Abstract
In China, the university-school partnership (USP) is a community of continuous professional development (PD) for teachers, involving teacher educators who visit schools. This study explores teachers’ personal factors, school working conditions, and principal leadership in order to explain differences in teachers’ learning when they have participated in the training program. Using a one-group pretest-posttest design, 375 teachers from 12 primary schools in Shanghai participated. Their learning performances are measured by changes in their teaching quality as evaluated by their students. Results of regression analyses show that teachers generally receive higher scores on teaching quality after the program than before. Three factors are significantly and negatively related to the changes in quality: teachers’ educational level, the extent to which teachers feel emotional pressure in their profession, and the support from their school principal. Implications for school leaders and policymakers are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Blume, B. D., Ford, K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1065–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352880
Bolhuis, S., & Voeten, M. J. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of student learning and own learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600320000170936
Bu, Y. H., & Li, J. C. (2013). The new basic education and whole school reform: A Chinese experience. Frontiers of Education in China, 8(4), 576–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396992
Dello-Iacovo, B. (2009). Curriculum reform and “quality education” in China: An overview. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.02.008
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002081
Ding, M. X., Li, Y. P., Li, X. B., & Kulm, G. (2010). Chinese teachers’ attributions and coping strategies for student classroom misbehaviour. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2010.495832
Dockterman, D. M. (2017). Discrepancies between students’ and teachers’ ratings of instructional practice: A way to measure classroom intuneness and evaluate teaching quality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Donche, V., & van Petegem, P. (2011). Teacher educators’ conceptions of learning to teach and related teaching strategies. Research Papers in Education, 26(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.561979
Epstein, S. (1998). Cognitive-experiential self-theory: A dual-process personality theory with implications for diagnosis and psychotherapy. In R. F. Bornstein & J. M. Masling (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on the psychoanalytic unconscious (pp. 99–140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Eyal, O., & Roth, G. (2011). Principals’ leadership and teachers’ motivation: Self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111129055
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001
Ferguson, R. F. (2012). Can student surveys measure teaching quality? Phi Delta Kappan, 94(3), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400306
Finnigan, K. S. (2010). Principal leadership and teacher motivation under high-stakes accountability policies. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(2), 161–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760903216174
Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J., Stoel, R. D., & Krüger, M. L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 406–427. https://doi.org/10.1086/593940
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Gorozidis, G. (2009). Physical education teachers’ motivation and self-efficacy in the implementation of the new curriculum (Unpublished master’s thesis). Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Harmsen, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., Maulana, R., & van Veen, K. (2018). The relationship between beginning teachers’ stress causes, stress responses, teaching behaviour and attrition. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 24(6), 626–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1465404
Hildebrandt, S. A., & Eom, M. (2011). Teacher professionalization: Motivational factors and the influence of age. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.011
Huberman, M. (1989). The professional life cycle of teachers. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 31–57.
Jansenin de Wal, J., van den Beemt, A., Martens, R. L., & den Brok, P. J. (2020). The relationship between job demands, job resources and teachers’ professional learning: Is it explained by self-determination theory? Studies in Continuing Education, 42(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1520697
Kaldi, S. (2009). Student teachers’ perceptions of self-competence in and emotions/stress about teaching in initial teacher education. Educational Studies, 35(3), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690802648259
Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED540960).
Kennedy, P. (2002). Learning cultures and learning styles: Myth-understandings about adult (Hong Kong) Chinese learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(5), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370210156745
Lam, S.-F., Cheng, R. W.-Y., & Choy, H. C. (2010). School support and teacher motivation to implement project-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.07.003
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244769
Lewis, R. (1999). Teachers coping with the stress of classroom discipline. Social Psychology of Education, 3(3), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009627827937
Lewis, R., Romi, S., Qui, X., & Katz, Y. J. (2005). Teachers’ classroom discipline and student misbehavior in Australia, China and Israel. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(6), 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.008
Liu, S. N., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. M. (2016). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.023
Louws, M. L., Meirink, J. A., van Veen, K., & van Driel, J. H. (2018). Understanding teachers’ professional learning goals from their current professional concerns. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 24(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1383237
Maskit, D. (2011). Teachers’ attitudes toward pedagogical changes during various stages of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 851–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.009
Maulana, R., & Helms-Lorenz, M. (2016). Observations and student perceptions of the quality of preservice teachers’ teaching behaviour: Construct representation and predictive quality. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9215-8
Mintzes, J. J., Marcum, B., Messerschmidt-Yates, C., & Mark, A. (2013). Enhancing self-efficacy in elementary science teaching with professional learning communities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(7), 1201–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9320-1
Morine-Dershimer, G., & Kent, T. (1999). The complex nature and sources of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 21–50). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Pelletier, L. G., Séguin-Lévesque, C., & Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.186
Qian, H. Y., & Walker, A. (2013). How principals promote and understand teacher development under curriculum reform in China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2013.809050
Roehrig, G. H., & Kruse, R. A. (2005). The role of teachers’ beliefs and knowledge in the adoption of a reform-based curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 105(8), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18061.x
Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: Rochester University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Weinstein, N. (2009). Undermining quality teaching and learning: A self-determination theory perspective on high-stakes testing. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104327
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307310317
Shi, L. J. (2006). The successors to Confucianism or a new generation? A questionnaire study on Chinese students’ culture of learning English. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310608668758
Silins, H. C. (1994). The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and school improvement outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 5(3), 272–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345940050305
Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670509353043
Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11400185
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1086/605771
van Veldhoven, M., & Meijman, T. (1994). Het meten van psychosociale arbeidsbelasting met een vragenlijst: De Vragenlijst Beleving en Beoordeling van de Arbeid [The measurement of psychosocial strain at work: The questionnaire experience and evaluation of work]. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Nederlands Instituut voor Arbeidsomstandigheden (NIA).
von Suchodoletz, A., Jamil, F. M., Larsen, R. A. A. A., & Hamre, B. K. (2018). Personal and contextual factors associated with growth in preschool teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs during a longitudinal professional development study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75(1), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.009
Walker, A., & Qian, H. Y. (2015). Review of research on school principal leadership in mainland China, 1998–2013: Continuity and change. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(4), 467–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2014-0063
Wong, K.-C. (2001). Chinese culture and leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 4(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120110077990
Xing, X., & Dervin, F. (2014). Dancing in fetters? Chinese principals’ perceptions of the effects of Finnish training programs. Frontiers of Education in China, 9(2), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397014
Yang, X., Ke, Z., Zhan, Y., & Ren, Y. (2014). The effect of choosing key versus ordinary schools on student’s mathematical achievement in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(3), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0126-5
Yang, Y. X. (2014). Principals’ transformational leadership in school improvement. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(3), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2013-0063
Yu, S., Chen, B. W., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2016). Chinese education examined via the lens of self-determination. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9395-x
Zhang, J.-W., Lo, L. N.-K., & Chiu, C.-S. (2014). Teacher leadership in University-School Collaboration for School Improvement (USCSI) on the Chinese Mainland. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 13(3), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-013-9158-0
Zhao, N. N., Valcke, M., Desoete, A., Sang, G., & Zhu, C. (2014). Does teacher-centered teaching contribute to students’ performance in primary school? A video analysis in Mainland China. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 3(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2014.729
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the China Scholarship Council (No. 201606140105) and the Institute of Life-Practice Educology of East China Normal University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X., Admiraal, W. & Saab, N. University-School Partnership in China: Teachers’ Personal Factors, Working Conditions, and Principal Leadership That Explain Their Development in Teaching. Front Educ China 15, 621–646 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-020-0029-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-020-0029-1