Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reconstruction of compressively sampled MR images based on a local shrinkage thresholding algorithm with curvelet transform

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To reduce the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data acquisition time and improve the MR image reconstruction performance, reconstruction algorithms based on the iterative shrinkage thresholding algorithm (ISTA) are widely used. However, these traditional algorithms use global threshold shrinkage, which is not efficient. In this paper, a novel algorithm based on local threshold shrinkage, which is called the local shrinkage thresholding algorithm (LSTA), was proposed. The LSTA can shrink differently for different elements from the residual matrix to adjust the shrinkage speed for each element of the image during the iterative process. Then, by taking advantage of the sparser characteristics of the curvelet transform, the LSTA combined with the curvelet transform (CLSTA) can make the construction process more efficient. Finally, compared with ISTA, the generalized thresholding iterative algorithm (GTIA) and the fast iterative shrinkage threshold algorithm (FISTA), when analysing human (brain and cervical) MR images, a conclusion can be drawn that the proposed method has better reconstruction performance in terms of the mean square error (MSE), the peak signal to noise ratio (PNSR), the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), the normalized mutual information (NMI), the transferred edge information (TEI) and the number of iterations. The proposed method can better maintain the detailed information of the reconstructed images and effectively decrease the blurring of the images edges.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wright GA (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Signal Process Mag IEEE 14(1):56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balestreri L (2012) Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, image performance, applications, 2nd edition[J]. Clin Imaging 53(8):218

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donoho DL (2006) Compressed sensing[J]. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 52(4):1289–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beck A, Teboulle M (2009) A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems[J]. Siam Journal on Imaging Sciences 2(1):183–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstein T, Osher S (2009) The Split Bregman method for L1-regularized problems[M]. Soc Ind Appl Math

  6. Luo J, Mou Z, Qin B et al (2017) A singular K-space model for fast reconstruction of magnetic resonance images from undersampled data[J]. Med Biol Eng Comput (6):1–15

  7. Qu X, Zhang W, Guo D, Cai C, Cai S, Chen Z (2010) Iterative thresholding compressed sensing MRI based on contourlet transform[J]. Inverse Prob Sci Eng 18(6):737–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bioucasdias JM, Figueiredo MAT (2007) A new TwIST: two-step iterative shrinkage/thresholding algorithms for image restoration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing A Publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society 16(12):2992–3004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elahi S, Kaleem M, Omer H (2018) Compressively sampled MR image reconstruction using generalized thresholding iterative algorithm[J]. J Magn Reson 286:91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Muckley MJ, Noll DC, Fessler JA (2015) Fast parallel MR image reconstruction via B1-based, adaptive restart, iterative soft thresholding algorithms (BARISTA)[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34(2):578–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Starck J, Donoho DL, Candès EJ (2002) The curvelet transform for image denoising[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 11(6):670–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Candes E, Demanet L, Donoho D et al (2006) Fast discrete curvelet transforms[J]. Multiscale Model Simul 5(3):861–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Long TJ (1982) Strong nondeterministic polynomial-time reducibilities[J]. Theor Comput Sci 21(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang H, Yin W, Cheng L (2015) Necessary and sufficient conditions of solution uniqueness in 1-norm minimization[J]. J Optim Theory Appl 164(1):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lustig M, Donoho DJ, Sparse MRI (2010) The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging[J]. Magn Reson Med 58(6):1182–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y, Lian QS, Li K (2010) MRI reconstruction based on compound regularizers and compressed sensing[J]. Optical Technique 36(3):350–355

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jiao LC, Tan S, Liu F (2005) Ridgelet theory: from Ridgelet transform to curvelet[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Mathematics 22(5):761–773

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hammouche AM, El-Bakry HM, Mostafa RR (2016) Image contrast enhancement using fast discrete curvelet transform via unequally spaced fast Fourier transform (FDCT-USFFT) [J]. International Journal of Electronics Communication and Computer Engineering 7(2):88–93

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tan H, Meyer CH (2009) Estimation of k-space trajectories in spiral MRI[J]. Magn Reson Med 61(6):1396–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ravishankar S, Bresler Y (2011) MR image reconstruction from highly under sampled k-space data by dictionary learning[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 30(5):1028–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Najjar Y (2012) Comparison of image performance assessment: PSNR, HVS, SSIM, UIQI[J]. Int J Sci Eng Res 3:3

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image performance assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity[J]. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81701806), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81601612), Key Medical Subjects of Jiangsu Province (BE 2015613, BE 2016763) and the Co-innovation Foundation of NMU and SEU (2017DN31).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Wang or Qingqiang Yao.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Zhou, Y., Wu, X. et al. Reconstruction of compressively sampled MR images based on a local shrinkage thresholding algorithm with curvelet transform. Med Biol Eng Comput 57, 2145–2158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-019-02017-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-019-02017-7

Keywords

Navigation