Skip to main content
Log in

An algorithm for the determination of the economic order quantity in a two-level supply chain with transportation costs: Comparison of decentralized with centralized decision

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers a two-level supply chain consisting of one warehouse and one retailer. In this model we determine the optimal ordering policy according to inventory and transportation costs. We assume that the demand rate by the retailer is known. Shortages are allowed neither at the retailer nor at the warehouse. We study this model in two cases; decentralized and centralized. In the decentralized case the retailer and the warehouse independently minimize their own costs; while in the centralized case the warehouse and the retailer are considered as a whole firm. We propose an algorithm to find economic order quantities for both the retailer and the warehouse which minimize the total system cost in the centralized case. The total system cost contains the holding and ordering costs at the retailer and the warehouse as well as the transportation cost from the warehouse to the retailer. The application of this model into the pharmaceutical downstream supply chain of a public hospital allows obtaining significant savings. By numerical examples, the costs are computed in MATLAB© to compare the costs in the centralized case with decentralized one and to propose a saving-sharing mechanism through quantity discount.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hill, R.M. (1997). The single-vendor single-buyer integrated production-inventory model with a generalized policy. European Journal of Operational Research, 97: 493–499

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Goyal, S.K. & Nebebe, F. (2000). Determination of economic productionshipment policy for a single-vendor-single-buyer system. European Journal of Operational Research, 121: 175–178

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoque, M.A. & Goyal, S.K. (2000). An optimal policy for a single-vendor singlebuyer integrated production-inventory system with capacity constraint of the transport equipment. International Journal of Production Economics, 65: 305–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ganeshan, R. (1999). Managing supply chain inventories: a multiple retailer, one warehouse, multiple supplier model. International Journal of Production Economics, 59: 341–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Swenseth, S.R. & Godfrey, M.R. (2002). Incorporating transportation costs into inventory replenishment decisions. International Journal of Production Economics, 77: 113–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ertogral, K., Darwish, M. & Ben-Daya, M. (2007). Production and shipment lot sizing in a vendor-buyer supply chain with transportation cost. European Journal of Operational Research, 176: 1592–1606

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, H.C., Chew, E.P. & Goh, K.H. (2005). A two-echelon inventory system with transportation capacity constraint. European Journal of Operational Research, 167: 129–143

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao, Q.H., Wang, S.Y., Lai, K.K. & Xia, G.P. (2004). Model and algorithm of an inventory problem with the consideration of transportation cost. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 46: 389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qu, W.W., Bookbinder, J.H. & Iyogun, P. (1999). An integrated inventory-transportation system with modified periodic policy for multiple products. European Journal of Operational Research, 115: 254–269

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Axsäter, S. (1993). Exact and approximate evaluation of batch-ordering policies for two-level inventory systems. Operations Research, 41 (4): 777–785

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Axsäter, S. (1996). Optimization of order-up-to-S policies in two-echelon inventory systems with periodic review. Naval Research Logistics, 40: 245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Forsberg, R. (1995). Optimization of order-up-to-S policies for two-level inventory systems with compound Poisson demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 81: 143–153

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Forsberg, R. (1996). Exact evaluation of (R, Q) policies for two-level inventory systems with Poisson demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 96: 130–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matta, K.F. & Sinha, D. (1995). Policy and cost approximations of two-echelon distribution systems with a procurement cost at the higher echelon. IIE Transactions. 27 (5): 638–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Das, C. & Tyagi, R. (1997). Role of inventory and transportation costs in determining the optimal degree of centralization. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 33 (3): 171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Seifbarghy, M. & Jokar, M.R.A. (2006). Cost evaluation of a two-echelon inventory system with lost sales and approximately Poisson demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 102: 244–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marklund, J. (2002). Centralized inventory control in a two-level distribution system with Poisson demand. Naval Research Logistics, 49 (2): 798–822

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Silver, E.A., Pyke, D.F. & Peterson, R. (1998). Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling. John Wiley & Sons, Third Edition

  19. Axsäter, S. (2005). A simple decision rule for decentralized two-echelon inventory control. International Journal of Production Economics, 93–94: 53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Andersson, J. & Marklund, J. (2000). Decentralized inventory control in a two-level distribution system. European Journal of Operational Research, 127: 483–506

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdul-Jalbar, B., Gutiérrez, J., Puerto, J. & Sicilia, J. (2003). Policies for inventory/distribution systems: the effect of centralization vs. decentralization. International Journal of Production Economics, 81–82: 281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, J.M. & Chen, T.H. (2005). The multi-item replenishment problem in a two-echelon supply chain: the effect of centralization versus decentralization. Computers & Operations Research, 32: 3191–3207

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Viswanathan, S. & Piplani, R. (2001). Coordinating supply chain inventories through common replenishment epochs. European Journal of Operational Research, 129: 277–286

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Mishra, A.K. (2004). Selective discount for supplier-buyer coordination using common replenishment epochs. European Journal of Operational Research, 153: 751–756

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, J. & Liu, L. (2006). Supply chain coordination with quantity discount policy. International Journal of Production Economics, 101: 89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hadley, G. & Whitin, T.M. (1963). Analysis of Inventory Systems. Prentice-Hall Inc

  27. Hassan, T., Baboli, A., Guinet, A., Leboucher, G. & Brandon, M.T. (2006). Reorganizing the pharmaceutical supply chain downstream: implementation a new pharmacy. In: 12th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing, 17–19, May 2006

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armand Baboli.

Additional information

The original version was presented on ICSSSM’06.

Armand Baboli is currently an Associate Professor in the Industrial Engineering Department of the National Institute of Applied Sciences (INSA) of Lyon, France, and member of LIESP laboratory. He received his B.Sc. degree in Industrial Engineering from Iran University of Science & Technology in 1988. In 1994 he received his M.Sc. degree in Industrial Engineering and then in 1999 his Ph.D. degree in Industrial Engineering both from Grenoble Polytechnic National Institute (INPG). His current research interests include supply chain design and organization, inventory management and facility layout planning.

Mohammadali Pirayesh Neghab received his B.Sc. & M.Sc. degrees in Industrial Engineering from Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, in 2000 and 2002, respectively. Currently he is a Ph.D. candidate in the Industrial Engineering Department of Sharif University. His Ph.D. thesis is in the area of inventory control and supply chain management.

Rasoul Haji is currently a professor of Industrial Engineering at Sharif University of Technology in Tehran, Iran. He received a B.Sc. degree from University of Tehran in Chemical Engineering in 1964. He also earned an M.Sc. degree from University of California-Berkeley in Industrial Engineering in 1967. In 1970 he received his Ph.D. degree from Berkeley in Industrial Engineering. He is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering and he is a member of Iran’s Academy of Sciences. He is recognized as a co-founder of a fundamental and important relation in queuing theory known as “Distributional Little’s Law” His research interest includes inventory control, stochastic processes, and queuing theory. He has published papers in different technical journals such as Journal of Applied Probability, SIAM Journal of Applied Math, European Journal of Operations research, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Journal of Production Planning and Control, and Applied Mathematics and Computation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baboli, A., Neghab, M.P. & Haji, R. An algorithm for the determination of the economic order quantity in a two-level supply chain with transportation costs: Comparison of decentralized with centralized decision. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 17, 353–366 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-008-5080-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-008-5080-z

Keywords

Navigation