Abstract
Sulfur (S) is an essential nutrient vital for ideal plant growth and optimal crop yield. Potatoes in sandy soils of northeast Florida often face challenges due to low organic matter content and a high water table. The S application guidelines must be developed to avoid the under and over-application of S and to optimize integrated nutrient management plans for potatoes in Florida’s sandy soils. A comprehensive study evaluated the response of S application in potatoes with S uptake, tuber yield, and quality. For 2 years (2021 and 2022), separate field experiments were conducted at three different locations, while location 1 had a trial replicated (Trial 1 and 2). The study was established in a randomized complete block design with four replications, in which five different rates (0, 45, 90, 135, and 180 kg S ha−1, as gypsum [17% S]) were applied at pre-planting. The results of this study show variations in soil-available S concentrations in response to different application rates and sampling times. The dry above-ground biomass production, S uptake, and potato tuber yield remained largely unaffected by S application. However, specific gravity at location 1 reported the response of the S application in interaction with trials. Location-specific effects, compounded by yearly variations, played a significant role, particularly at location 1. External and internal tuber quality showed inconsistent responses to the S application and interactions with trials and year factor. This study reported the significant influence of irrigation water (containing high amounts of SO42−) on the overall experiment. So, these findings underscore the importance of water nutrient concentration in developing crop nutrient recommendations. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the complex relationship between S application, S uptake, and yield in the unique agricultural context of the sandy soils of Florida.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data will be available on request from the authors.
Abbreviations
- ˚C:
-
Degree Celsius
- BC:
-
Brown centers
- Ca:
-
Calcium
- CRS:
-
Corky ring spot
- DAP:
-
Days after planting
- FL:
-
Florida
- ha:
-
Hectare
- HH:
-
Hollow heart
- IHN:
-
Internal heat necrosis
- kg:
-
Kilograms
- M:
-
Meter
- Mg:
-
Megagrams
- mg:
-
Milligrams
- mm:
-
Millimeter
- P:
-
Phosphorus
- S:
-
Sulfur
- SG:
-
Specific gravity
- SO4 2− :
-
Sulfate
References
Alfarrah N, Walraevens K (2018) Groundwater overexploitation and seawater intrusion in coastal areas of arid and semi-arid regions. Water 10(2):143. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020143
Barłóg P, Łukowiak R, Hlisnikovský L (2022) Band phosphorus and sulfur fertilization as drivers of efficient management of nitrogen of maize (Zea mays L.). Plants 11(13):1660. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131660
Besharati H (2017) Effects of sulfur application and Thiobacillus inoculation on soil nutrient availability, wheat yield and plant nutrient concentration in calcareous soils with different calcium carbonate content. J Plant Nutr 40(3):447–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1245326
Brady NC, Weil RR (2008) The nature and properties of soils (Vol. 13, pp. 662–710). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
Carciochi WD, Salvagiotti F, Pagani A, ReussiCalvo NI, Eyherabide M, SainzRozas HR, Ciampitti IA (2020) Nitrogen and sulfur interaction on nutrient use efficiencies and diagnostic tools in maize. Eur J Agron 116(March):126045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126045
Cherry GS, Peck M (2017) Saltwater intrusion in the Floridan Aquifer System near downtown Brunswick, Georgia, 1957 - 2015. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2017–1010, February, 10. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2017/1010/ofr20171010.pdf
Dukes MD, Zotarelli L, Morgan KT (2010) Use of irrigation technologies for vegetable crops in Florida. HortTechnology 20(1):133–142. https://doi.org/10.21273/horttech.20.1.133
Filipek-Mazur B, Tabak M, Gorczyca O, Lisowska A (2019) Effect of sulfur-containing fertilizers on the quantity and quality of spring oilseed rape and winter wheat yield. J Elementol 24(4):1383–1394. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2019.24.1.1809
Fleuridor L, Fulford A, Lindsey LE, Lentz E, Watters H, Dorrance A, Minyo R, Richer E, Chaganti V, Subburayalu S, Culman SW (2023) Ohio grain crop response to sulfur fertilization. Agron J 115(4):2007–2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21328
Food W (1959) World Food and Agriculture. In The Lancet (Vol. 274, Issue 7102). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(59)91820-3
Grzebisz W, Frąckowiak K, Spiżewski T, Przygocka‐cyna K (2022) Does elemental sulfur act as an effective measure to control the seasonal growth dynamics of potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.)? Plants 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030248
Hirsch CN, Hirsch CD, Felcher K, Coombs J, Zarka D, Van Deynze A, De Jong W, Veilleux RE, Jansky S, Bethke P, Douches DS, Buell CR (2013) Retrospective view of North American potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) breeding in the 20th and 21st centuries. G3 Genes Genomes Genetics 3(6):1003–1013. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.113.005595
Hutchinson CM (2003) Potato physiological disorders - brown center and hollow heart: HS945/HS197, 8/2003. EDIS, 2003(14). https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-hs197-2003
Jankowski KJ, Sokolski M, Kordan B (2019) Camelina: Yield and quality response to nitrogen and sulfur fertilization in Poland. Industrial Crops and Products 141:111776
Johnson DA (2008) Potato health management, 2nd edn. American Phytopathological Society, Minnesota
Kalra Y (ed) (1997) Handbook of reference methods for plant analysis. CRC Press
Khan MJ, Khan MH, Khattak RA, Jan MT (2006) Response of maize to different levels of sulfur. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 37(1–2):41–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620500403804
Klikocka H, Glowacka A (2013) Does the sulphur fertilization modify magnesium and calcium content in potato tubers (Solanum tubersosum L.)? Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Hortorum Cultus 12(5):41–53
Klikocka H, Haneklaus S, Bloem E, Schnug E (2005) Influence of sulfur fertilization on infection of potato tubers with Rhizoctonia solani and Streptomyces scabies. J Plant Nutr 28(5):819–833. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-200055547
Laboski CAM, Kelling KA (2007) Influence of fertilizer management and soil fertility on tuber specific gravity: a review. Am J Potato Res 84(4):283–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986240
Lenth RV, Buerkner P, Herve M, Love J, Riebl H, Singmann H (2020) emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means, (1.8.5). Vienna: R Core Team
Liu G, Simonne EH, Morgan KT, Hochmuth GJ, Agehara S, Mylavarapu R, Williams PB (2021) Chapter 2. Fertilizer management for vegetable production in Florida. EDIS. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-cv296-2021
Maier NA, McLaughlin MJ, Heap M, Butt M, Smart MK (2002) Effect of current-season application of calcitic lime and phosphorus fertilization on soil pH, potato growth, yield, dry matter content, and cadmium concentration. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 33(13–14):2145–2165. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120005754
Makani MN, Zotarelli L, Sargent SA, Huber DJ, Sims CA (2020) Nitrogen fertilizer rate affects yield and tuber quality of drip-irrigated tablestock potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) Grown under Subtropical Conditions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-020-09809-w/Published
Martin DL, Watts DG, Mielke LN, Frank KD, Eisenhauer DE (1982) Evaluation of nitrogen and irrigation management for corn production using water high in nitrate. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46(5):1056–1062. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600050034x
Munter RC, Halverson TL, Anderson RD (1984) Quality assurance for plant tissue analysis by ICP-AES. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15(11):1285–1322
Muttucumaru N, Powers SJ, Elmore JS, Mottram DS, Halford NG (2013) Effects of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on free amino acids, sugars, and acrylamide-forming potential in potato. J Agric Food Chem 61(27):6734–6742. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf401570x
Mylavarapu RS, Wilkinson N, Jean Y (2024) UF/IFAS analytical services laboratories (ANSERV Labs): analytical procedures and training manual: circular 1248/SS312, 1/2024. EDIS 2024 (1). Gainesville, FL. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-ss312-2002
Narayan OP, Kumar P, Yadav B, Dua M, Johri AK (2023) Sulfur nutrition and its role in plant growth and development. Plant Signal Behav 18(1):2030082. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2022.2030082
Nelder J, Wedderburn R (1972) Generalized linear models. J r Statist Soc A 135:370–384
Palta JP (2010) Improving potato tuber quality and production by targeted calcium nutrition: the discovery of tuber roots leading to a new concept in potato nutrition. Potato Res 53(4):267–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-010-9163-0
Papadopoulos I (1986) Effect of high sulfate irrigation waters on soil salinity and yields 1. Agron J 78(3):429–432. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1986.00021962007800030006x
Pinheiro J, Bates D (2006) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer Science & Business Media
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2019) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (3.1-142). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
Potatoes: 2021 Summary (2022) September. Accessed on the October 3 2023.https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usdaesmis/files/fx719m44h/gb19gf71k/37721m72q/pots0922.pdf
Prinos ST (2014) Using state-of-the-art technology to evaluate saltwater intrusion in the biscayne aquifer of miami-dade county, Florida. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2014–3050.
Qifu M, Murray F (1991) Responses of potato plants to sulphur dioxide, water stress and their combination. New Phytol 118(1):101–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1991.tb00570.x
Qiu Y, Fall T, Su Z, Bortolozo F, Mussoline W, England G, Dinkins D, Morgan K, Clark M, Liu G (2022) Effect of phosphorus fertilization on yield of chipping potato grown on high legacy phosphorus soil. Agronomy, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040812
Rens LR, Zotarelli L, Rowland DL, Morgan KT (2018) Optimizing nitrogen fertilizer rates and time of application for potatoes under seepage irrigation. Field Crops Research 215(July 2017):49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.004
Rosen CJ, Bierman PM (2008) Potato yield and tuber set as affected by phosphorus fertilization. Am J Potato Res 85(2):110–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-008-9001-y
RStudio Team (2023) RStudio: integrated development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/. Accessed 14 Mar 2023
Salvagiotti F, Castellarín JM, Miralles DJ, Pedrol HM (2009) Sulfur fertilization improves nitrogen use efficiency in wheat by increasing nitrogen uptake. Field Crop Res 113(2):170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.05.003
Sandhu AK, Sharma A, Kaur N, Zotarelli L, Morgan K, Sharma LK (2023) Evaluate the use of Mehlich-III compared to Mehlich-I as a soil test in Northeast Florida. Farming System 1(3):100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100056
Shankar T, Banerjee M, Malik GC, Dutta S, Maiti D, Maitra S, Alharby H, Bamagoos A, Hossain A, Ismail IA, Sabagh AEL (2021) The productivity and nutrient use efficiency of rice–rice–black gram cropping sequence are influenced by location specific nutrient management. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063222
Sharma AK, Sandhu AK, Sidhu SK, Griffin WD, Kaur N, Sharma LK (2023) Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield response to different sulfur rates and sources. HortScience 58(1):47–54. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI16870-22
Sharma LK, Bali SK, Dwyer JD, Plant AB, Bhowmik A (2017) A case study of improving yield prediction and sulfur deficiency detection using optical sensors and relationship of historical potato yield with weather data in Maine. Sensors (Switzerland) 17(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17051095
Silva ALBR da, Zotarelli L, Dukes MD, van Santen E, Asseng S (2023) Nitrogen fertilizer rate and timing of application for potato under different irrigation methods. Agric Water Manag 283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108312
Singh SP, Singh R, Singh MP, Singh VP (2014) Impact of sulfur fertilization on different forms and balance of soil sulfur and the nutrition of wheat in wheat-soybean cropping sequence in tarai soil. J Plant Nutr 37(4):618–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2013.867987
Singh DP, Seema S, Ali J, Singh SP, Singh V (2016a) Effect of sulphur on yield, uptake of nutrients and economics of garlic (Allium sativum), onion (Allium cepa) and potato (Solanum tuberosum) in alluvial soil. Indian J Agric Sci 86(5):661–665. http://epubs.icar.org.in/ejournal/index.php/IJAgS/issue/view/1729
Singh DP, Singh H, Ali J, Singh SP (2016b) Productivity, profitability and nutrient uptake in carrot (Daucus carota) and radish (Raphanus sativus) crops under sulphur nutrition. Indian J Agric Sci 86(12):1577–1580. http://epubs.icar.org.in/ejournal/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/65434
Soil Survey Staff (2023) Web soil survey. Natl. Soil Surv. Ctr., Lincoln, NE. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed 05/10/2023
Spechler RM (1994) Saltwater intrusion and quality of water in the Floridan Aquifer System, Northeastern Florida. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 92-4174, 76
United States Standards for Grades of Potatoes for Chipping (1997). Accessed on the 3 October 2023. https://www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards/potatoes-chipping-grades-andstandards
US EPA (1994) Method 200.7: Determination of metals and trace elements in water and wastes by inductively coupled plasmaatomic emission spectrometry
Van Zeghbroeck J, Liu G, Mylavarapu RS, Li YC (2021) Phosphorus management strategies for potato production in Florida: a review. In American Journal of Potato Research (Vol. 98, Issues 5–6, pp. 347–360). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-021-09851-2
Wagg C, Hann S, Kupriyanovich Y, Li S (2021) Timing of short period water stress determines potato plant growth, yield and tuber quality. Agric Water Manag 247(December 2020):106731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106731
Wei J, Guo X, Marinova D, Fan J (2014) Industrial SO2 pollution and agricultural losses in China: evidence from heavy air polluters. J Clean Prod 64:404–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.027
Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org. Accessed 20 March 2023
Worthington CM, Hutchinson CM (2006) Yield and quality of “Atlantic” and “Harley Blackwell” potatoes as affected by multiple planting dates, nitrogen rates and growing degree days. Proc Fla State Hort Soc 119:275–278
Wright PJ, Gardner-Gee R, Walker GP, Hedderley DI (2015) Effect of sulphur foliar applications on the tomato-potato psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli) in a potato crop. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 43(1):59–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2014.953550
Xiao H, Wang D, Medeiros SC, Bilskie MV, Hagen SC, Hall CR (2019) Exploration of the effects of storm surge on the extent of saltwater intrusion into the surficial aquifer in coastal east-central Florida (USA). Sci Total Environ 648:1002–1017
Zenda T, Liu S, Dong A, Duan H (2021) Revisiting sulphur—the once neglected nutrient: it’s roles in plant growth, metabolism, stress tolerance and crop production. Agriculture (Switzerland) 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11070626
Zotarelli L, Hutchinson C, Byrd S, Gergela D, Rowland DL (2012) Potato physiological disorders - growth cracks. Edis 2012(5):1–2. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-hs182-2012
Zotarelli L, Wade T, England G, Christensen C (2021) Nitrogen fertilization guidelines for potato production in Florida. EDIS, 2021(6). https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-hs1429-2021
Zotarelli L, Dittmar PJ, Roberts PD, Desaeger J, Wells B (2023) Chapter 14. Potato Production: VPH ch. 14, CV131/HS733, rev. 6/2023. EDIS, 2023(VPH). https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-cv131-2023
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge funding from the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS, grant number 27429) under the specialty crop grant. Special thanks to Amanpreet Kaur, Simranpreet Kaur Sandhu, Benjamin Tubb, Navdeep Kaur, Winifred Griffin, Brenden Burns, Holden Muehleisen, and Hayden Shellenbarger’s assistance with experiment setup, in-field soil and biomass sampling, and sample processing. We also thank Simon Riley for helping with statistical analysis and interpretation of the results. Special thanks to Dr. Diego Arruda Huggins de Sá Leitão for helping with improving this manuscript with his valuable review. We want to thank Hastings Agricultural Extension Center, Hastings, Florida, and their crew members for handling the trials and managing fields.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Yes.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, A.K., Zotarelli, L., Christensen T, C. et al. Assessing the Impact of Sulfur Application on Potato Sulfur Uptake and Yield in Sandy Soils of Florida. Potato Res. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-024-09727-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-024-09727-y