Skip to main content
Log in

The Evolution of Resource Adaptation: How Generalist and Specialist Consumers Evolve

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Why and how specialist and generalist strategies evolve are important questions in evolutionary ecology. In this paper, with the method of adaptive dynamics and evolutionary branching, we identify conditions that select for specialist and generalist strategies. Generally, generalist strategies evolve if there is a switching benefit; specialists evolve if there is a switching cost. If the switching cost is large, specialists always evolve. If the switching cost is small, even though the consumer will first evolve toward a generalist strategy, it will eventually branch into two specialists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, P.A., 1999. The adaptive dynamics of consumer choice. Am. Nat. 153(1), 83–97.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ackermann, M., Doebeli, M., 2004. Evolution of niche width and adaptive diversification. Evolution 58(12), 2599–2612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Vincent, T.L., 1992. Organization of predator–prey communities as an evolutionary game. Evolution 46(5), 1269–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Leenheer, P., Levin, S.A., Sontag, E.D., Klausmeier, C.A., 2003. Global stability in a chemostat with multiple nutrients. Technical report, DIMACS, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.

  • Dieckmann, U., Law, R., 1996. The dynamical theory of coevolution: A derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 34(5–6), 579–612.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Geritz, S.A.H., Kisdi, E., Meszena, G., Metz, J.A.J., 1998. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P.R., 1999. Ecology and Evolution of Darwin's Finches. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P.R., Grant, B.R., 2002. Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science 296, 707–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klausmeier, C.A., Daufresne, T., Litchman, E., Levin, S.A., 2004a. Optimal nitrogen-to-phosphorus stoichiometry of phytoplankton. Nature 429, 171–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klausmeier, C.A., Litchman, E., Levin, S.A., 2004b. Phytoplankton growth and stoichiometry under multiple nutrient limitation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 9, 1463–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J.R., Davies, N.B., 1993. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, D., 1947. The significance of clutch-size. Ibis 89, 302–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.A., 1977. A more functional response to predator–prey stability. Am. Nat. 111(978), 381–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.A., Segel, L.A., 1982. Models of the influence of predation on aspect diviersity in prey populations. J. Math. Biol. 14, 253–284.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J., Worden, L., Levin, S.A., in press. Evolutionary branching of single traits. In: Rooney, N., McCann, K., Noakes, D., (Eds.), From Energetics to Ecosystems: The Dynamics and Structure of Ecological Systems. Springer, Heidelberg, in press.A2

  • van Baalen, M., Krivan, V., van Rijn, P.C.J., Sabelis, M.W., 2001. Alternative food, switching predators, and the persistence of predator–prey systems. Am. Nat. 157(5), 512–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junling Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, J., Levin, S.A. The Evolution of Resource Adaptation: How Generalist and Specialist Consumers Evolve. Bull. Math. Biol. 68, 1111–1123 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-006-9096-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-006-9096-6

Keywords

Navigation