Abstract
This article reports on a study into students with disabilities and their experiences of eLearning at Curtin University in Australia. The results are compared to an earlier study of students at Open Universities Australia (OUA) (Kent 2016). The results confirm the earlier study’s findings that these students are drawn to eLearning. The prevalence of mental illness and medical disabilities as the two most frequent impairment types amongst students with disabilities in Australia was confirmed, along with a need to rethink universal design for eLearning to better accommodate these students. It also finds that the students had difficulty accessing online platforms and notably those provided directly by the university. This survey confirmed that students at Curtin University were more aware than their OUA counterparts of accommodations that could be made to help with their studies. It also showed that, when used, those accommodations were more successful. However, the study also reported that Curtin University students were more likely to not disclose their disability as part of their studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson survey research group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradechange.pdf.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). National survey of mental health and wellbeing summary of results. ABS website. [Canberra]: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/6AE6DA447F985FC2CA2574EA00122BD6/$File/43260_2007.pdf.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2015). Disability, aging and carers, Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/C258C88A7AA5A87ECA2568A9001393E8?Opendocument.
Corrigan, P. W., & Rao, D. (2012). On the self-stigma of mental illness: stages, disclosure, and strategies for change. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry [Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie], 57(8), 464–469.
Curtin University. (2017). Curtin University statistics 2012–2016. Retrieved from https://planning.curtin.edu.au/stats/students2012-2016.cfm
Department of Education and Training. (2016). Selected higher education statistics – 2014 student data. Canberra: Australian Government Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.au/selected-higher-education-statistics-2014-student-data.
Disabled World. (2010). National Federation of the blind certifies blackboard for accessibility of learning platform. Disabled World, 12 August. http://www.disabled-world.com/disability/accessibility/blackboard-learning.php.
Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2006). The disability divide in internet access and use. Information Communication and Society, 9(3), 309–311.
Druss, B. G., Marcus, S. C., Rosenheck, R. A., Olfson, M., Tanielian, T., & Pincus, H. A. (2000). Understanding disability in mental and general medical conditions. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(9), 1485–1491. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.9.1485.
Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2011). Disability and new media. New York & London: Routledge.
Fitchten, C. S., Ferraro, V., Asuncion, J. V., Chwojka, C., Barile, M., Nguyen, M. N., Klomp, R., & Wolforth, J. (2009). Disabilities and e-learning problems and solutions: an exploratory study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 241–256 Retrieved from http://www.adaptech.org/cfichten/abDisabilitiesAndE-LearningProblems.pdf.
Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital disability: The social construction of disability in new media. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc..
Guglielman, E. (2010). E-learning and disability: Accessibility as a contributor to inclusion. Fifth Doctoral Consortium at the European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Barcelona, Spain, 29 September 2010 (pp. 31-36). Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-709/paper06.pdf.
Holmes, E. P., & River, L. (1998). Individual strategies for coping with the stigma of severe mental illness. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 5(2), 231–239.
Kelly, S. M. (2009). Distance learning: How accessible are online educational tools. Paper presented at the Equal Access to Software and Information Webinar, February.
Kent, M. (2015a). Disability and eLearning: Opportunities and barriers. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(1) Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3815/3830.
Kent, M. (2015b). Disability, mental illness, and eLearning: Invisible behind the screen? The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, 8 Retrieved from https://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/disability-mental-illness-and-elearning-invisible-behind-the-screen/.
Kent, M. (2016). Access and barriers to online education for people with disabilities. Perth: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education Retrieved from https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Access-and-Barriers-to-Online-Education-for-People-with-Disabilities.pdf.
Kent, M., Ellis, K., Peaty, G., Latter, N., & Locke, K. (2017). Mainstreaming captions for online lectures in higher education in Australia: Alternative approaches to engaging with video content. Perth: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE), Curtin University https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/publications/4074/?doing_wp_cron=1493183232.7519669532775878906250.
Lee, B. A. (2014). Students with disabilities: opportunities and challenges for colleges and universities. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 46(1), 40–45.
Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Hampshire: Palgrave.
Roberts, J. B., Crittenden, L. A., & Crittenden, J. C. (2011). Students with disabilities and online learning: a cross-institutional study of perceived satisfaction with accessibility compliance and services. Internet and Higher Education, 14, 242–250.
Sachs, D., & Schreuer, N. (2011). Inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education: performance and participation in student experiences. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(2).
Sparks, R. L., & Lovett, B. J. (2013). Learning disability documentation in higher education: what are students submitting? Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948713486888.
Acknowledgements
Funding for this research was provided by the National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE) and the Australian Government grant: Access and Barriers to Online Education for People with Disabilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This study was partially funded by the National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE) and the Australian Government grant: Access and Barriers to Online Education for People with Disabilities.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee (research approval number HR 134/2014) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflicts of Interest
Mike Kent declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Katie Ellis declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Matt Giles declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kent, M., Ellis, K. & Giles, M. Students with Disabilities and eLearning in Australia: Experiences of Accessibility and Disclosure at Curtin University. TechTrends 62, 654–663 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0337-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0337-y