Potato Research

, Volume 57, Issue 3–4, pp 225–247 | Cite as

Drought and Heat Tolerance Evaluation in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

  • P. Monneveux
  • D. A. Ramírez
  • M. Awais Khan
  • R. M. Raymundo
  • H. Loayza
  • R. Quiroz


The impacts of water restriction and high temperatures on potato production will increase over the next decades, due to climate change and the extension of cultivation in drought and heat prone areas. We review recent achievements and describe new avenues in the evaluation of tolerance to these abiotic stresses in potato, focusing on the definition of target populations of environments, choice and characterization of the managed stress environment, stress monitoring, and secondary traits measurement.


Drought Heat Managed stress environments Phenotyping Secondary traits Solanum tuberosum L. Target populations of environments 



This research was conducted under the CGIAR Research Programs (CRP) on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) and Dryland Systems (DS). Authors thank MSc. Mariella Carbajal and Dr. Bruno Cóndori who elaborated Fig. 2 under the financial support of the BMZ-GIZ project “Improved potato varieties and water management technologies to enhance water use efficiency, resilience, cost-effectiveness, and productivity of smallholder farms in stress-prone Central Asian environments”.


  1. Ahn YJ, Claussen K, Zimmerman JL (2004) Genotypic differences in the heat-shock response and thermotolerance in four potato cultivars. Plant Sci 166:901–911Google Scholar
  2. Anithakumari AM, Dolstra O, Vosman B, Visser RGF, van der Linden G (2011) In vitro screening and QTL analysis for drought tolerance in diploid potato. Euphytica 181:357–369Google Scholar
  3. Atlin GN, Cooper M, Bjørnstad Å (2001) A comparison of formal and participatory breeding approaches using selection theory. Euphytica 122(3):463–475Google Scholar
  4. Basford KE, Cooper M (1998) Genotype x environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for wheat breeding in Australia. Aust J Agric Res 49(2):153–174Google Scholar
  5. Bertin J, Hémardinquer JJ, Keul M, Randies WGL (1971) Atlas of food crops. Geographical and chronological survey for an atlas of world history. Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes-Sorbonne. Section: Sciences économiques et sociales. Centre de Recherches Historiques et Laboratoire de Cartographie, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Bethke P, Sabba R, Bussan A (2009) Tuber water and pressure potentials decrease and sucrose contents increase in response to moderate drought and heat stress. Am J Potato Res 86:519–532Google Scholar
  7. Blum A (2009) Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crops Res 112:119–123Google Scholar
  8. Bouman BAM, Uenk D, Haverkort AJ (1992) The estimation of ground cover of potato by reflectance measurements. Potato Res 35(2):111–125Google Scholar
  9. Boyd NS, Gordon R, Martin RC (2002) Relationship between leaf area index and ground cover in potato under different management conditions. Potato Res 45(2–4):117–129Google Scholar
  10. Brunner P, Li HT, Kinzelbach W, Li WP (2004) Generating soil salinity maps with geophysics and remote sensing. General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union. European Geosciences Union, Nizza, FranceGoogle Scholar
  11. Cairns JE, Audebert A, Mullins CE, Price AH (2009) Mapping quantitative loci associated with root growth in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) exposed to soil water-deficit in fields with contrasting soil properties. Field Crops Res 114:108–118Google Scholar
  12. Cairns JE, Impa SM, O’Toole JC, Jagadish SVK, Price AH (2011) Influence of the soil physical environment on rice (Oryza sativa L.) response to drought stress and its implications for drought research. Field Crops Res 121:303–310Google Scholar
  13. Cairns JE, Sonder K, Zaidi PH, Verhulst N, Mahuku G, Babu R, Nair SK, Das B, Govaerts B, Vinayan MT, Rasid Z, Noor JJ, Devi P, San Vicent F, Prasanna BM (2012) Maize production in a changing climate: impacts, adaptation and mitigation strategies. Adv Agron 114:1–58Google Scholar
  14. Campos H, Heard JE, Ibañez M, Luethy MH, Peters TJ, Warner DC (2011) Effective and efficient platforms for crop phenotype characterisation under drought. In: Monneveux P, Ribaut JM (eds) Drought phenotyping in crops: from theory to practice. CGIAR Generation Challenge Programme, Texcoco, pp 39–47Google Scholar
  15. Carli C, Yuldashev F, Khalikov D, Condori B, Mares V, Monneveux P (2014) Effect of different irrigation regimes on yield, water use efficiency and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in the lowlands of Tashkent, Uzbekistan: a field and modeling perspective. Field Crop Res (in press)Google Scholar
  16. CCAFS (2011) CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Analogues online toolkit: calculate climate analogues. A glimpse of tomorrow's climates, today. CCAFSGoogle Scholar
  17. Chavez P, Zorogastua P, Chuquillanqui C, Salazar LF, Mares V, Quiroz R (2009) Assessing potato yellow vein virus (PYVV) infection using remotely sensed data. Int J Pest Manag 55(3):251–256Google Scholar
  18. Chenu K, Cooper M, Hammer GL, Matthews KL, Dreccer MF, Chapman SC (2011) Environment characterization as an aid to wheat improvement: interpreting genotype-environment interactions by modelling water-deficit patterns in North-Eastern Australia. J Exp Bot 62(6):1743–1755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Condori B, Hijmans R, Quiroz R, Ledent JF (2010) Quantifying the expression of potato genetic diversity in the high Andes through growth analysis and modeling. Field Crops Res 119(1):135–144Google Scholar
  20. Condori B, Hijmans RJ, Ledent JF, Quiroz R (2014) Managing potato biodiversity to cope with frost risk in the high Andes: a modeling perspective. PLoS ONE 9(1):e81510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081510 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooper M, Stucker RE, DeLacy IH, Harch BD (1997) Wheat breeding nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield. Crop Sci 37(4):1168–1176Google Scholar
  22. Cooper MS, Rajatasereekul S, Immark S, Fukai S, Basnayake J (1999) Rainfed lowland rice breeding strategies for northeast Thailand. I. Genotypic variation and genotype-environment interactions for grain yield. Field Crops Res 64:131–151Google Scholar
  23. Cooper M, Chapman SC, Podlich DW, Hammer GL (2002) The GP problem: quantifying gene-to-phenotype relationships. Silico Biol 2(2):151–164Google Scholar
  24. Crossa J, Yang RC, Cornelius PL (2004) Studying crossover genotype x environment interaction using linear-bilinear models and mixed models. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 9:362–380Google Scholar
  25. Dang YP, Pringle MJ, Schmidt M, Dalal RC, Apan A (2011) Identifying the spatial variability of soil constraints using multi-year remote sensing. Field Crop Res 123:248–258Google Scholar
  26. Dannoura M, Kominami Y, Oguma H, Kanazawa Y (2008) The development of an optical scanner method for observation of plant root dynamics. Plant Root 2:14–18Google Scholar
  27. Deblonde PMK, Ledent JF (2001) Effects of moderate drought conditions on green leaf number, stem height, leaf length and tuber yield of potato cultivars. Eur J Agron 14:31–41Google Scholar
  28. Deblonde PMK, Haverkort AJ, Ledent JF (1999) Responses of early and late potato cultivars to moderate drought conditions: agronomic parameters and carbon isotope discrimination. Eur J Agron 11:91–105Google Scholar
  29. Deguchi T, Naya T, Wangchuk P, Itoh E, Matsumoto M, Zheng X, Gopal J, Iwama K (2010) Aboveground characteristics, yield potential and drought tolerance in "Konyu" potato cultivars with large root mass. Potato Res 53(4):331–340Google Scholar
  30. DeLacy IH, Fox PN, Corbett JD, Crossa J, Rajaram S, Fischer RA, van Ginkel M (1994) Long-term association of locations for testing spring bread wheat. Euphytica 72:95–106Google Scholar
  31. Edmeades GO, Bolaños J, Chapman SC (1997) Value of secondary traits in selecting for drought tolerance in tropical maize. In: Edmeades GO, Bänziger M, Mickelson HR, Peña-Valdivia CB (eds) Developing drought and low-N tolerant maize. CIMMYT, El Batan, pp 222–234Google Scholar
  32. Eiasu BK, Soundy P, Hammes PS (2007) Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber yield components to gelpolymer soil amendments and irrigation regimes. N Z J Crop Hortic 35:25–31Google Scholar
  33. Ekanayake IJ, Midmore DJ (1989) Root-pulling resistance of potatoes in a drought environment. Am Potato J 66:519Google Scholar
  34. Eldredge EP, Holmes ZA, Mosley AR, Shock CC, Stieber TD (1996) Effects of transitory water stress on potato tuber stem-end reducing sugar and fry color. Am Potato J 73:517–530Google Scholar
  35. Ewing EE, Simko I, Omer EA, Davies PJ (2004) Polygene mapping as a tool to study the physiology of potato tuberization and dormancy. Am J Potato Res 81:281–289Google Scholar
  36. FAO (2009) New light on a hidden treasure. FAO, Rome, 136 pGoogle Scholar
  37. FAOSTAT (2013) FAO, statistical databases FAOSTAT,
  38. Fares A, Polyakov V (2006) Advances in crop water management using capacitive water sensors. Adv Agric 90:43–77Google Scholar
  39. Federer WT, Crossa J (2011) Screening experimental designs for quantitative trait loci, association mapping, genotype by environment interaction, and other investigations. In: Monneveux P, Ribaut JM (eds) Drought phenotyping in crops: from theory to practice. CGIAR Generation Challenge Programme, Texcoco, pp 95–103Google Scholar
  40. Finch VC, Baker OE (1917) Geography of the World's agriculture. GPO, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Fiorani F, Schurr U (2013) Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:17.1–17.25Google Scholar
  42. Fischer KS, Fukai S, Lafitte R, McLaren G (2003) Know your target environment. In: Fischer KS, Lafitte R, Fukai S, Atlin G, Hardy B (eds) Breeding rice for drought-prone environments. IRRI, Los Baños, pp 5–11Google Scholar
  43. Fleisher DH, Timlin DJ, Reddy VR (2008) Interactive effects of carbon dioxide and water stress on potato canopy growth and development. Agron J 100(3):711–719Google Scholar
  44. Flexas J, Escalona JM, Medrano H (1999) Water stress induces different levels of photosynthesis and electron transport rate regulation in grapevines. Plant Cell Environ 22:39–48Google Scholar
  45. Furbank RT, Tester M (2011) Phenomics – technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends Plant Sci 16(635–644):17Google Scholar
  46. Gauch H, Zobel R (1997) Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci 37:311–326Google Scholar
  47. Gaur PC, Pandey SK (2000) Potato improvement in sub-tropics. In: Khurana SMP, Shekhawat GS, Singh BP, Pandey SK (eds) Potato: global research and development. Proceedings of the Global Conference on Potato, New Delhi, India, 6–11 December 1999 Vol 1. Indian Potato Association, Shimla, pp 52–63Google Scholar
  48. Gomide RL, Durães FOM, Guimarães CM, Andrade CLT, Albuquerque PEP, Bastos EA, Viana JHM, Stone LF, Morais OP, Del Peloso MJ, Magalhães PC, Morgado LB, Oliveira AC (2011) Drought tolerance phenotyping in crops under contrasting target environments: procedures and practices. In: Monneveux P, Ribaut JM (eds) Drought phenotyping in crops: from theory to practice. CGIAR Generation Challenge Programme, Texcoco, pp 51–91Google Scholar
  49. Gordon R, Brown DM, Dixon MA (1997) Estimating potato leaf area index for specific cultivars. Potato Res 40:251–266Google Scholar
  50. Gregory LE (1965) Physiology of tuberization in plants. Encycl Plant Physiol 15:1328–1354Google Scholar
  51. Harahagazwe D, Ledent JF, Rusuku G (2012) Growth analysis and modelling of CIP potato genotypes for their characterization in two contrasting environments of Burundi. Afr J Agric Res 7(46):6173–6185Google Scholar
  52. Haverkort AJ (1989) Ecology of potato cropping systems in relation to altitude and latitude. Agric Syst 32:251–272Google Scholar
  53. Haverkort AJ, Verhagen A (2008) Climate change and its repercussions for the potato supply chain. Potato Res 51:223–237Google Scholar
  54. Heidinger H, Yarlequé C, Posadas A, Quiroz R (2012) TRMM rainfall correction over the Andean Plateau using wavelet multi-resolution analysis. Int J Remote Sens 33(14):4583–4602Google Scholar
  55. Heinemann AB, Dingkuhn M, Luquet D, Combres JC, Chapman S (2008) Characterization of drought stress environments for upland rice and maize in central Brazil. Euphytica 162(3):395–410Google Scholar
  56. Herrmann I, Pimstein A, Karnieli A, Cohen Y, Alchanatis V, Bonfil DJ (2011) LAI assessment of wheat and potato crops by VENμS and Sentinel-2 bands. Remote Sens Environ 115(8):2141–2151Google Scholar
  57. Hignett C, Evett S (2008) Direct and surrogate measures of soil water. In: Evett SR, Heng LK, Moutonnet P, Nguyen ML (eds) Field estimation of soil water content: a practical guide to methods, instrumentation and sensor technology. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  58. Hijmans RJ (2001) Global distribution of the potato crop. Am J Potato Res 78:403–412Google Scholar
  59. Hijmans RJ (2003) The effect of climate change on global potato production. Am J Potato Res 80:271–280Google Scholar
  60. Hyman G, Fujisaka S, Jones P, Wood S, de Vicente MC, Dixon J (2008) Strategic approaches to targeting technology generation: assessing the coincidence of poverty and drought-prone crop production. Agric Syst 98:50–61Google Scholar
  61. Hyman G, Hodson D, Jones P (2013) Spatial analysis to support geographic targeting of genotypes to environments. Front Physiol 4(40):1–13Google Scholar
  62. Islam AS, Bala SK (2008) Assessment of potato phenological characteristics using MODIS-Derived NDVI and LAI Information. Gisci Remote Sens 45(4):454–470Google Scholar
  63. Iwama K (2008) Physiology of the potato: new insights into root system and repercussions for crop management. Potato Res 51:333–353Google Scholar
  64. Iwama K, Yamaguchi Y (2006) Abiotic stresses. In: Gopal J, Paul Khurana SM (eds) Handbook of potato production improvement and post harvest management. Food Product Press, New York, pp 231–278Google Scholar
  65. Jackson P, Robertson M, Cooper M, Hammer G (1996) The role of physiological understanding in plant breeding: from a breeding perspective. Field Crops Res 49:11–39Google Scholar
  66. Jagadish KSV, Cairns JE, Kumar A, Somayanda IM, Craufurd PQ (2011) Does susceptibility to heat stress confound screening for drought tolerance in rice? Funct Plant Biol 38:261–269Google Scholar
  67. Janski SH, Jin LP, Xie KY, Xie CH, Spooner DM (2009) Potato production and breeding in China. Potato Res 52:57–65Google Scholar
  68. Jarvis PG (1995) Scaling processes and problems Plant, Cell Environ 18:1079–1089Google Scholar
  69. Jefferies RA (1992a) Effects of drought on chlorophyll fluorescence in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). I. Plant water status and the kinetics of chlorophyll fluorescence. Potato Res 35:25–34Google Scholar
  70. Jefferies RA (1992b) Effects of drought on chlorophyll fluorescence in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). II. Relations between plant growth and measurements of fluorescence. Potato Res 35:35–40Google Scholar
  71. Jefferies RA, MacKerron DKL (1997) Carbon isotope discrimination in irrigated and droughted potato (Solanum tuberosum L). Plant, Cell Environ 20(1):124–130Google Scholar
  72. Jeffery RA (1995) Physiology of crop response to drought. In: Haverkort AJ, MacKerron DKL (eds) Potato ecology and modeling of crops under conditions limiting growth. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 61–74Google Scholar
  73. Jhonston MA, Savage MJ, Moolman JH, Du Pleissis HM (1997) Evaluation of calibration methods for interpreting soil salinity from electromagnetic induction measurements. AJSSS 61:1627–1633Google Scholar
  74. Johnson DA, Asay KH, Tieszen LL, Ehleringer JR, Jefferson PG (1990) Carbon isotope discrimination: potential in screening cool-season grasses for waterlimited environments. Crop Sci 30:338–343Google Scholar
  75. Jones HG (2007) Monitoring plant and soil water status: established and novel methods revisited and their relevance to studies of drought tolerance. J Exp Bot 58:119–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Kooman PL, Haverkort AJ (1995) Modelling development and growth of the potato crop influenced by temperature and daylenght: LINTUL-POTATO. In: Haverkort AJ, MacKerron DKL (eds) Potato ecology and modelling crops under conditions limiting growth current issues in potato ecology. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Netherlands, p 379Google Scholar
  77. Krause GH, Weis E (1991) Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42:313–349Google Scholar
  78. Kumar S, Asrey R, Mandal G (2007) Effect of differential irrigation regimes on potato (Solanum tuberosum) yield and post-harvest attributes. Indian J Agric Sci 77:366–368Google Scholar
  79. Kumar S, Garrick DJ, Bink MCAM, Whitworth C, Chagné D, Volz RK (2013) Novel genomic approaches unravel genetic architecture of complex traits in Apple. BMC Genomics 14:393Google Scholar
  80. Lafitte HR, Blum A, Atlin G (2003) Using secondary traits to help identify drought-tolerant genotypes. In: Fischer KS, Lafitte RH, Fukai S, Atlin G, Hardy B (eds) Breeding rice for drought-prone environments. IRRI, Los Baños, pp 37–48Google Scholar
  81. Lahlou O, Ledent JF (2005) Root mass and depth, stolons and roots formed on stolons in four cultivars of potato under water stress. Eur J Agron 22:159–173Google Scholar
  82. Levy D, Veilleux RE (2007) Adaptation of potato to high temperatures and salinity. A review. Am J Potato Res 84:487–506Google Scholar
  83. Levy D, Itzhak Y, Fogelman E, Margalit E, Veilleux RE (2001) Ori, Idit, Zohar and Zahov: tablestock and chipstock cultivars bred for adaptation to Israel. Am J Potato Res 78:167–173Google Scholar
  84. Levy D, Coleman W, Veilleux R (2013) Adaptation of potato to water shortage: irrigation management and enhancement of tolerance to drought and salinity. Am J Potato Res 90(2):186–206Google Scholar
  85. Li X, Waddington SR, Dixon J, Joshi AK, de Vicente MC (2011) The relative importance of drought and other water-related constraints for major food crops in South Asian farming systems. Food Secur 3:19–33Google Scholar
  86. Liu FL, Shahnazari A, Andersen MN, Jacobsen SE, Jensen CR (2006a) Effects of deficit irrigation (DI) and partial root drying (PRD) on gas exchange, biomass partitioning, and water use efficiency in potato. Sci Hortic 109(2):113–117Google Scholar
  87. Liu FL, Shahnazari A, Andersen MN, Jacobsen SE, Jensen CR (2006b) Physiological responses of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to partial root-zone drying: ABA signalling, leaf gas exchange, and water use efficiency. J Exp Bot 57(14):3727–3735PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Liu FL, Andersen MN, Jensen CR (2009) Capability of the 'Ball-Berry' model for predicting stomatal conductance and water use efficiency of potato leaves under different irrigation regimes. Sci Hortic 122(3):346–354Google Scholar
  89. Loffler CM, Wei J, Fast T, Gogerty J, Langton S, Bergman M, Merrill B, Cooper M (2005) Classification of maize environments using crop simulation and geographic information systems. Crop Sci 45:1708–1716Google Scholar
  90. Martínez CA, Moreno U (1992) Expresiones fisiológicas de resistencia a sequía en dos variedades de papa sometidas a estrés hídrico. Rev Bras Fisiol Veg 4:33–38Google Scholar
  91. Masuka B, Araus JL, Das B, Sonder K, Cairns JE (2012) Phenotyping for abiotic stress tolerance in maize. J Integr Plant Biol 54:238–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Mauromicale G, Ierna A, Marchese M (2006) Chlorophyll fluorescence and chlorophyll content in field-grown potato as affected by nitrogen supply, genotype, and plant age. Photosynthetica 44(1):76–82Google Scholar
  93. Minhas JS, Rawat S, Govindakrishnan PM, Kumar D (2011) Possibilities in enhancing potato production in non-traditional areas. Potato J 38(1):14–17Google Scholar
  94. Monfreda C, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2008) Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 22:1–19. doi: 10.1029/2007GB002947 Google Scholar
  95. Monneveux P, Reynolds MP, Trethowan R, González-Santoyo H, Peña RJ, Zapata F (2005) Relationship between grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination in bread wheat under four water regimes. Eur J Agron 22:231–242Google Scholar
  96. Monneveux P, Ramírez DA, Pino M-T (2013) Drought tolerance in potato (S. tuberosum L.): can we learn from drought tolerance research in cereals? Plant Sci 205–206:76–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Moya I, Cerovic ZG (2004) Remote sensing of chlorophyll fluorescence: instrumentation and analysis. Chlorophyll a fluorescence: a signature of photosynthesis. Adv Photosynth Respir 19:429–445Google Scholar
  98. Moya I, Camenen L, Latouche G, Mauxion C, Evain S, Cerovic ZG (1998) An instrument for the measurement of sunlight excited plant fluorescence. In: Gorab G (ed) Photosynthesis: mechanisms and effects. Kluwer Acad Pub, Dordrecht, pp 4265–4270Google Scholar
  99. Nagy V, Stekauerova V, Milics G, Lichner L, Nemenyi M (2008) Harmonisation of different measuring methods of soil moisture used in Zitny Ostrov (SK) and Szigetköz (HU). Cereal Res Commun 36(5):1475–1478Google Scholar
  100. Noborio K (2001) Measurement of soil water content and electrical conductivity by time domain reflectometry: a review. Comp Electr Agric 31:213–237Google Scholar
  101. Papadavid G, Hadjimitsis D, Toulios L, Michaelides S (2011) Mapping potato crop height and leaf area index through vegetation indices using remote sensing in Cyprus. J Appl Remote Sens 5(1):053526Google Scholar
  102. Passioura JB (2005) The perils of pot experiments. Funct Plant Biol 33:1075–1079Google Scholar
  103. Peñuelas J, Piñol J, Ogaya R, Filella I (1997) Estimation of plant water content by the reflectance Water Index WI (R900/R970). Int J Remote Sens 18:2869–2875Google Scholar
  104. Peterson CJ, Pfeiffer WH (1989) International winter wheat evaluation: relationships among test sites based on cultivar performance. Crop Sci 29:276–282Google Scholar
  105. Prashar A, Yildiz J, McNicol JW, Bryan GJ, Jones HG (2013) Infrared thermography for high throughput field phenotyping in Solanum tuberosum. Plos One 8(6):1–9Google Scholar
  106. Presterl T, Seitz G, Landbeck M, Thiemt EM, Schmidt W, Geiger HH, Zea M (2003) Improving nitrogen-use efficiency in European maize: estimation of quantitative genetic parameters. Crop Sci 43(4):1259–1265Google Scholar
  107. Qiao CG, Basford KE, DeLacy IH, Cooper M (2004) Advantage of single-trial models for response to selection in wheat breeding multi-environment trials. Theor Appl Genet 108(7):1256–1264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Quiroz R, Chujoy E, Mares V (2012) Potato In: Steduto P, Hsia TC, Fereres E, Raes D (eds). Crop yield response to water. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 66. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations pp. 184–189Google Scholar
  109. Rajaram S, van Ginkel M, Fischer RA (1995) CIMMYT's wheat breeding mega-environments (ME). In: Li ZS, Xin ZY (eds) Proceedings of the 8th International wheat genetics symposium. China Agricultural Scientech Press, Beijing, pp 1101–1106Google Scholar
  110. Ramírez D, Yactayo W, Gutiérrez R, Mares V, De Mendiburu F, Posadas A, Quiroz R (2014) Chlorophyll concentration in leaves is an indicator of potato tuber yield in water-shortage conditions. Sci Hortic 168:202–209Google Scholar
  111. Rana RK, Sharma N, Kadian MS, Girish BH, Arya S, Campilan D, Pandey SK, Carli C, Patel NH, Singh BP (2011) Perception of Gujarat farmers on heat tolerant potato varieties. Potato J 38(2):121–129Google Scholar
  112. Ray SS, Das G, Singh JP, Panigrahy S (2006) Evaluation of hyperspectral indices for LAI estimation and discrimination of potato crop under different irrigation treatments. Int J Remote Sens 27(23–24):5373–5387Google Scholar
  113. Riga P, Vartanian N (1999) Sequential expression of adaptive mechanisms is responsible for drought resistance in tobacco. Aust J Plant Physiol 26:211–220Google Scholar
  114. Roozeboom KL, Schapaugh WT, Tuinstra MR, Vanderlip RL, Milliken GA (2008) Testing wheat in variable environments: genotype, environment, interaction effects, and grouping test locations. Crop Sci 48:317–330Google Scholar
  115. Rossouw FT, Waghmarae J (1995) The effect of drought on growth and yield of two South African potato cultivars. S Afr J Sci 91:149–150Google Scholar
  116. Schafleitner R (2009) Growing more potatoes with less water. Trop Plant Biol 2:111–121Google Scholar
  117. Schafleitner R, Gutierrez R, Espino R, Gaudin A, Pérez J, Martínez M, Domínguez A, Tincopa L, Alvarado C, Numberto G, Bonierbale M (2007) Field screening for variation of drought tolerance in Solanum tuberosum L. by agronomical, physiological and genetic analysis. Potato Res 50:71–85Google Scholar
  118. Schreiber U, Bilger W, Neubauer C (1994) Chlorophyll fluorescence as a non-intrusive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo photosynthesis. Ecol Stud 100:49–70Google Scholar
  119. Scott GJ (1985) Plants, people, and the conservation of biodiversity of potatoes in Peru. Nat Conservacão 9:21–38Google Scholar
  120. Scott GJ, Rosegrant MW, Ringler C (2000) Global projections for root and tuber crops to the year 2020. Food Policy 25:561–597Google Scholar
  121. Shah SFA, McKenzie BA, Gaunt RE, Marshall JW, Frampton CM (2004) Effect of production environments on radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of potato (Solanum tuberosum) grown in Canterbury, New Zealand. N Z J Crop Hortic 32:113–119Google Scholar
  122. Simelton E, Fraser EDG, Termansen M, Benton TG, Gosling SN, South A, Arnell NW, Challinor AJ, Dougill AJ, Forster PM (2012) The socioeconomics of food crop production and climate change vulnerability: a global scale quantitative analysis of how grain crops are sensitive to drought. Food Secur 4(2):163–179Google Scholar
  123. Simmonds NW (1971) The potential of potato in the tropics. Trop Agric 48:291–299Google Scholar
  124. Slater JW (1968) The effect of night temperature on tuber initiation of the potato. Eur Potato J 11:14–22Google Scholar
  125. Steckel JRA, Gray D (1979) Drought tolerance in potatoes. J Agric Sci 92:375–381Google Scholar
  126. Struik PC, Vreugdenhil D, Van Eck HJ, Bachem C, Visser RGF (1999) Physiological and genetic control of tuber formation. Potato Res 42:313–331Google Scholar
  127. Suárez L, Zarco-Tejada PJ, Berni JAJ, González-Dugo V, Fereres E (2009) Modelling PRI for water stress detection using radiative transfer models. Remote Sens Environ 113:730–744Google Scholar
  128. Tardieu F (2012) Any trait or trait-related allele can confer drought tolerance: just design the right drought scenario. J Exp Bot 63:25–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Theisen K, Thiele G (2008) Implementing CIP’s vision: impact targeting. Social Sciences Working Paper. International Potato Center (CIP), Lima, Peru, 24 pGoogle Scholar
  130. Thiele G, Hareau G, Suárez V, Chujoy E, Bonierbale M, Maldonado L (2008) Varietal change in potatoes in developing countries and the contribution of the International Potato Center: 1972–2007. CIP Working Paper, International Potato Center (CIP), Lima, Peru, 46 pGoogle Scholar
  131. Thiele G, Theisen K, Bonierbale M, Walker T (2010) Targeting the poor and hungry with potato science. Potato J 37:75–86Google Scholar
  132. Tuberosa R (2012) Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era. Front Physiol 3(347):1–26Google Scholar
  133. Vacher JJ (1998) Responses of two main Andean crops, quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) and papa amarga (Solanum juzepczukii Buk.) to drought on the Bolivian Altiplano: Significance of local adaptation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 68(1–2):99–108Google Scholar
  134. van der Ploeg MJ, Gooren HPA, Bakker G, de Rooij GH (2008) Matric potential measurements by polymer tensiometers in cropped lysimeters under water-stressed conditions. Vadose Zone J 7:1048–1054Google Scholar
  135. van Keulen H, Stol W (1995) Agroecological zonation for potato production. In: Haverkort AJ, MacKerron DKL (eds) Potato ecology and modelling of crops under limiting growth. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 357–372Google Scholar
  136. Van Royen W (1954) The agricultural resources of the world. atlas of the world's resources, vol 1. Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  137. Vos J, Oyarzun PJ (1987) Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of potato leaves—effects of leaf age, irradiance, and leaf water potential. Photosynth Res 11(3):253–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Wahbi A, Sinclair TR (2005) Differing transpiration response to drying of artificial and mineral soils. Environ Exp Bot 59(2):188–192Google Scholar
  139. Walker T, Thiele G, Suárez V, Crissman C (2011) Hindsight and foresight about potato production and consumption. CIP Working Paper International Potato Center (CIP), Lima, Peru, 43 pGoogle Scholar
  140. Werban U, Al Hagrey SA, Rabbel W (2008) Monitoring of root-zone water content in the laboratory by 2D geoelectrical tomography. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:927–935Google Scholar
  141. Windhausen VS, Wagener S, Magorokosho C, Makumbi D, Vivek B, Piepho H-P, Melchinger AE, Atlin GN (2012) Strategies to subdivide a target population of environments: results from the CIMMYT-Led maize hybrid testing programs in Africa. Crop Sci 52(5):2143–2152Google Scholar
  142. Xu HL, Qin FF, Xu QC, Tan JY, Liu GM (2011) Applications of xerophytophysiology in plant production—the potato crop improved by partial root zone drying of early season but not whole season. Sci Hortic 134:20–25Google Scholar
  143. Yactayo W, Ramírez DA, Gutiérrez R, Mares V, Posadas A, Quiroz R (2013) Effect of partial root-zone drying irrigation timing on potato tuber yield and water use efficiency. Agric Water Manag 123:65–70Google Scholar
  144. Yan W, Rajcan I (2002) Biplot evaluation of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci 42:11–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Yan WK, Kang MS, Ma BL, Woods S, Cornelius PL (2007) GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype by environment data. Crop Sci 47:643–655Google Scholar
  146. Zarco-Tejada PJ, Berni JAJ, Suárez L, Sepulcre-Cantó G, Morales F, Miller JR (2009) Imaging chlorophyll fluorescence with an airborne narrow-band multispectral camera for vegetation stress detection. Remote Sens Environ 113(6):1262–1275Google Scholar
  147. Zarco-Tejada PJ, González-Dugo V, Berni JAJ (2012) Fluorescence, temperature and narrow-band indices acquired from a UAV platform for water stress detection using a micro-hyperspectral imager and a thermal camera. Remote Sens Environ 117:322–337Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association for Potato Research 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Monneveux
    • 1
  • D. A. Ramírez
    • 1
  • M. Awais Khan
    • 1
  • R. M. Raymundo
    • 2
  • H. Loayza
    • 1
  • R. Quiroz
    • 1
  1. 1.International Potato CenterLimaPeru
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Biological EngineeringUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations