Advertisement

TechTrends

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 73–80 | Cite as

Graduates’ Reflections on an Online Doctorate in Educational Technology

  • Julia S. FullerEmail author
  • Mary E. Risner
  • Laura Lowder
  • Mark Hart
  • Barry Bachenheimer
Article

Abstract

In recent years online education doctorates have become more prevalent to accommodate the growing need for distance academic preparation. Due to the newness of these degree programs, there is a dearth of information in the literature on learner perspectives of effective online teaching and learning strategies. The authors of this paper are recent graduates of the online Doctor of Education program in Educational Technology at the University of Florida. They convey their own experiences using supporting research and the three components of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) model (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000)—social, cognitive, and teaching presence—to examine this online doctoral program. The insights in the paper are intended to promote dialogue on the student perspective and make recommendations to further the initiation and development of online education doctorates.

Keywords

Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework distance learning educational technology higher education professional practice doctorate student perspectives 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, T., & Tynan, B. (2010). Why the student voice? The case for investigating the distance learners’ experience of ICT in distance education. In C. H. Steel, M. J. Keppel, P. Gerbic, & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp. 60-64). Retrieved February 19, 2014, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney10/procs/Andrews-concise.pdf
  3. Benbunan-Fich, R., & Hiltz, S. R. (2003). Mediators of the effectiveness of online courses. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46(4), 298-312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CPED Consortium. (2014). Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. Retrieved February 19, 2014, from http://cpedinitiative.org/
  5. Calandra, B., Barron, A. E., & Thompson-Sellers, I. (2008). Audio use in e-learning: What, why, when, and how?. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(4), 589-601.Google Scholar
  6. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved February 19, 2014, from http://www.editlib.org/p/24297
  7. Cavanaugh, C., & Dawson, K. (2009). Designing an online professional practice doctoral program in educational technology. 25th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. Retrieved February 19, 2014, from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/09_20041.pdf
  8. Dawson, K., Cavanaugh, C., Sessums, C., Black, E., & Kumar, S. (2011). Designing a profesprofessional practice doctoral degree in Educational Technology: Signature pedagogies, implications and recommendations. Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), Retrieved February 19, 2014, from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/767
  9. Eisenhart, M., & DeHann, R. (2005). Doctoral preparation of scientifically based educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 3-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kenney, J., Kumar, S., & Hart, M. (2013). More than a social network: Facebook as a catalyst for an online educational community of practice. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments. Special Issue: Facebook as an Educational Tool, 1(4), 355-369. doi:  10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.057467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Knowles, M., Elwood F., & Swanson, R. (1998). The adult learner. Houston: Gulf Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Kumar, S., Dawson, K. Black, E. W., Cavanaugh, C., & Sessums, C. D. (2011). Applying the Community of Inquiry framework to an online professional practice doctoral program. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(6). Retrieved February 19, 2014, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/978
  16. Kumar, S., & Dawson, K. (2012a). Theory to practice: Implementation and initial impact of an online doctoral program. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 15(1). Retrieved February 19, 2014 from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring151/kumar_dawson.html
  17. Kumar, S., & Dawson, K. (2012b). Exploring the impact of a professional practice education doctorate in educational environments. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(2), 165-178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar, S., Johnson, M. L., & Hardemon, T. (2013). Dissertations at a distance: Students’ perceptions of online mentoring in a doctoral program. Journal of Distance Education, 27(1). Retrieved February 19, 2014, from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/835/1481
  19. Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2014). Adapting the Community of Inquiry survey for an online graduate program: Implications for online programs. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1). Retrieved February 19, 2014, from http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.59
  20. Labaree, D. F. (2003). The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 13-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mayes, T. (2006). LEX: The Learner Experience of e-learning: Methodology report. Scotland: Glasgow Caledonian University.Google Scholar
  23. Meyer, K. A. (2004). Evaluating online discussions: Four different frames of analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 101–114.Google Scholar
  24. Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  25. Moyle, K., & Owen, S. (2008). Students voices learning with technologies. Students expectations about learning with technologies: A literature review. Australia: University of Canberra.Google Scholar
  26. Packard, W. (2003). Student training promotes mentoring awareness and action. Career Development Quarterly, 51(4), 335-345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Palloff, P., & Pratt K. (2011). The excellent online instructor: Strategies for professional development. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Perry, J. A. & Imig, D. G. (2008). A stewardship of practice in education. Change: The Magazine of High Learning, 40(6), 42-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shulman, L. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52-59. doi: 10.1162/0011526054622015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shea, P., Hayes, S., & Vickers, J. (2010). Online instructional effort measured through the lens of teaching presence in the community of inquiry framework: A re-examination of measures and approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(3), 127-154.Google Scholar
  31. Swan, K. (2003). Developing social presence in online discussions. In S. Naidu (Ed.), Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (147-164). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  32. Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9, 115-136.Google Scholar
  33. Teng, D., Chen, N., Kinshuk, & Leo, T. (2012). Exploring students’ learning experience in an international online research seminar in the Synchronous Cyber Classroom. Computers & Education, 58, 918–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia S. Fuller
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mary E. Risner
    • 2
  • Laura Lowder
    • 3
  • Mark Hart
    • 2
  • Barry Bachenheimer
    • 4
  1. 1.Kennesaw State UniversityKennesawUSA
  2. 2.University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Pfeiffer UniversityMisenheimerUSA
  4. 4.Pascack Valley Regional School District/Montclair State UniversityMontvaleUSA

Personalised recommendations