Abstract
Hemangiomas are the most common benign tumors of the liver. These lesions are typically asymptomatic, solitary and almost always discovered incidentally, and in recent years with advances in imaging technology these lesions are being detected more frequently. Although, in majority of the cases, the imaging diagnosis of a liver hemangioma is clearly and confidently established, not all hemangiomas present with their characteristic or typical appearance on imaging. Occasionally, these lesions do present with an atypical pattern, and can be confused with other malignant lesions such as hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and angiosarcoma. In this article, we review with illustrations the diverse imaging appearances of hemangiomas on the commonly used imaging modalities, as well as provide a gamut of common and uncommonly encountered hemangioma mimickers. Knowledge of the various atypical avatars of this benign lesion is important and can help one circumvent diagnostic errors, thereby potentially avoiding unnecessary surgeries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ojili V, Tirumani SH, Gunabushanam G, Nagar A, Surabhi VR, Chintapalli KN, Ryan J (2013) Abdominal hemangiomas: a pictorial review of unusual, atypical, and rare types. Can Assoc Radiol J 64(1):18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2011.08.004
Madrazo BL (2010) Using imaging studies to differentiate among benign liver tumors. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 6(7):423–427
Vilgrain V, Boulos L, Vullierme MP, Denys A, Terris B, Menu Y (2000) Imaging of atypical hemangiomas of the liver with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 20(2):379–397. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.2.g00mc01379
Lin S, Zhang L, Li M, Cheng Q, Zhang L, Zheng S (2017) Atypical hemangioma mimicking mixed hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: case report. Medicine 96(50):e9192. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009192
Mamone G, Miraglia R (2019) The, “light bulb sign” in liver hemangioma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 44(6):2327–2328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01964-x
Francisco FA, de Araújo AL, Oliveira Neto JA, Parente DB (2014) Hepatobiliary contrast agents: differential diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions, pitfalls and other indications. Radiol Bras 47(5):301–309. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2013.1867
Thian YL, Riddell AM, Koh DM (2013) Liver-specific agents for contrast-enhanced MRI: role in oncological imaging. Cancer Imaging 13(4):567–579. https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0050
Klotz T, Montoriol PF, Da Ines D, Petitcolin V, Joubert-Zakeyh J, Garcier JM (2013) Hepatic haemangioma: common and uncommon imaging features. Diagn Interv Imaging 94(9):849–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2013.04.008
Oto A, Kulkarni K, Nishikawa R, Baron RL (2010) Contrast enhancement of hepatic hemangiomas on multiphase MDCT: can we diagnose hepatic hemangiomas by comparing enhancement with blood pool? AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(2):381–386. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3324
Alturkistany S, Jang HJ, Yu H, Lee KH, Kim TK (2012) Fading hepatic hemangiomas on multiphasic CT. Abdom Imaging 37(5):775–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9826-6
Doyle DJ, Khalili K, Guindi M, Atri M (2007) Imaging features of sclerosed hemangioma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(1):67–72. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1076
Zerpa R, Abdelghani EH, Iliescu G, Escalante C (2019) Enormous hemangioma of the liver. BMJ Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2018-226983
Abdel Wahab M, El Nakeeb A, Ali MA, Mahdy Y, Shehta A, Abdulrazek M, El Desoky M, Abdel Wahab R (2018) Surgical management of giant hepatic hemangioma: single center’s experience with 144 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 22(5):849–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3696-y
Al Farai A, Mescam L, De Luca V et al (2018) Giant pedunculated hepatic hemangioma: a case report and literature review. Case Rep Oncol 11(2):476–484. https://doi.org/10.1159/000490696
Patnana M, Menias CO, Pickhardt PJ, Elshikh M, Javadi S, Gaballah A, Shaaban AM, Korivi BR, Garg N, Elsayes KM (2018) Liver calcifications and calcified liver masses: pattern recognition approach on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211(1):76–86. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.19704
Liu MC, Little EC (2018) Isolated hepatic hemangiomatosis in 2 septuagenarians. Radiol Case Rep 13(6):1097–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2018.08.018
Thampy R, Elsayes KM, Menias CO, Pickhardt PJ, Kang HC, Deshmukh SP, Ahmed K, Korivi BR (2017) Imaging features of rare mesenychmal liver tumours: beyond haemangiomas. Br J Radiol 90(1079):20170373. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170373
Matsushita M, Takehara Y, Nasu H, Hirai Y, Yamashita S, Souda K, Kobayashi Y, Miura K (2006) Atypically enhanced cavernous hemangiomas of the liver: centrifugal enhancement does not preclude the diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma. J Gastroenterol 41(12):1227–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-006-1906-y
Bartolotta TV, Taibbi A, Galia M, Lo Re G, La Grutta L, Grassi R, Midiri M (2007) Centrifugal (insideout) enhancement of liver hemangiomas: a possible atypical appearance on contrast enhanced US. Eur J Radiol 64(3):447–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.02.038
Lee J, Lim HK, Jeon YH (2007) Multiple hepatic hemangiomas with fluid-fluid levels. Australas Radiol 51(Suppl):B310–B312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01801.x
Lin J, Bigge J, Ulbright TM, Montgomery E (2013) Anastomosing hemangioma of the liver and gastrointestinal tract: an unusual variant histologically mimicking angiosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol 37(11):1761–1765. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182967e6c
Lunn B, Yasir S, Lam-Himlin D, Menias CO, Torbenson MS, Venkatesh SK (2019) Anastomosing hemangioma of the liver: a case series. Abdom Radiol (N Y) 44(8):2781–2787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02043-x
Kim KW, Kim TK, Han JK, Kim AY, Lee HJ, Choi BI (2001) Hepatic hemangiomas with arterioportal shunt: findings at two-phase CT. Radiology 219(3):707–711. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01ma05707
Kim KW, Kim AY, Kim TK, Kim SY, Kim MJ, Park MS, Park SH, Lee KH, Kim JK, Kim PN, Ha HK, Lee MG (2006) Hepatic hemangiomas with arterioportal shunt: sonographic appearances with CT and MRI correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(4):W406–W414. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0611
Jang HJ, Kim TK, Lim HK, Park SJ, Sim JS, Kim HY, Lee JH (2003) Hepatic hemangioma: atypical appearances on CT, MR imaging, and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(1):135–141. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.1.1800135
Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Blachar A, Grazioli L (2001) Hemangioma in the cirrhotic liver: diagnosis and natural history. Radiology 219(1):69–74. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.1.r01ap3269
Dodd GD III, Baron RL, Oliver JH III, Federle MP (1999) Spectrum of imaging findings of the liver in end stage cirrhosis. II. Focal abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1185–1192
Cheng HC, Tsai SH, Chiang JH, Chang CY (1995) Hyalinized liver hemangioma mimicking malignant tumor at MR imaging (letter). AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:1016–1017
Panick CEP, Ward RD, Coppa C, Liu PS (2019) Hepatic capsular retraction: an updated MR imaging review. Eur J Radiol 113:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.037
Blachar A, Federle MP, Sosna J (2009) Liver lesions with hepatic capsular retraction. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 30(5):426–435
Vilgrain V, Uzan F, Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Zappa M, Menu Y (2003) Prevalence of hepatic hemangioma in patients with focal nodular hyperplasia: MR imaging analysis. Radiology 229(1):75–79. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2291021284
Ponnatapura J, Kielar A, Burke LMB, Lockhart ME, Abualruz AR, Tappouni R, Lalwani N (2019) Hepatic complications of oral contraceptive pills and estrogen on MRI: controversies and update—adenoma and beyond. Magn Reson Imaging 60:110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2019.04.010
Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S, Hahn PF, Sahani DV (2009) Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29(6):1725–1748. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.296095515
Yasir S, Torbenson MS (2019) Angiosarcoma of the liver: clinicopathologic features and morphologic patterns. AM J Surg Pathol 43(5):581–590. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001228
Ehman EC, Torbenson MS, Wells ML, Welch BT, Thompson SM, Garg I, Venkatesh SK (2018) Hepatic tumors of vascular origin: imaging appearances. Abdom Radiol (N Y) 43(8):1978–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1401-3
Semelka RC, Nimojan N, Chandana S, Ramalho M, Palmer SL, DeMukder D, Parada Villavicencio C, Woosley J, Garon BL, Jha RC, Miller FH, Altun E (2018) MRI feature of primary rare malignancies of the liver: a report from four university centres. Eur Radiol 28(4):1529–1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5102-7
Ansari-Gilani K, Modaresi Esfeh J (2019) Unusual MRI appearance of a well differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma, mimicking a cavernous hemangioma: a case report. Radiol Case Rep. 14(7):885–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2019.04.002
Chung YE, Kim MJ, Park YN, Choi JY, Pyo JY, Kim YC, Cho HJ, Kim KA, Choi SY (2009) Varying appearances of cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 29(3):683–700. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.293085729
Burkholz KJ, Silva AC (2008) AJR teaching file: hypervascular metastasis or hepatic hemangioma? AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(6 Suppl):S53–S56. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.7074
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This is a review article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mathew, R.P., Sam, M., Raubenheimer, M. et al. Hepatic hemangiomas: the various imaging avatars and its mimickers. Radiol med 125, 801–815 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01185-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01185-z