Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 232.
Amenta, S., Günther, F., & Marelli, M. (2020). A (distributional) semantic perspective on the processing of morphologically complex words. The Mental Lexicon, 15, 62–78.
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipović Ðurđević, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118, 438–481.
Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., & Zanchetta, E. (2009). The WaCky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation, 43, 209–226.
Baroni, M., Bernardi, R., & Zamparelli, R. (2014a). Frege in space: A program for compositional distributional semantics. Linguistic Issues in Language Technologies, 9(6), 5–110.
Baroni, M., Dinu, G., & Kruszewski, G. (2014b). Don’t count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context-predicting semantic vectors. In Proceedings of ACL 2014 (52nd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics), pp. 238–247. East Stroudsburg: ACL.
Bauer, L. (1998). When is a sequence of noun + noun a compound in English? English Language and Linguistics, 2, 65–86.
Bell, M. J., & Schäfer, M. (2013). Semantic transparency: challenges for distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the IWCS 2013 workshop towards a formal distributional semantics (pp. 1–10). ACL.
BNC Consortium (2007). The British National Corpus, version 3. Oxford: Bodleian Libraries. http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/.
Costello, F. J., & Keane, M. T. (2000). Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 24, 299–349.
Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0121945.
Dinu, G., Pham, N., & Baroni, M. (2013). DISSECT: DIStributional SEmantics Composition Toolkit. In Proceedings of the system demonstrations of ACL 2013 (51st annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics) (pp. 31–36). East Stroudsburg, PA: ACL.
Di Sciullo, A. M. (2005). Asymmetry in morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Downing, P. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language, 53, 810–842.
Gagné, C. (2009). Psycholinguistic perspectives. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 255–271). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Gagné, C. L., & Shoben, E. J. (1997). Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier–noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 71.
Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L., & Schmidtke, D. (2019). LADEC: the large database of English compounds. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2152–2179.
Guevara, E. (2010). A regression model of adjective-noun compositionality in distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the 2010 workshop on geometrical models of natural language semantics (pp. 33–37).
Günther, F., & Marelli, M. (2016). Understanding Karma police: The perceived plausibility of noun compounds as predicted by distributional models of semantic representation. PLoS ONE, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163200.
Günther, F., & Marelli, M. (2019). Enter Sandman: Compound processing and semantic transparency in a compositional perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 1872–1882.
Günther, F., & Marelli, M. (2020). Trying to make it work: Compositional effects in the processing of compound “nonwords”. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 1082–1091.
Günther, F., Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2019). Vector-space models of semantic representation from a cognitive perspective: A discussion of common misconceptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 1006–1033.
Günther, F., Petilli, M. A., & Marelli, M. (2020). Semantic transparency is not invisibility: A computational model of perceptually-grounded conceptual combination in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 112, 104104.
Hollis, G. (2017). Estimating the average need of semantic knowledge from distributional semantic models. Memory & Cognition, 45, 1350–1370.
Janssen, T. M. V. (2001). Frege, contextuality and compositionality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 10, 115–136.
Johns, B. T., Jones, M., & Mewhort, D. J. (2016). Experience as a free parameter in the cognitive modeling of language. In Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2291–2296). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1–37.
Jones, M. N., Willits, J., & Dennis, S. (2015). Models of semantic memory. In J. Busemeyer, Z. Wang, J. Townsend, & A. Eidels (Eds.), Oxford handbook of mathematical and computational psychology (pp. 232–254). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Juhasz, B. J., Lai, Y-H., & Woodcock, M. L. (2015). A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1004–1019.
Kim, S. Y., Yap, M. J., & Goh, W. D. (2019). The role of semantic transparency in visual word recognition of compound words: A megastudy approach. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2722–2732.
Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 257–266.
Kintsch, W. (2007). Meaning in context. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 89–105). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kuperman, V., & Bertram, R. (2013). Moving spaces: Spelling alternation in English noun-noun compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(7), 939–966.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.
Lenci, A. (2008). Distributional semantics in linguistic and cognitive research. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 20(1), 1–31.
Li, B., Drozd, A., Guo, Y., Liu, T., Matsuoka, S., & Du, X. (2019). Scaling word2vec on big corpus. Data Science and Engineering, 4, 157–175.
Libben, G. (2006). Why study compounds? An overview of the issues. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1–21). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Libben, G. (2010). Compound words, semantic transparency, and morphological transcendence. In S. Olson (Ed.), New impulses in word-formation (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 17) (pp. 212–232). Hamburg: Buske.
Libben, G. (2014). The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 8–25.
Libben, G. (2017). The quantum metaphor and the organization of words in the mind. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 1, 49–55.
Libben, G., Goral, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2018). What does constituent priming mean in the investigation of compound processing? The Mental Lexicon, 13, 269–284.
Lieber, R., & Štekauer, P. (2009). Introduction: status and definition of compounding. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 57–78.
Marelli, M., & Baroni, M. (2015). Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Psychological Review, 122, 485–515.
Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 644–664.
Marelli, M., Dinu, G., Zamparelli, R., & Baroni, M. (2015). Picking buttercups and eating butter cups: Spelling alternations, semantic relatedness, and their consequences for compound processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1421–1439.
Marelli, M., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2017). Compounding as abstract operation in semantic space: A data-driven, large-scale model for relational effects in the processing of novel compounds. Cognition, 166, 207–224.
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013a). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv:1301.3781v3.
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013b). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, & K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS) 2013 (pp. 3136–3144). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Miller, G. A. (1995). WordNet: a lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 39–41.
Mitchell, J., & Lapata, M. (2010). Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cognitive Science, 34, 1388–1439.
Murphy, G. L. (1988). Comprehending complex concepts. Cognitive Science, 12, 529–562.
Murphy, G. L. (1990). Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 259–288.
Pereira, F., Gershman, S., Ritter, S., & Botvinick, M. (2016). A comparative evaluation of off-the-shelf distributed semantic representations for modelling behavioural data. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 33, 175–190.
Pham, H., & Baayen, H. R. (2013). Semantic relations and compound transparency: A regression study in CARIN theory. Psihologija, 46, 455–478.
Plag, I. (2006). The variability of compound stress in English: structural, semantic, and analogical factors. English Language and Linguistics, 10, 143–172.
Rodd, J. M. (2020). Settling into semantic space: An ambiguity-focused account of word-meaning access. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15, 411–427.
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & The PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (volume 1: Foundations). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 42, 529–567.
Schäfer, M. (2018). The semantic transparency of English compound nouns. Berlin, Germany: Language Science Press.
Schäfer, M., & Bell, M. J. (2020). Constituent polysemy and interpretational diversity in attested English novel compounds. The Mental Lexicon, 15, 42–61.
Schmidtke, D., Van Dyke, J. A., & Kuperman, V. (2018). Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 421–439.
Smolka, E., & Libben, G. (2017). ‘Can you wash off the hogwash?’–semantic transparency of first and second constituents in the processing of German compounds. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32, 514–531.
Williams, E. (1981). On the notions “lexically related” and “head of a word”. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 245–274.
Wisniewski, E. J. (1997). When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 167–183.