Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative US-MRI evaluation of the Insall–Salvati index

  • MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate whether the universally accepted range of normal patellar height ratio derived from MRI for the Insall–Salvati (IS) method could be similarly applied to ultrasound (US).

Materials and methods

This study included 52 patients (age range 11–75 years) who underwent a bi-modality (US and MRI) examination, with a total of 60 knees evaluated. IS index (ratio of the patella tendon length to length of the patella) was acquired with both methods. Two operators, with different experiences of musculoskeletal imaging and blinded to the results of other investigators, separately performed the MRI and US measurements.

Results

For the two operators, MRI reported a mean value of patellar height ratio of 1.10 ± 0.16 (mean ± standard deviation SD), while US a mean value of 1.17 ± 0.16 (mean ± SD). For comparable results, the small addition of 0.16 is needed for the measurements on US compared with MRI. Inter-observer agreements using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was, respectively, 0.97 for MRI and 0.98 for US. The difference of mean values in patellar height ratios between MRI and US was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). The ICC between the two modalities was 0.94.

Conclusion

According to our experience, IS index can be appropriately evaluated on US images, reducing the need of other imaging techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ward SR, Terk MR, Powers CM (2007) Patella alta: association with patellofemoral alignment and changes in contact area during weight-bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1749–1755

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lenhart RL, Brandon SC, Smith CR et al (2017) Influence of patellar position on the knee extensor mechanism in normal and crouched walking. J Biomech 25(51):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caton JH, Dejour D (2010) Tibial tubercle osteotomy in patello-femoral instability and in patellar height abnormality. Int Orthop 34(2):305–912

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Insall J, Salvati E (1971) Patella position in the normal knee. Radiology 101(1):101–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee PP, Chalian M, Carrino JA (2012) Multimodality correlations of patellar height measurement on X-ray, CT, and MRI. Skelet Radiol 41(10):1309–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Laugharne E, Bali N, Purushothamdas S et al (2016) Variability of measurement of patellofemoral indices with knee flexion and quadriceps contraction: an MRI-based anatomical study. Knee Surg Relat Res 28(4):297–301

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Park MS, Chung CY, Lee KM et al (2010) Which is the best method to determine the patellar height in children and adolescents? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1344–1351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Diederichs G, Issever AS, Scheffler S (2010) MR imaging of patellar instability: injury patterns and assessment of risk factors. Radiographics 30:961–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seil R, Müller B, Georg T et al (2000) Reliability and interobserver variability in radiological patellar height ratios. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(4):231–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Phillips CL, Silver DAT, Schranz PJ (2010) The measurement of patellar height: a review of the methods of imaging. J Bone Joint Surg 92:1045–1053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith TO, Davies L, Toms AP et al (2011) The reliability and validity of radiological assessment for patellar instability. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Skelet Radiol 40:399–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu W, Yang J, Chen S (2016) Abnormal patella height based on Insall–Salvati ratio and its correlation with patellar cartilage lesions: an extremity-dedicated low-field magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 1703 chinese cases. Scand J Surg 105(3):197–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Munch JL, Sullivan JP, Nguyen JT et al (2016) Patellar articular overlap on MRI is a simple alternative to conventional measurements of patellar height. Orthop J Sports Med 7:2325967116656328

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mohammadinejad P, Shekarchi B (2016) Value of CT scan-assessed tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in identification of patellar instability. Radiol Med 9:729–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dei Giudici L, Enea D, Pierdicca L et al (2015) Evaluation of patello-femoral alignment by CT scans: interobserver reliability of several parameters. Radiol Med 11:1031–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Solivetti FM, Guerrisi A, Salducca N et al (2016) Appropriateness of knee MRI prescriptions: clinical, economic and technical issues. Radiol Med 4:315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martino F, Ettorre GC, Macarini L et al (1992) Comparative study of echography and conventional radiology in the evaluation of the Insall–Salvati index. Radiol Med 84(6):736–739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shabshin N, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB et al (2004) MRI criteria for patella alta and baja. Skelet Radiol 33:445–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller TT, Staron RB, Feldman F (1996) Patellar height on sagittal MR imaging of the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:339–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ali SA, Helmer R, Terk MR (2009) Patella alta: lack of correlation between patellotrochlear cartilage congruence and commonly used patellar height ratios. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1361–1366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Ricci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have not conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the institutional review board.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giovagnorio, F., Olive, M., Casinelli, A. et al. Comparative US-MRI evaluation of the Insall–Salvati index. Radiol med 122, 761–765 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0781-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0781-3

Keywords

Navigation