Zappa M, Menu Y (2003) Prevalence of hepatic hemangioma in patients with focal nodular hyperplasia: MR imaging analysis. Radiology 229(1):75–79. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2291021284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ponnatapura J, Kielar A, Burke LMB, Lockhart ME, Abualruz AR, Tappouni R, Lalwani N (2019) Hepatic complications of oral contraceptive pills and estrogen on MRI: controversies and update—adenoma and beyond. Magn Reson Imaging 60:110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2019.04.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S, Hahn PF, Sahani DV (2009) Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29(6):1725–1748. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.296095515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yasir S, Torbenson MS (2019) Angiosarcoma of the liver: clinicopathologic features and morphologic patterns. AM J Surg Pathol 43(5):581–590. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ehman EC, Torbenson MS, Wells ML, Welch BT, Thompson SM, Garg I, Venkatesh SK (2018) Hepatic tumors of vascular origin: imaging appearances. Abdom Radiol (N Y) 43(8):1978–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1401-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Semelka RC, Nimojan N, Chandana S, Ramalho M, Palmer SL, DeMukder D, Parada Villavicencio C, Woosley J, Garon BL, Jha RC, Miller FH, Altun E (2018) MRI feature of primary rare malignancies of the liver: a report from four university centres. Eur Radiol 28(4):1529–1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5102-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ansari-Gilani K, Modaresi Esfeh J (2019) Unusual MRI appearance of a well differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma, mimicking a cavernous hemangioma: a case report. Radiol Case Rep. 14(7):885–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2019.04.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Chung YE, Kim MJ, Park YN, Choi JY, Pyo JY, Kim YC, Cho HJ, Kim KA, Choi SY (2009) Varying appearances of cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 29(3):683–700. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.293085729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Burkholz KJ, Silva AC (2008) AJR teaching file: hypervascular metastasis or hepatic hemangioma? AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(6 Suppl):S53–S56. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.7074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rishi Philip Mathew.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This is a review article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mathew, R.P., Sam, M., Raubenheimer, M. et al. Hepatic hemangiomas: the various imaging avatars and its mimickers. Radiol med 125, 801–815 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01185-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01185-z

Keywords

Navigation