Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive feedback analysis and control of programmable stimuli for assessment of cerebrovascular function

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 09 March 2013

Abstract

The assessment of cerebrovascular regulatory mechanisms often requires flexibly controlled and precisely timed changes in arterial blood pressure (ABP) and/or inspired CO2. In this study, a new system for inducing variations in mean ABP was designed, implemented and tested using programmable sequences and programmable controls to induce pressure changes through bilateral thigh cuffs. The system is also integrated with a computer-controlled switch to select air or a CO2/air mixture to be provided via a face mask. Adaptive feedback control of a pressure generator was required to meet stringent specifications for fast changes, and accuracy in timing and pressure levels applied by the thigh cuffs. The implemented system consists of a PC-based signal analysis/control unit, a pressure control unit and a CO2/air control unit. Initial evaluations were carried out to compare the cuff pressure control performances between adaptive and non-adaptive control configurations. Results show that the adaptive control method can reduce the mean error in sustaining target pressure by 99.57 % and reduce the transient time in pressure increases by 45.21 %. The system has proven a highly effective tool in ongoing research on brain blood flow control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. D. E. Hokanson, Inc., Bellevue, 12840 NE 21st Place, WA 98005 USA.

  2. Measurement Computing Corporation, Norton, MA 02766, USA.

  3. Data Translation GmbH, Im Weilerlen 10, 74321 Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany.

  4. MathWorks, 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA, USA.

References

  1. Aaslid R, Blaha M, Sviri G, Douville CM, Newell DW (2007) Asymmetric dynamic cerebral autoregulatory response to cyclic stimuli. Stroke 38(5):1465–1469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ioannou P, Sun J (1996) Robust adaptive control. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  3. Katsogridakis E, Bush G, Fan L, Birch AA, Simpson DM, Allen R, Potter JF, Panerai RB (2012) Random perturbations of arterial blood pressure for the assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation. Physiol Meas 33(2):103–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu J, Simpson DM, Yan J, Allen R (2010) Tracking time-varying cerebral autoregulation in response to changes in respiratory Pa CO2. Physiol Meas 31:1291–1307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitsis GD, Poulin MJ, Robbins PA, Marmarelis VZ (2004) Nonlinear modeling of the dynamic effects of arterial pressure and CO2 variations on cerebral blood flow in healthy humans. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51(11):1932–1943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mallion J, Mancia G, Mengden T, Myers M, Padfield P, Palatini P, Parati G, Pickering T, Redon J, Staessen J, Stergiou G, Verdecchia P, on behalf of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring (2003) European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 21(5):821–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Panerai RB (1998) Assessment of cerebral pressure autoregulation in humans—a review of measurement methods. Physiol Meas 19(3):305–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Panerai RB, Simpson DM, Deverson ST, Mahoney P, Hayes P, Evans DH (2000) Multivariate dynamic analysis of cerebral blood flow regulation in humans. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 47(3):419–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Poulin MJ, Liang PJ, Robbins PA (1996) Dynamics of the cerebral blood flow response to step changes in end-tidal P CO2 and PO2 in humans. J Appl Physiol 81(3):1084–1095

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sastry S, Bodson M (1989) Adaptive control: stability, convergence, and robustness. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  11. Simpson DM, Panerai RB, Evans DH, Naylor AR (2001) A parametric approach to measuring cerebral blood flow autoregulation from spontaneous variations in blood pressure. Ann Biomed Eng 29(1):18–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tao G (1999) Adaptive inverse for actuator compensation. In: Feng G, Lozano R (eds) Adaptive control systems. Newnes, Oxford, pp 260–286

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research described here has been supported by the UK EPSRC grant No. EP/G008787/1. The authors sincerely thank Mike Squires and Milan Drca, for their help implementing the pressure and CO2 controllers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lingke Fan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fan, L., Bush, G., Katsogridakis, E. et al. Adaptive feedback analysis and control of programmable stimuli for assessment of cerebrovascular function. Med Biol Eng Comput 51, 709–718 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1040-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1040-y

Keywords

Navigation