Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Advances in Modelling the Potato Crop: Sufficiency and Accuracy Considering Uses and Users, Data, and Errors

  • Published:
Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When we consider complex, multi-step processes such as crop growth or the progress of a disease then simple mathematical functions are inadequate to describe them and we generally use some kind of mathematical model. The commonest form in use is one that we call a simulation model although there are other forms of model such as Rule-based, (e.g. Gu et al. AI Appl 10:13–24, 1996), Bayesian (Gold, Plant Disease Epidemiol 4:84–122, 1989) and ‘fuzzy’ (Burrough, J Soil Sci 40:477–492, 1989), depending upon the application. Models may sometimes be combined into packages that we call decision support systems. This paper will consider simulation modelling and also the combination of complementary models. Mathematical models of the potato crop have been devised, in a range of sophistication, over a long period of years and a quite proper question is: “Where next? What are the developments that are sought or, more importantly, that are needed?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamsen P, Hansen S (2000) Daisy: an open soil–crop–atmosphere system model. Environ Model Softw 15:313–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade-Piedra JL, Forbes GA, Shtienberg D, Grünwald NJ, Chacón MG, Taipe MV, Hijmans RJ, Fry WE (2005) Qualification of a plant disease simulation model: performance of the LATEBLIGHT model across a broad range of environments. Phytopathology 95(12):1412–1422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Battilani A (2006) FERTIRRIGERE V2.11: a multi-target DSS to manage water and nutrients supply at macrozone level. IX ISHS Symposium on Processing Tomato, Melbourne Nov 15–18 2004. Acta Hortic 724:114–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilani A, Bussières P, Dumas Y (2003) Fertirrigere: a simple tool-model for managing water and nutrient supply in drip-irrigated processing tomatoes. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 616: VIII International Symposium on the Processing Tomato 2003, pp 155–158

  • Belmans C, Dekker LW, Bouma J (1982) Obtaining soil physical field data for simulating soil moisture regimes and associated potato growth. Agric Water Manag 5:319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belmans C, Wesseling GJ, Feddes RA (1983) Simulation model of the water balance of a cropped soil: SWATRE. J Hydrol 63:271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengough AG (1997) Modelling root depth and soil strength in a drying soil profile. J Theor Biol 186:327–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP (1979) Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. In: Launer RL, Wilkinson GN (eds) Robustness in statistics. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA (1989) Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation. J Soil Sci 40:477–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldiz DO (2000) Analysis of seed and ware potato production systems and yield constraints in Argentina. PhD thesis, University of Wageningen. Dissertation no. 2816

  • de Wit CT (1965) Photosynthesis of leaf canopies. Pudoc, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott MJ, Trudgill DL, McNicol JW, Phillips MS (2004) Projecting PCN population changes and potato yields in infested soils. In: MacKerron DKL, Haverkort AJ (eds) Decision support systems in potato production—bringing models to practice. Wageningen Academic, Wageningen, pp 142–152

    Google Scholar 

  • FertOrgaNic (2008) http://www.fertorganic.org/FertOrgaNic.asp

  • Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. Pegasus Communications, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold HJ (1989) Decision analytic modelling for plant disease control. Plant Disease Epidemiol 4:84–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu Y, McNicol JW, Peiris DR, Crawford JW, Marshall B, Jefferies RA (1996) A belief network-based system for predicting future crop production. AI Appl 10:13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort AJ, Grashoff C (2004) IDEOTYPING-POTATO a modelling approach to genotype performance. In: MacKerron DKL, Haverkort AJ (eds) Decision support systems in potato production—bringing models to practice. Wageningen Academic, Wageningen, pp 199–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson PD, Stone PJ, Zyskowski RF, Sinton S, Martin RJ (2004) Implementation and testing of the Potato Calculator, a decision support system for nitrogen and irrigation management. In: MacKerron DKL, Haverkort AJ (eds) Decision support systems in potato production—bringing models to practice. Wageningen Academic, Wageningen, pp 84–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies RA (1993a) Use of a simulation model to assess possible strategies of drought tolerance in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Agric Syst 41:93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies RA (1993b) Cultivar responses to water stress in potato: effects of shoot and roots. New Phytol 123:491–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KB, Johnson SB, Teng PS (1986) Development of a simple potato growth model for use in crop-pest-management. Agric Syst 19:189–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat P, Marshall B, van den Broek BJ (1995a) Comparison of simulation results and evaluation of parameterization schemes. In: Kabat P, Marshall B, van den Broek BJ, Vos J, van Keulen H (eds) Modelling and parameterisation of the soil–plant–atmosphere system—a comparison of potato growth models. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 439–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat P, Marshall B, van den Broek BJ, Vos J, van Keulen H (eds) (1995b) Modelling and parameterisation of the soil–plant–atmosphere system—a comparison of potato growth models. ISBN 90-74134-16-5, Pudoc, Wageningen, 523 pp

  • Kadaja J, Tooming H (2004) Potato production model based on principle of maximum plant productivity. Agric For Meteorol 127:17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk WW (1986) Leaf and canopy development in the potato. PhD thesis, University of Dundee, 135 pp

  • LeDuc SK, Holt DA (1987) The scale problem: modeling plant yield over time and space. In: Wisiol K, Hesketh JD (eds) Plant growth modelling for resource management. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 125–137

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKerron DKL (1984) Potato sprout emergence in soil as a function of temperature and time from planting. Abstracts of the 9th Triennial Conference, EAPR, Interlaken, p 364

  • MacKerron DKL, Lewis GJ (1995) Modelling to optimize the use of both water and nitrogen by the potato crop. In: Haverkort AJ, MacKerron DKL (eds) Potato ecology and modelling of crops under conditions limiting growth. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 129–146

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKerron DKL, Peng ZY (1989) Genotypic comparisons of potato root growth and yield in response to drought. Aspects Appl Biol 22: Roots and the Soil Environment. 199–206

  • MacKerron DKL, Marshall B, McNicol JW (2004) MAPP, the Management Advisory Package for Potatoes: decision support means giving informed options not making decisions. In: MacKerron DKL, Haverkort AJ (eds) Decision support systems in potato production—bringing models to practice. Wageningen Academic, Wageningen, pp 118–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall B, van den Broek BJ (1995) Field experiments and analysis of data used in the case study. In: Kabat P, Marshall B, van den Broek BJ, Vos J, van Keulen H (eds) Modelling and parameterisation of the soil–plant–atmosphere system—a comparison of potato growth models. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 179–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeteson JJ (1982) Investigation into the relationship between amount of soil mineral nitrogen and optimum nitrogen fertilization for potatoes and sugar beet. Assessment of the nitrogen status of the soils (Research Workshop Leuven, 12–14 Jan 1982), pp 44–47

  • Neeteson JJ (1990) Development of nitrogen fertilizer recommendations for arable crops in the Netherlands in relation to nitrate leaching. Fertil Res 26:291–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ng E, Loomis RS (1979) A simulation model of potato crop growth. Final report for co-operative agreement No. 12-14-5001-287 with the USDA Snake River Conservation Research Center

  • Ng E, Loomis RS (1984) Simulation of growth and yield of the potato crop. PUDOC, Wageningen ISBN 90-220-0843-6

    Google Scholar 

  • OPTIRas (2006) http://optiras.agrobiokon.eu/

  • OPTIRas (2008) http://optiras.agrobiokon.nl/optiras3/index.faces

  • Parker CJ, Carr MKV, Jarvis NJ, Evans MTB, Lee VH (1989) Effects of subsoil loosening and irrigation on soil physical properties, root distribution and water uptake of potatoes. Soil Tillage Res 13:267–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng TY (1989) The physiological basis of genotypic differences in drought tolerance in potatoes. MSc thesis, University of Dundee

  • Raatjes P, Hadders J, Martin D, Hinds H (2004) PLANT-Plus: turn-key solution for disease forecasting and irrigation management. In: MacKerron DKL, Haverkort AJ (eds) Decision support systems in potato production—bringing models to practice. Wageningen Academic, Wageningen, pp 168–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose CW, Begg JE, Byrne GF, Torssel BWR, Goncz JH (1972) A simulation model of growth–field environment relationships for Townsville stylo (Stylosanthes humilis H.B.K.) pasture. Agric Meteorol 10:161–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth O, Derron J, Fischlin A, Nemecek T, Ulrich M (1995) Implementation, parameter adaptation, and integration of a potato crop and a soil water simulation model. In: Kabat P, Marshall B, van den Broek BJ, Vos J, van Keulen H (eds) Modelling and parameterisation of the soil–plant–atmosphere system—a comparison of potato growth models. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 371–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporleder MJ, Kroschel MR, Gutierrez Q, Lagnaoui A (2004) A temperature-based simulation model for the potato tuber worm, Phthorimaea operculella Zeller. Lepidoptera Gelechiidae. Environ Entomol 33(3):477–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2002) All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. Syst Dyn Rev 18:501–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans BGH, Vos J, Stomph TJ (2009) The development, validation and application of a crop growth model to assess the potential of S. sisymbriifolium as a trap crop for potato cyst nematodes in Europe. Field Crops Res (in press).

  • USDA (2007) Crop simulation models and GUICS http://www.ars.usda.gov/Research/docs.htm?docid=6339

  • van den Broek BJ, Kabat P (1995) SWACROP: dynamic simulation model of soil water and crop yield applied to potatoes. In: Kabat P, Marshall B, van den Broek BJ, Vos J, van Keulen H (eds) Modelling and parameterisation of the soil–plant–atmosphere system—a comparison of potato growth models. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 299–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Keulen H, Stol W (1995) Agro-ecological zonation for potato production. In: Haverkort AJ, MacKerron DKL (eds) Potato ecology and modelling of crops under conditions limiting growth. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 357–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Keulen H, Wolf J (eds) (1986) Modelling of agricultural production: weather, soils and crops. Simulation Monograph Series, Pudoc Wageningen, 479 pp

  • Wolf J, van Oijen M (2003) Model simulation of effects of changes in climate and atmospheric CO2 and O3 on tuber yield potential of potato (cv. Bintje) in the European Union. Agric Ecosyst Environ 94:141–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. K. L. MacKerron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacKerron, D.K.L. Advances in Modelling the Potato Crop: Sufficiency and Accuracy Considering Uses and Users, Data, and Errors. Potato Res. 51, 411–427 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-008-9108-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-008-9108-z

Keywords

Navigation