Abstract
Temporal variations in population size under unpredictable environments are of primary concern in evolutionary ecology, where time scale enters as an important factor while setting up an optimization problem. Thus, short-term optimization with traditional (arithmetic) mean fitness may give a different result from long-term optimization. In the long-term optimization, the concept of geometric mean fitness has been received well by researchers and applied to various problems in ecology and evolution. However, the limit of applicability of geometric mean has not been addressed so far. Here we investigate this problem by analyzing numerically the probability distribution of a random variable obeying stochastic multiplicative growth. According to the law of large number, the expected value (i.e., arithmetic mean) manifests itself as a proper measure of optimization as the number of random processes increases to infinity. We show that the finiteness of this number plays a crucial role in arguing for the relevance of geometric mean. The geometric mean provides a satisfactory picture of the random variation in a long term above a crossover time scale that is determined by this number and the standard deviation of the randomly varying growth rates. We thus derive the applicability condition under which the geometric mean fitness is valid. We explore this condition in some examples of risk-spreading behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Materials
This article has no additional data.
Code Availability
This article has no custom code essential to the results.
References
Bulmer M (1996) Theoretical evolutionary ecology. Sinauer Associates Publishers
Cohen D (1966) Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J Theor Biol 12:119–129
Cohen D (1968) A general model of optimal reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J Ecol 56:219–228
Cohen D (1993) Fitness in random environments. In: Yoshimura J, Clark CW (eds) Adaptation in stochastic environments. Lecture notes in biomathematics, vol. 98. Springer, Berlin, pp 8–25
Cooper WS, Kaplan RH (1982) Adaptive coin-flipping: a decision theoretic examination of natural selection for random individual variation. J Theor Biol 94:135–151
Dempster ER (1955) Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 20:25–32
Dobzhansky T (1937) Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York (2nd ed., 1941; 3rd ed., 1951)
Eldredge N, Gould SJ (1972) Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf TJM (ed) Models in paleobiology. Freeman Cooper, San Francisco, pp 82–115
Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Gould SJ (1989) Wonderful life: the burgess shale and the nature of history. Norton, New York
Gould SJ (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Belknap, Cambridge
Gould SJ, Eldredge N (1977) Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3(2):115–151
Haaland TR, Wright J, Ratikainen II (2019) Bet-hedging across generations can affect the evolution of variance-sensitive strategies within generations. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 286:20192070
Haldane JBS, Jayakar SD (1963) Polymorphism due to selection of varying direction. J Genet 58:237–242
Hartl D, Clark A (1997) Principles of population genetics, 3rd edn. Sinauer
Iwasa Y, Cohen D (1989) Optimal growth schedule of a perennial plant. Am Nat 133:480–505
Iwasa Y (1991) Pessimistic plants: the optimal growth schedule in fluctuating environments. Theor Popul Biol 40:246–268
Iwasa Y (2000) Dynamic optimization of plant growth. Evol Ecol Res 2:437–455
Jansen VAA, Yoshimura J (1998) Population can persist in an environment consisting of sinks only. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:3696–3698
Kaplan RH, Cooper WS (1984) The evolution of developmental plasticity in reproductive characteristics: an application of the “adaptive coin-flipping” principle. Am Nat 123:393–410
Lewontin RC, Cohen D (1969) On population growth in a randomly varying environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 62:1056–1060
Nii M, Okabe T, Ito H, Morita S, Yasuda Y, Yoshimura J (2019) Bankruptcy is an inevitable fate of repeated investments with leverage. Sci Rep 9:13745
Okabe T, Nii M, Yoshimura J (2019) The median-based resolution of the St. Petersburg paradox. Phys Lett A 383:125838
Okabe T, Yoshimura J (2022) Earthquake sizes: an example of a statistical distribution that lacks a well-defined mean. Am J Phys (to appear)
Philippi T, Seger J (1989) Hedging one’s evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends Ecol Evol 4:41–44
Seger J, Brockmann HJ (1987) What is bet-hedging? In: Harvey PH, Partridge L (eds) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, vol 4. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 182–211
Simons AM (2002) The continuity of microevolution and macroevolution. J Evol Biol 15:688–701
Slatkin M (1974) Hedging one’s evolutionary bets. Nature 250:704–705
Starrfelt J, Kokko H (2012) Bet-hedging—a triple trade-off between means, variances and correlations. Biol Rev 87:742–755
Vermeij GJ (2004) Nature: an economic history. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Vermeij GJ (2006) Historical contingency and the purported uniqueness of evolutionary innovations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(6):1804–1809. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508724103
Yasui Y, Yoshimura J (2018) Bet-hedging against male-caused reproductive failures may explain ubiquitous cuckoldry in female birds. J Theor Biol 437:214–221
Yoshimura J, Clark CW (1991) Individual Adaptations in Stochastic Environments Evolutionary Ecology 5:173–192
Yoshimura J, Clark CW (eds) (1993) Adaptation in stochastic environments. Lecture notes in biomathematics, vol 98. Springer, Berlin, p 193
Yoshimura J, Ito H, Miller DG III, Tainaka K (2013a) Dynamic decision-making in uncertain environments I. The principle of dynamic utility. J Ethol 31:101–105
Yoshimura J, Ito H, Miller DG III, Tainaka K (2013b) Dynamic decision-making in uncertain environments II. Allais paradox in human behavior. J Ethol 31:107–113
Yoshimura J, Jansen VAA (1996) Evolution and population dynamics in stochastic environments. Res Popul Ecol 38:165–182
Yoshimura J, Tanaka Y, Togashi T, Iwata S, Tainaka K (2009) Mathematical equivalence of geometric mean fitness with probabilistic optimization under environmental uncertainty. Ecol Model 220:2611–2617
Funding
This work was partly supported by grants-in-aid from the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (No. 21K12047 to TO and Nos. 22255004, 22370010, 26257405, 15H04420 to JY).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TO conceived and performed the study. TO and JY wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
We declare that we have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
In the long-time limit t → ∞, St obeys the log-normal distribution with its µ and σ2 parameters as given in the main text. In the log-normal distribution, the probability that St is less than K is given by \({\text{Prob}}\left( {S_{t} < K} \right) = {\text{Prob}}\left( {\frac{1}{t}\sum\limits_{t = 0}^{t - 1} {\log r_{t} < \frac{1}{t}\log K} } \right) = \Phi \left( {\frac{\log K - \mu t}{{\sigma \sqrt t }}} \right)\), where \({\Phi }\left( y \right)\) is the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of the normal distribution with mean 0 and standard deviation 1. Owing to \({\text{Prob}}\left( {S_{t} > S_{{{\text{max}}}} } \right) = 1/N\), or \({\text{Prob}}\left( {S_{t} < S_{{{\text{max}}}} } \right) = 1 - \frac{1}{N}\), we obtain \(S_{{{\text{max}}}} = e^{\mu t + C\left( N \right)\sigma \sqrt t }\), where \(C\left( N \right) = {\Phi }^{ - 1} \left( {1 - \frac{1}{N}} \right)\). On the other side, the conditional expectation is also expressed as \(E\left[ {S_{t} {|}S_{t} < K} \right] = e^{{\mu t + \frac{{\sigma^{2} }}{2}t}} {\Phi }\left( {\frac{{\log K - \mu t - \sigma^{2} t}}{\sigma \sqrt t }} \right)/{\Phi }\left( {\frac{\log K - \mu t}{{\sigma \sqrt t }}} \right)\) \(= e^{{\mu t + \frac{{\sigma^{2} }}{2}t}} {\Phi }\left( {C\left( N \right) - \sigma \sqrt t } \right)/\left( {1 - \frac{1}{N}} \right)\), where we substituted K = Smax in the second equation. For a sufficiently large t, we may use an asymptotic formula \({\Phi }\left( x \right) \simeq e^{{ - \frac{{x^{2} }}{2}}} /\left( {\left| x \right|\sqrt {2\pi } } \right)\) valid for x → ± ∞. Consequently, we obtain \(E\left[ {S_{t} {|}S_{t} < S_{{{\text{max}}}} } \right] \simeq e^{\mu t } /\left( {\sqrt {2\pi t} \sigma } \right)\), for \(\sigma \sqrt t \gg C\left( N \right)\), or for \(t \gg t_{{{\text{cr}}}}\) with \(t_{{{\text{cr}}}} = \left( {C\left( N \right)/\sigma } \right)^{2} .\) Noting that \(e^{\mu } = m_{{{\text{geo}}}}\) by Eqs. (2) and (10), we obtain \(S_{tN} \sim \left( {m_{{{\text{geo}}}} } \right)^{t}\) for \(t \gg t_{{{\text{cr}}}}\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Okabe, T., Yoshimura, J. Practical Basis of the Geometric Mean Fitness and its Application to Risk-Spreading Behavior. Bull Math Biol 84, 25 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-021-00984-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-021-00984-3