Skip to main content
Log in

Capacity commitment and pricing for substitutable products under competition

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Capacity acquisition and pricing decisions are a company’s long-term strategic decisions. However, demand uncertainty and substitutability of multiple products cause the difficulty to solve capacity and pricing decision problems. In this paper, we address a multiple product pricing and multiple resource capacity acquisition problem with demand uncertainties and competition. The company needs to determine capacity commitment for each resource and product prices before demands are realized so that the total profit is maximized. If the demand exceeds the committed capacity, extra amounts can be purchased from the spot market. Variable unit production costs, capacity acquisition and maintenance costs are considered. We first analyze a single company basic problem and find the optimal solutions on prices and capacity. Based on the single company model, we address the two-product, two-firm capacity commitment and pricing problem considering across product and across company price competition factors. The existence and uniqueness of equilibrium on price and capacity commitment are proved, and then we extended the results to the multiple product, multiple company case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmet, K.H. & Ioana, P. (2006). Deterministic price-inventory management for substitutable products. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 4(4): 354–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alptekinôglu, A. & Corbett, C.J. (2008). Mass customization vs. mass production: variety and price competition. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(2): 204–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aydin, G. & Porteus, E.L. (2008). Joint inventory and pricingdecisions for an assortment. Operations Research, 56(5): 1247–1256

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Aydin, G. & Ryan, J.K. (2002). Product line selection and pricing under the multinomial logit choice model. Working Paper, Standford University

  5. Banker, R. & Hugnes, J.S. (1994). Product costing and pricing. The Accounting Review, 69(3): 479–494

    Google Scholar 

  6. Banker, R., Hwang, I. & Misha, B.K. (2002). Product costing and pricing under long-term capacity commitment. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 14: 79–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernstein, F. & DeCroix, G.A. (2004). Decentralized pricingand capacity decisions in a multitier system with modular assembly. Management Science, 50(9): 1293–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bernstein, F. & Federgruen, A. (2004). A general equilibrium model for industries with price and service competition. Operations Research, 52(6): 868–886

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bertsimas, D. & de Boer, S. (2005). Dynamic pricing and inventory control for multiple products. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 3(4): 303–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Birge, J., Drogosz, J. & Duenyas, I. (1998). Setting single-period optimal capacity levels and prices for substitutable products. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 10: 407–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bitran, G., Caldentey, R. & Vial, R. (2009). Pricing policiesfor perishable products with demand substitution. Working paper, MIT

  12. Dong, L., Kouvelis, P. & Tian, Z. (2009). Dynamic pricing and inventory control of substitute products. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 11(2): 317–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gallego, G., Huh, W.T., Kang, W. & Philips, R. (2006). Price competition with the attraction demand model: existence of unique equilibrium and its stablity. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 8(4): 359–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuyumcu, H.A. & Popescu, L. (2005). Deterministic price — inventory management for sub-stitutable products. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 4(4): 354–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maddah, B. & Bish, E.K. (2007). Joint pricing, assortment, and inventory decisions for a retailer’s product line. Naval Research Logistics, 54(2): 315–330

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Maglaras, C. & Meissner, J. (2006). Dynamic pricing strategies for multi-product revenue management problems. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 8(2): 136–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Netessine, S. & Rudi, N. (2003). Centralized and competitive inventory models with demand substitution. Operations Research, 51(2): 329–335

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Rajaram, K. & Tang, C.S. (2001). The impact of product substitution on retail merchandising. European Journal of Operations Research, 135: 582–601

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Song, J.-S. & Xue, Z. (2007). Demand management and inventorycontrol for substitutable products. Working paper, Duke University

  20. Suh, M. & Aydin, G. (2009). Dynamic pricing of substituable products with limited inventories under logit demand. Working paper, University of Michigan

  21. Sundaram, R.K. (1996). A First Course in Optimization Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang, C.S. & Yin, R. (2007). Joint ordering and pricing strategies for managing substitutable products. Production and Operations Management, 16(1): 138–153

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Topkis, D.M. (1998). Supermodularity and Complementarity. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, US

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vives, X. (1990). Nash equalibrium with startegic complementarities. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 19: 305–321

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Vives, X. (1999). Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu, K. & Thonemann, U. (2009). Coordination of pricing and inventory control across products. Naval Research Logistics, 56(2): 175–190

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianhui You.

Additional information

This research was partly supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (71101021 and 71271049), Post-Doctor Science Foundation of China (20110490144), and Humanities and Society Science Plan Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (11YJA630180).

Hongyan Li received B.E. degree in statistics from Northeastern University (NEU), Shenyang, China in 1997, M.S. degree in Management Science and Engineering from NEU in 2000, and Ph.D. degree from Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster University, UK, 2007. She is currently an associate professor at the Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business Administration in NEU. Her primary research interests are in supply chain management and revenue management. She is also a member of INFORMS and POMS, and has publish a number of papers in internationally recognized journals in OR area.

Tianhui You received the B.E. degree in science and technology information engineering from Jilin University of Technology, Changchun, China in 1990, the M.S. degree in enterprise management from Northeastern University (NEU), Shenyang, China in 1998, and Ph.D. degree in management science and engineering from NEU in 2004. She is currently an associate professor in the Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business Administration, NEU. Her current research interests include decision analysis, knowledge management and operations research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, H., You, T. Capacity commitment and pricing for substitutable products under competition. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 21, 443–460 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-012-5204-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-012-5204-3

Keywords

Navigation