Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction to: TechTrends (2017) 61:273–281
Since this paper’s publication, it has come to our attention that two of the tables included in the paper were calculated using a slightly different dataset than the rest of our analysis. Consequently, we have recalculated the values for those tables and reviewed our manuscript for other errors. The resulting changes are minor and do not affect the overall findings or conclusions of the paper; nonetheless, we provide the following corrections by way of reference:
On p. 273, the reference to “3598 users” in the abstract should read “3583 users.”
On p. 275, the term “in vivo” does not accurately describe the coding methods used in this paper and should be disregarded.
On p. 276, the reference to “3598 users” in the first paragraph of the RQ1 subsection should read “3583 users.”
On p. 276, the phrase “less than 11% of participants actually posted original tweets” in the second paragraph of the RQ1 subsection should read “only approximately 11% of participants actually posted original tweets.”
Table 2 should appear as follows:
Table 3 should appear as follows:
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0142-4
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greenhalgh, S.P., Koehler, M.J. Correction to: 28 Days Later: Twitter Hashtags as “Just in Time” Teacher Professional Development. TechTrends 63, 499 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00405-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00405-2