Skip to main content
Log in

Multiscale wavelet-based regularized reconstruction algorithm for three-dimensional compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, the most dynamic and safe imaging technique used in hospitals to diagnose is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In clinical applications, such as follow-up of patients with planning surgery, radiation therapy, therapy response in bone metastases assessment and treatment for brain disorders, repeated MRI scans are performed. Unfortunately, the slow acquisitions of MRI drive cost high by limiting patient throughput as well as limiting the potential indications for use. A mathematical framework called compressed sensing (CS) to accelerate MRI acquisition is used for generating undersampled measurements. Then, the iterative nonlinear numerical method is required for perfect reconstruction from highly undersampled measurements. In this work, the multiscale wavelet domain regularization prior-based iterative reconstruction algorithm is developed to address the above-mentioned reconstruction problem, in which multiscale wavelet domain generalized Gaussian mixture model is utilized for the regularization prior. The regularization-based algorithm is applied to generate three-dimensional (3D) high-quality MRI volume from multichannel k-space measurements in a compressed sensing framework. Several experiments using one synthetic and one real 3D CS multichannel k-space data were used to evaluate and validate the performance of the proposed algorithm. The total variation (TV)-based and soft-thresholding (ST) based-reconstruction methods were implemented to compare with the proposed algorithm. Extensive experimental results demonstrated that the proposed method has improved results in terms of visual quality and quantitative measurements compared to the existing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lustig, M., Donoho, D.L., Santos, J.M., Pauly, J.M.: Compressed sensing mri. IEEE Signal Process. Magn. 25(2), 72–82 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Quan, T.M., Nguyen-Duc, T., Jeong, W.: Compressed sensing mri reconstruction using a generative adversarial network with a cyclic loss. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37(6), 1488–1497 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Çukur, T., Santos, J.M., Pauly, J.M., Nishimura, D.G.: Variable-density parallel imaging with partially localized coil sensitivities. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29(5), 1173–1181 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Donoho, D.L.: Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52(4), 1289–1306 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Çukur, T., Lustig, M., Nishimura, D.: Improving non-contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession angiography with compressed sensing. Magn. Reson. Med. 61, 1122–31 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Çukur, T., Lustig, M., Saritas, E.U., Nishimura, D.G.: Signal compensation and compressed sensing for magnetization-prepared mr angiography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 30(5), 1017–1027 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Islam, R., Lambert, A.J., Pickering, M., Scarvell, J.M., Smith, P.N.: Improved regularisation constraints for compressed sensing of multi-slice mri. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng.: Imaging Visual 4(1), 30–43 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jaspan, O., Fleysher, R., Lipton, M.: Compressed sensing MRI: A review of the clinical literature. British J Radiol 88(1056), 20150420150420150420150420150487 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bıyık, E., Ilicak, E., Çukur, T.: Reconstruction by calibration over tensors for multi-coil multi-acquisition balanced ssfp imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 79(5), 2542–2554 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang, D., Liu, B., Wang, J., Ying, L.: Accelerating SENSE using compressed sensing. Magn. Reson. Med. 62(6), 1574–1584 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lustig, M., Donoho, D., Pauly, J.M.: Sparse mri: The application of compressed sensing for rapid mr imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 58(6), 1182–1195 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldstein, T., Osher, S.: The split bregman method for L1-regularized problems. SIAM J. Imaging. Sci. 2(2), 323–343 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kingsbury, N.: Complex wavelets for shift invariant analysis and filtering of signals. Appl. Computat. Harmonic Anal. 10(3), 234–253 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Yazdanpanah, A.P., Regentova, E.E.: Compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging based on shearlet sparsity and nonlocal total variation. J. Med. Imaging 4(2), 026003 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Daubechies, I., Defrise, M., Mol, C.: An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constrains. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 57(11), 1413–1457 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bayram, I., Selesnick, I.W.: A subband adaptive iterative shrinkage/thresholding algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 58(3), 1131–1143 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Beck, A., Teboulle, M.: A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2(1), 183–202 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Elahi, S., Kaleem, M., Omer, H.: Compressively sampled mr image reconstruction using generalized thresholding iterative algorithm. J. Magn. Reson. 286, 91–98 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dar, S.U.H., Özbey, M., Çatlı, A.B., Çukur, T.: A transfer-learning approach for accelerated mri using deep neural networks. Magn. Reson. Med. 84(2), 663–685 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dar, S.U.H., Yurt, M., Shahdloo, M., Ildız, M.E., Tınaz, B., Çukur, T.: Prior-guided image reconstruction for accelerated multi-contrast mri via generative adversarial networks. IEEE J. Select/. Top. Signal Process. 14(6), 1072–1087 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Antun, V., Renna, F., Poon, C., Adcock, B., Hansen, A.: On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction and the potential costs of ai. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117(48), 30088–30095 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shahdloo, M., Ilicak, E., Tofighi, M., Saritas, E.U., Çetin, A.E., Çukur, T.: Projection onto epigraph sets for rapid self-tuning compressed sensing mri. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38(7), 1677–1689 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang, J., Yang, F.: Compressed magnetic resonance imaging based on wavelet sparsity and nonlocal total variation. In 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, pages 968–971, (May 2012)

  24. Candes, E.J., Wakin, M.B.: An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 25(2), 21–30 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Menzel, M., Tan, E., Khare, K., Sperl, J., King, K., Tao, X., Hardy, C., Marinelli, L.: Accelerated diffusion spectrum imaging in the human brain using compressed sensing. Magn. Reson. Med. 66(5), 1226–33 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Islam, M.S., Islam, R.: Generalized Gaussian model-based reconstruction method of computed tomography image from fewer projections. Signal, Image Video Process. 14(3), 547–555 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mohamed, O.M.M., Jaïdane-Saïdane, M.: Generalized gaussian mixture model. In 17th European Signal Processing Conference, pages 2273–2277, (Aug 2009)

  28. Figueiredo, M.A.T., Nowak, R.D.: An EM Algorithm for Wavelet-based Image Restoration. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 12(8), 906–916 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Hashemi, M., Beheshti, S.: Adaptive Bayesian Denoising for General Gaussian Distributed (GGD) Signals in Wavelet Domain. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 62(5), 1147–1156 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Undersampled MRI data of knees, collected from:. http://old.mridata.org/undersampled/knees

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Department of Computer Science and Engineering of Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology, Gazipur, for providing research support to continue the research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Shafiqul Islam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest, and this work does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Islam, M.S., Islam, R. Multiscale wavelet-based regularized reconstruction algorithm for three-dimensional compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging. SIViP 15, 1487–1495 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-021-01881-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-021-01881-x

Keywords

Navigation